Tell me about the children's crusade. Children's crusade

The children's crusade is the name given to the popular movement in 1212 in historiography.

Middle Ages

The legendary Children's Crusade provides an excellent idea of ​​the extent to which the mentality of the people of the Middle Ages differed from the worldview of the present. Reality and fiction were closely intertwined in the mind of a man of the 13th century. The people believed in a miracle. Nowadays, the idea of ​​a children's crusade seems to us wild, then thousands of people did not doubt the success of the enterprise. Although, we still do not know if this actually happened.

It would not be true to believe that the clergy was able to captivate only the greedy knighthood and the equally greedy Italian merchants by the struggle for Jerusalem. The crusading spirit was also sustained in the lower strata of society, where the fascination of his myths was especially strong. The young peasants' march was the embodiment of this naive commitment to him.

How it all began

At the beginning of the 13th century, there was a strong conviction in Europe that only sinless children could liberate the Holy Land. Incendiary speeches of preachers who mourned the seizure of the Holy Sepulcher by the "infidels" found a wide response among children and adolescents, usually from peasant families in Northern France and Rhine-Rhine Germany. Adolescent religious fervor was fueled by parents and parish priests. The Pope and the higher clergy opposed the enterprise, but they could not stop it. Local priests tended to be as ignorant as their flock.

Ideological inspirers

1212 June - in the village of Cloix near Vendôme in France a certain shepherd boy named Stephen of Cloix appeared, declaring himself a messenger of God, who was called to become the leader of Christians and to re-conquer the promised land; the sea was to dry up before the army of spiritual Israel. Allegedly, Christ himself appeared to the boy and handed the letter to the king. The shepherdess walked all over the country everywhere, causing stormy enthusiasm with his speeches, as well as miracles performed by him in front of thousands of eyewitnesses.

Soon, preacher boys appeared in many localities, they gathered around them whole crowds of like-minded people and led them with banners and crosses, with solemn songs to Stephen. If someone asked the young madmen where they were going, they answered that they were going “across the sea, to God”.

The king tried to stop this madness, ordered to return the children home, but this did not help. Some of them obeyed the order, but the majority did not pay attention to it, and soon adults were involved in the event. Stefan, who was already traveling in a chariot hung with carpets and surrounded by bodyguards, was joined not only by priests, artisans and peasants, but also by thieves and criminals who "took the true path."

In the hands of slavers

1212 - in two streams, young travelers headed to the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Several thousand French children (maybe up to 30 thousand people, if you count the adult pilgrims), led by Stephen, arrived in Marseille, where cynical slave traders loaded them onto ships. Two ships sank during a storm off the island of San Pietro near Sardinia, while the remaining 5 were able to reach Egypt, where the shipowners sold their children into slavery.

Many of the captives allegedly ended up in the court of the Caliph, who was amazed at the stubbornness of the young crusaders in his faith. Some of the chroniclers argued that later both slave owners who transported children fell into the hands of the enlightened emperor Frederick II, who sentenced the criminals to be hanged. At the conclusion of an agreement in 1229 with Sultan Alkamil, he may have been able to return some of the pilgrims to their homeland.

Crossing the Alps

In those same years, thousands of German children (maybe up to 20 thousand people), led by 10-year-old Nicholas from Cologne, went on foot to Italy. Nicholas's father was a slave owner, who also used his son for his own selfish purposes. When crossing the Alps, two-thirds of the detachment died from hunger and cold, the rest of the children were able to reach Rome, Genoa and Brindisi. The bishop of the last of these cities strongly opposed the continuation of the march by sea and turned the crowd in the opposite direction.

He and Pope Innocent III freed the crusaders from their vows and sent them home. There is evidence that the pontiff only gave them a reprieve to fulfill their plans until they reached adulthood. But on the way home, almost all of them died. According to legend, Nicholas himself survived and even fought at Damietta in Egypt in 1219.

And it could be so ...

There is another version of these events. According to her, French children and adults still succumbed to the persuasion of Philip Augustus and went home. The German children, under the leadership of Nicholas, reached Mainz, where they were able to persuade some to return, but the most stubborn continued on their way to Italy. Some of them arrived in Venice, others in Genoa, and a small group was able to reach Rome, some children showed up in Marseille. Be that as it may, most of the children disappeared without a trace.

