Conspiracy Theory - Climate Wars (05/22/2017). Professor Katasonov: “Climate War” is a showdown in a “noble family

Tsunami in the Indian Ocean - 300 thousand dead. Hurricane Katrina in the United States - about 2 thousand dead. Earthquake in Sichuan province - at least 100 thousand dead. It would seem that these terrible natural disasters have nothing to do with each other, except that they all claimed many lives and occurred at the beginning of the 21st century. However, there is an opinion that all these cataclysms did not happen by chance, but were artificially created by man and used as a climate weapon! Who seeks to control the elements? Against whom are they trying to use military means of unprecedented destructive power? We'll tell you in our film.

The Turkish betrayal, the terrorist attack in Paris, the war in Syria and Ukraine - are these events accidental or is someone deliberately provoking crises around the world? There is a narrow circle of experts in Russia who predicted all this a few years ago. Then they were labeled contemptuously as "conspiracy theorists", and their predictions were called "conspiracy theories". But the development of events in the world showed that the "conspiracy theorists" were right. The authors of this television project are going to explain in detail to the viewer how the shadow model of the globe operates. Who are these manipulators and what do they want? And what can we all expect next...

Andrey MOISEYENKO

Part I. There is a weather war

"Komsomolskaya Pravda" understands how reliable the rumors are that scientists have already learned how to change the climate at will, arranging droughts and floods, dead calm and hurricanes

Bad weather is in vogue now

In Russia and the USA, Sidney Sheldon's book "Are You Afraid of the Dark?" became a bestseller. The plot is uncomplicated. An unscrupulous scientist - the head of a large corporation - has learned to control the weather. And with this he blackmails entire states: “Transfer a billion dollars to my account, otherwise orange plantations will be hailed all over the country. The peasants will go bankrupt, unrest, revolution ... "Or:" Do you want me to press the button, and a giant wave will wash away all your oil platforms? But everything ends well - the evil genius dies safely from the climate control system he created. Pure fiction? Or is there something real in the plot? After all, the author describes the real climatic cataclysms that have occurred in recent years, the causes of which have remained incomprehensible.

Indeed, according to the UN, the number of weather-related emergencies – hurricanes, droughts, floods, storms – has tripled over the past 25 years. And no longer jokingly, but seriously, politicians, military men and scientists from different countries talk about ways to control the climate. As if confirming their speeches, nature throws out all new tricks.

Climate of Mass Destruction

The two main catastrophes of the past year are climate. At the end of summer, Hurricane Katrina in the United States - 1228 dead, 1 million evacuated. Flooding due to heavy rains in southeast China in early summer - 732 dead, 2.4 million evacuated. A bulletproof vest can save you from a bullet, an anti-missile defense system can save you from a nuclear bomb. And against the fury of nature, humanity is powerless: both in the USA and in China, people could not do anything with the elements.

And immediately rumors appeared that these cataclysms were not the punishment of the Lord at all, but the work of human hands. Like, the Yankees sent downpours to China when they began to saber-rattling too actively towards Taiwan. And maybe that's why a week after the terrible flood, Major General of the People's Liberation Army of the People's Republic of China Zhu Chenghu announced at an official briefing for journalists that in the event of a conflict with the United States, China could be the first to use nuclear weapons. The statement is extremely aggressive, if not hysterical.

And as for the "authors" of Hurricane Katrina, rumors put forward three candidates:

1. China - revenge for supposedly sent downpours;

2. secret coalition of European countries. This is a separate story related to the year before last heat and floods in Europe. They were allegedly organized by the same Americans in order to knock down the euro against the dollar;

3. Russia. Why is unclear. But not a single global “horror story” can do without our country.

But. These versions only at first glance seem wild. After all, climatologists have been working for the military for a long time. And very successfully.

What is known for certain

Wet and mud-stained, Ho Chi Minh soldiers, looking up at the sky, scratched their thin beards in bewilderment - never in North Vietnam had there been such torrential rains as in the late 60s and early 70s during the civil war. Only a year later it became known about the project "Spinach" - for five years, American aircraft treated the clouds over Vietnam with special reagents that cause heavy showers. The goal is the destruction of fields in the rebel areas and flooding, blurring the "Ho Chi Minh trail" - the road in the jungle, along which the partisans received "humanitarian aid" from China.

Two more American operations carried out in that war: "Roman Plow" (200 bulldozers with special knives) and "Farmer's Hand" (90 thousand tons of herbicides sprayed from the air). On the territory of 65 thousand square kilometers in Vietnam, all vegetation was destroyed and the topsoil was removed. The result is swamping of the area, local climate change.

