The Fable of the Frog Begging the King is short. Composition based on the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar

Analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging for the Tsar" allows you to emphasize the negative perception of rulers and leaders in society. A work written more than 200 years ago, in certain cases, can be an example for some today.

From Aesop to Krylov

Since the days of ancient literature, the fable has occupied a special place. She was able to notice such traits of a human character that were always considered vicious and caused negative feelings. The wisest ancient Greek poet-philosopher Aesop was the first to speak about human minuses in the language of fables. The ability not to name a specific person, resorting to allegory, indicated the shortcomings that need to be combated.

Lafontaine became his follower. "Frogs Begging the Tsar" is a fable that belongs to his pen. Allegory allows authors to make representatives of the animal world the main characters. To understand how such a technique works, it is necessary to analyze the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar."

So what is this piece about? Long ago, the inhabitants of the swamps wanted to be led by the king. Jupiter heeded their request and sent a huge aspen block of wood to their kingdom. The frogs were afraid of him, but then, having taken courage, they began to behave badly, in spite of the high title of their new master.

The blockhead did not interfere with anything, did not reproach his subjects for anything. But he never did anything useful for them. This caused discontent among the entire circle of the king. The frogs wanted a quick sovereign, and they again turned with such a request to Jupiter.

A serpent ascended the throne. Agile and beautiful, she punished severely for disobedience. Even innocent frogs became her dinner. The survivors complained to the heavenly lord. Jupiter was surprised, but refused another request from the frogs, promising to send them as a king a ruler even worse than the previous ones.

Zeus' warning

Not only La Fontaine wrote about dissatisfaction with those who are in power, Krylov also addresses this topic, "Frogs Begging the Tsar" - a fable, which is also in his collection. By frogs we mean people. For Krylov, the aspen block, which was replaced by Crane, still becomes the first wordless ruler.

In order to add contrast to the process of government and to depict the position of frogs more vividly, the authors of fables choose the snake and the crane as the second kings, because they both love to feast on frogs. A quiet and calm king was given, he was underestimated, he did not want a quiet and calm life, she seemed too boring and uninteresting to the frogs. And the other turned out to be even worse. It is not for nothing that they say: "They do not seek good from good." "Live with him so that you don't feel worse!" - Zeus warns the frogs.

The analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" will help determine what is moral in this fable. And it is simple: you cannot change everything at once. It must be borne in mind that in nature everything has its own development, but it happens gradually. If the frogs had suffered, they would have adapted to the block and even learned to derive great benefit from communication with him. The essence of fable morality has not lost its relevance.

About rhyme, characters of heroes

A fable written by Ivan Andreevich Krylov ("Frogs Begging the Tsar"), in verse. The author has a very clear rhyme: sideways - prone, next - backwards, power - glory.

The main drawback prevailing in society and noted by the author is a painful passion for change, an unwillingness to accept the existing situation as it is, a desire to change your previous way of life, not relying on the past and on your experience. The frogs became "not pleased with the rule of the people", "they did not like to live freely and freely."

The most memorable phrases of the author are: "cracked into the kingdom", "it seemed quite ignoble."

The protagonists of the fable are frogs, they are in constant contact with Zeus and the changing kings. Due to their characteristic character traits, they can be called:

• cowardly;
• obsequious to those who are much higher in status.

But as soon as they feel impunity, they immediately demonstrate their disdain for the king, turning their backs on him. Zeus, on the other hand, is very attentive to all requests addressed to him.

• The tsar is a blockhead staid, silent, of enormous stature.
• A crane of a different disposition, does not like to pamper anyone and do condescension to someone. He has two images. It is a bird that devours frogs. A formidable king who punishes his subjects indiscriminately.

Nationality of the work

In the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" morality can be replaced with the well-known proverbs: "Better a tit in the hands than a crane in the sky", "horses do not prowl from food", "they do not look for good from good."

Krylov always likes to show through laughter and gentle banter which moments are worth pondering. And there are a great many of them in the fable.

As you know, people take bright expressions from famous works that they actively use in their everyday speech, thereby making these expressions winged, aphoristic. These phrases adorn the speaker's vocabulary. In addition, colloquial speech brings the work closer to the people. Here are some examples: “to help the grief”, “swallows like flies”, “stick out your nose”, “why - why”.