Children's crusade in history

These gloomy events probably formed the basis of the legend about the rat-catcher-flutist, who took all the children from the city of Gammeln (). Some Genoese patrician families even traced their ancestry from German children who remained in the city.

The improbability of this kind of event makes historians believe that the "Crusade of Children" was actually called the movement of the poor (serfs, laborers, day laborers) who gathered in the Crusade and who failed in Italy.

Children's crusade

The famous medieval historian Jacques Le Goff asked: "Were there children in the medieval West?" If you look closely at works of art, you will not find them there. Later, angels will often be depicted as children and even as playful boys - half angels, half cupids. But in the Middle Ages, angels of both sexes were portrayed only as adults. “When the sculpture of the Virgin Mary had already acquired the features of soft femininity, clearly borrowed from a particular model,” writes Le Goff, “the baby Jesus remained a terrifying freak, not interested in either the artist, or the client, or the public.” Only at the end of the Middle Ages did the iconographic theme spread, reflecting a new interest in the child. In the conditions of the highest infant mortality, this interest was embodied in a feeling of anxiety: the theme of "Beating of Babies" was reflected in the spread of the holiday of the Innocent, under whose "patronage" were the orphanages for foundlings. However, such shelters appeared not earlier than the 15th century. The Middle Ages barely noticed the child, having no time to either touch or admire him. After leaving the care of a woman, the child immediately found himself thrown into the exhausting rural labor or training in military affairs, depending on the origin. In both cases, the transition was carried out very quickly. Medieval epics about the childhood of legendary heroes - Sid, Roland, etc. - portray the heroes as young people, not boys. The child comes into view only with the emergence of a relatively small urban family, education more focused on the personality of the burgher class. According to a number of scholars, the city suppressed and fettered the independence of women. She was enslaved by the hearth, while the child emancipated and filled the house, school and street.

Le Goff is echoed by the famous Soviet researcher A. Gurevich. He writes that according to the ideas of the people of the Middle Ages, a person does not develop, but passes from one age to another. This is not a gradually prepared evolution leading to qualitative shifts, but a sequence of internally unrelated states. In the Middle Ages, the child was viewed as a small adult, and there was no problem of the development and formation of the human personality. F. Aries, who studied the problem of attitudes towards a child in Europe in the Middle Ages and in the early modern period, writes about the Middle Ages' ignorance of the category of childhood as a special qualitative state of a person. “Medieval civilization,” he argues, is the civilization of adults. Until the 12th-13th centuries, fine art sees children as adults of reduced size, dressed like adults, and folded like them. Education is not age-appropriate, and adults and adolescents are taught together. Games, before they became children, were knightly games. The child was considered the natural companion of the adult.

Moving away from the age classes of primitiveness with their initiation rites and forgetting the principles of upbringing antiquity, medieval society for a long time ignored childhood and the transition from it to an adult state. The problem of socialization was considered solved by the act of baptism. Singing love, courtly poetry contrasted it with marriage. Christian moralists, on the other hand, warned against excessive passion in relationships between spouses and saw in sexual love a dangerous phenomenon that must be curbed, since it cannot be completely avoided. Only with the transition to the New Age, the family begins to be seen not as a union between spouses, but as a unit that is entrusted with socially important functions of raising children. But first of all, this is a bourgeois family.

According to Gurevich, in a specific relationship to childhood in the Middle Ages, a special understanding of the human personality is manifested. Man, apparently, is not yet able to realize himself as a single developing entity. His life is a series of states, the change of which is not internally motivated.

A general analysis of attitudes towards children in the Middle Ages will help us understand such an episode as the children's crusade. It is now difficult to imagine that parents would let their children go, so that they would follow on foot either to Rome or to the Middle East. Perhaps there was nothing extraordinary in this for a medieval person? Why little man don't try to do what big can do? After all, the little one is the same son of the Lord as the big one. On the other hand, isn't this whole trip nothing more than a fairy tale, composed already when they began to compose anything about children?

The legendary children's crusade gives an excellent idea of ​​how the mentality of the people of the Middle Ages differed from the worldview of our contemporaries. Reality and fiction were closely intertwined in the mind of a 13th century man. The people believed in miracles. Moreover, he saw and created them. Now the idea of ​​a children's trip seems wild to us, then thousands of people believed in the success of the enterprise. True, we still do not know whether it happened or not.

