The tasks of the exam in Russian are evaluated. Unified State Exam

Before each graduate who wanted to become a student of one of the universities of the Russian Federation in 2018, it is not an easy task - to successfully pass the exam, as well as choose the right to choose an educational institution and the faculty to submit documents. Most of the 11-tick-graders and their parents are first faced with the results of estimating the final exams and are often hampered to find answers to emerging issues. Therefore, we decided to shed light to important moments.

In 2017-2018, the main rules for passing the exam will not be significantly changed. This means that for graduates everything will also be relevant to a 100-ball evaluation system of final tests.

How does everything happen?

During the examination of the examination work for each correctly performed task, the graduate is counted the so-called "primary points", which, upon completion of the test, are summed up and transferred to the "test score", which is indicated in the Certificate of the EGE.

Important! Since 2009, it has not been officially not used for the transformation scale of primary and test scores to traditional five-point estimates for school, because in 2017 and in 2018 the final exams are not taken into the certificate.

Checking work is performed in two ways:

  • automatically (with special programs and technical means);
  • manually (the correctness of the deployed answers check two independent experts).

Challenge the result of automatic verification is quite difficult. If, when filling out the answers table, the basic rules were not met, the computer may not protect the result, and only a graduate itself will be to blame for this, which has not fulfilled a number of mandatory rules.

If controversial moments arise during the expert check, the third specialist is attracted, whose opinion will be decisive.

When to expect results?

According to the law, such a temporary framework apply:

  • data processing (for mandatory subjects) in the RCC should not last longer than 6 calendar days;
  • on data processing (options for choosing) RCS give 4 days;
  • checking at the Federal Testing Center should take no more than 5 business days;
  • approval of the results of the State Examination Commission - another day;
  • until 3 days to send the results to the participants of the exam.

In practice, from the moment of passing the exam before receiving the official result, it can pass from 8 to 14 days.

Translation of EGE points to assess

Despite the fact that Officially, in 2018, the scales for the transfer of points on the subjects of the exam in a five-point estimate is not used, many still want to interpret their result in a more familiar "school" system. To do this, you can use special tables or online calculators.

Test Test Point OGE Points in Evaluation

Russian language

Mathematics

Computer science

Social science

Foreign languages

Biology

Geography

Literature

The second method is slightly simpler and more convenient than finding the desired values \u200b\u200bin the huge tables. It is enough just to choose the subject (mathematics, Russian, chemistry, physics, history, English, social studies ... and other items), enter the data and get in a matter of seconds to consider the desired result.

We suggest trying how easy it is to use in practice online calculators of the EGE score and its transfer to a 5-hundred-grades.

Translation of primary points in test

Translation of the scam points in the assessment

Internet systems for applicants

The training 2017-2018 is completed, the exam is delivered, the results are known and even an interactive translation scale of primary points showed that the result of the exam is located in a fairly good range ... But, is it enough for joining the desired university?

Evaluate the real chances of accession, relying on test points and the minimum passing threshold sent by the University.

Important! The minimum passing score forms the university itself. It will be directly dependent on applicants' points that submit documents in 2018. The more popular the specialty - the higher the passage point will be.

Often even 100 ballroom results are sufficiently at the top faculties for budget. The chances of seeing their surname in the lists of applicants received for such directions are only the winners of the Olympiads that give weighty additional points.

In 2018, the most popular services for the selection of the university and monitor the threshold of entrance points for different specialties will be:

  1. Study.ru.
  2. Ads online
  3. Economy Higher School Calculator
  4. PostyPlenie.ru.
  5. Typical applicant

Find these services is very easy. Just enter their name to any search engine.

When passing exam testing, students are invited to perform 24 basic tasks from the first part. They require graduates providing a brief response, which is fixed in verbal or digital form. The second part of the examination testing contains only one task. Students are invited to write an essay.

How is the translation of the scam points in the Russian language and what is the minimum and maximum number of their quantity? These issues are one of the most exciting as for students of high schools and their parents and teachers. After checking the final testing, the primary score is set: from 0 to 58. For each task, a certain number is provided: from 1 to 5. The more difficult it is, the more points receive a graduate. Evaluation of the results of writing the writing is carried out differently. For him, schoolchildren can be accrued from 0 to 24 points.