Krylov's views and their expression in fables

In any case, the phrase said by Zeus at the very end of the work makes an indelible impression. It sounds like this: "Live with him so that you don't get worse!" Thus, the analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" allows us to say that this is a very sharp and sharp topic, in which the author tried to express his negative attitude towards the ruling imperial elite as much as possible. The fabulist believed that there are no good kings and each subsequent ruler will only get worse. During his creative life, the demon Ivan Andreevich Krylov wrote a lot: "The Frog Begs the Tsar", "The Wagon Train" and others, in which he, without fear of punishment, boldly shows his attitude towards the Russian tsars.

Thus, the moral of the fable can be applied to the present day. No matter how good a leader, a ruler, a person always expresses his dissatisfaction with his work and wants something new. And he may turn out to be a phony block or a crane.

There were three famous writers of tragedies in Athens: the elder - Aeschylus, the middle - Sophocles and the younger - Euripides. Aeschylus was mighty and dignified, Sophocles was clear and harmonious, Euripides was tense and paradoxical. Having looked once, the Athenian spectators could not forget for a long time how his Phaedra was tormented by a passion for his stepson, and his Medea with a chorus stood up for the rights of women. The old people watched and cursed, and the young admired.

Aeschylus died long ago, back in the middle of the century, and Sophocles and Euripides died half a century later, in 406, almost simultaneously. Disputes between the amateurs immediately began: which of the three was better? And in response to such disputes, the playwright Aristophanes staged the comedy "Frogs" about it.

“Frogs” - this means that the chorus in the comedy is dressed with frogs and begins its songs with croaking lines: “Breckekeks, coax, coax! / Breckekeks, coax, coax! / We are children of the swamp waters, / We will sing the hymn, friendly chorus, / Lingering groan, ringing our song! "

But these frogs are not simple: they live and croak not somewhere, but in the hellish river Acheron, through which the old shaggy boatman Charon transports the dead to the next world. Why this comedy needed that light, Acheron and frogs, there are reasons for that.

The theater in Athens was under the patronage of Dionysus, the god of wine and earthly vegetation; Dionysus was portrayed (at least sometimes) as a beardless gentle youth. This Dionysus, worried about the fate of his theater, thought: "I will descend into the afterlife and bring Euripides back to the light, so that the Athenian stage is not completely empty!" But how to get to the next world? Dionysus asks Hercules about this - after all, Hercules, a hero in a lion's skin, went down there after the terrible three-headed hellish dog Kerber. "Easier than easy," says Hercules, "hang yourself, poison yourself or throw yourself off the wall." - “Too stuffy, too tasteless, too cool; show better how you walked yourself. " - "Here the afterlife boatman Charon will transport you across the stage, and there you will find yourself." But Dionysus is not alone, with him a slave with a load; can you send it with a fellow traveler? Here is the funeral procession. "Hey, deceased, take our bundle with you!" The dead man readily lifts himself up on a stretcher: "Will you give two drachmas?" - "Never mind!" - "Hey, gravediggers, carry me on!" - "Well, throw off at least half a drachma!" The deceased is indignant: "So that I come to life again!" There is nothing to do, Dionysus and Charon are rowing dry across the stage, and the slave with his luggage runs around. Dionysus is not used to rowing, grunts and swears, and the chorus of frogs mocks him: "Breckekeks, coax, coax!" They meet at the other end of the stage, exchange afterlife impressions: "Have you seen the local sinners, and thieves, and false witnesses, and bribe-takers?" “Of course I saw it, and now I see it,” and the actor points to the rows of spectators. The audience laughs.

Here is the palace of the underground king Hades, Eak sits at the gate. In myths, this is a stately judge of human sins, but here - a noisy servant-gatekeeper. Dionysus puts on a lion's skin, knocks. "Who's there?" - "Hercules has come again!" - “Ah, villain, oh, villain, it was you who took Kerber away from me just now, my dear dog! Wait, here I will unleash all the hellish monsters on you! " Eak leaves, Dionysus is terrified; gives the slave Hercules skin, puts on his dress himself. They come back to the gate, and in them the servant of the underground queen: "Hercules, our dear, the hostess remembers so much about you, she has prepared such a treat for you, come to us!" The slave is radehonek, but Dionysus grabs him by the cloak, and they, quarreling, change their clothes again. Eak returns from the infernal guards and cannot understand at all who is the master here, who is the slave here. They decide: he will lash them in turn with rods - whoever shouts first is, therefore, not a god, but a slave. Beats. "Oh oh!" - "Aha!" - "No, I thought: when will the war end?" - "Oh oh!" - "Aha!" - "No, it's a splinter in my heel ... Oh-oh! ... No, I remembered bad poems ... Oh-oh! ... No, I quoted Euripides." - "I can't figure it out, let the god Hades figure it out himself." And Dionysus with a slave enter the palace.