The Crusades were an era in themselves. The most heroic and at the same time one of the most controversial pages in the history of chivalry, the Catholic Church and the whole of medieval Europe. The event held "for the sake of God" least of all corresponded in its methods not only to Christian ethics, but also to the usual norms of morality.

The beginning of the Crusades to the East was caused by several serious reasons. First, it is the plight of the peasantry. Oppressed by taxes and duties, having survived for several years (from the late 80s to the mid-90s of the XI century) a series of terrible disasters in the form of plague and famine epidemics, the common people were ready to go as far as they like, just to find a place where there is food.

Secondly, the knightly estate also experienced hard times. By the end of the 11th century, there were almost no free lands in Europe. The feudal lords stopped splitting their possessions between their sons, passing to the system of entitlement - inheritance only by the eldest son. A large number of poor knights appeared, who, by their origin, did not consider it possible to do anything other than war. They were aggressive, threw themselves into any adventure, turned out to be mercenaries during numerous civil strife, simply engaged in robbery. In the end, they had to be removed from Europe, there was a need to consolidate chivalry and direct its warlike energy somewhere "outside", to solve external problems since further efficient management European territories on the part of kings, large feudal lords and the church became very problematic.

The third factor is the ambitions and material claims of the Catholic Church and, first of all, the papacy. The unification of believers with some idea objectively led to the strengthening of the power of Rome, since the idea came from there. The trip to the East promised the Pope's “interception” of the religious initiative in Eastern Europe from Constantinople, and the strengthening of the position of Catholicism.

Also, such a military event promised enormous wealth to the churches, feudal lords, and even the poor. Moreover, the churches not only at the expense of, in fact, military booty, but also at the expense of rich donations and European lands of the crusaders who left for the war.

The most convenient and, it seems, obvious pretext was a campaign under the banner of war with the "infidels" - that is, with the Muslims. The immediate reason for the start of the campaign was the appeal of the Byzantine emperor Alexei Comnenus for help to Pope Urban II (1088-1099) (his name before the papacy was Oddon de Lagerie). The Byzantine Empire suffered from the combined blow of the Seljuk Turks and Pechenegs against it. Vasilevs addressed the "Latins" as brothers in faith. And without this, since the 70s of the XI century, the idea of ​​the need to free the Holy Sepulcher, which was in Jerusalem, captured by the Turks, was in the air. Thus, the gaze of believers, who from the time of Augustine turned to heavenly Jerusalem, that is, the Kingdom of God, turned to earthly Jerusalem. The dream of a future paradise bliss after death has strangely intertwined in the minds of Christians with concrete, earthly rewards for righteous labors. These sentiments were used by the organizers of the Crusades.

The Pope removed the excommunication from the Byzantine Emperor Alexei, which until then lay on him as a schismatic. In March 1095, the pontiff once again listened to the ambassadors of Alexei at the council in Piacenza, and in the summer of 1095 Urban II went to France. For some time he negotiated with the southern French monasteries, which are part of the most influential Cluny congregation, major feudal lords and authoritative priests. Finally, on 18 November, a church council began in the city of Clermont-Ferrand in Auvergne. As often happened, in the city where such an important forum took place, there were a lot of visiting people. In total - about 20 thousand people: knights, peasants, vagabonds, etc. The Council discussed, in general, exclusively church problems. But after its completion on November 26, Urban II, not far from the city on a plain in the open air, made a speech to the people, which made the Cathedral of Clermont so famous.

The Pope called on Catholics to take up arms for the war against "the Persian tribe of the Turks ... who made it to the Mediterranean Sea ... killed and taken away many Christians." The liberation of the Holy Sepulcher was announced as a separate task. Pope tried to present the war as an easy walk, promising rich booty. Jerusalem, he said, was a place where milk and honey flowed; in the East, everyone will receive new lands, which are not enough for everyone in close Europe. The pontiff urged to abandon internal strife for the sake of a common cause. Urban II was extremely specific and straightforward. All who went on a campaign were forgiven their sins (including future ones - committed during a godly war). The crusaders could count on going to heaven. The Pope's speech was constantly interrupted by an enthusiastic crowd shouting: "This is what God wants!" Many immediately vowed to go camping and attached crosses made of red fabric to their shoulders.

