The Battle of Cape Stock is over. Naval battle of Cape Actium (31 BC)

Battle of Actium took place on September 2, 31 BC. In this naval battle, the naval military forces of Mark Antony and Octavian Augustus came together. Hemmed in by Octavian's naval blockade off Cape Actium in northwestern Greece, Mark Antony was forced to fight a weakened, hungry, and dispirited army.
Antony's fleet was divided into four squadrons. Ready for battle, the ships, contrary to custom, did not leave sails on the shore. The presence of sails on board was unacceptable in those days and could only mean one thing: Anthony was planning to escape from the battlefield. Cleopatra's squadron, which included transport ships with money and jewelry, was located in the rear. It is obvious that the ships Egyptian queen and did not intend to participate in this battle.
At Cape Actium, at the entrance to the Ambracian Gulf, stood the hundred thousandth army of Mark Antony; on the opposite bank of the strait there were also his troops, with whom Octavian’s army of 75 thousand people came into contact.

The fleet of Mark Antony and Cleopatra consisted, according to various sources, from 220 to 360 ships; of which 170 were large ships with three, four and five rows of oars; There were also enners and decimrems among them. They were huge powerful ships with a strong ram, a wooden armored belt to protect against ramming strikes; the height of the side in the middle of the ship reached 3 meters and increased from the bow and stern, so that it was difficult to board them. On the deck there were heavy throwing machines and towers for hanging projectiles. Ships of this design were slow and clumsy; their offensive power consisted mainly of incendiary and throwing shells. The action of the latter was directed not so much against the ships as against the crews. Anthony put 25 thousand soldiers on the ships, not counting the crews. Anthony ordered some of the ships of the Egyptian allies to be burned in order to free up the ship's crews for his floating fortresses.

The basis of Octavian's fleet (260 ships), commanded by the famous commander Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, consisted of biremes and light maneuverable ships with one (rarely two) rows of oars. This new type The Romans borrowed ships from Illyrian pirates and called them “Liburnians” - after the name of the Illyrian tribe. Liburns, as a rule, had only one row of oars, were no more than 30 m in length and about 4-5 m in width. The crew consisted of 84 oarsmen and 36 other servants. Liburns were adapted for maritime robbery, and at the same time for the actions of the maritime police, that is, for the pursuit of pirates. Compared to Antony's heavy capital ships, which had poorly trained crews, the new ships were dangerous weapons with well-trained crews. In addition, such ships were quickly built, and damaged ones could be replaced with new ones from the reserve. The boarding parties on Octavian's ships numbered 34 thousand legionnaires.


Agrippa loaded all his soldiers onto the ships and took a wait-and-see position a mile (1.6 km) from the shore, hoping that Antony's larger ships would sail into open water, where each of them could be attacked by two of his ships at once. Antony, for his part, tried to provoke a battle closer to the coast, where his fleet could not be surrounded. But the wind foreshadowed good weather. By noon, a strong southeast wind blew, which could have carried Antony's ships with sails far from Agrippa's fleet, whose sails remained on the shore. Therefore, in the afternoon, Anthony tried to go out to sea as far as possible, where he could catch the wind.

Plutarch left an excellent description battles of Actium. First, Antony's left wing moved forward, and then the fleet entered the battle. Meanwhile, Agrippa, who commanded the left wing, began to deploy a line against Antony's right flank. Antony's right wing was forced to advance north to counter this, and in the process became separated from its center. At this point, Cleopatra's squadron was able to break through the center of Octavian's line, which was obviously Antony's plan. Antony also managed to save part of his right wing. It was too difficult for his flagship to break away from the enemy, so Antony switched to another ship and escaped. It all happened in the afternoon, when the wind began to get stronger and changed direction so that Anthony’s ships were able to use their sails. Two hours later, around 1600 hours, the remnants of Antony's fleet began to surrender.

Battle of Aktsum became decisive in the confrontation between “young Caesar” and the freethinker Mark Antony. Shortly after the naval defeat of the 19 legions ground forces Antony joined Octavian's army (which was smaller in number). Mark Antony and Cleopatra fled to Alexandria, where they lived whole year waiting for the inevitable end. The era of the Roman Empire has arrived. Contemporaries soon felt the turning point that had taken place. Many cities and provinces began to keep official chronology from September 2, 31 BC. e. (the so-called Aktian era). For several centuries, the peoples of the Mediterranean had reason to consider this day one of the most important in the history of the region. In memory of the victory, Octavian established the Actium Games in Nicopolis and lasted for about three centuries.