Then the transfer of primary points into tests is carried out. They are indicated in the certificate of a single state examination. It is this result that is taken into account when entering universities.

How many points need to dial to talk about successful testing? It should be borne in mind that students who received a certificate cannot always claim admission to universities. It is possible to talk about the successful assimilation of the main general education program and the possibility of entering the university only if the schoolboy scored 16 primary, or 36 test points, respectively. Will be taken into account in the student rating in the list of applicants for applicants. The average passage score is at least 65-75. Graduates, planning to enter the leading universities of Moscow and other cities of our country, should take into account the fact that in this case this figure will be higher.

The translation of the USE points in the Russian language is carried out using a special scale. It should be borne in mind that the algorithm is adjusted from year to year.

Table of scam points in the Russian language

Primary score Test score
1 3
2 5
3 8
4 10
5 12
6 15
7 17
8 20
9 22
10 24
11 26
12 28
13 30
14 32
15 34
16 36
17 38
18 39
19 40
20 41
Primary score Test score
21 42
22 44
23 45
24 46
25 47
26 48
27 50
28 51
29 52
30 53
31 54
32 56
33 57
34 58
35 59
36 60
37 62
38 63
39 64
40 65

Each graduate perfectly understands that for successful admission to the specialty of interest, it is necessary to qualitatively prepare for the EEG-2018 and to gain the highest possible points.

Minimum scam points for 2018

Depending on the specialty, which receives a graduate, the profile subject may be mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, foreign language, or another subject, which is based on the basis of training. Each year, the university's admission committee sets the threshold value of this score. If the student cannot provide a certificate with a passing minimum, its documents are not considered even if it has high points for other subjects.

russian language - minimum 34 points;

basic mathematics - minimum of 27 points;

profile mathematics - minimum 27 points;

social science - minimum 42 points;

physics - minimum 36 points;

literature is minimum 32 points;

history, minimum 29 points;

chemistry - minimum 36 points;

all-Russian exam in English (French, German, Spanish) language - minimum 22 points;

biology - minimum 36 points;

informatics - minimum 40 points;

geography - minimum 40 points.

Points for the transfer of points to the EHE-2018 evaluation

Russian language:

0-35 points correspond to the estimate 2,
36-57 points - score 3,
58-71 points - estimate 4,
72 points and higher - score 5;

Mathematics (profile level):

0-26 points - score 2,
27-46 points - score 3,
47-64 points - rating 4,
65 and above points - rating 5;

Mathematics (base level):

0-6 points - rating 2,
7-11 points - score 3,
12-16 points - estimate 4,
17-20 - rating 5;

Social science:

0-41 points - score 2,
42-54 points - score 3,
55-66 points - estimate 4,
67 and above points - rating 5;

Biology:

0-35 points - Rating 2,
36-54 points - score 3,
55-71 points - score 4,
72 and above points - score 5;

0-31 points - score 2,
32-49 points - score 3,
50-67 points - estimate 4,
68 and above points - rating 5;

0-35 points - Rating 2,
36-52 points - score 3,
53-67 points - Evaluation 4,
68 and above points - rating 5;

0-26 points correspond to the estimate 2,
36-55 points - score 3,
56-72 points - estimate 4,
73 points and higher - score 5;

Literature:

0-31 points - score 2,
32-54 points - score 3,
55-66 points - estimate 4,
67 and above points - rating 5;

Computer science:

0-39 points - score 2,
40-55 points - score 3,
57-72 points - estimate 4,
73 and above points - rating 5.

Geography:

0-36 points - Rating 2,
37-50 points - score 3,
51-66 points - estimate 4,
67 and above points - rating 5;

Foreign languages:

0-21 points - score 2,
22-58 points - score 3,
59-83 points - score 4,
84 and above points - score 5;

Is it possible to recall the exam in order to improve the result?

The exam on the choice can be rented only the next year. But the mandatory objects are Russian or mathematics - it is allowed to reckon this year, but only if the participant has not overcome the minimum threshold according to one of these items. For example, if one of the exams was commissioned successfully, and on the second it is not recruited the desired minimum. If the graduate did not pass both mandatory exam, they will be able to recall in September. It happens that the student came to the exam, began to write work, but for some reason the reasons could not complete it. In this case, the result is considered canceled, with the examination of the exam in a reserve day.

