Criteria for evaluating the oge in the Russian language. Evaluation criteria for the entire oge
Point transfer rules
Onnovy State Exam (OGE) - this is the final exam for graduates of 9 classes in a secondary school in Russia.
By passing the final exams, the student confirms that he has mastered the program of basic general education.
Certification is required to move to grade 10 or enter colleges and technical schools.
Graduates of the 9th grade are held in 14 subjects.
The primary scores for the performance of the GIA examination work are converted into an assessment on a 5-point scale according to the methodology developed by the FIPI.
The points received at the GIA and recalculated into a five-point system affect the grades in the certificate in the corresponding subject. The certificate puts the average between the mark obtained at the GIA and the annual in the subject. Rounding is done according to the rules of mathematics, that is, 3.5 is rounded to 4 and 4.5 to 5.
Exam grades are available to graduates at their school after the papers have been reviewed and the results approved.
Russian language scoring scale
(table for transferring OGE scores in 2019)
The maximum number of points in the Russian language, which can be received by the examinee for the completion of the entire examination work, - 39 points
* Criteria and explanation for the assessment of the GIA in the Russian language
Criterion |
Explanation for grading |
Points |
GK1. Compliance with spelling rules |
There are no spelling errors, or no more than 1 error was made. |
|
Made 2-3 mistakes |
||
4 errors or more |
||
GK2. Compliance with punctuation rules |
There are no punctuation errors, or no more than 2 errors were made |
|
Made 3-4 mistakes |
||
5 errors or more |
||
GK3. Compliance with grammar rules |
No grammatical errors or 1 error |
|
Made 2 mistakes |
||
3 errors or more |
||
GK4. Compliance with speech norms |
There are no speech errors, or no more than 2 errors were made |
|
Made 3-4 mistakes |
||
5 errors or more |
OGE scores conversion scale in mathematics in 2019
Maximum primary score in math in 2019: 32 points, of which - for the module "Algebra" - 20 points, for the module "Geometry" - 12 points.
The recommended minimum result of the examination work is 8 points, scored in total for completing the tasks of both modules, provided that at least 2 points of them were received in the "Geometry" module.
The scale for recalculating the total score for the performance of the examination paper as a whole into a mark in mathematics
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized classes for training in educational programs of secondary general education. The benchmark for selection to profile classes can be indicators, the lower limits of which correspond to the following primary scores:
for the natural science profile: 18 points, of which at least 6 in geometry;
for the economic profile: 18 points, of which at least 5 in geometry;
for the physical and mathematical profile: 19 points, of which at least 7 in geometry.
Biology points conversion scale in 2019
Maximum primary score: 46 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016-2018, there are no changes - Letter of Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection in profile classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 33 points.
GIA points conversion table by geography in 2019
Maximum primary score: 32 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A benchmark in the selection for specialized classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 24 points.
Foreign Language Score Translation Scale
(English, German, French, Spanish)
Maximum primary score: 70 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The scale for recalculating the primary score for the performance of the examination paper into a mark on a five-point scale
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection in profile classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 56 points.
Informatics and ICT points conversion table
Maximum primary score: 22 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection in specialized classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 15 points.
History Score Translation Scale
Maximum primary score: 44 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in specialized classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 32 points.
Literature Score Translation Scale
Maximum primary score: 33 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection in profile classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 22 points.
Social Studies Score Translation Scale
Maximum primary score: 39 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
Table of points conversion in physics 2019
Maximum primary score: 40 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection in specialized classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 30 points.
(work without real experiment, demo 1)
Maximum primary score: 34 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection to profile classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 23 points.
The maximum number of points that an OGE participant can receive for completing the entire examination work (with a real experiment) is 38 points.
Chemistry score transfer scale
(work with a real experiment, demo 2)
Maximum primary score: 38 points
(in 2019, compared to 2016 - 2018, there are no changes - Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. The benchmark for selection in profile classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 25 points.
The maximum number of points that an OGE participant can receive for completing the entire examination work (with a real experiment) is 38 points.
Article written on 06/12/2012, updated on 09/29/2012, 12/28/2013, 05/28/2014, 09/12/2014, 05/28/2015, 09/04/2015, 05/05/2017, 04/09/2018, 04/21/2019
Useful links on the topic "Translation of GIA points table and scale of points conversion"
Since we published the criteria for presentation and composition in the relevant sections, it remains to publish here only the criteria for assessing literacy and notes from the demonstration version of the OGE 2016.
