Wings Mirror and Monkey Home Thought. Bass "Mirror and Monkey": analysis of the work

Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. - M.: "Lock-Press". Vadim Serov. 2003.

Watch what is "What is the bitter to consider work, / no better about yourself, kuma, turn around?" in other dictionaries:

Union. 1. Joins turnover or attached. Run. with a comparison value, comparing whom, which l. With what is said in the main thing. Turn louder than usual. In the south of the stars brighter than in the north. The mountains were higher than someone assumed. 2 ... encyclopedic Dictionary

Turn around, blundering, you will kill, perfect. (to turn around) (simple). The same thing to turn around in all means. Except 7, and contact 1 and 2 meanings. "What the grooves are considered to work, no better about yourself, Kuma, turn around." Wings. "He is on the point ... ... Explanatory Dictionary Ushakov

Union. 1. Comparative. Introduces a comparative turnover explaining what L. A member of this proposal, expressed by the form of a comparative degree of adjective or adverb, as well as words: "Other", "Other", "Other", and so on ... Small Academic Dictionary

Kroket someone else's roof, and his own flows. Ashul would be uncle, looking at himself. Cf. What the grip to consider to work, no better for themselves, Cuma, turn around. Wings. Mirror and monkey. Cf. Willst du Fremde Fehler Zählen, Heb An Deinen An Zu Zählen: IST MIR Recht, ... ... Mikhelson's Big Thick-Frazological Dictionary

Marty, in the mirror seeing his image,
Tikhokhonko bear sense:
"Look," says, "my cute is my!
What is it there for the face?
What kind of shelters and jumping!
I would help with longing,
Whenever at least a little bit like it.
But, admit, there is
From the grooves of my such crusher five to six:
I can even count them on my fingers. "-
"What is the guns to consider work,
No better about yourself, kuma, turn around? "-
She answered Bear.
But Mishenekin advice only disappeared.

There are many such examples in the world:
Do not like to recognize anyone in satire.
I even saw that yesterday:
That the climate in the hand is unclean, all this knows;
Climate read about bribes.
And he knocks on Peter.

Moral Basni "Mirror and Monkey"

Moral Basney on a monkey, condemned its own reflection, seen in the mirror, but did not recognize himself, enclosed in the rows of creation that "no one loves to recognize himself in satire."

And indeed, many of us very clearly distinguish other disadvantages, and may argue that "good", and what is "bad," about the right or wrong deeds, if it comes to other people.

But few of us are able to recognize their own shortcomings and mistakes.

This bascie Ivan Krylov teaches us before condemning the harmful habits or the wrong behavior of another person, first analyze their own behavior and correct perfect errors.

Each of us has its drawbacks. This can not be avoided - ideal people does not happen. But one thing is these shortcomings to have and recognize, and quite another - to deny the other things for them, as we do increasingly, as well as a monkey from the Baszy Mirror and Monkey.

Bass "Mirror and Monkey"

Marty, in the mirror seeing his image,
Tikhokhonko bear sense:
"Look," says, "my cute is my!
What is it there for the face?
What kind of shelters and jumping!
I would help with longing,
Whenever at least a little bit like it.
But, admit, there is
From the grooves of my such crusher five to six:
I can even count them on my fingers. " -
"What is the guns to consider work,
No better on yourself, kuma, turn around? " -
She answered Bear.
But Mishenekin advice only disappeared.

There are many such examples in the world:
Do not like to recognize anyone in satire.
I even saw that yesterday:
That the climate in the hand is unclean, all this knows;
Climate read about bribes.
And he knocks on Peter.

Moral Basni Krylova "Mirror and Monkey"

According to the classics of the Morrel of Mirror's Mirror and Monkey, Ivan Andreevich concluded in one of the last lines of his work - in a phrase that does not require explanations and has become a quote since the publication of an instructive poem: "Doesn't like to recognize yourself in satire." But not to do this, it is enough to just be able to recognize your mistakes and disadvantages.

Analysis of the fables "Mirror and Monkey"

The Basinie "Mirror and Monkey" lay down the "favorite" wing human vice - ignorance. It rises literally in every line of the work: And where a monkey, finding a mirror, did not recognize himself in it, and where it was described, with what disgust she considered an unfamiliar reflection, and where the stupid animal compares the "crusher" with his friends , And, of course, where the monkey ignores the board hint of a bear to look at himself.