The church took upon itself the protection of the lands (and, of course, the conduct of business) of the departed crusaders, their debts to creditors were declared null and void. Feudal lords who did not want to go on a campaign had to buy off rich gifts in favor of the clergy.

The news of the beginning of the campaign quickly spread throughout Europe. Probably, dad himself did not expect such an effect from his speech. Already in the spring of 1096, thousands of poor people from the Rhine lands set off. Then the knights moved to the East. Thus began the First Crusade.

In total, united in six large groups, tens of thousands of people took part in this campaign. First, some detachments set out on their way, largely composed of the poor, led by Peter the Hermit and the knight Walter Golyak. Their first "godly" deed was Jewish pogroms in German cities:

Trier, Cologne, Mainz. They also did a lot of trouble in Hungary. The Balkan Peninsula was plundered by the "warriors of Christ".

Then the crusaders arrived in Constantinople. The most numerous detachment, moving from southern France, was led by Raimund of Toulouse. Bohemond of Tarentum set out with his army to the East across the Mediterranean. Robert of Flanders reached the Bosphorus by the same sea route. The number of crusaders who gathered in different ways in Constantinople probably reached 300 thousand. The emperor of Byzantium Alexei I was horrified by the prospect of unrestrained looting in the capital that opened before him. And there was no reason to count on the fact that the Latins would only be engaged in returning to him the lands taken away by the Muslims. Through bribery and flattery, the emperor obtained a vassal oath from most of the knights and tried to send them on their further journey as soon as possible. In April 1097, the crusaders crossed the Bosphorus.

The first detachment of Walter Golyak was by that time already defeated in Asia Minor. But the other troops that appeared here in the spring of 1097 easily defeated the army of the Nicaean Sultan. In the summer, the crusaders split up: most of them moved towards the Syrian city of Antioch. In early July 1098, after a seven-month siege, the city surrendered. Meanwhile, some French crusaders established themselves in Edessa (now Urfa, Turkey). Baldwin of Boulogne established his own state here, stretching on both sides of the Euphrates. This was the first crusader state in the East.

In Antioch, the crusaders, in turn, were besieged by the emir of Mosul, Kerbuga. Hunger began. Being in great danger, they left the city and were able to defeat Kerbuga. After a long feud with Raymun, the house of Antioch took possession of Bohemond, who, even before her fall, managed to force the other crusader leaders to agree to transfer this to him. important city... Soon, in Asia Minor, a war between the crusaders and the Greeks of the coastal cities began, who hoped to get rid of not only the Muslim dictatorship, but also from the new Western masters.

From Antioch, the crusaders moved south along the coast without any special obstacles and took possession of several port cities along the way. The way to Jerusalem opened before the knights, but they did not immediately move to the desired city. An epidemic broke out - far from the last in the time of the Crusades. “Christ's army” lost many people every day without any battles. The leaders split up, and their troops scattered across the surrounding areas. Finally, the departure from Antioch was scheduled for March 1099.

Gottfried of Bouillon and the Count of Flanders set out for Laodicea. The whole army united under the walls of Arhas, whose siege had already been launched by Raimund. At this time, the ambassadors of the Cairo caliph, who had recently become the ruler of Jerusalem, arrived to the crusaders. They stated that the gates of the holy city would only open in front of unarmed pilgrims. This did not in any way affect the plans of the Europeans. Taking Arhas, they continued to move towards the main goal. At that time, the Christian army numbered up to 50 thousand people. These were already battle-hardened warriors, and not the rabble of the first stage of the Crusades. But at Jerusalem, which opened up to their gaze, they looked with the same childish delight and reverent awe, like any person of that era. The riders dismounted from their horses and walked barefoot; screams, prayers and a thousand-fold exclamation of "Jerusalem!" announced to the district.

The Crusaders were deployed in three groups: Gottfried, Robert of Normandy and Robert of Flanders - to the northeast of the city, Tancred - to the northwest, Raimund - to the south. Jerusalem was defended by an Egyptian garrison of 40 thousand people. The city thoroughly prepared for the siege: food was prepared, wells were filled up throughout the surrounding area and the bed of the Kidron River. The knights faced big problems. They suffered from thirst and heat, there was a treeless space around, they had to send expeditions to remote areas behind the forest, from which huge siege engines, ladders and battering rams were built. Logs were also used, from which the country houses and churches of the area were made. On the other hand, merchants from Genoa promptly sent ships with provisions and qualified carpenters and engineers.