Literacy Assessment Criteria
| № | Criteria for assessing the literacy and actual accuracy of the examinee's speech | Points |
| GK1 | Compliance with spelling rules | |
| There are no spelling mistakes or no more than one error was made. | 2 | |
| Two or three mistakes were made. | 1 | |
| Four or more errors were made. | 0 | |
| GK2 | Compliance with punctuation rules | |
| There are no punctuation errors, or no more than two errors were made. | 2 | |
| Three or four mistakes were made. | 1 | |
| Five or more errors were made. | 0 | |
| GK3 | Compliance with grammar rules | |
| There are no grammatical errors or one mistake was made. | 2 | |
| Made two mistakes. | 1 | |
| Three or more errors were made. | 0 | |
| GK4 | Compliance with speech norms | |
| There are no speech errors, or no more than two errors were made. | 2 | |
| Three or four mistakes were made. | 1 | |
| Five or more errors were made | 0 | |
| FC1 | The actual accuracy of written speech | |
| There are no factual errors in the presentation of the material, as well as in the understanding and use of terms. | 2 | |
| One mistake was made in the presentation of the material or the use of terms. | 1 | |
| Two or more errors were made in the presentation of the material or the use of terms. | 0 | |
| The maximum number of points for an essay and presentation according to the criteria of FC1, GC1–GC4 | 10 |
Notes
When assessing literacy (GC1-GC4), the volume of presentation and essay should be taken into account.
The standards indicated in the table are used to check and evaluate the presentation and essay, the total volume of which is 140 or more words.
If the total volume of the essay and presentation is 70–139 words, then for each of the criteria GC1–GC4 no more than 1 point is given:
GK1 - 1 point is given if there are no spelling errors or one minor mistake is made;
GK2 - 1 point is given if there are no punctuation errors or one minor mistake is made;
GK3 - 1 point is given if there are no grammatical errors;
GK4 - 1 point is given if there are no speech errors.
If the presentation and the essay as a whole have less than 70 words, then such a work is evaluated by zero points according to the criteria of GK1-GK4. If the student has completed only one type of creative work (or
presentation, or essay), then the assessment according to the criteria of GK1-GK4 is also carried out in accordance with the amount of work:
- if the work has at least 140 words, then literacy is assessed according to the above table;
- if the work contains 70–139 words, then for each of the criteria GK1–GK4 no more than 1 point is given (see above);
- if the paper contains less than 70 words, then such work is evaluated by zero points according to the criteria of GK1-GK4.
Maximum Points, which can be received by the examinee for the completion of the entire examination work, - 39
.
In accordance with the procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of basic general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 25, 2013 No. 1394 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31206) “48. Exam papers are checked by two experts. According to the results of the check, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the examination paper ... In case of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. Significant discrepancy in scores
defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject. The third expert is appointed by the chairman of the subject committee from among the experts who have not previously checked the examination paper. The third expert is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the student's examination work. The points given by the third expert are final.
A discrepancy of 10 or more points given by two experts for completing tasks 1 and 15 is considered significant (scores for all positions (criteria) for assessing the task are summed up).
each expert: SG1-SG3, S1K1-S1K4, S2K1-S2K4, S3K1-S3K4, GK1-GK4, FK1). In this case, the third expert rechecks tasks 1 and 15 for all assessment positions. For the performance of the examination paper, a mark is given on a five-point scale.
The mark "2" is set if the student scored no more than 14 points (from 0 to 14) for completing all parts of the examination paper.
The mark "3" is set if the student scored at least 15 and not more than 24 points (from 15 to 24) for completing all parts of the examination paper.
A mark of "4" is given if the student scored at least 25 and not more than 33 points (from 25 to 33) for completing all parts of the examination paper. In this case, the student must score at least 4 points for literacy (criteria GK1-GK4). If, according to the criteria of GK1-GK4, the student scored less than 4 points, the mark "3" is set.
A mark of "5" is given if the student scored at least 34 and not more than 39 points (from 34 to 39) for completing all parts of the examination paper. In this case, the student must score at least 6 points for literacy (criteria GK1-GK4). If, according to the criteria of GK1-GK4, the student scored less than 6 points, the mark "4" is set.
Description of the presentation on individual slides:
1 slide
Description of the slide:
STATE FINAL CERTIFICATION (GIA) OGE - 2017 9 CLASS RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification Codifiers of the elements of the content of the examination paper Evaluation criteria
2 slide
Description of the slide:
OGE in the Russian language 2017 is a mandatory form of certification for graduates of grade 9. It is necessary for further school education, as well as enrollment in secondary specialized institutions. Students who pass this exam with a high score receive the opportunity to study in classes with a liberal arts specialization.