It is to look at yourself by the author calls the author of all those who are used to judge the actions of others. Moreover, with the help of this fable, the wings are trying to make it make a concrete man-bribe, for which it inserts his surname to the text.

Winged expressions from Basni "Mirror and Monkey"

• "What is the bitter to consider work, no better for yourself, kuma, turn around?" - Used in the Basna "Mirror and Monkey", as a reproach to those who are looking for disadvantages in others instead of objectively, with due degree of criticism, look before this.

Bugai from the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, unsure of themselves representatives of other religions on the one hand, and dystrophics from science and pedagogy - with the other friendly and cheeky shouting about the need to let into school under the name of "alternative points of view" the law of God. And all this under the slogans of the democracy, then pluralism, then scientific creationism, the eternal incompleteness and defectiveness of scientific knowledge. From the multi-voice choir of defensors of ignorance and preachers of obscurantism, the public was laid, the head was smelled, and a common sense was stuck. Well, let's try to grow sensitive.

If the consciousness of schoolchildren to start investing not only the truth established by science, but also the content of those countless misconceptions regarding these truths, which existed in the scientific and about the scientific environment for at least two to three thousand years, then what would the above-mentioned disciples who have graduated from such school? After all, on any modern scientific reliable truth, the same scientists were expressed by thousands of erroneous truths on behalf of science. On the studied and still unknown science, dozens, hundreds and even thousands of assumptions, guessing hypotheses and only one of them later turned out to be true. Moreover, the same in the content of truth was expressed in dozens and hundreds of competing options. So, some evidence of the Pythagore Theorem in the scientific world several hundred was recorded. But in order to know that the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the cathets is enough of one convincing evidence. A hundred other options for evidence will not add anything to the knowledge of this theorem. On the contrary, if one more, second, the proof will strengthen the knowledge of the first version of the truth, then the third will already leave the student indifferent, the fourth - tackle, and the hundred can cause disgust to the theorem itself. And the presentation of alternative, even if just essentially, points of view on the same truth will not leave the disciple of a place for this truth in general. And if the scientific truth of the evolutionary teaching is to oppose theological creationism, the student will stop believing not only science, but also creationism.

Of course, there will be alternative points of view in science, alternative explanations for the same natural processes in nature, society and in the spiritual world of man. This is especially true of those problems that are still little accessible to practical and evidential comprehension of their essence. But these questions are designed to solve scientists. And the schoolboy is not a scientist. He, if we say the words of the boy from the movie "Cinderella": "I am not a wizard / not a scientist. I'm just learning. "

Consequently, even from a pedagogical point of view, creationism and other types of alternative anti-scientific concepts will bring undoubted harm to the rapid consciousness of students.

Protodiankon Andrei Kuraev, Archpriest Vseodod Chaplin, and the Glavfop Himself Kirill Gundyayev persistently with numerous "aggregates" prove the inability and usefulness of teaching at school parallel with the Chang of God called "Orthodox culture" an alternative evolutionary taking into account Creation rate. The arguments of these governorate shepherds and their followers sat down in their teeth, long ago and everyone is known. I will not repeat them. Boring and useless. But in the course of the speeches of the "Radeli" about the school and the younger generation, I can share a delometon council with all speech attacks to school.

Fathers saints and not saints! Why are you so unwillingly trying to bring your order in not your, secular and state, school? Religion, according to the Constitution, separated from the state, and the school is separated from the church. Why do you need with your "good tips" climbs through the fence separating you from school? Do you have anything about your concerns? Do you have that?, Not? There is also plenty!

For the benefit of your same case, read the fables of Ivan Andrevich Krylova "The mirror and monkey. In a monkey mirror you will see ourselves. See:

Marty, in the mirror Seeing his image, Tihochonko Bear Clean the foot: "Look," says, "my cute is my face! What is it for the face? What kind of shelters and jumping! I would help me with longing when it were at least I slightly looked like. But, if you admit, there are five to six of the grooves of my crusher: I can even count them on my fingers. " - "?" "She answered Bear." But Mishenekin advice only disappeared.