September 2, 31 BC Octavian, or rather his admiral Agrippa, completely defeated the fleet of Mark Antony, effectively deciding the outcome of the civil war. During the middle battle, Cleopatra, along with 60 Egyptian ships, left the battle with a fair wind and rushed south. Anthony rushed after her on a light penther. Ancient authors attribute Cleopatra's flight to feminine timidity and deceit, and Antony's flight to a fit of insane and shameful passion. They cannot explain it any other way, since they write from the words of Octavian himself and his official historians. This explanation fits well with the caricatured images of the “Egyptian fury” and the “madman in love” created by Octavian propaganda even before the start of the war. However, this version, which has been repeated by poets and many history textbooks for many centuries, can hardly be considered acceptable. If there is nothing implausible in the flight of the frightened queen, then it is difficult to believe that an experienced general and politician left the army to catch up with his mistress who betrayed him. Modern historians offer various alternative explanations. The most plausible version seems to me to be the one first proposed in the 19th century by J. de la Gravière, according to which the escape was pre-planned by Anthony. It not only sounds more natural, but is also confirmed by an analysis of the situation before the battle and Anthony's preparations known to us. To understand the arguments in favor of this version, we need to go back a few months and analyze the position of Antony’s army on the eve of the battle.

Balance of power before the start of the war

Antony's army and navy were significantly superior to Octavian's forces. Some historians believe that he should have immediately marched on Italy. However, on the one hand, this was associated with many technical difficulties. On the other hand, it was not clear what to do with Cleopatra. Taking her with him, Anthony would have caused active resistance from the Romans. If he left, he could lose the financial and material support of Egypt. Yes, apparently, he himself did not have the slightest desire to part with her. At the same time, Octavian's position was not very simple. Primarily due to financial difficulties. He actually did not have the means to maintain an army, and an attempt to increase taxes led to open riots. Time was on Anthony's side, and he firmly decided not to go to Italy until the decisive battle, which Octavian had no opportunity to postpone. Let Octavian experience all the difficulties and risks of the campaign. Anthony preferred to give him battle on his own territory. This approach seems very rational. In any case, many then believed that Anthony would win. Noble Romans began to gradually move to his side. They just didn’t take into account that Octavian had one decisive trump card - Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, " best man of his time" (Dion Cassius) and "undoubtedly the only Roman who had a talent for waging naval wars" (A. Shtenzel).

Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa


Summer 31 BC

Agrippa's actions were very risky, but surprisingly successful. In early March, when the navigation season was just beginning, and Anthony’s troops were still holed up in winter quarters, he and most of the fleet crossed the sea and, with an unexpected blow, occupied the considered impregnable port of Methona in Messenia, in the southwest of the Peloponnese. In the 15th century, the Venetians defended Methona from the Turks for 40 years. Agrippa took it in a few days. With this victory the situation immediately changed. Agrippa received an excellent base for attacks on other ports of Antony, who had to use almost his entire fleet to guard the coast. This allowed Agrippa to almost completely interrupt the supply of grain from Egypt to Greece. Anthony's army began to have food problems. Meanwhile, the tireless Agrippa captured the islands, strengthening control over sea communications.

Agrippa convinced Octavian to cross with the army to Epirus, which, in view of the proximity of a significant enemy fleet, seemed a very risky undertaking. However, Antony's naval patrols did not detect the crossing army because there were no patrols. All ships were busy guarding the coast and trying to organize grain supplies from Egypt.

Octavian landed a 75,000-strong army in the area of ​​Thorin ("The Stirrer") - just 20 miles from Actium - the main base of Octavian's army and navy. Cleopatra joked: “Let him sit on the stirrer.” But Anthony was no longer in the mood for jokes. He hurried to the army, which was now cut off from communications not only by sea, but also by land. The only source of food was the already exhausted local population. In addition, a malaria epidemic began in the army. Now time was working against Anthony. Feeling where the wind was blowing, many began to run over to Octavian’s side. Among them, for example, was the consul Domitius Ahenobarbus. Discontent grew among the client kings and their troops.

In early August, Anthony attempted to break the blockade. Agrippa successfully prevented all attempts to break through by sea. Then Antony tried a cavalry attack on Octavine's position. But it failed because... the king of Galatia used it to go over to Octavian’s side along with 2000 Galatian horsemen.

Before the battle

It was necessary to organize another breakthrough. Anthony convened a council of war. At this council, Canidius, the commander of the ground forces, made a big speech. He spoke of the plight of the navy, which had become a burden to the army; while the enemy fleet, on the contrary, is well equipped and manned, and Octavian’s sailors have extensive combat experience. But on land, Anthony has a numerical superiority (100 thousand versus 75 thousand). Canidius proposed burning the fleet, retreating into the depths of Macedonia and Thrace and fighting a decisive battle there. Cleopatra sharply objected to Canidius. She indicated that with the loss of the fleet, communication with the main supply base - Egypt - would be interrupted. Even having won a victory on land, Anthony would be unable to either cross over to Italy or retreat to Egypt. He is often accused of simply following his mistress’s lead. We will never know what would have happened if Antony had chosen the ground operation. But his chances in this case, in my opinion, were not very high. Good analysis This option is given in Chapter V of Alfred Stenzel's book "History of Wars at Sea". On the contrary, if he managed to lead the fleet out of the trap, then all worries about food would disappear for him and he would, in turn, have the opportunity to complicate the supply of the enemy. In addition, it is very likely that Anthony was not confident in the reliability of his ground army. The choice of sea battle looks, in my opinion, very rational decision.