If the student does not agree with the scores, where and to whom to go?

Within two working days after the official day of the announcement of the results, it is necessary to appeal there, where the application was written for the exam. This is usually a school. She will immediately give an appeal to a conflict commission. In each region there are such commissions, and everyone has the right to prove their right.

Recently was held in Nalchik, the share of "100 points for victory", when last year's stufflets told the current graduates, as successfully passing the exam. There was one girl who had 97 points on the exam, but she was sure that he had even higher evaluation. The work was revised, she was put 100 points.

Recently, the number of applications to conflict commissions has decreased. Those guys have ceased to appeal to appeal, on maybe: what if the examiners will add points? Now all statements are essentially, as a rule, from those who are very confident in their forces and knowledge.

Ege -2019. Russian language

Evaluation criteria and scores.

Part 1.

Attention!

There is a step-by-step explanation of each part of the writing, examples of writing these parts are given.

Material can be found on my site.eSSEEGE .RU

Part 2.

Criteria for estimating response to task 27

Point

I.

Composition of writings

Formulation of the problems of the source text

Examined (in one form or another in any of the parts of the writing) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text.

Actual errors associated with understanding and

word wording, no

1

The examiner could not correctly formulate none of the problems of the source text.

* If the examusable did not formulate or

formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any of the parts of the writing) one of the problems of the source text, then such work on the criteria K1-K4 is estimated 0 points

0

K2.

Commentary on the formulated problem of source text

Examined problem

commented with a support for the source text.

The examiner brought at least 2 examples-illustrations from the read text, important to understand the problem.

An explanation is given to 2 given examples. Detected meaningful bond between them. Actual errors associated with the understanding of the problem of the source text, in the comment not.

5

The problem-formulated problem commented on the support for the source text. The examiner brought at least 2 examples-illustrations from the read text, important to understand the problem.

An explanation is given to the 2 examples given, but the meaningful bond between them is not detected,

or

detected meaning between examples, but the explanation is given only to one example. Actual errors associated with the understanding of the problem of the source text, in the comment not.

4

The problem-formulated problem commented on the support for the source text. The examiner led at least 2 examples-illustrations from the read text, important to understand the problem, but the explanation is given only to one example, the sense relationship between the examples is not detected,

or

the examiner led 1 example-illustration from the read text, important to understand the problem, and gave an explanation for him. Actual errors associated with the understanding of the problem of the source text, in the comment not.

3

The examiner brought 2 examples-illustrations from the read text, important to understand the problem, but did not explain their meaning

2

The examiner led 1 example-illustration from the read text, important to understand the problem, but did not explain its meaning

1

Examples of illustrations from the read text, important for understanding the problem, are not given or

the problem commented without support for the source text,

or

In the comments, actual errors (one or more) associated with the understanding of the source text were admitted,

or

The other problem is commented, non-examined problem,

or

instead of comment, there is a simple retelling of the text, or

instead of comment, a large fragment of source text is cited.

0

To 3.

The examiner correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text at the commented problem. Actual errors associated with understanding the position of the author of the original text is not.

1

or

0

To 4.

The examiner expressed my attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it.

1

The examiner did not express my attitude to the position of the author of the text,

or

Reflections of the examiner do not correspond to the formulated problem,

or

the opinion of the examined is only formally declared (for example, "I agree / disagree with the author")

0

II.

Speech decoration of writings

K5.

Meaningful integrity, speech connectivity and

sequence of presentation

solidity, speech connectivity and sequence of presentation:

- Logic errors are missing, the sequence of the presentation is not violated;

- There are no violations of paragraphic membership in the paper.

2

The work of the examiner is characterized by the meaning

solidity, connectivity and sequence of presentation,

but

one logical error is allowed,

and / or

there is one violation of the paragraphic session of the text.

1

In the work of the examiner, the communicative intention is visible,

but

more than one logical error is admitted,

and / or

there are two cases of violation of paragraphic membership Text

0

To 6.

Speech accuracy and expressiveness

The work of the examined is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, a variety of grammatical system of speech.