It is believed that it was after these "strategic" measures of the Yankees that the "Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Means of Impact on the Environment" was developed at the UN. The countries that signed it pledged "not to cause harm to another state party to the convention by deliberately managing the natural processes of the Earth, including its hydrosphere and atmosphere."

Both the USSR and the USA joined the convention in 1977 in Geneva. Very willingly. Because the loophole still remains. After all, the convention did not prevent "the use of means of influencing the natural environment for peaceful purposes."

That's all the crumbs of reliable information regarding the "military" methods of influencing the weather. But much more - not entirely reliable.

Anyone can make it rain

Before dealing with the secrets of the military, you need to understand what civilian scientists really know. Can they change the weather?

Yes. And for a very long time, - Professor of the Department of Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Protection of the Russian State Meteorological University, Doctor of Geological Sciences Gennady MAZUROV was surprised at my question. - I, for example, can cause rain or, conversely, prevent it. Now it is no longer a secret, but in the Soviet years we worked on the order of the military to create artificial fogs. At the same time, they learned to overclock the real ones. Another thing is to prevent frost.

How rain is prevented, we know. In Moscow, before each City Day, airplanes take off and spray crystals of nitrogenous silver over rain clouds on the distant approaches to the capital. Moisture condenses on them and rains down. Muscovites feel good, residents of the region feel bad. How can you make it rain when there's not a cloud in the sky?

In the warm season, our employees are often called to Siberia to put out taiga fires.

We put a decommissioned jet aircraft engine “on the priest” and turn it on to the fullest. Air heated to 500 - 700 degrees Celsius rises into the sky in a jet - it turns out a "pipe" with decent traction. In the upper atmosphere, hot air, cooling, gains moisture, and cumulus clouds form. It is necessary to install an aircraft engine in such a place that the wind drives the clouds to the area of the burning forest.

Probably, if everything was so simple, then the cinders from peat fires a few years ago would not have hung over Moscow. Yes, and any taiga fire could be extinguished in a matter of hours.

Are you ready to place giant "fans" throughout the taiga or along the perimeter of peat bogs, to provide them with fuel? And not every cumulus cloud can rain. The result depends on many more factors - air humidity, temperature ... But this method really works. Meteorologists also know how to deal with typhoons.

Not only Russians, but also Americans, - says a senior researcher at the laboratory of aerosol physics of the Research Institute of Physics. V. A. Foka of St. Petersburg State University, the author of a dozen international weather modeling patents Sergey VASILEV. “They also tried to stop the ill-fated Katrina. Make her walk in circles until she's out of breath. But it looks like they miscalculated.

Unconfirmed information about the testing of meteorological weapons

In August 1952, in the British county of Devon, 230 millimeters of rain fell in 12 hours - ten times more than the average for this month in other years. As a result of the flood, the village of Linemat was washed away. 35 people died.

It is claimed to be the result of an Air Force experiment to artificially induce rain. At hearings in Parliament, the British Ministry of Defense denied any involvement in the emergency.

1972, USA. In South Dakota, 400 mm of rain fell in 6 hours. Water washed away 750 houses. About 250 inhabitants were killed. There has never been a flood here again.

September 1977, USSR. "Petrozavodsk phenomenon" - the inhabitants of Karelia observed a huge luminous clot in the sky, similar to a jellyfish, for four minutes. The anomaly was also visible from the territory of Finland - the video recordings got to the West. The Washington Post commented on several reputable scientists who suggested that the phenomenon was related to military weather experiments.

In 1978 in the United States, days of heavy rains drowned two dozen villages in Wisconsin and caused $50 million in damage. Supporters of the theory of "climate wars" explain the cataclysm as an experiment of the military, which got out of their control.

In 1981 California experienced a strange drought. Climatologists call it the most unusual natural phenomenon in the history of meteorology in the United States. For unknown reasons, an area of high pressure arose in the atmosphere, preventing cyclones from the Pacific Ocean from reaching the mainland. American geophysicist Manuel Sereio claims that this is the result of the work of a Soviet weather control station located in Cuba.

During the recent bombings of Yugoslavia in southeastern Europe, the weather was unusually good. And there were rumors that the Americans support it artificially. Belgrade newspaper Politika: “On the evening of April 5, the sky over Nis was overcast, we were waiting for it to rain. There was the sound of an airplane, after which the sky suddenly turned red, the clouds began to roll up and disappear, the sun came out. Nis was bombed that night. In the evening of the next day, the same thing happened over Negotin and Prakhov.

