Yeletsky city court of Lipetsk region

The history of the Yeletsk court of the Lipetsk region began along with the formation of the judicial system in the region. The beginning of its activity was carried out in the conditions of the creation of a system of post-war justice. At its origins were the participants of the Great Patriotic War - people's judges, who made a great contribution to the development of the court.

Since 1954, in the history of the court there have remained many worthy names of employees who were directly involved in the formation of a positive attitude towards Russian justice... Over the years, several generations have changed, through whose efforts the Yeletsky city court was created.

During his work, the composition was constantly changing, the staff was increasing. Per last years The Yeletsky court, which exercises judicial power in Lipetsk, became a full member of the judicial system in the region.

From the very beginning of the work of the Yeletsky District Court, its staff included only two judges (according to the legislation of that time). On May 3, 1954, the Council of Ministers issued a Resolution, which approved the network of people's courts in several regions, which included the Lipetsk region. In the Yeletsk region, two judicial sections were formed.

Then the Yeletsky city court of the Lipetsk region was located in a residential building in a cramped room. In 1986, the district court was located in the building of the former district committee of the CPSU. In 1991, in accordance with the Presidential Decree Russian Federation a new building was allocated to him.

In 1987, with the increase in the workload, there were 3 judges, in 2000 - 4 judges, in 2005 - 6 judges. In addition, in 2000 in the Yeletskiy court, 2 peace judicial sites were formed. Their activities continue to this day.

Since April 2008, the Izmalkovsky District Court has been included in the Yeletsky District Court. Now the Yeletsky court is located in two buildings:

The Yeletsky court is a launching pad for the introduction and application of juvenile justice technologies. The third floor has all the necessary equipment for the operation of the juvenile court.

The apparatus of the Yeletsk court

Over time, the apparatus of the Yeletsk court of the Lipetsk region increased due to the consolidation of the courts. Currently, its staff consists of 24 people:

· 7 assistant judges;
Assistant to the president of the court:
· Deputy heads of the department;
· 2 chief specialists;
· Senior specialist of the 1st category;
· 2 heads of department;
· Court clerk;
· 9 secretaries of the court session.

The majority of employees have a university degree in law, and about one third of them have two higher education... The team of the Eletsk City Court of the Lipetsk Region is very friendly and close-knit, is able to promptly solve the problems that have arisen, is constantly working to improve its professional level, attends various seminars of the Regional Court and the Office of the Judicial Department, the Central Branch Russian Academy justice.

Eletsk city court website

The Yeletsky court of the Lipetsk region has its own official website, where you can get high-quality and reliable information about its activities, the course and procedure of work, and the adopted court decisions.

In addition to general information about the court (reception hours, addresses, structure, working hours, contact phone numbers) on the website you can find information about each case in the section "Legal Proceedings". In the Hearing section, you can find out about the cases that are scheduled for hearing on the current date.

You can get acquainted with the judicial acts adopted on the basis of the considered cases in various categories in the section "Adopted judicial acts". Also, by visiting the site of the Yeletsk court, you can find information on the legal basis of its activities, which are enshrined in the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Yeletskiy court - fair justice guarding the protection of citizens' rights.

Decision of November 29, 2018 in case No. 2A-656/2018

Refuse Olesya Valerievna Kalinina in an administrative claim against the Rosreestr Office in the Lipetsk Region and Robert Vaganovich Taslakyan to declare illegal the decision to suspend the state cadastral registration and state registration of rights dated 02.07.2018, the decision to refuse to carry out state cadastral registration and state registration of rights from 02.10.2018.

Resolution of November 28, 2018 in case No. 5-А40 / 2018

DD.MM.YYYY chief specialist - expert of the territorial department of the Office of Rospotrebnadzor in the Lipetsk region in Yelets, Dolgorukovsky, Yeletsky, Izmalkovsky, Stanovlyansky districts in the implementation of unscheduled supervision activities on the basis of the order of the Office of Rospotrebnadzor in the Lipetsk region in relation to the State Healthcare Institution "RB" Izmalkov a protocol was drawn up on an administrative offense under Art. 6.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation ...