Preparing for battle

Due to desertion and malaria, Anthony experienced a great shortage of sailors. Especially the rowers. He could barely man a little more than half of his ships. He ordered the rest to be burned. According to Alfred Stenzel, this decision should be considered a mistake, since his own soldiers could only understand this as an admission that he himself no longer hoped for victory and preferred to burn the ships that he could not use in battle, so as not to give them to the enemy. It would have been better to give the ships to Octavian, but to maintain the morale of the army before the battle.

In those days, warships usually went into battle leaving their sails on the shore. The battle was still fought with oars, and heavy sails only reduced the maneuverability of the ships. However, Anthony ordered the sails to be loaded, explaining this by the need to pursue the defeated enemy after the battle. Not a plausible explanation!

In my opinion, the decision to burn some of the ships and take the sails on board clearly indicates that from the very beginning Anthony was striving not for victory, but for a breakthrough.

Battle


The state of the sources makes it difficult to restore the true picture of the Battle of Actium, and it is therefore not surprising that in special studies even the nature of the battle is defined differently. The following picture, developed by I. Kromayer, seems to me the most plausible:

The battle was planned by Anthony in the form of a breakthrough of his fleet with legionnaires boarded on ships (20 thousand legionnaires and 2 thousand archers were taken on board). Octavian's fleet was much larger than Antony's and consisted of much smaller but more mobile ships. Agrippa planned to attack the enemy by surrounding his large ships with a group of his small ones (tactics " wolf pack"). Therefore, Antony gave the order for the ships to remain in close formation, without leaving the Ambracian Gulf, and to adhere to strictly defensive tactics. However, the enemy did not attack, the wait became aimless, and the left wing of Antony's fleet moved forward. The right flank of Octavian's battle line pulled back , in order to lure the enemy out of the narrow throat of the bay and gain the opportunity to use their numerical superiority, and in the operational space came into combat contact with the Antonians. In close combat, all the advantages were on the side of Octavian's experienced sailors, who had lighter and more maneuverable ships. When Agrippa began to surround enemy ships, the Antonian admiral Poplicola, undertaking a counter-maneuver, stretched his battle formation until a gap formed in it. L. Arruntius, commander of the left wing of Octavian's fleet, immediately took advantage of this to attack. The position of the Antonians became critical. It was at this moment that Antony decided to save what what else was possible. He gave a prearranged signal, which Cleopatra followed first. Her squadron, consisting of fast, but not very combat-ready ships, on which there were almost no legionnaires, but the entire treasury of Anthony was placed in advance, was in reserve. She managed to slip through a gap in the battle formations of the combatants. Few were able to follow her example - most of Antony's ships that were drawn into the battle (including the flagship) died or were captured.

Sources

Plutarch

On the border of Greece and Epirus

Bottom line Octavian's victory Opponents
Commanders Losses Media files on Wikimedia Commons

Battle of Cape Actium(lat. Actiaca Pugna; September 2, 31 BC) - the last great naval battle of antiquity between the fleets of Ancient Rome on final stage period of civil wars.

General situation

A decisive naval battle near Cape Actium (northwestern Greece) between the fleets of Mark Antony and Octavian Augustus ended the period of civil wars in Rome. Octavian's fleet was commanded by Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, and Antony's ally was the Egyptian queen Cleopatra. Ancient accounts of this battle are probably not entirely objective: most claim that at the climax of the battle, Cleopatra fled with her fleet to Egypt, and Antony followed her. However, the main goal that Antony set for himself when entering the battle could have been to break the blockade, but the idea was implemented extremely unsuccessfully: a smaller part of the fleet broke through, and the main part of the fleet and Antony’s ground army, being blocked, surrendered and went over to Octavian’s side. Octavian won a decisive victory, achieved unconditional power over the Roman state and eventually became the first Roman emperor since 27 BC. e. under the name Augusta.

Of the ancient historians whose works have survived to this day, the battle of Actium was most fully described by Plutarch and Dio Cassius. Both used memoirs of participants and contemporaries of events that have not reached us. Important information about this battle is also contained in the odes of Horace and the Roman History of Velleius Paterculus.