Part II. Climate weapons are better than the atomic bomb

U.S. military analysts say so

"Komsomolskaya Pravda" understands how reliable the rumors are that scientists have already learned how to control the natural elements

A new bestseller in the US, Europe and Russia is Sidney Sheldon's book Are You Afraid of the Dark? It is about climate weapons, which are supposedly being created by scientists in many countries. It turns out that you can not bomb the territory of the enemy, but simply send a hurricane or flood. And it's not a joke. So far, the Americans have advanced furthest in the creation of climate weapons. For example, in the last issue, we already talked about how they used it in the Vietnam War. There is anecdotal evidence that US meteorologists are trying to use these weapons for peaceful purposes as well - an unsuccessful attempt to stop Hurricane Katrina. And recently, the Pentagon has developed a whole climate war doctrine.

Subjugation of the weather

In the United States, Air Force analysts prepared a report that later got into the media. The title is uncomplicated: "Weather as a force multiplier: subjugation of the weather by 2025" (the report in English can be read). Answering the question why the military needs this, the authors develop the following picture:

“Imagine that in 2025 the US is fighting a wealthy South American drug cartel that has patrons among the leadership of several local countries. The United States does not plan or does not have the opportunity to start a full-scale war in this region. The only way out is to destroy coca plantations and warehouses with finished products from the air. But through their political patrons, the drug traffickers bought decommissioned fighter jets from China and Russia, and systems for tracking and intercepting missiles from France. Of course, our aircraft (the authors mean American technology. - A.M.) are more advanced. But for every US Air Force aircraft, there are 10 decommissioned, and therefore cheaper, Russian-Chinese aircraft. And not by skill, but by numbers, drug traffickers manage to protect their territory. What to do?"

The authors offer an elegant way out. According to long-term meteorological observations in equatorial South America throughout the year, around noon, there is a high probability of heavy thunderstorms, and, according to the CIA, drug cartel pilots try not to take off at this time of day (so in the document. - A.M.). On the day of the planned operation, a high-altitude "stealth" aircraft of the US Air Force processes clouds over a given target in order to cause rain with thunderstorms for sure. Enemy planes remain in hangars, and American all-weather combat vehicles brilliantly carry out an act of retaliation.

Fighting with climate is cheaper

At first glance, the proposed situation looks implausible. For example, why don't rich drug dealers shell out for Russian all-weather Su-30 fighter jets or buy state-of-the-art anti-missile systems on the black market somewhere? But the meaning of the action is clear: it is much cheaper to cause rain, while risking one or two aircraft, than to endanger the pilots of dozens or hundreds of aircraft. With the help of influencing the weather, it is proposed to carry out other actions on the territory of the alleged enemy - to arrange floods, to provoke poisonous rains: to the reagents that cause a downpour - silver iodide or solid carbon dioxide - poisons are added that affect fresh water sources and plants. And you can throw a multi-day fog on the enemy - a good way, for example, to demoralize the poorly educated warriors of some small, but still proud Arab or African country.

Summing up their analytical note, the authors say that it would be nice for the United States to withdraw from the “Convention on the Prohibition of Military Interference with the Environment”, and believe that, in terms of their significance, climate weapons will make the same revolution in the world as the first atomic bombs. And this weapon is primarily of interest to the major powers. In order, for example, to make the same United States forget and think about world domination, it is enough for several years in seasons with suitable climatic conditions to “direct” hurricanes like the destructive Katrina to the large cities of this country. After all, while humanity is powerless against such an element.

How to extinguish a hurricane

So far, there is no evidence that people will learn to arrange "by order" typhoons and hurricanes. But they already know how to “extinguish” them in the bud. True, not very powerful. According to my information, the Americans also tried to stop the Katrina hurricane, ”Sergey VASILEV, a weather modeling specialist, senior researcher at the aerosol physics laboratory of the Research Institute of Physics of St. Petersburg State University, told KP, but it didn’t work out. Satellite images show that the hurricane changed direction several times and then weakened, then filled with the same power. This is somewhat unusual. It was as if someone's hand was moving him. Or something artificial. For the USSR and Russia, the fight against typhoons was not a paramount scientific problem, since only a small part of the country suffered from them - Sakhalin and Kamchatka. And the Americans have achieved serious success in this matter. The essence of the methods of struggle is the same as with hail and thunder clouds. With the help of special reagents that can cause or, conversely, prevent immediate precipitation. Theoretically, it is known that by seeding the “eye” of a typhoon, its rear or front part with these substances from an airplane, it is possible, by creating a difference in pressure and temperature, to make it walk “in a circle”, or simply stand still. The problem is that every second you need to take into account many constantly changing factors. A huge amount of reagents is needed. I repeat that Russian meteorologists know about this only theoretically. The Americans, it seems, are trying to do something in practice. And, of course, they hide their results - this is a matter of national security. And the fact that Katrina nevertheless turned towards New Orleans, although it initially seemed that the elements would pass by, scientists could not foresee all the consequences of the experiment. The strange trajectory of the hurricane leads me to such thoughts. But I'm afraid we won't know the truth very soon.