Decision of November 26, 2018 in case No. 2-679 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

The claim of the prosecutor of the Yeletsky district in the interests of an indefinite circle of persons for compulsion to conduct a special assessment of working conditions to satisfy: To oblige the individual entrepreneur Ryazanova Natalia Ivanovna, within a month from the date of entry into force of the decision, to conduct a special assessment of the working conditions of the workplaces of the machine operator and handyman. Collect from SP Ryazanova N.AND. to the Yeletsky budget municipal district state fee in the amount of 300 (three hundred) rubles ...

The verdict of November 23, 2018 in case No. 1-92 / 2018

Muratov S.A. made illegal acquisition, storage without the purpose of selling narcotic drugs in a significant amount under the following circumstances. Muratov S.A., having the intent to illegally acquire and store without the purpose of selling a narcotic drug - cannabis (marijuana) in a significant amount, realizing his criminal intent, 15.08 ...

The verdict of November 23, 2018 in case No. 1-87 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Criminal

Defendant Chetvergov R.A. committed theft, i.e. secret theft of someone else's property, by a group of persons by prior agreement, with illegal entry into the premises, with causing significant damage to a citizen. Also Chetvergov R.A. committed theft, i.e. secret theft of another's property, by a group of persons by prior conspiracy, with illegal entry into a dwelling. These crimes were committed under the following circumstances: Chetvergov R.A. ...

Decision of November 22, 2018 in case No. 2-536 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Establish the fact of acceptance Grinko Valentina Vasilievna inheritance after the death of mother FULL NAME1, deceased DD.MM.YYYY. Recognize Valentina Vasilyevna Grinko's ownership of land plot area of ​​3000 sq.m., with cadastral number No., from land settlements for running a personal subsidiary farm, located at:<адрес>... The decision is the basis for the registration of property rights Grinko V.The. on real estate in the manner prescribed by law ...

Decision of 22 November 2018 in case No. 2-636 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Partially satisfy Valentina Ivanovna Pugina's claim against Anastasia Sergeevna Kedrova. To recover from Anastasia Sergeevna Kedrova in favor of Valentina Ivanovna Pugina monetary compensation for moral damage in the amount of RUB 90,000. and legal costs - 5,000 rubles, a total of 95,000 (ninety-five thousand) rubles. In the rest of the claim, Pugina Valentina Ivanovna should be denied ...

Decision of November 21, 2018 in case No. 2-666 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Decision of 20 November 2018 in case No. 2-513 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Satisfy the claim of the Yeletsk district prosecutor in the interests of an indefinite circle of persons. To oblige the administration of the Yelets municipal district within four months from the date of entry into force of the decision to allocate cash to ensure the protection of the building of the secondary school of the village. Sokolye of the Eletsky municipal district by employees of a private security organization. Obligate the municipal budget educational institution average comprehensive school pos ...

Decision of November 16, 2018 in case No. 2-602 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Partially satisfy the claim of Mikhail Viktorovich Savvin against Viktor Petrovich Semenkov for the recovery of unjust enrichment. To collect from Viktor Petrovich Semenkov in favor of Mikhail Viktorovich Savvin monetary funds in the amount of RUB 50,000. Satisfy the counterclaim of Viktor Petrovich Semenkov to Mikhail Viktorovich Savvin on the recognition of the contract as not concluded, to declare the sale and purchase agreement No. 47 of 12/17/2015 as not concluded ...

Decision of November 14, 2018 in case No. 2-623 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Satisfy the claim of Viktor Sergeevich Demidenko: to recover from Anastasia Vladimirovna Demidenko in favor of Viktor Sergeevich Demidenko 109,686 (one hundred nine thousand six hundred and eighty-six) rubles. The decision can be appealed to Lipetsk regional court within a month from the date of its adoption in the final form by filing an appeal through the Yeletsky District Court. Referee: The reasoned decision was made on November 19, 2018. Referee: ...

The verdict of November 14, 2018 in case No. 1-84 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Criminal

Defendant Zabanov P.N. made a threat of murder if there were reasons to fear that the threat would be realized; theft, i.e. secret theft of someone else's property, committed with causing significant damage to a citizen; theft, i.e. secret theft of someone else's property from FULL NAME13 .; theft, i.e. secret theft of someone else's property from FULL NAME14 The crimes were committed under the following circumstances: 12/16/2017 at about 21 o'clock P.N. Zabanov, being intoxicated, after a quarrel with FULL NAME15 ...