3 slide
Description of the slide:
The OGE IS CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL LAW OF 29.12.2012 No. 273-FZ “ON EDUCATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION” FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STATE FINAL CERTIFICATION OF GRADUATES ON THE BASIS OF CENTRALLY DEVELOPED EXAMINATION MATERIALS 1 THE RESULTS OF THE EXAM CAN BE USED IN THE ADMISSION OF STUDENTS TO THE PROFILE CLASSES OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL. Examination work on the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE consists of three parts, including 15 tasks. 3 hours 55 minutes (235 minutes) are allotted to complete the examination paper in the Russian language.
4 slide
Description of the slide:
During the tests, when performing all parts of the work, the examinees have the right to use a spelling dictionary. The OGE in Russian in 2017 is considered passed if the graduate scored 15 points out of 39 possible.
5 slide
Description of the slide:
PART 1. ASSIGNMENT 1. SUMMARY This is a small written work on the text you have listened to. Performed on a separate sheet. The original text is listened to 2 times. PURPOSE - the transfer of the main content of both each micro-theme (there are 3 of them), and the entire text as a whole. The volume of presentation is not less than 70 words. Note-taking of the main points of the text (draft notes) is allowed already at the 1st listening! The use of spelling dictionaries is also allowed from the very beginning of the exam.
6 slide
Description of the slide:
7 slide
Description of the slide:
JUDGING CRITERIA FOR TASK 1 № Criteria for judging a condensed presentation Scores SG1 Content of the presentation 2 – 1 - 0 SG2 Compression of the source text 3 – 2 – 1 - 0 SG3 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation 2 – 1 - 0 IC1-IC3 criteria 7
8 slide
Description of the slide:
PART 2. TASKS BASED ON THE READ TEXT Part 2 consists of 13 tasks (2-14). The tasks of part 2 are performed on the basis of the read text. Answers to tasks 2–14 are written in the form of a word (phrase), number, sequence of numbers in the bank of answers No. 1 without spaces or other symbols.
9 slide
Description of the slide:
10 slide
Description of the slide:
SPECIFIC: TASKS 2 - 14 ... No. 2 - Adequate understanding of written speech in various areas and situations of communication (which fragment of the text contains the information necessary to justify the answer to the question ...) - a figure. No. 3 - The expressiveness of Russian speech (indicate the sentence in which the means of expressiveness of speech is ...) - a figure. No. 4 - From the sentences ... write out the word in which the spelling of the prefix is \u200b\u200bdetermined by its meaning - “approximation”.
11 slide
Description of the slide:
No. 5 - From the sentences ... write down a word in which the spelling of the suffix is an exception to the rule ... No. 6 - Replace the colloquial word "whispered" in sentence 12 with a stylistically neutral synonym. Write this synonym. No. 7 - Replace the phrase "wooden box", built on the basis of agreement, with a synonymous phrase with a control connection. Write the resulting phrase. No. 8 - Write out the grammatical basis of the sentence ...
12 slide
Description of the slide:
No. 9 - Among the sentences ... find a sentence with isolated homogeneous definitions. Write the number of this offer. No. 10 - In the sentences below from the read text, all commas are numbered. Write down the numbers denoting commas at the introductory word. No. 11 - Indicate the number of grammatical bases in the sentence ... Write down the answer with a number. No. 12 - In the sentences below from the read text, all commas are numbered. Write down the numbers denoting commas between parts of a complex sentence connected by a subordinating relationship. No. 13 - Among the sentences ... find a complex sentence with homogeneous subordination of subordinate clauses. Write the number of this offer. No. 14 - Among the sentences ... find a complex sentence with an allied and allied coordinating connection between the parts. Write the number of this offer.
13 slide
Description of the slide:
ASSESSMENT PART 2: Automatic processing, and therefore - extremely accurate filling in the answer sheet! The maximum number of points is 13. (one point for each correct answer). For an incorrect answer or its absence, zero points are given.
14 slide
Description of the slide:
PART 3 WORK-REASONING The task of part 3 is performed on the basis of the same text that the graduates read while working on the tasks of part 2. Using the read text from part 2, it is necessary to complete ONLY ONE of the tasks on a separate sheet: 15.1, 15.2 or 15.3. This is a written reasoned answer! Before writing an essay, you must write down the number of the selected task: 15.1, 15.2 or 15.3. The essay must be at least 70 words. The essay must be written in neat, legible handwriting.
