How to distinguish the accusative of the pet
You will need
- Nouns in parent and vinegenic cases.
- Knowledge definition of cases.
- Knowledge of questions defining cases.
Instruction
Genitive
According to the definitions in, the genitive case indicates:
Belonging to someone or anything, for example "Spring Spring", "Magazine Teacher";
If the ratio of the whole and its part is, for example, the page of the magazine (R.P.) ";
Mapping a sign of an object relative to another subject, for example "survey results (R.P.)";
The object of impact in the presence of a verb with a negative particle "not", for example, "meat does not eat (R.P.)";
The object of impact in the presence of a verb, denoting the desire, intention or removal, for example, "Wishing happiness (R.P.)", "Avoid responsibility (R.P.)";
If there is a comparison of objects, for example, "tight oak (R.P.)";
If the noun is an object of measurement, or a genitive date, such as "spoon of sour cream" or "Day of the Paris Commune".
Accusative
According to the definitions in the Russian language, the accusative case indicates:
The transition to the subject is completely, for example, "flipping a magazine", "Machine Machine";
Transmission of spatial and temporal relations "To pass mile", "relax";
In rare cases, it is formed as a dependence on, for example, "insulting for a friend."
To never confuse the noun, it is important to remember that each case in Russian corresponds to a universal question, asking which by this noun, in the end we obtain the appropriate case.
Parental Padel matches the question "No Who?" For animated and "No What?" For inanimate nouns.
Vinate Padel matches the question "I see who?" For animate and "I see what?" For inanimate nouns.
Determine the cases of nouns according to its definitions or extremely difficult. Suppose, remember all the definitions of the parent and vinitive pedegers are quite difficult. And the endings of the nouns often coincide.
Let us give an example using a dressed noun in a plural:
Nearby, I noticed people (I see who? - V.P.)
There were no people around (there was no whom? - R.P.)
As you can see, the word is equally the same in both cases.
But, in order to finally be convinced of the correctness of the definition of the case, substitute mentally instead of an inanimate animational noun.
For example:
Nearby I noticed a pillar (I see who? - V.P.)
There was no pillars around (there was no whom? - R.P.)
From the example, it can be seen: inanimately noun in the vinegenial case does not change in contrast to the same noun having a genitive case.
From here you can draw conclusions:
1. To distinguish the genitive case from the vinitive, set a noun defining question.
2. If you determine the case of an animated noun, because Question "Who?" Refers to both cases, then substitute the nouns instead inanimate and ask him the determining question. For the parent it will be "No What?", And for Vinitive, I see what? ". If the word looks like in, then the case of your noun - accusative.
Loading...