BY THE WAY

In the United States, they began to try to extinguish hurricanes back in the mid-60s of the last century. One of the successful experiments was carried out in 1969 off the coast of Haiti. Tourists and locals saw a huge white cloud, from which huge rings diverged, as if some giant was smoking a pipe. Meteorologists showered the typhoon with silver iodide and managed to turn it away from Haiti to the coast of unfriendly Panama and Nicaragua. True, this hurricane was ten times weaker than the destructive Katrina and did not bring any special troubles.

QUESTION EDGE

Is it possible to send frost?

Now almost all of Russia is suffering from unprecedented cold weather. In many regions, the temperature is lower than usual in mid-January, by 10-15 degrees. As if in the climatic disaster film "The Day After Tomorrow": from the upper layers of the atmosphere, where eternal 70 - 100-degree frost reigns, a powerful whirlwind began to suck in and lower icy air to the Earth's surface. Fiction? For now, yes. But theoretically it is possible. And what are scientists capable of in practice? Can they bring frost on their own?

They can,” says Gennady MAZUROV, Professor of the Department of Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Protection at the Russian State Meteorological University. - This is the "nuclear winter" known to everyone from science fiction novels. The explosion of several nuclear bombs or the simultaneous eruption of large volcanoes will create a dust curtain over the planet, impenetrable to sunlight, and a long winter will come, which can last from several months to tens of years. But, I hope, no one on Earth will ever think of conducting such an experiment.

- Well, is it really possible to freeze the territory of a potential enemy?

Let the cold in - no. But to make them hold out longer is quite. If snow fell, and then frost hit, then you just need to disperse the clouds over this territory. Natural water clouds, unlike dust clouds, let the sun's rays down, but do not release them back, creating a greenhouse effect - warming the atmosphere. And if you "do not let" clouds into hostile territory, then there will be no greenhouse effect, and the snow on the surface will reflect the sun's rays back. As a result, the heating of the air and the surface will not occur - approximately the same climatic situation prevails now in Antarctica.

- So, on the contrary, by driving the clouds, we will raise the temperature?

Yes, it's real. Each region, of course, has its own conditions. But if now a dense layer of clouds is created over Moscow, then the temperature would be 5-10 degrees higher. However, in this case we are talking about the usual temperature fluctuations without the participation of someone's evil will. And the frost will soon subside.

READ IN THE NEXT ISSUE

in Alaska, in a territory prohibited for flights of civil aircraft, there are 180 antennas 24 meters high each, capable of creating a magnetic storm and building a local Armageddon for any single country;

on the official website of this project, a very ambiguous phrase flaunts as a motto: “September 11, 2001. We are united, we are determined, we will never forget!”

4 478

What is happening to the weather around the world? In Africa, in the hot summer, hail suddenly falls, and in Central Russia, December resembles spring. Sleeping volcanoes suddenly wake up, coastal cities experience severe floods. Scientists say the world is on the verge of a climate war. If this is so, and somewhere in secret laboratories methods of controlling the weather are being developed, humanity may be in danger worse than nuclear explosions.

Chemicals for the Ho Chi Minh Trail

The two superpowers, the USSR and the USA, began to accuse each other of the climate war since the 70s of the last century. Declassified archival materials suggest that such programs really existed. But how far have these studies progressed in practice?

It is known that during the Vietnam War (1957-1975), the Americans used chemicals to change the climate, spraying certain mixtures in order to cause heavy rains. According to the British press, the level of precipitation in Vietnam increased by about 30%, and this made it possible to eliminate the Ho Chi Minh trail - completely wash out the road along which weapons and food were delivered to the Vietnamese fighters.

On December 10, 1976, the UN General Assembly adopted the "Convention for the Prohibition of the Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Means of Interference with the Natural Environment". It prohibits any artificial climate change for military purposes. That is, officially there can be no climate war. Nevertheless, scientists from many countries confidently say that work in this direction has not stopped.

Oil in the ocean

Here are the studies reported in foreign newspapers. In 1962-1983, hurricane control experiments were conducted in the United States. The secret project was called "Furious Storm". The main direction of his research was the study of the influence of a film of vegetable oil spilled in the ocean. The English scientist Damien Wilson has published several articles on this subject. It is known that hurricanes are born due to the heat that is generated on the vast water surface. That is, they can be caused by a spill of oil or other oily liquid.

True, Wilson argues that the control of such a hurricane is almost impossible. In what direction it will move and what strength it will gain is unknown. But this is the opinion of a scientist who only collects individual facts and tries to put together a whole picture from them. Is this really the case - or has climate weapons already become a reality?