15 slide
Description of the slide:
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR TASK 15 (ESSAY-REASONING) № Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic (15.1) Points С1К1 Presence of a reasonable answer to the question posed 2 - 1 - 0 С1К2 Presence of examples-arguments 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 С1К3 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of the composition 2 - 1 - 0 С1К4 Compositional harmony of the work 2 - 1 - 0 The maximum number of points for the composition according to the criteria С1К1–С1К4 9
16 slide
Description of the slide:
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR TASK 15 (ESSAY-REASONING) № Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.2) Points С2К1 Understanding the meaning of a text fragment 2 - 1 - 0 С2К2 Presence of examples-arguments 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 С2К3 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of the essay 2 - 1 - 0 С2К4 Compositional harmony of the work 2 - 1 - 0
17 slide
Description of the slide:
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR TASK 15 (ESSAY-REASONING) № Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.3) Points С3К1 Interpretation of the meaning of the word 2 - 1 - 0 С3К2 Presence of examples-arguments 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 С3К3 Semantic integrity , speech coherence and sequence of the composition 2 - 1 - 0 С3К4 Compositional harmony of the work 2 - 1 - 0 The maximum number of points for the composition according to the criteria С2К1–С2К4 9
18 slide
Description of the slide:
ASSESSMENT OF LITERACY AND ACTUAL ACCURACY OF SPEECH OF THE EXAMINANT No. Criteria for assessing literacy and actual accuracy of speech Scores GK1 Compliance with spelling norms 2 - 1 - 0 GK2 Compliance with punctuation norms 2 - 1 - 0 GK3 Compliance with grammatical norms 2 - 1 - 0 GK4 Compliance with speech norms 2 - 1 - 0 FC1 Actual accuracy of written speech 2 - 1 - 0
19 slide
Description of the slide:
In accordance with the procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of basic general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 25, 2013 No. 1394 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31206): “48. Exam papers are checked by two experts. Based on the results of the check, the experts independently assign points for checking tasks 1 and 15 of the examination paper ... In case of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. The THIRD EXPERT is appointed by the chairman of the subject committee from among the experts who have not previously checked the examination paper. The third expert is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the student's examination work. The scores given by the third expert are FINAL."
The translation of the OGE scores in the Russian language into grades is carried out in accordance with developed by the specialists of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "FIPI" of the scale for converting primary points into marks on a five-point scale for conducting the OGE, and is RECOMMENDATIONAL.
OGE grading scale from FIPI - download
Table of grades OGE 2017 in Russian
Maximum Points OGE (GIA grade 9) in the Russian language, which the examinee can receive for completing all the examination work, is 39.
For the performance of the examination paper, a mark is given on a five-point scale.
How many points do you need to score at the OGE in Russian to get a grade of 3, 4, or 5?
Mark "2" is set in the event that the student scored no more than 14 points (from 0 to 14) for completing all parts of the examination paper.
Mark "3" is given if the student has scored at least 15 and not more than 24 points (from 15 to 24) for completing all parts of the examination paper.
Mark "4" is given if the student scored at least 25 and no more than 33 points (from 25 to 33) for completing all parts of the examination paper. In this case, the student must score at least 4 points for literacy (criteria GK1-GK4). If, according to the criteria of GK1-GK4, the student scored less than 4 points, the mark "3" is set.
Mark "5" is given if the student has scored at least 34 and not more than 39 points (from 34 to 39) for completing all parts of the examination paper. In this case, the student must score at least 6 points for literacy (criteria GK1-GK4). If, according to the criteria of GK1-GK4, the student scored less than 6 points, the mark "4" is set.
The criteria for assessing the OGE in the Russian language and the scores for the tasks can be found in the demo version of KIM, or in more detail in the document from the official website of FIPI:
Methodological materials for chairmen and members of regional subject commissions for checking assignments with a detailed answer to the examination papers of the OGE 2017
The examination work of the OGE in the Russian language consists of three parts.
The third part of the work contains a creative task (Task 15), which tests the communicative competence of schoolchildren, in particular, the ability to build their own statement in accordance with a given type of speech.
Detailed criteria for evaluating the essay of the OGE are presented in detail in the document published on the FIPI website:
You can briefly get acquainted with the criteria for evaluating the essay of the OGE in the demo version in the Russian language.