The Saracens staunchly defended themselves, poured boiling tar on their opponents' heads, threw stones at them, and struck them with arrows. The crusaders used a variety of techniques. Once they even made a religious procession around the impregnable fortress. The decisive assault began on July 14, 1099. At night, Gottfried's warriors secretly moved their camp to the eastern part of Jerusalem, which was less defended by the Saracens. At dawn, at a signal, all three parts of the army began to move. Colossal rolling towers moved to the walls of Jerusalem from three sides. But after a twelve-hour battle, the Muslims managed to repulse the enemy. Only the next day, from the tower of Gottfried, a bridge was finally thrown onto the wall, along which his soldiers burst into the city. The knights managed to set fire to the Saracens' defenses. Soon, both Raymond and Tancred were in Jerusalem. It happened at three o'clock in the afternoon, on Friday, on that day of the week and at the time when the Savior died on the cross.

A terrible massacre and no less terrible robbery began in the city. During the week, the "pious" conquerors killed about 70 thousand people. And they, with prayers and sobs, with bare feet and bare heads, atoned for sins in the Church of the Resurrection in front of the Tomb of Christ.

Soon, in a battle with a large Egyptian army at Ascalon, the united crusader army defended its main conquest. The Crusaders took possession of most of the eastern Mediterranean coast. On the occupied territory, the knights created four states: the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the county of Tripoli, the principality of Antioch and the county of Edessa. Chief among the rulers was King Gottfried of Jerusalem, but the rest behaved quite independently. The dominion of the Latins, however, proved to be short-lived.

From the beginning, the Crusades were a gamble. Huge, heterogeneous troops led by ambitious kings, earls and dukes often at war with each other, with constantly diminishing religious zeal, thousands of kilometers from their homeland, were to experience insurmountable difficulties. And if during the first campaign the Europeans managed to stun the Muslims with their pressure, then they could not create a solid system of government here, and then they could not defend their conquests.

In 1137, the Byzantine emperor John II attacked and captured Antioch. In 1144, the powerful emir of Mosul, Imad-ad-din Zengi, took the county of Edessa, an outpost of Christendom in the East. Difficult times have come for other knightly states. From all sides, they were attacked by the Syrians, Seljuks and Egyptians. The Jerusalem king lost control of his own vassal princes.

Naturally, the fall of Edessa should have been a heavy blow for Christians. This event caused especially great resonance in France. King Louis VII the Young was romantic enough and at the same time belligerent. He was seized with a thirst for exploits, which he had heard from childhood. This impulse was supported by Pope Eugene III, and one of the most authoritative confessors in Europe - the Abbot of Clairvaux Bernard, a supporter of strict morals, a teacher of both Eugene, and Abbot Sugeria, an influential adviser to Louis. In the city of Wesel in Burgundy, Bernard convened a council, at which, in the presence of the king, on March 31, 1146, he delivered a fiery speech, urging all Christians to rise up to fight against the infidels. “Woe to him whose sword is not stained with blood,” said the preacher. Immediately many, and, first of all, Louis, laid crosses on themselves as a sign of their readiness to set off on a new campaign. Soon Bernard arrived in Germany, where, after some struggle, he managed to persuade King Konrad III to support the new endeavor.

The Germans and French from the very beginning of the campaign (spring 1147) poorly coordinated their actions, each pursuing his own goals. So, the French wanted to move to the East by sea, using the help of the Norman king of Sicily Roger, the Germans agreed with the Byzantine emperor Manuel and were going to move by land through Hungary and the Balkans. Conrad's point of view won, and an angry Roger, already at odds with Byzantium over southern Italy, formed an alliance with African Muslims and made a series of devastating raids on the Greek coast and islands.