The battle was decided further development Roman state for the next centuries. Anthony brought to Rome the Hellenistic idea of ​​a hero-king, a living deity on earth, a new Alexander the Great. Octavian’s idea was a kind of “republican monarchy”, which, based on eternal Roman values, masked the sole power of the “first citizen” with a “reborn republic”. Octavian’s winning idea was called “principate” by historians.

Enemy forces

Antique warships

It was at this moment that something no one expected happened. Cleopatra, instead of bringing her 60 light ships into battle, turned south and left the battle with a fair wind. Mark Antony, having learned about this, switched from the flagship to a high-speed penther and caught up with the queen. After the commanders-in-chief fled, the battle continued for several more hours. Some ships threw heavy missile engines overboard in an attempt to escape, but the main forces held out until the end. Agrippa used massive amounts of incendiary shells and only a few of Antony’s ships managed to escape back into the bay, only to then surrender to the victorious Octavian. Octavian himself spent the sea battle in his cabin, suffering from seasickness.

According to legend, Mark Antony sat in prostration for four days on the bow of the ship. Only in the Peloponnese did he share a bed with Cleopatra. On the shore, Anthony began to send orders to the troops, but it was too late.

The ground army held out for another seven days. Despite the already obvious fact of escape, the soldiers continued to believe that Mark Antony would return and lead them into battle. It all ended only after its commander, Publius Canidius Crassus, left the army. Then 19 of Antony's legions joined Octavian's army.

Modern researchers are trying to rationally explain the behavior of Mark Antony and Cleopatra in this battle, since it is clear that most of the information about the battle belongs to the supporters of the victorious Octavian Augustus, and it was they who formed such an unattractive image of a traitor who abandoned his loyal army for his mistress. A version was put forward that Mark Antony and Cleopatra from the very beginning planned to withdraw only part of the fleet, since

Battle of Cape Actium

31 BC e.

In March 44 BC. e. The “eternal” dictator of Rome, the man who laid the foundations of the empire, Gaius Julius Caesar, dies under the daggers of assassins. His killers sought to revive the Republic, but the era had already changed and their plans were not destined to come true. Caesar's closest ally, Mark Antony, takes over the reins of power. It seemed that the transfer of power would take place without a hitch, but then an eighteen-year-old young man, Gaius Octavius, appears in Rome and claims that he was adopted by Caesar, and it is to him that the great man’s inheritance belongs. At first, Mark Antony, feeling the power of Caesar’s legions behind him, laughed at the young man’s ridiculous requests. But it soon became clear that Octavius ​​was telling the truth, that his new name was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavian, and that the numerous legions of the nascent empire were still the legions of Caesar, and not the legions of Mark Antony. The result was a division of power, first formalized as a triumvirate, and after being removed from power in 36 BC. e. another of Caesar's comrades, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, who became a duumvirate. According to the agreement of the duumvirs, Octavian received the west of the empire, and Antony received the east. But everyone in Rome understood that such a situation could not last long, and the decisive clash for sole power over Rome was just around the corner. The hour struck in 31 BC. e.

Battle of Cape Actium. Lorenzo A. Castro. 1672

The decisive battle between the army and navy of Anthony and Octavian took place in 31 BC. e. at Cape Aktium (Aktium is a cape and city of the same name in North-Western Greece on the shores of the Ambracian Gulf). The circumstances that led to this battle were as follows. Anthony, under the influence of the Queen of Egypt Cleopatra, decided to land in Italy, where he had many followers. Success depended on quick and decisive action, but Anthony was in no hurry to implement his plan. He moved to Greece and slowly began to gather his numerous legions there. Only in the late autumn of 32 BC. e. he went to the island of Corfu as an intermediate base for transferring the army to Italy and settled in Western Greece for winter quarters. Thus, the landing was postponed until next year, which, of course, was not in the best possible way affected Antony's soldiers, who found themselves in poorly prepared camps. Moreover, this inexplicable delay gave Octavian the opportunity to prepare well for war.

The success of the enterprise for Antony became increasingly doubtful, and some allies began to fall away from him. In his army, hardships, illnesses, and desertion began. By the spring of 31 BC. e. About a third of the personnel deserted from Antony's ships. At the same time, during the winter Octavian assembled an army of eighty thousand infantry and twelve thousand cavalry. His general Agrippa equipped a fleet of two hundred and sixty liburnae, equipping the ships with various new devices for throwing incendiary compositions. He began to capture enemy transports that were delivering food and ammunition. During these raids, Agrippa received accurate information about the condition and disposition of Antony's army. In total, Anthony had one hundred thousand infantry, twelve thousand cavalry and about three hundred and seventy ships in Greece.