What to climb to you through the fence into secular schools, no better than you, priests, to be engaged in your schools. In your schools, you are all a squash and one, teach listeners and students only to your creation. But the belief that you learn your own, there are dozens and hundreds of more powerful beliefs to your belief. You interpret your, for example, that the Bible is the only absolutely holy and absolutely infallible teaching of the Lord God of God - Savaof / Jehovah. There is no evidence of this approval. Objective, without any prejudice, the analysis shows that the Bible is a contradictory, ignorant and insolvent source. This, as they say, of course. But besides this, the Bible has many alternative sources of creed. For Muslims, the Quran is not a little less than your Bible, the only absolutely holy and absolutely infallible teaching of the very Lord of God - Allah. Compared to the Bible in the Qur'an, much less internal contradictions, although absurdity there should be biblical. For Buddhists, Holy Infallional and Absolutely True is trucks, for Hindus - Vedi, for Mormons - the Book of Mormon ... All these sources of "the only right" religious exercise have three to four times more admirers than the world of Bible admirers. Why don't you enter the study of these altenitary bibles of the Holy Books in your educational institutions? Oh, how?! You are learning the creed of other religions and their sacred books! Perfectly! But how do you study them? - Oh, how! - Critical. So, your sacred scriptures and the same creationism are critical in our secular schools. And how many good words are you talking to the Syath teachings about other religions, so much in schools is a good creationism. We are not against what you are talking about other religions and about other not your holy books. So you do not oppose that we are talking about your creationism in our secular schools. Want to subside with us publicly? Please invite us to your radio and telecasts. We, and I personally, agree to act at least in your seminaries, even in your spiritual academies. Invite. Want, I will read the course of Atheism. From me, seminarists hear the fact that atheism speaks of himself, and not what you tell them about atheism. Is it not suitable for you? In this case, why should we be approaching that inspected heresy you are trying to drag into our school?

Marty, in the mirror seeing his image,
Tikhokhonko bear sense:
"Look," says, "my cute is my!
What is it there for the face?
What kind of shelters and jumping!
I would help with longing,
Whenever at least a little bit like it.
But, admit, there is
From the grooves of my such crusher five to six:
I can even count them on my fingers. "
"What the grooves consider work,
No better to himself, kuma, turn around? "-
She answered Bear.
But Mishenekin advice only disappeared.
____________

There are many such examples in the world:
Do not like to recognize anyone in satire.
I even saw that yesterday:
That the climate in the hand is unclean, all this knows;
For bribes, climate read,
And he knocks on Peter.

Analysis / Moral Basni "Mirror and Monkey" Krylov

Bass Ivan Andreevich Krylov "The Mirror and Monkey" was first published in the journal "Son of Fatherland".

Bass is written in about 1815. Its author at this time was 46 years old, he is known not only by successful translations of foreign forage, but also by original, original works. He works at that time an assistant librarian in St. Petersburg. The work is built on the heroes dialogue and the author of morality. The mirror from the subject turns into a kind of acting person, exposing the problem. Martyka for the first time sees himself in the mirror. Do not understand what is happening and who is being married to her in response, she calls the bear to laugh at the "Rogue". The decreasing suffix of the adverbs "Tikhokhonko" emphasizes the hypocritical desire of monkeys and attract the attention of the "Kuma", and not to bring to his revenue from "Rims". So the cowardice is combined with heating. "Cleasing your foot": here "Cleak" acts as a verb. It is immediately seen that they have a Panibrate relationship, because they are also Kumany (quite frequently found in the work of I. Krylov degree of kinship). Tied dialogue. And if Kum "cute", then in the mirror obviously "Ryzh". Collision of vocabulary strengthens the comicity of the situation. A few questions and exclamations. Own "grips and jumps" are mixed by a marty. She will die better than it will be a little bit like this eccentric. "From the grooves": apparently, here this word is also used in the meaning of "girlfriends". "Five-six": Numeral gives her story special likelihood. Indeed, the reader and will be ready to agree with the arguments of Martexe, but the author already warned the first line that the monkey sees himself. Meshnik with a mirror sign and advises the monkey "to be thrust". She did not turn to his words or the slightest attention. In the final marked Moral Basni: people persistently do not recognize themselves in satire, diligently brand other people's flaws and quirks, without noticing their own. The final lines are a living example of a storyteller from life: a bribe read about bribes, and he knows the "nods to Peter." There is also attention to the couple of anthroponyms, the presence of Russian calendar names for characters. For the fastening creativity of that time it was an innovative reception. The problem of burned conscience, and frivolry, and self-love is discussed here. The vocabulary is spacious, alive, obsolete places.

The vice of condemnation is considered in the work of I. Krylov "Mirror and Monkey".