The Germans were the first to find themselves near Constantinople in September 1147, like the last time, having managed to inspire terror with their looting on the way. Manuel, like Alexei Komnenos, did everything possible to quickly find the Latins in Asia Minor. On October 26, the Germans suffered a crushing defeat at the Ikonian Sultan at Doriley in Anatolia. Returning to Nicaea, many thousands of Germans died of hunger. But to the soldiers of Louis, who arrived in the Byzantine capital a little later, Manuel talked about Konrad's amazing successes, making them envy. Soon the French found themselves in Asia Minor. At Nicaea, the armies of the kings met and continued on their way together. Trying to bypass the sites of the recent pre-Rilean tragedy, the monarchs led the troops in a complex detour through Pergamum and Smyrna. The Turkish cavalry constantly harassed the columns, the crusaders lacked forage and food. The matter was complicated and slowed down by the fact that Louis VII took with him a numerous retinue, which was completely inappropriate in a difficult campaign, a magnificent courtyard led by a beautiful wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine. The help of the Byzantine army turned out to be insufficient - apparently, the emperor Manuel, in his heart of hearts, wanted the defeat of the crusaders. On July 3, 1147, a fierce battle broke out near the village of Hittin, west of Lake Genesaret. The Muslim army outnumbered the Christian forces. As a result, the crusaders suffered a crushing defeat. Countless numbers of them were killed in battle, and those who survived were taken prisoner. Only a few powerful fortresses in the north remained in the hands of Christians: Krak de Chevalier, Châtel Blanc and Margat.

At the beginning of 1148, a greatly thinned crusader army arrived at Ephesus. From here Louis with great difficulty, having withstood a series of battles, cold and torrential rains, reached Antioch in March 1148. His army made the last part of the journey on Byzantine ships. In Antioch, the French received a warm welcome, festivities and celebrations. Eleanor struck up an intrigue with the local ruler. Louis VII was losing all enthusiasm, and his army was losing the necessary fighting spirit.

Meanwhile, Konrad no longer even thought about joint actions with his ally. With the Jerusalem king Baldwin III, he agreed to speak out not at all against the emir of Mosul - the powerful offender of Edessa, for the sake of which, it seemed, the whole campaign was started - but against Damascus. The French monarch was forced to join them. The 50,000-strong Christian army spent a lot of time under the walls of the Syrian capital. Its leaders quickly quarreled among themselves, suspecting each other of treason and a desire to seize most of the potential prey. The attack on Damascus pushed its ruler to conclude an alliance with another Muslim feudal lord - the prince of Aleppo. The combined Muslim forces forced the crusaders to retreat from Damascus.

In the fall of 1148, the Germans departed for Constantinople on Byzantine ships, and from there they left for Germany. Louis also did not dare to continue hostilities. At the beginning of 1149, the French crossed to southern Italy on Norman ships, and in the fall of the same year they were already at home.

The second crusade proved to be a completely useless undertaking. In addition to numerous losses, he did not bring anything to his leaders and initiators - neither fame, nor wealth, nor lands. The Abbot of Clairvaux, for whom the defeat of the campaign was a personal tragedy, even wrote a "word of excuse" in which he attributed the calamities of the war to the crimes of Christians.

During the Second Crusade, similar local events were organized by some feudal lords in Europe. Thus, the Saxons attacked the Slavic tribes between the Elbe and the Oder, and a number of French, Norman and English knights intervened in Spanish affairs, fought against the Moors and captured Lisbon, which became the capital of Christian Portugal.

If one can imagine a "match of all stars" in the Middle Ages, then it may well be called the Third Crusade. Almost all the striking characters of that time, all the most powerful rulers of Europe and the Middle East took a direct part in it. Richard the Lionheart, Philip II Augustus, Friedrich Barbarossa, Saladin. Everyone is a person, everyone is an era, everyone is a hero of their time.

After the Second Crusade, the affairs of Christians in the East took a turn for the worse. Sultan Saladin, an outstanding statesman and talented military leader, became the leader and hope of the Muslim world. First, he came to power in Egypt, then subjugated Syria and other territories in the east. In 1187 Saladin took Jerusalem. The news of this became the signal for the beginning of the next crusade. The Roman legates were able to convince the powerful rulers of France, England and Germany - Philip, Richard and Frederick to move to the East.

The German emperor chose the already well-known route for movement through Hungary and the Balkan Peninsula. His crusaders, led by the wise experience and practical 67-year-old Barbarossa, were the first to set out on a campaign in the spring of 1189. Naturally, the relations of the Germans with the Byzantines traditionally deteriorated as soon as the Latins found themselves on the territory of Byzantium. Skirmishes broke out, a diplomatic scandal erupted. Frederick seriously thought about the siege of Constantinople, but in the end everything was more or less resolved and the German army crossed over to Asia Minor. She was slowly but surely moving south when the irreparable happened. While crossing the Salef River, the emperor drowned. This event made a depressing impression on the pilgrims. Many of them returned home. The rest moved to Antioch.