The fleet of Mark Antony and Cleopatra, at first glance, was significantly superior in combat power to the fleet of Octavian. For the most part, these were huge, powerful ships with a strong ram and a wooden armored belt, often sheathed in copper to protect against ramming attacks. The height of the side in the middle of the ship reached three meters and increased from the bow and stern so that it was difficult to board them. On the deck there were heavy throwing machines and towers for hanging projectiles. However, ships of this design were slow and clumsy; their offensive power consisted mainly of incendiary and throwing shells. The action of the latter was directed not so much against the ships as against the crews. Antony placed twenty-five thousand soldiers on the ships, not counting the crews. Anthony ordered some of the ships of the Egyptian allies to be burned in order to free up ship crews for his floating fortresses, since desertion and disease were curtailed personnel With almost half of his fleet, Agrippa persuaded Octavian, despite the smaller number of army and navy, to go on the offensive. The sudden appearance of Octavian's military forces made a strong impression on the enemy. Antony transported his army to Cape Actium, but did not dare to attack. Octavian also did not move, hoping for further disintegration of Antony's army. In addition, every day the favorable time for a major landing operation in Italy was passing away. In addition, Agrippa, without wasting any time, captured the island of Leucadia and the cities of Patras and Corinth, while defeating the Corinthian fleet and depriving Anthony of food supplies. The position of Anthony's army was becoming critical.

September 2, 31 BC e. Antony led the fleet out of the gulf and lined it up in such a way that its flanks were almost adjacent to the shores, and behind it was the entrance to the Ambracian Gulf, along the shores of which his land army stood. Antony's plan, according to historians, was to abandon maneuvers, keep his ships in close formation and wait for an attack from the enemy, who, according to his assumption, could do nothing against the heavy ships. Cleopatra stood ready in the center with her ships. Agrippa moved towards Antony's battle line in an arched formation, trying to cover the enemy's flanks.

Antony's ships were out of reach of the Liburns, and the Liburns easily avoided the clumsy monsters. Taking advantage of Antony's passivity, Agrippa, with the help of coordinated maneuvers of his fleet, managed to lure Antony's left and right flanks forward, as a result of which the latter's formation was broken. Then Agrippa suddenly attacked the enemy fleet - his fast liburines engulfed Antony's floating fortresses from all sides. Antony's ships, protected by an armor belt, were not afraid of ramming attacks, and their high sides and soldiers on board saved them from boarding. Like the battles of modern times, at the first stage the battle was reduced to a skirmish. Such a struggle, according to Plutarch, was more reminiscent of a battle at the fortress walls than a naval battle. The fast-moving Liburnians attacked Antony's large ships in threes or fours, but for a long time the outcome of the battle was completely unclear.

But it was at that moment that something no one expected happened. Cleopatra, instead of bringing sixty of her light, fast ships into battle, capable of successfully fighting similar ships of Agrippa, turned south and left the battle with a fair wind. Mark Antony, having learned about this, moved from the flagship to the fastest ship and caught up with the queen. But even after the commanders-in-chief fled, the battle continued for several more hours. Anthony's fleet, even having lost a single command, continued desperate resistance. Some ships threw heavy missiles overboard in an attempt to escape, but the main forces held out until the end. Agrippa used massive amounts of incendiary shells, and only a few of Antony's ships managed to get back into the bay - but only to then surrender to the victorious Octavian.

The ground army held out for another seven days. Despite the already obvious fact of the commander’s escape, the soldiers continued to believe that Mark Antony would return and lead them into battle. It all ended only after its commander, Canidius Crassus, left the army. Then nineteen of Antony's legions joined Octavian's army.

Modern researchers are trying to rationally explain the behavior of Mark Antony and Cleopatra in this battle, since it is clear that most of the information about the battle belongs to the supporters of the victorious Octavian Augustus, and it was they who formed such an unattractive image of a traitor who abandoned his loyal army because of his mistress. A version was put forward that Mark Antony and Cleopatra from the very beginning planned to withdraw only part of the fleet, since fresh legions were waiting for them in Egypt. Another version is that after the formation was broken, the ships of the left flank returned to the bay, but the ships of the right flank were unable to do this because of Cleopatra’s ships and surrendered. Realizing that the battle was lost, Cleopatra broke out of the encirclement with her ships, and Mark Antony went after her.

Be that as it may, the Battle of Cape Actium ended in a crushing defeat for Antony. Having lost the entire fleet and most of the army, Anthony in Egypt for another year in complete prostration awaited the inevitable end, which was not slow in coming on August 1 of the following year. Now there was only one leader in Rome. The time of the Empire has begun.