Decision of November 13, 2018 in case No. 2-469 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Partially satisfy the claim of PJSC CB Vostochny against Marina Georgievna Semenikhina to recover the debt under the loan agreement. To collect from Marina Georgievna Semenikhina in favor of PJSC KB Vostochny the loan debt in the amount of 62,536 (sixty-two thousand five hundred thirty-six) rubles 85 kopecks ...

Decision of 13 November 2018 in case No. 2-628 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

The claim of Golovkin Sergei Nikolaevich and Golovkina Natalia Vladimirovna, acting in their own interests and the interests of Golovkin Daniil Sergeevich, Golovkin Alexander Sergeevich and Golovkina Svetlana Sergeevna, against Porosova Irina Nikolaevna and Dyachkina Olga Nikolaevna on the exclusion from the Unified State Register of information on the location of the border of the land plot and the establishment of the location boundaries land plots to satisfy...

Decision of 12 November 2018 in case No. 2-617 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Satisfy the application of Tatiana Vasilievna Chumakova, Gennady Vasilievich Narkhov, Sergei Vasilievich Narkhov on establishing the fact of acceptance of the inheritance. To establish the fact that Chumakova Tatyana Vasilyevna, Narkhov Gennady Vasilyevich, Narkhov Sergey Vasilyevich accepted the inheritance left after the death of Narkhova Ekaterina Nikolaevna, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, deceased DD.MM.YYYY year ...

Resolution of November 12, 2018 in case No. 5-56 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Administrative offenses

Ignatov E.A. - a citizen of the Republic of Ukraine violated the regime of stay in the Russian Federation, which resulted in evading leaving the Russian Federation at the end of the period of temporary stay. The foregoing was revealed on 12.11.2018 by officers of the OMVD of Russia in the Yeletsky district in<адрес>Eletsky municipal district. At the hearing, Ignatov E.A., who speaks Russian, did not deny that he was in Russia in violation of the regime of stay ...

Resolution of November 12, 2018 in case No. 5-57 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Administrative offenses

Zorya L.P. - citizen R. Moldova violated the regime of stay in the Russian Federation, which resulted in evading leaving the Russian Federation at the end of the period of temporary stay. The foregoing was revealed on 12.11.2018 by officers of the OMVD of Russia in the Yeletsky district in<адрес>Eletsky municipal district. At the hearing, L.P. Zorya, who speaks Russian, explained that she had come to her daughter, a citizen of the Russian Federation in the city of ...

Decision of November 9, 2018 in case No. 2-А131 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Satisfy the claim of the Military Prosecutor's Office of the Tambov garrison against the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the imposition of the obligation to carry out a major overhaul of the building of the military commissariat of the Izmalkovsky district of the Lipetsk region ...

Resolution of November 8, 2018 in case No. 5-А39 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Administrative offenses

M.V. Kudinov committed an offense under Part 1. Art. 19.3 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation - disobedience to a lawful order or request of a police officer. DD.MM.YYYY at 11 o'clock. 00 minutes in<адрес>citizen Kudinov M.The. did not fulfill the legal requirement of an authorized official - a traffic police inspector of the traffic police group of the traffic police department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for<адрес>FULL NAME3 on the presentation of a driver's license, title documents of the owner of the car, insurance policy OSAGO. At the hearing, M.V. Kudinov ...

Decision of November 8, 2018 in case No. 2A-654/2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Satisfy the administrative statement of claim of the head of the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Izmalkovsky district to supplement the administrative restrictions established by the court VOROBYEV VIKTOR NIKOLAEVICH DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, which is under administrative supervision. To impose an additional administrative restriction on him: - prohibition of staying in certain places (clubs) located on the territory of the Izmalkovsky district ...

Decision of November 7, 2018 in case No. 2-609 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

Satisfy the claim of Svetlana Valentinovna Dauksha to Sergey Viktorovich Dauksha on the division of jointly acquired property. Divide the jointly acquired property between the spouses. Recognize Svetlana Valentinovna Dauksha's ownership of? share in the right of common shared ownership of a land plot, cadastral number No., located at:<адрес>, with an area of ​​1000 sq.m ...