* The highest score on this criterion examines only if the highest score is obtained by the criterion K10

2

The work of the examined is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought,

but

mixed monotony of the grammatical system of speech,

or

the work of the examined is characterized by a variety of grammatical system of speech,

but

there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought

1

The work of the examined is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical system of speech

0

III

Literacy

To 7.

Compliance with spelling norms

Orphographic errors no (or one non-adubulent

error)

3

Not more than two errors are allowed

2

Made three or four mistakes

1

More than four errors are admitted

0

To 8.

Compliance with punctuation norms

There are no punctuation errors (or one non-abrupt error is allowed)

3

One to three errors are made

2

Four to five mistakes are admitted

1

More than five mistakes are admitted

0

To 9.

Compliance with language norms

There are no grammatical errors

2

One or two errors are admitted

1

More than two errors are admitted

0

K10

Compliance with speech norms

A not more than one speech error is allowed

2

Admitted two or three errors

1

More than three errors are allowed

0

K11.

Compliance with ethical norms

1

Ethical errors in work are missing

0

Ethical errors (one or more) are allowed

K12

Compliance with factual accuracy in the background material

Actual errors in the background material are missing

1

Actual errors (one or more) are appaped in the background material

0

Maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12)

24

When estimating literacy (K7-K10), the volume of essays should be taken into account. The estimation rate specified in the table is designed for the composition of the volume in 150-300 words .

If in writings less than 70 wordsThis work is not counted and 0 points are estimated, the task is considered unfulfilled.

When evaluating an essay from 70 to 150 words The number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria

K7. - orphographic errors are not (or one non-bug is made);

K8.- There are no punctuation errors (or one nonbulent error is allowed).

1 score for these criteria put in the following cases:

K7. - not more than two errors are allowed;

K8. - one or three errors are admitted;

K9. - no grammatical errors;

K10 - Not more than one speech error is allowed.

Highest mark According to the criteria K7-K12 for the work of the volume from 70 to 150 words are not put.

If an essay is a retracted or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then

such work on all aspects of the inspection (K1-K12) is estimated 0 points.

If in the work, correspondent or retold source textIt contains fragments of the text of the examined, then only the number of words belongs to the examiner is taken into account when checking.

Work written without support for read text (not on this text), not Estimated .

Changes in the USE occur every year, but most of them do not have a fundamental importance. The order of tasks is changing, some of them are complicated, some simplify ... But here are the new criteria for assessing the task number 27 in the Russian language (an essay in the text) nominate and fundamentally new requirements for graduates. And the essay is, by the way, 24 out of 58 primary points, or 41 out of 100 test!

How did the comprehensive requirements change? Can you write it yourself taking into account the new criteria? We understand!

Arguments are no longer obligatory

Any mom, whose child graduated from school in the past few years, knows what is important in the composition of the "literary argument". If you are still not interested in this topic, retell the essence of the problem in short: an essay is the most difficult and "expensive" task of the EGE for 11-graders in the Russian language. It is written along a small excerpt of the text, which is shown right there in the text of the task.

An essay was evaluated for a number of criteria, among which one of the mains was the ability to confirm or refute the point of view of the author to the problem, using the so-called "literary argument" - an example from artistic, journalistic or even popular science literature.

Although the texts that will be used in the USE remained a secret until the very last moment, the main topics are known in advance and do not change for several years. Therefore, tutors and training courses for the exam (and school, what happened there) offered schoolchildren to serve examples from the "Bank of Arguments": Love - Evgeny Onegin, Man and Nature - "Farewell to Mattera", the role of art in life - "Letters About the good and beautiful "Dmitry Likhacheva ... as a result of the composition of graduates, written in the most honest way, sometimes resembled each other as two drops of water. Not delighting in the subtleties of the problems of the text under discussion, they tied to him the memorable "arguments from the bank" as the owl on the globe. It turned out, to put it mildly, not very.

We decided to get acquainted with the interests of the arguments in the Internet and, to be honest, their rectilinear primitiveness was horrified.

Problem: Search for the meaning of life in the modern world. In the story I.A. Bunin "Mr. from San Francisco" The American millionaire served as Golden Tales. The main character believed that the meaning of life lies in the accumulation of wealth. When Mr died, it turned out that genuine happiness passed by him.