Artificial fireballs

Also, since the 1960s, a number of countries have been building installations for the possible use of ionospheric energy. The most famous of them are included in the American HAARP program (HAARP - High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, "Program for the study of auroras by high-frequency exposure"). Officially, these stations are intended for scientific experiments in the ionosphere and magnetosphere of the Earth. The power of the radio emission of each of them, concentrated in a small space, can be thousands and even millions of times greater than the energy of the Sun. In the zone of action of such a beam, the formation of giant ball lightning occurs, capable of influencing the climate of any selected part of the planet.

HAARP air conditioner in Alaska

Since 2002, when the HAARP project was fully operational, the number of anomalous weather phenomena on Earth has sharply increased. True, in 2013, there were reports in the US press that the project would be closed, but this scientific program is so secret that there has not yet been an official confirmation or refutation of this information.

In the 1960s and 1970s, stations for the study of the ionosphere were also built in the USSR.

They are significantly inferior to modern American ones in power, but the principles of operation are similar. Now, according to experts, these stations are mothballed, but not destroyed and are fully operational.

Somalia without wheat and bananas

In 2007, the French newspaper Le Figaro published an article about climate change in African countries. In particular, that Somalia was suddenly swept by a wave of floods and hurricanes. Because of this, about 200 thousand residents of the country moved to neighboring Kenya, but weather anomalies have already arrived there, causing crop failures. Who is to blame for African climate change?

The United Nations Representative for Refugees, Walter Kälin, spoke in a 2013 report to the UN General Assembly about the responsibility of industrialized countries. It is they who, by massive emissions of greenhouse gases, contribute to a sharp climate change.

But some scientists link weather anomalies in Africa not only with carbon dioxide emissions, but also with possible projects to create climate weapons that are being tested on the land of the continent.

Somali refugees in Kenya

In particular, Professor Owen Green from the University of Bradford (England) writes about this. In his opinion, such studies have never stopped - they just don't talk about them.

Former US Secretary of Defense William Cohen approaches the issue from a different angle, saying that the secrecy of such projects is necessary to keep climate weapons out of the hands of terrorists who have long been interested in man-made earthquakes, floods and hurricanes, especially those that can be called from great distance.

A hurricane in response to a flood?

What other weather events could be linked to the use of climate weapons?

In 2005, the most devastating hurricane Katrina in the history of the country hit the United States and covered the city of New Orleans. Its result was the death of 1836 people, the total economic damage amounted to 125 billion dollars.

A little earlier in the same year, one of the largest floods in the world was recorded in southeast China, which killed 732 residents of the country.

Some researchers consider these events to be related to each other. Relations between the two affected countries were then extremely tense. Shortly before the flood, one of the highest ranks of the Chinese army, Major General Zhu Chenghu, at an official briefing, said that in the event of an armed conflict with the Americans, his country would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons.

Allegedly, because of such statements, the United States decided to unleash a local climate war, causing powerful downpours on the territory of an intractable enemy. Thus, Hurricane Katrina could be China's revenge. By the way, the US military put forward a version that Russians helped Chinese scientists. True, no evidence was provided in this regard.

In 2010, a series of severe forest fires took place in Central Russia. Some researchers have suggested that they were caused by the use of a laser gun mounted on an American satellite. The British newspaper The Times reported a little later that on April 22, 2010, the Americans launched an unmanned spacecraft called X-37-B and had a similar laser gun on board, capable of hitting ground and even underwater targets. Another argument in favor of the possible use of climate weapons was the fact that almost all fires occurred around important strategic facilities - military depots or secret associations where new types of weapons were created.

In 2011, the famous American military historian Dwayne Day published an article in the online publication The Space Review, where he claimed that the same laser guns, starting from the 80s of the XX century, were developed by Soviet engineers - first to equip aircraft, and later space ships. After the collapse of the USSR, the program was curtailed, but some theoretical and practical developments undoubtedly remained.

Most recently, in February 2015, the respected English newspaper The Daily Mail published a confession from Rutgers University (USA) professor Alan Robock, who stated that he had advised CIA officials on the possibility of the use of climate weapons by Russia or China.

All these facts together suggest that a weather war is not only possible - it is most likely already underway. Many well-known researchers of anomalous phenomena agree with this statement, in particular Academician Nikolai Levashov, who published an article “Anti-Russian Anticyclone” in the Russian newspaper “President”, dedicated to waging a climate war against our state.

"Geophysical" sounds better

True, most researchers prefer to call such weapons not climatic, but geophysical. First of all, because the term is becoming more streamlined and includes not only military, but generally any effect on the weather - for example, dispersal of clouds by spraying silver iodide. It is known that such actions were carried out by the aviation of our country during the Moscow Olympics and on the eve of the 50th anniversary of the Victory in 1995.

Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke about geophysical weapons in an election article published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta in February 2012. It directly says: the development of "fundamentally new types of weapons - such as beam, wave and geophysical" weapons is of decisive importance in the future armed struggle, because their results are comparable to the effect of a nuclear explosion, but are more acceptable politically.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu recently stated the same thing: the country will develop weapons based on new physical principles, and the tasks for its creation are included in the already adopted military budget, developed until 2020.

Rockefellers again against the Rothschilds, or the fight against global warming as a battle between oil and gas producers and alternative energy

Trump spoke about his intention to withdraw from the climate agreement during his election campaign. He has repeatedly denied the climate change theory, calling it a "scam". In his opinion, it was developed by China to destroy US industry. The statement of the American President, made last week, provoked a strong reaction from the world community...

AND YOU ALL GO!..

President of the U.S.A Donald Trump late Thursday evening announced the US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. “We are withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, but we will begin negotiations to re-enter either the Paris Agreement or a completely different deal on fair terms for American business, workers, people and taxpayers,” the US President said during a press conference. The Paris climate agreement puts the US at a disadvantage by creating benefits for other countries, the US president said. According to Trump, the US could lose about 2.7 million jobs by 2025 due to the Paris Agreement. At the same time, Trump promised that the United States will remain the world leader in environmental protection. He also stressed that the future actions of the United States will depend on whether they can get a "fair deal."

Yesterday's statement by the American president provoked a stormy reaction from the world community.

UN Secretary General António Guterres, speaking on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), said that climate action cannot be stopped, and states must stick to the course they have chosen.

The WWF said the US decision would ultimately damage their leadership.

Chairman of the Board of "Rosnano" Anatoly Chubais generally believes that the United States has become a pariah by abandoning the Paris Agreement. “I affirm that this is a very good deal for Russia. The US leader declared himself a country for which the global interests of mankind are insignificant. Declared itself a country that ignores the interests of mankind. I declared myself a country for which the interests of future generations are a secondary thing, ”Chubais said during his speech at the SPIEF. “In some century we did not touch upon the situation when the United States became one of the rogue states, and Russia, together with civilized mankind, signed the Paris Agreement,” he added. Chubais also called the Paris Agreement a unique technology driver. “We have received an additional tool to accelerate scientific and technological progress,” he said.

Meanwhile, as the Minister of Natural Resources and Ecology of Russia said on the sidelines of the SPIEF Sergey Donskoy, the Russian Federation does not expect the terms of the Paris climate agreement to be adjusted due to the US decision to withdraw from it.

Vice Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Alexander Khloponin clarified that Russia is not going to abandon its obligations under the Paris climate agreement and will consistently fulfill them. “This is their personal business, we both moved and move consistently. We consistently fulfill our obligations. And we are not going to give it up,” Khloponin said on the sidelines of the SPIEF.

Valentin Katasonov

PROFESSOR VALENTIN KATASONOV COMMENTS:

- It is not so much Trump's statement on the climate agreement that is interesting, but the reaction of the so-called "world community". I would like to draw attention to the phrase that was heard in the joint statement of Merkel, Macron and Gentiloni: “We firmly believe that the Paris Agreement cannot be revised, as it is a vital tool for our planet, society and economy.” What kind of instrument is meant, what is hidden in this phrase?

Indeed, the correct word "instrument" is used. Since the establishment of the Club of Rome, the following has been heard: global ecology, global climate, climate change... The problem of environmental protection and climate stabilization has been on the agenda of many international forums. There were programs of the UN and other international organizations in the field of environmental protection and combating global warming. A “tool” is, as they say, a Freudian slip, because really “environmental” programs and projects are not aimed at improving the physical environment of a person, but these are programs that are precisely tools for realizing the interests of certain business groups and the financial oligarchy . Whatever ecological problem you take, it is clear that the ears of these very interests are sticking out behind it.

In this case, the theme of the greenhouse effect - climate change under the influence of an increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide CO 2 in the atmosphere - is a long-playing tool. It was fabricated back in the 70s and 80s. In the 1990s, the World Bank already had its own projects in the field of curbing CO 2 emissions. In the 1990s, I worked as the financial director of the World Bank's environmental management project in Russia, and I can say that in relation to Russia, this tool was used to destroy our industry, because it is supposedly excessively energy-intensive, produces excess amounts of carbon dioxide . So then (as, indeed, today) this tool was used against our state.