Decision of November 6, 2018 in case No. 2A-631/2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Civil and Administrative

The administrative claim of IDGC-Center, PJSC, represented by the Lipetskenergo branch, against the administration of the rural settlement of Nizhnevorgolsky village council of the Yeletsky municipal district of the Lipetsk region on recognizing as illegal the order dated 09/14/2018 to eliminate violations of the rules for maintaining territories and elements of external improvement to satisfy ...

Resolution of November 6, 2018 in case No. 5-А38 / 2018

Eletsky District Court (Lipetsk Region) - Administrative offenses

S.V. Nekhlopochin committed an offense under Part 2 of Art. 14.10 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation - the sale of goods containing illegal reproduction of someone else's trademark, service mark, appellation of origin of goods or similar designations for similar goods, except for the cases provided for in part 2 of Article 14.33 of this Code, if these actions do not contain a criminal offense ... From the protocol on an administrative offense from DD.MM ...

Do you think you are Russian? Born in the USSR and think that you are Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian? No. This is not true.

You are actually Russian, Ukrainian or Belarusian. But you think you are a Jew.

Game? Wrong word. The correct word is "imprinting".

The newborn associates himself with those facial features that he observes immediately after birth. This natural mechanism is inherent in most living creatures with vision.

For the first few days, newborns in the USSR saw their mother for a minimum of feeding time, and most of the time they saw the faces of the hospital staff. By a strange coincidence, they were (and still are) mostly Jewish. The reception is wild in its essence and effectiveness.

All your childhood you wondered why you live surrounded by non-native people. Rare Jews on your way could do anything with you, because you were drawn to them, and others were repelled. And even now they can.

You cannot fix this - imprinting is one-time and for life. It is difficult to understand this, the instinct took shape when you were still very far from the ability to formulate. Since that moment, no words or details have survived. Only facial features remained in the depths of my memory. Those traits that you consider to be your own.

System and Observer

Let's define a system as an object, the existence of which is beyond doubt.

An observer of a system is an object that is not part of the system he observes, that is, it determines its existence, including through factors independent of the system.

From the point of view of the system, the observer is a source of chaos - both control actions and the consequences of observational measurements that do not have a causal relationship with the system.

An internal observer is a potentially achievable object for the system in relation to which inversion of observation and control channels is possible.

An external observer is even a potentially unattainable object for the system, located beyond the event horizon of the system (spatial and temporal).

Hypothesis No. 1. All-seeing eye

Let's assume that our universe is a system and it has an external observer. Then observational measurements can occur, for example, with the help of "gravitational radiation" penetrating the universe from all sides from the outside. The capture cross-section of "gravitational radiation" is proportional to the mass of the object, and the projection of the "shadow" from this capture onto another object is perceived as an attractive force. It will be proportional to the product of the masses of objects and inversely proportional to the distance between them, which determines the density of the "shadow".

The capture of "gravitational radiation" by an object increases its chaos and is perceived by us as the passage of time. An object that is opaque for "gravitational radiation", the capture cross section of which is larger than the geometric size, looks like a black hole inside the universe.

Hypothesis No. 2. Internal observer

It is possible that our universe is observing itself. For example, with the help of pairs of quantum entangled particles spaced apart in space as standards. Then the space between them is saturated with the probability of the existence of the process that generated these particles, reaching the maximum density at the intersection of the trajectories of these particles. The existence of these particles also means that there is no sufficiently large capture cross section on the trajectories of objects to absorb these particles. The rest of the assumptions remain the same as for the first hypothesis, except:

Time flow

Outside observation of an object approaching the event horizon of a black hole, if the “external observer” is the determining factor of time in the universe, will slow down exactly twice - the black hole's shadow will block exactly half of the possible trajectories of “gravitational radiation”. If the “inner observer” is the determining factor, then the shadow will block the entire trajectory of interaction and the flow of time for an object falling into a black hole will completely stop for a view from the side.

Also, the possibility of combining these hypotheses in one proportion or another is not excluded.