It turns out that the next world also has its own competitions for poets, and until now Aeschylus was known as the best, and now he is challenged by the newly-dead Euripides. Now there will be a judgment, and Dionysus will be a judge; now they will “measure with elbows and weigh with weights” poetry. True, Aeschylus is unhappy: "My poetry did not die with me, but Euripides died under his hand." But he is appeased: the judgment begins. There is already a new choir around the contenders - the croaking frogs remained far away in Acheron. The new choir is the souls of the righteous: at this time, the Greeks believed that those who lead a righteous life and received initiation into the mysteries of Demeter, Persephone and Iacchus would not be insensitive in the next world, but blessed. Iacchus is one of the names of Dionysus himself, so such a choir is quite appropriate here.

Euripides accuses Aeschylus: “Your plays are boring: the hero stands, and the choir sings, the hero says two or three words, then the play is over. Your words are old, cumbersome, incomprehensible. But for me everything is clear, everything is like in life, and people, and thoughts, and words. " Aeschylus objects: “The poet must teach goodness and truth. Homer is famous for showing everyone examples of valor, and what example can your depraved heroines set? A lofty language befits lofty thoughts, and the subtle speeches of your heroes can only teach citizens not to obey their bosses. "

Aeschylus reads his poems - Euripides finds fault with every word: "Here you have Orestes over the grave of his father prays to him" to hear, heed ... ", but" to hear "and" heed "is a repetition!" (“A freak,” Dionysus soothes him, “Orestes is addressing the dead, but here, no matter how much you repeat, you will not end up!”) Euripides reads his poems - Aeschylus finds fault with every line: “All your dramas begin with genealogies:“ Hero of Pelop , who was my great-grandfather ... "," Hercules, who ... "," That Cadmus, who ... "," That Zeus, who ... ". Dionysus separates them: let them speak one line at a time, and he, Dionysus, with the scales in his hands, will judge which weight is greater. Euripides recites a clumsy and cumbersome verse: "Oh, if the boat had stopped its run ..."; Aeschylus - smooth and euphonic: "A river stream pouring through the meadows ..." Dionysus suddenly shouts: "Aeschylus is harder!" - "But why?" - "He soaked his poems with his stream, so they pull more."

Finally, the verses were put aside. Dionysus asks poets for their opinion on political affairs in Athens and again throws up his hands: "One answered wisely, and the other wiser." Which of the two is better, whom to lead out of the underworld? "Aeschila!" - Dionysus announces. "And he promised me!" - Euripides is indignant. “Not I - my tongue promised,” Dionysus replies with the same Euripides verse (from “Hippolytus”). "Are you guilty and not ashamed?" “There is no guilt where no one sees,” Dionysus replies with another quote. "Are you laughing at me at the dead?" - "Who knows, life and death are not one and the same?" - Dionysus answers with the third quote, and Euripides falls silent.

Dionysus and Aeschylus are getting ready for their journey, and the underground god is admonishing them: "To such and such a politician, and to such and such a world-eater, and to such a poet, tell them that it is high time for them to come to me ..." To Athens: in order for them to win a victory as soon as possible and get rid of such and such politicians, and from such and such a world eater, and from such and such poetry.

Retold

The fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" should be read as an allegory, like other works of Krylov. In her text, it is easy to see the analogy between the images of frogs and ordinary people who are always dissatisfied with the way they are ruled. At the same time, the form made it possible for the fabulist to express his views on free thought and state structure. Studying it in literature class provides an opportunity to understand that the poet saw the shortcomings of the monarchical system, but did not see a way out of this situation. Indeed, in his opinion, the people are completely lacking in initiative: they are not capable of not having a ruler, that is, with the possibility of a free life, which is clearly stated in the verse.