In general, if we take a global scale, then this tool was invented by those who wanted to shake the monopoly of the oil business, which really occupied key positions not only in industry, but also in the financial sector. And not just in the financial sector, but specifically among the main shareholders of the Fed. This is the Rockefeller clan, which we rightly associate with the oil business. The Rockefeller clan is one of the Fed's largest shareholders. So there is a multi-level fight going on, squabbling between different clans. Trump certainly voices the interests of the oil business. Note that on his first international tour, he took almost none of his advisers with him, with the exception of members of his family and Secretary of State Tillerson, who is a very big dock in the oil business. So there are a lot of signs that, first of all, Trump is pursuing the interests of the oil business, the interests of the Rockefellers.

Europe, in this case, takes a different position. It implements the interests of the Rothschilds, who are also large - but not the largest - shareholders of the Fed. There is a "war of thrones" under the pretext that philanthropic rulers care about preventing climate change.

Please note: today the world oil markets are low prices. It turns out that Trump's statement is a blow to the oil business? But it must be borne in mind that with the help of low oil prices, the Rockefellers and other representatives of the hydrocarbon business are trying to maintain their positions, because low prices do not make it possible to replace hydrocarbon and carbon fuels (hydrocarbon is oil and natural gas, carbon is coal) with some alternative energy sources. Today, oil and gas companies are ready to sacrifice even their profits, because there is a war going on. During the war, profits temporarily decrease. Now the “hydrocarbons” need to repel the attacks of the “environmentalists”.

I am not inclined to idealize Trump. “Climate war” is a showdown in the “noble family”. The whole history of the twentieth century is a continuous squabble, and there were many such situations. The Second World War was also a squabble. And although formally Roosevelt and Churchill sat side by side, but mentally they were ready to cut each other's throats. Roosevelt in this case was interested in definitively depriving Britain of its geopolitical support called the "colonial system". And I must say that Uncle Sam succeeded. And so on. That is, it is not necessary to consider the current situation as unique. Only in the twentieth century there were dozens of such situations.

But there is also something new. America is split, and it's not even about Trump. Although, of course, Trump is a litmus test that captures the balance of power between different interest groups. Trump is behind those forces that are associated with oil. Military-industrial complex. Ministry of Defence. Part of the banking community is against Trump. Special services. Of course, against Trump "Silicon Valley", which is gaining weight. High-tech companies want to push the traditional Wall Street banks. Trump really wanted to make friends with the IT people, but they showed him that they were by no means ready to fraternize. So there was a complex alignment of forces - but very interesting. There has never been such an arrangement.

Let's talk about the most vehement defenders of the global warming hypothesis. Merkel, Macron, Gentiloni, the leaders of Canada and Japan, Theresa May from the UK - we see a kind of international. By the way, we can add our Mr. Dvorkovich to him, who said that Russia is indifferent to Trump's judgments on this issue. And Chubais, who agreed to "the United States is a rogue country." What is this international? I would say this: the International of the servants of the devil. You can also call them degenerates - it is not for nothing that almost all the leaders of Europe do not have children. In fact, the devil is also a degenerate, but we understand this. Now I am increasingly quoting St. Nicholas of Serbia, who said that all people are divided into god-like, animal-like and demon-like. We are all animal-like to some extent, and our task is to look at ourselves in the mirror more often and somehow correct ourselves. Actually, when I say "beastlike", I do not exclude myself from this list. But there are also demons. Most likely, the leaders of the West and liberalism belong to the third category. And demons, as you understand, do not have children.

All these Merkels, macrons and Chubais who joined them, in addition to a completely clear utilitarian position on the climate agreement (that is, the desire to destroy the economies of countries that could compete with the golden billion), also pursue a long-term goal - world domination. This goal was born thousands of years ago. Turning to the Holy Scriptures, we remember the history of the Jewish people. The Jewish people at the time when Jesus came to earth lived in the provinces of the Roman Empire and dreamed of crushing the imperial power. We remember that on Palm Sunday, the inhabitants of Jerusalem shouted “Hosanna!” to Christ, because they thought that the same leader was coming who would allow this hard-nosed people to become the master of the whole world. And they welcomed the crucifixion of the Lord, when they saw that they had been deceived. Their heirs are striving for world power even today. For them, money is a means; tool, not an end in itself. It is to their vassals that they inspire the idea that money is everything, and for them it is just a tool. They have seized the money printing press and, of course, at some point, when full power is in their hands, this printing press will be thrown into the dustbin of world history. He will no longer be needed when they build a world concentration camp.