From the book Great Battles [fragment] author

Battle of Plataea 479 BC e. The Battle of Plataea is one of the largest land battles of the Greco-Persian wars, which took place, according to one version, on August 30, according to another, on September 9, 479 BC. e. (Attempts to determine the exact day differ due to errors in the Greek

From the book The First Blitzkrieg. August 1914 [comp. S. Pereslegin] by Tuckman Barbara

Battle of Leuctra 371 BC e. The Battle of Leuctra was a battle that took place during the Boeotian War between the Thebans and their Boeotian allies, led by the Boeotarch Epaminondas, on the one hand, and the Spartans and their Peloponnesian allies, led by the king

From the book Vienna, 1683 author Podhorodetsky Leszek

Battle of Chaeronea 338 BC. e. In the 4th century BC. e. North of Hellas was the small mountainous country of Macedonia. Separated from the Hellenic city-states by the vast Thessaly, Macedonia was considered a barbarian country among the Greeks themselves, although by the middle of the 4th century BC. e. Macedonian

From the book CIA vs. KGB. The art of espionage [trans. V. Chernyavsky, Yu. Chuprov] by Dulles Allen

Battle of Ipsus 301 BC e. After the great eastern campaign, Alexander the Great did not live long. In 323 BC. e. the great conqueror who created the most grandiose empire of the ancient era dies at the age of thirty-three. He bequeathed a huge power to his not yet

From the book Great Battles. 100 battles that changed the course of history author Domanin Alexander Anatolievich

Battle of Cannae 216 BC e. Among hundreds of battles of the ancient era special place occupies the Battle of Cannae, which became the largest battle of the Second Punic War - the war for supremacy in the Mediterranean between the two great powers of the time, Roman and Carthaginian

From the book The Largest Tank Battle of the Great Patriotic War. Battle for Eagle author Shchekotikhin Egor

Battle of Cape Actium 31 BC. e. In March 44 BC. e. The “eternal” dictator of Rome, the man who laid the foundations of the empire, Gaius Julius Caesar, dies under the daggers of assassins. His killers sought to revive the Republic, but the era had already changed and their plans were not destined to

From the book of Zhukov. The ups, downs and unknown pages of the life of the great marshal author Gromov Alex

From the book Heroes of the Mediterranean author Shigin Vladimir Vilenovich

From the book Punishing Sword of Admiral Kolchak author Khandorin Vladimir Gennadievich

The form of Soviet actions is changing The success of Soviet intelligence in achieving its goals is most clearly illustrated by its operations during the Second World War, which we learned about much later. At the same time, it must be recognized that many Soviet actions have not yet been included in

From the book 1812. Generals Patriotic War author Boyarintsev Vladimir Ivanovich

Battle of the Lech River (Battle of Augsburg) 955 The 8th–10th centuries turned out to be difficult for the peoples Western Europe. The 8th century was a struggle against Arab invasions, which were repelled only at the cost of enormous effort. Almost the entire 9th century passed in the struggle against cruel and victorious

From the book SMERSH without the “Secret” stamp author Lenchevsky Yuri

BATTLE FOR EAGLE - THE DECISIVE BATTLE OF THE SUMMER 1943 Second World War- the largest conflict in history, greatest tragedy, staged by a man on her stage. In the enormous scale of war, the individual dramas that make up the whole can easily get lost. The duty of the historian and his

From the author's book

Battle of Stalingrad. The Battle of Rzhev as a cover and a distraction On July 12, 1942, by decision of the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command, the Stalingrad Front was formed under the command of Marshal S.K. Timoshenko, who was tasked with preventing

From the author's book

Battle for the Islands Lacking solid regular forces to resist the French on land, Senyavin still managed to capture a port no less important than Ragusa, confusing all the cards for both the Austrians and the French. Now Senyavin turned his attention to the Kortsula Islands,

From the author's book

Section 3. MAIN AREAS OF ACTIVITY SUPPRESSING INTELLIGENCE AND DISRUPTIVE ACTIONS OF SOVIET AND FOREIGN SPECIAL SERVICES According to the above-mentioned “Temporary Regulations”, the primary task of counterintelligence has traditionally been “detection and examination

From the author's book

Battle of Borodino The Battle of Borodino is one of the bloodiest in history: up to one hundred thousand people were killed, wounded and missing in one day. biggest battle Patriotic War of 1812 between the Russian and French armies, which took place at

From the author's book

Chapter Eleven. The failure of the Zeppelin shares Lieutenant Konstantin Sumtsov managed to successfully legalize himself in the Abwehr. He facilitated the transfer of teenagers studying at a sabotage school near Kassel to the Red Army, which actively contributed to the failure

Octavian won. The Battle of Cape Actium off the coast of Epirus was destined to become the last great naval battle of antiquity. It is generally accepted that it was on that day, September 2, 31 BC, that the fate of the Roman state was decided - the winner in the long-term struggle for sole power was the adopted (more precisely, adopted by will) son of Julius Caesar, Octavian, a few years later receiving the honorary title of Augustus, under which he went down in history.