Thus, it turns out that the imperfect ruler, who is easy to see in the characters of Krylov's fable “Frogs Begging the Tsar,” is still better than his absence. If you download the work for free, read it online or in a book, it is easy to see that its author saw the solution to the problem of reorganizing society in the fact that it developed and reformed gradually. It is enough to read the fable “Frogs Begging the Tsar” in full to see that the poet advocates not to cut from the shoulder, but to rely on the natural path of movement of society.

The frogs didn't like it
The rule of the people,
And it seemed to them not at all noble
Without service and at liberty to live.
To help grief,
Then they began to ask the gods of the Tsar.
Though listening to all sorts of nonsense would not be akin to the gods,
This time, however, Zeus listened to them:
He gave them a King. The King from heaven flies to them with a noise,
And so tightly he cracked into the kingdom,
That the state has gone like a quagmire:
From all the frogs feet
In fright, swept away,
Who did how, where who could,
And they marveled in a whisper to the King in their cells.
And it is true that the King was given to them for a miracle:
Not fussy, not helpless,
Decent, taciturn and important;
Birthright, the growth of a giant,
Well, look, it's a miracle!
One thing in the Tsar was only bad:
This king was a block of aspen.
At first, honoring his personage exceeding,
No one dares to approach from among the subjects:
They look at him with fear, and then
Furtively, from a distance, through calamus and sedge;
But since there is no miracle in the light,
To which the light would not get accustomed,
They also rested from fear at first,
Then crawl to the Tsar with devotion
dared:
First, face down in front of the Tsar;
And there, whoever dares, let me sit sideways to him:
Let me try to sit next to him;
And there, who are still removed,
They sit back to the Tsar.
The king tolerates everything according to his mercy.
A little later, see who wants to,
He will jump on him.
In three days life with such a Tsar got bored.
Frogs are a new petition
Let them Jupiter to their swamp state
He truly gave the Tsar to glory!
Heeding their warm prayers,
Jupiter sent them to the kingdom of the Crane.
This king is not a blockhead, of a completely different disposition:
He does not like to pamper his people;
He eats the guilty: and at his trial
No one is right;
But already with him,
What is breakfast, what is lunch, what is supper, then reprisal.
On the inhabitants of the swamps
The black year is coming.
There is a great flaw in the Frogs every day.
From morning to evening, their King walks through the kingdom
And whoever he meets,
He will immediately sue and swallow.
Here, more than ever, and croaking, and moaning,
Let them Jupiter again
Gave the Tsar Inov;
That their present King swallows them like flies;
That even they can't (no matter how awful!)
It is safe to neither stick out your nose, nor croak;
That, finally, their King is sicker than droughts.
“Why didn't you know how to live happily before?
Is it not for me, madmen, - a voice spoke to them from heaven, -
Was there no rest from you?
Didn't you rustle my ears about the Tsar?
Was a King given to you? - so he was too quiet:
You rebelled in your puddle,
Another is given to you - so this one is very dashing;
Live with him, so that you don't feel worse! "

They are works of a special satirical genre that has been inherited since the era of antiquity. In the days of classicism, fables were considered a "low" genre, and therefore they often sounded simple speech characteristic of ordinary conversation. The heroes of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" are the inhabitants of the swamp. But, of course, this is an allegory skillfully used by the author. The work is dated 1809.

Plot

In the analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar", the student needs to be told about the main characters of the work. It tells of frogs who cry out to heaven for a ruler. And the great Zeus listens to their prayers - gives them a quiet and calm king who does not darken the lives of the inhabitants of the swamp.

But even in this case, the frogs begin to murmur to heaven. After all, this ruler does not require anything from them. And then the angry ruler of the world sends them another king - one who punished them without trial or investigation. Again they turned their prayers to heaven. But this time Zeus did not listen to their request. After all, now they are to blame themselves. Stupid frogs did not appreciate what they had, and now they have to disentangle the consequences of their short-sightedness. God answers them that now it is better to be silent, so that something worse does not happen.

Literary Analysis Plan

Analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" according to the plan may include the following points:

1. When the work was written, who is the author.
2. Plot.
3. The main characters, their character (in this case, frogs).
4. What vices does the fabulist make fun of? In this work, Krylov writes about the stupidity of frogs, their inability to appreciate what is available.
5. Features of the language of the fable.