The French and British agreed to perform together. Since the wars against Henry II Plantagenet, the cunning and subtle diplomat Philip was on the most friendly terms with the young English king Richard I. The latter was the complete opposite of Philip. State affairs interested him insofar as. He was much more interested in war, exploits, and glory. The first knight of his time, physically strong, courageous Richard the Lionheart, was a shortsighted politician and a bad diplomat. But so far, before the campaign, the friendship of the monarchs seemed unshakable. It took them some time to prepare, within the framework of which a special tax was established in their countries for all segments of the population - the so-called Saladin's tithe. Richard was especially diligent in collecting money. It was said that the king would sell London too if he could find a buyer. As a result, a sizable army was assembled under his command.

Philip Augustus and Richard set out on a campaign in the spring of 1190. Their path lay through Sicily. Already here all the fragility of their union was revealed. Richard made claims to this island. He began military operations against the Sicilians (more precisely, the Normans who owned the kingdom), because of whom he quarreled with the more peaceful Philip. Finally the British and French moved on. Philip's troops safely reached the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, and the British were overtaken by a storm that washed them to the shores of Cyprus. Richard conquered the island from the usurper Isaac Comnenus and declared his possession. He soon pledged it to the Templars. It was not until June 1191 that British forces arrived at Acre.

This seaside Syrian city had major events unfolding. Actually, the fortress was not supposed to be of great strategic value for Christians. At first (back in 1189), the Christian ruler of Jerusalem, Guido Lusignan, who had been deprived of his city, got involved in the struggle for it. Gradually, all the detachments from Europe that came one by one joined him. One by one, they were ground by the Muslims. The siege dragged on, near Acre, in fact, a Christian knightly city grew up. Acre was well defended, food and reinforcements arrived there by sea from Egypt and by land from Mesopotamia. Saladin was outside the city and constantly raided the besiegers. The crusading troops suffered from disease and heat. The arrival of new forces, especially Richard, inspired the crusaders to conduct more vigorous warfare. Trenches were dug, siege towers were built ... Finally, in July 1191, the fortress was taken.

The crusaders were prevented from developing success in the east by the usual strife. A dispute arose over the candidacy of a new Jerusalem king. Philip supported the defense hero of Tyr Konrad of Monferat, Richard played for Guido Lusignan. There were also problems with the division of the spoils. The episode with Leopold of Austria was evidence of fierce contradictions. He hoisted his banner over one of Acre's towers, and Richard ordered it to be torn down. Then, by a miracle, a bloody clash between Christians was avoided. Philip, dissatisfied and irritated by Richard's actions, and simply considering his mission completed, left for France. The English king remained the sole leader of the crusading army. He did not receive complete trust and approval of his actions. His relationship with Saladin was inconsistent. The sultan was distinguished by his great political tact and many truly chivalrous qualities, which even Europeans appreciated in him. He willingly went to negotiations, but when Richard was kind to the enemy, he was suspected of treason. When he took more drastic steps, Christians also had every reason to discontent. So, after the capture of Acre, the knights presented Saladin with excessively difficult conditions for him to ransom the Muslim hostages: the return of all the occupied territories, money, the Tree of the Cross ... Saladin hesitated. Then an angry Richard ordered the slaughter of two thousand Muslims - an action that horrified their fellow believers. In response, the Sultan ordered the killing of the Christian prisoners.

From Acre, Richard moved not to Jerusalem, but to Jaffa. This path was very difficult. Saladin constantly disturbed the knightly columns. A big battle took place at Arzuf. Here Richard proved to be an amazingly brave warrior and a good commander. The knights utterly defeated the numerically superior enemy. But the king did not manage to take advantage of the results of this victory. The English monarch and the sultan made a peace in 1192 that did not at all correspond to the goals of the campaign. Jerusalem remained in the hands of Muslims, although it was open to peaceful Christian pilgrims. Only a narrow coastal strip that began north of Tire and reached Jaffa remained in the hands of the crusaders. Richard, returning home, in Austria was captured by Leopold, who harbored a grudge against him, and spent two years in prison.