With an understanding of the goals and objectives of today's "environmentalists", I am in favor of genuine protection of the natural environment. Let me remind you that in the Soviet Union, environmentally friendly glass for drinks, paper for wrapping products were used, there was no ubiquitous plastic container that flooded the environment, and when burned, it emits not just carbon dioxide, but terrible poisons. Of course, today's garbage state of society is a reflection of more serious deep processes of human transformation. If in the Soviet period he was still a creature that creates something and consumes to a lesser extent, today it is precisely this hypostasis of him that catches the eye - a consuming person. That is, there is a spiritual degradation of man. This is also proved by the fact that people have stopped doing long-term things. Our grandfathers and grandmothers did things forever, they were also used by descendants. This concerned utensils, clothing, art objects. And now how? The gadget becomes obsolete in a few months. A person buys a mobile phone, two months later a new version appears, he throws out the old one - and these things are terribly poisonous. Already in Africa, there are entire countries that have turned into garbage cesspools. This can and should be a cause for alarm. I can list ecological troubles and ulcers even until the morning of the next day - I have been professionally engaged in ecology for twenty-five years. Everything is very clear here, now even any housewife understands that disposable goods are, of course, profit. That is, the business satisfies its own needs, and does not produce goods necessary for human life. These are obvious things: here everything is turned upside down.

The most interesting thing is even more and more. The fact that not only a commodity, some kind of product of labor becomes disposable, but a person becomes disposable. The entrepreneur today proceeds from the fact that he just needs a labor force. For example, in ancient Rome, a slave was the personal property of the slave owner. If something is personal property, then the object of this personal property is kept in order, clean. Naturally, such an object should be used as long as possible and, perhaps, even passed on to your children and grandchildren. It seems to be an understandable thing. And the modern capitalist slave-owning system does not make the employee the property of the employer. In principle, this is quite simple. It would be possible to pass a law that would make workers serfs. What for? When in some countries 50% of young people are unemployed, you can, roughly speaking, use an employee for 2-3 years, then throw him away like a disposable cup or a disposable bottle. That's what worries me the most. And this topic is rarely voiced - a one-time person, a one-time worker. And when robots appear, there will be not millions of such disposable people on the planet, but billions.

Entropic processes have led to the fact that humanity has degraded. That's what all honest defenders of nature should do first of all - human nature. Man is the cause of everything. Man is the measure of all things. And a person who forgets God, moves away from God, can certainly only destroy. And the modern ruler-degenerate thinks that now he will do what Nimrod did not succeed - he will finally build the Tower of Babel...

Valentin Katasonov

"Tomorrow", 06/2/2017

Valentin Katasonov- Doctor of Economics, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Economic Sciences and Entrepreneurship, Professor of the Department of International Finance at MGIMO, Chairman of the Russian Economic Society named after. Sharapova, author of 10 monographs (including Great Power or Ecological Power? (1991), Project Finance as a New Method of Organizing Investment in the Real Sector of the Economy (1999), Capital Flight from Russia (2002), Flight capital from Russia: macroeconomic and monetary aspects” (2002)) and many articles.

Born in 1950.

Graduated from MGIMO (1972).

In 1991 - 1993 he was a consultant to the UN (Department of International Economic and Social Problems), in 1993 - 1996 - a member of the Advisory Board under the President of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).

2001 - 2011 - Head of the Department of International Monetary and Credit Relations, MGIMO (U) of the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Eight people became victims of the hurricane wind in Moscow, according to the emergency services of the capital.
In a few minutes of a hurricane on the territory of the All-Russian Exhibition Center, a tree fell on the girl. She died on the spot. Another tree crushed a man to death near Jawaharlal Nehru Square.
On Novomaryinskaya Street, a tree fell on a man, but he survived.

Hurricane in Moscow became the deadliest in recent decades

"According to preliminary information, the man survived, but he cannot get out on his own, rescuers are sent to him," an informed source told Interfax.

Photo and video evidence of the hurricane that swept through from different parts of the city have already begun to appear on social networks. In particular, several trees were uprooted in the area of Shabolovka Street. Fortunately, there were no casualties.
A storm warning is now in effect in the capital: heavy rain, thunderstorm, hail, wind gusts of 17-22 m/s are possible.

Video of a hurricane in Moscow on May 29, 2017

What do climate war advocates say?

Supporters of the theory of "climate wars" explain the cataclysm and hurricane in Moscow as an experiment of the US military.

So far, there is no evidence that people have learned to arrange "by order" typhoons and hurricanes. But they already know how to “extinguish” them in the bud. True, not very powerful.

Michel Chossudovsky, an economics professor at the University of Ottawa (Canada), who studies the official documents of the military department about the HAARP program, has no doubt that these weapons are ready for action. "There are clear statements from the US Air Force that climate change technology is already in place. HAARP will be fully operational next year and could be used in actual combat," he says.

- To claim that this system has at least some non-military application is to sin against the truth. I do not think that it can be used for peaceful purposes - it is a weapon of mass destruction that can cause serious climate change.

The special elegance of the project lies in the fact that the enemy may not even guess that weapons were used against him. In my opinion, this is undoubtedly a violation of the UN Convention."

Pyramid on New Riga collapsed during hurricane