Disadvantages of the main characters

In analyzing the fable "Frogs Begging for the Tsar," the student can emphasize that the frogs' claim to the right to have their own opinion is not backed up by a willingness to make important decisions on their own. This leads to sad consequences for the inhabitants of the swamp. The fabulist depicted the images of cowardly inhabitants with irony, endowing them with the appearance of frogs. Their arrogance ends very tragically. The work causes sadness also because such a situation often takes place in reality.

Morality

An analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging for the Tsar" would be incomplete without highlighting the moral aspect. Its reader can find in the words of the god Jupiter, who sincerely wonders why frogs could not live happily when they had all the conditions for this. These words are quite applicable in situations where people have had the opportunity to improve their situation. However, they did not take advantage of these chances. And after that, they complain to others about their misfortunes.

The fabulist in allegorical form writes about those people who are ready to transfer self-determination into the wrong hands. They don't want to organize their lives. Like stupid frogs, such people want to follow a routine set from the outside. However, such ordinary people are never satisfied with the current situation. The reason for this may be either a real danger hanging over them, or their stupidity and inability to appreciate the good that is available. After all, those who do not want to take responsibility for their lives have the most primitive interests, one of which is a senseless display of impudence and criticism.

What frogs can't learn

In the analysis of Krylov's fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar", the student can point out that the lesson the author teaches people is this: stories. And frogs proceed only from their own ideas about what power should be. However, their intelligence is not enough to understand at what pace social relations should develop. For this they receive punishment from heaven.

Analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar": vocabulary features

The fable uses many lexical units that give the work a special figurativeness. For example, the word "help" means "help". But the phrase "aspen block" symbolizes rudeness, roughness. The phrase "black year" refers to a period of time during which one has to face setbacks and suffering.

We will not only now analyze the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar", but we will also see what the moral of the fable is. The author of this wonderful work is Ivan Andreevich Krylov. Of course, the work was written two centuries ago, but even today it has not lost its relevance. To be convinced of this, first, consider the plot of the fable, and it is rather short.

To emphasize the main theme, the author resorts to allegory, that is, the main characters are animals. The inhabitants of the swamps somehow wanted a king for them. They began to ask Zeus about this, and he, in turn, put a ruler over them, who turned out to be an aspen block. Although the frogs were afraid of him, very soon they realized that the king was harmless - he did not even reproach them and did not interfere with their life, allowing everything. However, there was little benefit from such a king. Then the frogs decided that another ruler would be better, and made an appropriate request to Zeus.

To see the moral of the "Frogs Begging the Tsar" fable, let's see what happened next. Indeed, the first one was replaced by a new king - Crane, and he turned out to be much more agile, but Crane ate even innocent frogs, from which their life turned into a real nightmare. Once again asking the ruler, already the third in a row, the frogs were refused.

What is the moral of the fable

The moral of the fable is the most important thing in this kind of works. In other words, after reading the fable, you need to think about what it can teach and how not to repeat mistakes in your life. Here, when we talk about the morality of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar", it is clear that changes do not occur from scratch and instantly. Nature is arranged in such a way that everything develops in a planned way and everything has its time. You should not rush things and for the sake of the unknown give up what is now.

For example, if they had waited a bit, when the king of frogs was a blockhead, they would have realized that communication with him and his rule could be useful. In fact, it took time to adjust to this ruler and new circumstances. Constantly desiring changes, insatiability appears, and a person will never get what he wants, he will always be dissatisfied with something. This can be seen from the analysis of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar".

Society has always had a serious flaw, and the author of the fable was able to emphasize it remarkably. People constantly want changes, they do not accept the existing order, they do not like the current order, they strive for a new life. Is this bad? On the one hand, no. But it is not the craving for the best itself that is bad, but the inability to notice the good that is at the moment. In addition, the fabulist Krylov wanted to vividly express the idea that there is no king who would suit everyone perfectly. It is possible that the next king to replace the previous one will be much worse.

So, the analysis of the work and the moral of the fable "Frogs Begging the Tsar" are very clear. It's easy to remember the main thing. Read the entire fable, if you have not done so yet, to be sure of the correctness of our conclusion. We recommend reading other articles of our literary