Task 15.1. Criteria for evaluating an essay - reasoning on a linguistic topic
Table 1
| № | Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic (15.1) |
Points |
| C 1 K1 | Reasonable response | |
| The examinee gave reasoning at the theoretical level. There are no factual errors related to understanding the thesis | 2 | |
| The examinee gave reasoning at the theoretical level. One factual error was made with understanding of the thesis |
1 | |
| The examinee gave reasoning at the theoretical level. Two or more factual errors were made related to the understanding of the thesis, or thesis is not proven or reasoning is given outside the context of the task, or the thesis is proven at the household level | 0 | |
| C 1 K2 | Presence of examples-arguments | |
| from text, correctly indicating their role in the text | 3 | |
| The examinee gave two examples-arguments from text, but did not indicate their role in the text, or gave two examples from text, indicating the role in the text of one of them, or gave one example from text, indicating its role in the text | 2 | |
| The examinee gave one example-argument from text, without specifying his role in the text |
1 | |
| The examinee did not give a single example-argument illustrating the thesis, or the examinee gave examples-arguments not from the read text | 0 | |
| S 1 K3 | ||
| 2 | ||
| butand/or | 1 | |
| but and/or | 0 | |
| C 1 K4 | The compositional harmony of the work | |
| |
2 | |
| The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness but |
1 | |
| 0 | ||
| The maximum number of points for an essay according to the criteria C 1 K1–C 1 K4 |
9 | |
An essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic can be written by the examinee, based on both general cultural experience and philological knowledge.
Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis
table 2
| № | Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.2) | Points |
| C 2 K1 | Understanding the meaning of a piece of text | |
| The examinee gave a correct explanation of the content of the fragment. No errors in interpretation | 2 | |
| The examinee gave a generally correct explanation of the content of the passage, but made one mistake in his interpretation | 1 | |
| The examinee gave an incorrect explanation of the content of the text fragment, or the examinee made two or more mistakes in interpreting the content of the text fragment, or there is no explanation of the content of the fragment in the work of the examinee | 0 | |
| C 2 K2 | Presence of examples-arguments | |
| Examinee led from text two examples-arguments that correspond to the explanation of the content of this fragment | 3 | |
| Examinee led from text one example is an argument that matches the explanation of the content of the given fragment | 2 | |
| The examinee gave an example(s)-argument(s) not from the read text | 1 | |
| The examinee did not give a single example-argument explaining the content of this fragment, or the examinee cited the quote given in the task or part of it as an example-argument | 0 | |
| C 2 K3 | Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of composition | |
| The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work | 2 | |
| The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error and/or there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work | 1 | |
| In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text | 0 | |
| C 2 K4 | Compositional harmony | |
| The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, there are no errors in the construction of the text | 2 | |
| The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, but one mistake was made in the construction of the text | 1 | |
| There are two or more errors in the construction of the text in the work | 0 | |
| The maximum number of points for an essay according to criteria C 2 K1–C 2 K4 | 9 | |
Assessment Criteria for Assignment 15.3
Table 3
| № | Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.3) | Points |
| C 3 K1 | Interpretation of the meaning of the word | |
| The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) gave a definition and commented on it | 2 | |
| The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) gave a definition, but didn't comment on it | 1 | |
| The examinee gave the wrong definition, or there is no interpretation of the word in the work of the examinee | 0 | |
| C 3 K2 | Presence of examples-arguments | |
| The examinee gave two examples-arguments: one example-argument was given from the read text, and the second - from life experience, or the examinee gave two examples-arguments from the read text | 3 | |
| The examinee gave one example-argument from the read text | 2 | |
| The examinee gave an example (s) - argument (s) from life experience | 1 | |
| The examinee did not give a single example-argument | 0 | |
| C 3 K3 | Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of composition | |
| The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work | 2 | |
| The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error and/or there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work | 1 | |
| In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text | 0 | |
| C 3 K4 | Compositional harmony | |
| The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, there are no errors in the construction of the text |
2 | |
| The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness but one mistake was made in the construction of the text |
1 | |
| There are two or more errors in the construction of the text in the work | 0 | |
| The maximum number of points for an essay according to criteria C 3 K1–C 3 K4 | 9 | |
It is important that the student is offered 3 options for writing. In each variant, a different setting can be implemented (research, analytical, value), which corresponds both to different types of text perception, and to different forms of the student's personal orientation.
The presence of different versions of the essay contributes to the development of the competence of the responsible choice of the student, allows the teacher, when preparing for the exam, to implement the whole variety of teaching aids aimed at developing speech. At the same time, it is no coincidence that special attention is paid to the ability to argue the positions of one's work using the text read: the education of a culture of evidence-based reasoned reasoning is the most important task of the modern school. It is also important to note that argumentation is an integrated indicator of the depth and accuracy of understanding the source text and the ability to functionally use the extracted information to solve certain communication goals.
It is significant that the ability to argue one's own statements is insufficiently developed among 11th grade graduates. A new form of examination work for graduates of the basic school contributes to a more active work of the teacher in this direction already in the basic school.
Loading...