According to ancient tradition, the decisive role during the battle of Actium was played by the unexpected betrayal on the part of the Egyptian queen Cleopatra, who, in the midst of the battle, left the fleet of her husband and patron Mark Antony and fled. Anthony himself rushed after the Egyptian squadron. His fleet, deprived of unified command as a result of this, was destroyed, and the land army surrendered to the winner a few days later.

The official version and unclear questions. It was this version of the final battle for power in Rome that dominated historical literature for a long time. However, there is reason to believe that the true picture of that grandiose historical drama was carefully and skillfully retouched: most ancient sources reflected only the point of view of the victors. On the other hand, it must be borne in mind that the official interpretation of the war between Antony and Octavian was developed by Octavian's headquarters for immediate use as a propaganda weapon.

It follows that gross distortion of facts can be excluded, because witnesses and participants in the war would have noticed this immediately. Therefore, there is no reason to doubt that on the day of the battle Cleopatra’s squadron really left the battlefield, Anthony did the same, his fleet was defeated, and the army capitulated. The question remains open about the reasons that prompted Octavian’s opponents to act in this way: after all, they had to understand that this would decide not only the outcome of the war, but also their personal fate.

Preparation of the parties. By the time hostilities began, both sides had conducted intensive propaganda, political and diplomatic preparations for the military campaign. It can be said without exaggeration that on all counts Octavian managed to beat Antony in this. A subtle calculation was even present in the fact that war on the part of Rome (that is, Octavian) was declared not on Antony, but on Cleopatra - for appropriating the “property of the Roman people.” This maneuver was undertaken to show that the civil wars were finally over, a new campaign against the foreign queen would be of the nature external war, and Octavian’s enmity with Antony has only the character of a private feud (inimicitia) between two Romans. At the same time, it was emphasized that Antony, having contacted Cleopatra, betrayed both the Romans and the cause of Caesar to please her, while Octavian protected not only the Caesarians, but also the entire Western civilization from the danger approaching it from the East.

Thus, Octavian’s headquarters was able to create an ideological basis for the fight against Anthony that suited the majority of Roman society, and the ruler of the Roman East was unable to counter his opponent’s propaganda with anything of equal value. Therefore, it is not surprising that Anthony’s party began to rapidly melt away with the outbreak of hostilities, and reprisals against those suspected of wanting to desert only accelerated this process.

The situation in Anthony's army is critical. By the end of the summer of 31 BC. Anthony, with his army and fleet concentrated in Epirus, found himself in critical situation, which required an immediate solution. His armed forces were disintegrating before his eyes: the Roman historian, assessing the situation from the point of view of Octavian’s supporters, stated: “No one ran from here to Anthony, from there to Caesar (i.e. Octavian) someone ran across every day.” The army had to be paid and paid generously, but Anthony no longer had this opportunity. Octavian's fleet landed troops at the most vulnerable points of enemy communications and managed to block Antony from the sea. The supplies in the latter’s camp were running low, which forced Anthony to convene a military council to discuss a plan for further action.

The council participants, Antony and Cleopatra himself and their senior military leaders, had to proceed from the indisputable fact that as a result of the actions of the enemy and Antony’s own mistakes, the need for a general battle practically disappeared: the war had already been lost in the East. Realizing this, the council participants, having discussed various options, ultimately accepted Cleopatra’s proposal to leave garrisons in the most important points of the Balkan provinces of Antonia, and for the fleet with part of the troops to break the blockade and continue the war in the East.

Octavian's fleet awaits the enemy. That same night, through defectors, this decision became known to Octavian. Absolutely confident that the main thing had already been done, at first he even intended to provide the enemy fleet with the opportunity to escape unhindered. But his headquarters, professional military men, dissuaded him from such a risky step, fearing that the enemy would retain too large forces and, as a consequence of this, the opportunity to continue resistance in the East. Thus, Octavian's fleet continued to cruise on the high seas, blocking the exit from the Ambracian Gulf. The sailors had a hard time: there was strong excitement at sea, which for four days in a row made it impossible to start a battle. Finally, by the morning of September 2, the wind died down and the sea became smooth as a mirror.

Antony prepares the fleet for battle. In preparation for battle, Anthony gave the order to burn some of the ships and equip only the most powerful ones for battle, from triremes to ships with ten rows of oars. On board, contrary to custom, it was ordered to take sails. 20 thousand legionnaires and 2 thousand archers were placed on the decks. They said that one commander of the cohort, a veteran, all cut up in countless battles under the command of Antony, saw him, burst into tears and said: “Ah, emperor, you no longer believe these scars and this sword and place all your hopes on treacherous logs and boards! Let the Egyptians and Phoenicians fight at sea, and give us the land on which we are accustomed to stand firmly with both feet, and either die or defeat the enemy! " Anthony did not answer and, calling on the old warrior to take courage with his eyes and a movement of his hand, he walked past.