Problem: Internal human beauty. Antoine de Saint-Exupery "Little Prince". The wise thoughts of a small prince can a lot of learning even adult. Our hero said: "Zorko is one heart. You won't see the most important eyes. " And you can no doubt say that he is right. True beauty inside a man, in his soul, in his correct deeds.

Problem: careful attitude towards nature. Hero of the poem N.A. Nekrasov "Grandflower Mazay and Hares" during the spring flood saves sinking hares, collects them into the boat, two sick cures. The forest for him is a house, and about those who live in him, Grandfather Mazay cares, protects. Such an attitude is a lesson of love for nature, love careful and reasonable.

In 2019, the position in terms of an essay is fundamentally changing. The emphasis shifts to the understanding of the text under discussion. In 2018, it was necessary in the presented text to find a problem; Comment on it, give, at least two examples from the text. Now you need to clarify why these fragments are chosen, and show the relationship between them.

If earlier for this action, three primary scores were assumed, now - as many as five.

In 2018, his attitude to the problem was necessary to reinforce at least two arguments, and one of them was supposed to be taken from artistic, journalistic or scientific literature. Now it does not matter exactly how the graduate will confirm its point of view, the main thing is conviction.

Previously, three points could be obtained for the argument of his opinion, now - only 1.

This does not mean that a graduate cannot appeal to the authority of literary classics, just now it is not necessary.

No arguments - good or bad?

Strictly speaking, Russian language and literature are different items. The literary argument, of course, demonstrated such an important dignity of the student as well-thought. But the Russian exam should identify completely different qualities: the ability to understand the text, to identify its essence, formulate the problem and support the dialogue.

If we reasonably - it is these skills that it is not necessary for any citizen, whatever a professional laughter he has chosen (after all, the results of the Russian exam, unlike mathematics, are taken into account when entering any university, to any specialty). And I read the future dentist or heat engineer Likhacheva, or did not read, it, by and large, the question is not fundamental.

If the exam in Russian had, as an exam in mathematics, two levels - the basic and profile, many "techinari" would certainly prefer to take the base. But, since this option was not suggested, and each score for Russian when entering the account, there were "banks of arguments" and writings catalogs.

And now the situation has unfolded not 180 degrees, but, let's say, by 90. The basis of the composition is not erudition, but the accuracy of understanding the text and persuasive reasoning. Will the exam be from this easier? Although! It is enough to explore the methodological recommendations of the Federal Institute of Pedagogical Measurements (FIPI), prepared on the basis of the analysis of typical errors of the participants of the 2018 participants of 2018, to understand: It is a comment on the main problem of text has become a stumbling block for many graduates:

Statistics performing work in general and individual tasks allows you to identify the main problems in the preparation of the examined in the Russian language. As in previous years, there are not enough instruments of the course related to the formation of communicative competence. Insufficiently developed analytical skills with word and text, the absence of the necessary practice of analyzing language phenomena affects and on the quality of writing the writing-reasoning. The task with the detailed answer (26) has demonstrated the most common errors associated with the information processing of the text and the presentation of their own thoughts about the read.

According to the K2 criterion (commenting on the designated problem of source text), 3 points received only 47.5% of graduates; 2 points 32%; 1 score of 13.8%. The level of formation among graduates of the ability to conduct text analysis is still not high enough.

On the one hand, in writings, graduates justify the relevance of the problem, disclose its significance for the author of the text, sharpen attention on text details illustrating the problem. On the other hand, the examiners are often deepening in their own reflections without support for source text or simply use it to retells. Many graduates do not consider it necessary to include two mandatory examples in writings, important for understanding the problem of source text.

What we cost ... write an essay!

Probably, many of our readers are now somewhat confused. Is it difficult to see the problem in the text? It seems that it is quite simple, right? And find two confirmation examples? And the relationship between them? Well, try your hand at the examinations of the exam in the Russian language - 2019. As a text for discussion, there will be a passage of the story "Scarecrow" writer Nikolai Leskov. We put the text under the spoiler.