Octavian's fleet was much larger in number than Antony's ships that were put on alert. Therefore, Anthony believed that the battle would begin with an attack by the enemy, and decided to adhere to strictly defensive tactics. He, “circling his ships in a boat, called on the warriors to fight confidently, as if on land, relying on the heavy weight of the ships, and punished the helmsmen, taking the blows of enemy rams, to keep the ships in place, as if they were anchored, and to beware of strong currents in the throat of the bay" (Plutarch). However, as time passed, the enemy, contrary to expectation, did not attack, and around noon a strong wind arose from the sea. Then the left wing of Antony's fleet moved forward.

The plans of Octavian and Antony. Octavian observed the enemy fleet from aboard the flagship trireme and was surprised at how motionless Antony's ships stood in the throat of the bay. He decided that they had dropped anchor and, suspecting some kind of trick, kept his battle line about eight furlongs from the enemy. When Antony's ships went forward, then, according to Plutarch, “Caesar was delighted and ordered the right wing to reverse in order to lure the enemy out of the bay even further, and then surround him and, with his well-equipped ships, hit the ships, which were made clumsy and clumsy by excessive heaviness and shortage of rowers."

Thus, Antony hoped to force the enemy into battle at the neck of the bay, where he could not use his numerical superiority, so that a breakthrough by the Antonians could become a reality. Octavian, on the contrary, planned to lure Antony's fleet into the open sea in order to surround it from the flanks. Since Octavian did not want to be the first to enter the battle, Antony could either return to the harbor (a clearly losing option) or accept the battle on the enemy’s terms, which was done.

The battle. On the high seas, Octavian's fleet had an excellent opportunity to use the numerical superiority and better maneuverability of their ships: their battle line pulled back and, once in the operational space, came into combat contact with the Antonians. According to the description of Plutarch, our main source, even in close combat “there were no ram strikes or holes, because Antony’s cargo ships could not gain acceleration, on which the strength of the ram mainly depends, and Caesar’s ships not only avoided head-on collisions, fearing the impenetrable copper plating of the bow, but did not dare to hit the sides, because the ram was breaking into pieces, bumping into the thick tetrahedral beams of the hull, connected with iron staples. The fight was like a land battle, or, more precisely, like a battle near fortress walls. Three, and or even four ships at once attacked one enemy ship, and siege canopies, throwing spears, spears and incendiary shells were used, and Anthony’s ships even fired from catapults installed in wooden towers.”


When Agrippa began to surround the enemy ships, the Antonian admiral Poplicola, undertaking a counter-maneuver, stretched his battle formation until a gap formed in it. Lucius Arruntius, commander of the left wing of Octavian's fleet, immediately took advantage of this to attack. The battle began to boil all along the battle line of both fleets, but in the center it was torn apart. Due to the fact that the position of the Antonians had become critical, it was at that moment that Anthony gave the prearranged signal - to make a breakthrough. But only Cleopatra’s squadron, which was in reserve and managed to slip through a gap (or gaps) in the combat formations of the combatants, could follow this command. Anthony's first ships were also able to break away from the enemy and go out to the open sea, raising their sails. Anthony, however, had to transfer to another ship: the flagship was too conspicuous a target and was eventually captured by the enemy.

The breakthrough plan fails. But then the breakthrough plan began to crumble before our eyes. The remaining ships of the first line should have immediately followed Anthony, but only a few of them were able to break through - the enemy's numerical superiority was too great. About 40 of Antony's ships were lost in the battle, and the rest were driven back into the bay and blocked there. In the morning they had to surrender.

Flight of Antony and Cleopatra. The surviving ships reached Cape Tenar in the Peloponnese three days later. Then Antony and Cleopatra apparently believed that they had lost the battle, but not the war. However, a few days later, a message arrived about the surrender of the land army, which, according to Anthony’s order, was supposed to retreat to Macedonia. Anthony and Cleopatra could only flee to Egypt, where almost a year later they met death.

The meaning of the battle. If we evaluate the significance of the Battle of Actium, it must be emphasized that Antony lost it long before it began. Realizing this, the Antonians decided to break through to the East and continue the war there. The plan was partially successful, but the expectation of continuing the war turned out to be deeply mistaken. Thus, the battle of Actium meant the final triumph of Octavian's party and the bankruptcy of Antony's policy.

Results of the civil war. Overall Second Civil War in Rome, with interruptions, lasted for almost two decades (49-30 BC), ended with the fall of the republican system and the establishment of the monarchy, however, in the specific Roman form of the principate, when all republican institutions were preserved and continued to function, and the ruler, power which had a military character, therefore bearing the title of emperor, in relation to civilian population was considered a princeps, i.e. first among his equals in dignity (meaning senators).

Share with friends or save for yourself:

Loading...