Text from the demo version of the EGE-2019

My father and fixer were amazed by the fact that we had to spend the night in the house of Selivan, who was considered to be a sorcerer and a robber in the district and who, as we thought, wanted to kill us and take advantage of our things and money ...

By the way, about money. When mentioning them, the aunt now exclaimed:

Oh my god! Yes where is my box?

In fact, where is this casket and lying in it thousands? Her, imagine that it was not! Yes, yes, her alone was alone and there was not in the rooms between the things made, nor in the wagon - in a word, nowhere ... The box, obviously, remained there, at the end of the courtyard, and now - in the hands of Selivanny ...

I'll jump now, jumping there ... He, right, already disappeared somewhere, but he will not leave me! - spoke by the fixer. "Our happiness that everyone knows that he is a thief, and everyone does not like him: no one will hide him ...

But only the fixer squeezed his saber, as suddenly in the front heard the extraordinary movement between the former people there, and through the threshold in the hall, where we all were, breathing heavily, entered homework with a tetushkaya box in his hands.

Everyone jumped up from the places and stopped as inserted.

Forgot, take, - Ducho said Selon.

She could not say anything, because he was completely littered from an exorbitant soon walking and, must be from strong inner excitement.

He put the box on the table, and himself, not the last, sat down on the chair and lowered his head and his arms.

The box was complete. The aunt took off the key from the neck, revealed it and exclaimed:

All, everything was as it was!

Preserved ... - Selican quietly. "I'm all fright ... I wanted to catch up ... I'm sorry that I sit in front of you ... suffocated."

Father first approached him, hugged him and kissed himself.

Seliban did not touch.

The aunt took out two hundred paces from the box and began to give them into his hands.

Selivan continued to sit and looked, as if nothing understood.

Take what they give you, "Corp. said.

For what? Do not!

For the fact that you honestly saved and brought your forgotten money.

And how about? Is it not good?

Well, you ... a good person ... You did not think to conceal someone else's.

And he got out of place to go back to his ruined courtyard, but his father did not let him down: he took him to his office and locked him on the key there, and then in an hour he ordered to damage Sani and take him home.

A day later, they knew about this incident in the city and in the district, and two days later the father with the aunt went to chrome and, stopping at Selivan, drank tea in his hut and left him a warm fur coat. On the way back, they again drove to him and brought him gifts: tea, sugar and flour.

He took everything politely, but reluctantly and said:

For what? To me now, now for three days, everyone has become people to travel ... I went to the income ... Sing Cook ... We are not afraid of how afraid they were afraid.

When I was lucky after the holidays in the guesthouse, I again had a parcel to Selivano, and I drank tea and everything looked in my face and thought: "What is his beautiful, kind face! Why did he and others seem to me for so long? "

This thought persecuted me and did not leave me alone ... After all, this is the same person who seemed to be so terrible, whom everyone considered the sorcerer and villain. Why did he suddenly become so good and pleasant?

In the future years of my life, I got close to Selivan and had happiness to see how he became a man beloved and revered.

If you could not formulate the problem, here are your tips, or rather, the correct answers from FII. So, the following problems are set in the text (under the spoiler).

Text problems from the demo ege-2019

  1. The problem of human reservation by society.
  2. The problem of creating a reputation, formation of opinion about a person.
  3. The problem of manifestation of the inner beauty of a person.
  4. The problem of trusting attitude towards a person.
  5. The problem of manifestation of honesty.
  6. The problem of gratitude.

Well, how did you determine the problem? Now you need to find two examples to it from the text, explain the importance of each example and indicate the relationship between them. Now that you have demonstrated an understanding of the problem, you need to formulate the position of the author (narrator) towards it. And now you can express your position in relation to the position of the author (this is so intricate). So, you did all this. How many primary points do you get?

  • Definition and wording of the problem (one of those in the text of FIPI specialists) - 1 point.

A little, but without it nowhere. If you are wrong here, then all the subsequent will also be wrong.

    They led two examples from the text illustrating the problem, and showed the relationship between them - the most expensive part of the answer, 5 points.

That's all, another 16 scores for the writing can be obtained for stylistics, punctuation and spelling.

Successful exam delivery to all graduates and ... their mothers!

Prepared Irina Ilina

Share with friends or save for yourself:

Loading...