The fourth crusade clearly showed what goals the crusader army really pursues and what its Christian piety is worth. No wonder Pope John Paul II had relatively recently to apologize to the Patriarch of Constantinople for the actions of the knights in the distant XIII century.

The active Pope Innocent III became the initiator of the next campaign. In 1198, he began to agitate the Western sovereigns and feudal lords to go again to liberate the Holy Sepulcher. The powerful monarchs of England and France this time ignored Innocent's offer, but several feudal lords nevertheless decided to take part in the campaign. They were Thibaut Champagne, Margrave of Montferat Boniface, Simon de Montfort, Baudouin of Flanders and others.

The crusaders agreed with the pope that the army should first go not to Syria and Palestine, but to Egypt, from where the Muslim world drew its strength. Since the knights did not have a large fleet, they turned to the leading naval power of the time - the Republic of Venice. The wealthy merchant cities of Italy from the very beginning of the Crusades took Active participation in their organization. The Genoese, Pisans and Venetians transported supplies and people, being interested not only in a specific reward for these services, but also in increasing their influence in the Eastern Mediterranean to the detriment of the interests of competitors: Arabs and Byzantium. In 1201, the elderly (he was over 90 years old!) Doge of Venice, Enrico Dandolo, promised to transport 25 thousand crusaders to Egypt and for three years bring them supplies for 85 thousand marks and half of the future booty. In May of the same year, Boniface of Monferata, a practical and cynical man, became the leader of the crusaders. Soon, he and Dandolo pushed Pope Innocent away from the leadership of the campaign and focused on their interests, different from the original goals of the campaign.

The crusaders gathered in a camp on the island of Lido, a few kilometers from Venice. It was quickly discovered that the Crusaders did not have sufficient funds to pay for food. Then the Doge agreed with Boniface that the soldiers of Christ would pay Venice with a favor - they would seize the rich city of Zadar on the Dalmatian coast, which then belonged to Hungary. Only a few knew about the agreement. All the crusaders were put on ships in the fall of 1202, and a month later they were landed not from Egypt, but from Zadar, which the irritated knights took without difficulty.

The Byzantine prince Alexei Angel arrived at the knights. His father Isaac, who was in alliance with the German emperor, had not long before been overthrown and blinded by Alexei III Comnenus. The prince managed to escape, and now he asked for help from the crusaders. And for this he promised a rich reward, assistance in the campaign to the Holy Land and, finally, the restoration of the unity of the Greek and Roman Christian churches. So there was a reason to go to Constantinople. This idea was actively supported by Boniface and Dandolo. The Venetians have long had a grudge against the Byzantines. In commercial and maritime relations, they were stronger and in Constantinople had great privileges for a long time, but more and more often misunderstandings arose between the Venetian merchants and the emperor, costing the Italians great losses.

On June 23, 1203, the crusaders arrived at the Bosphorus and landed on the Asian coast, at Chalcedon. Then they crossed over to Galata and became a fortified camp here. The Venetian ships, having broken through the famous chain that blocked the entrance, burst into the Golden Horn Bay. By this time, the knightly army numbered about 40 thousand people, but due to illness, desertion and military losses, only about 15 thousand participated in the final distribution of the spoils.

Actually, there was no siege as such - all actions were concentrated on a relatively small section of city fortifications. The walls seemed completely impregnable. Over the past seven centuries, they have repeatedly defended the city from the Huns, Bulgarians, Slavs, Arabs and Turks, whose armies significantly exceeded the forces with which they led the siege of Dandolo and Boniface. But Constantinople did not have a sufficient number of defenders. In addition, in July, Alexei III fled from the capital. Isaac returned to the throne. He and his son were in no hurry to fulfill their obligations to the Latins. The same behaved more and more insolently towards the local residents, causing universal hatred. It ended with the fact that in January 1204 the ardent enemy of the crusaders Aleksey Duka seized power in the capital, Aleksey Angel was thrown into prison and killed. When Western feudal lords were asked whether the new emperor was going to pay the amount promised by his predecessors, he refused. The crusaders had yet another pretext for capturing Constantinople.

In March, Boniface of Monferata and Dandolo drew up a detailed plan of action, from which they did not retreat a single step. According to the treaty, the knights were to take Constantinople by storm and establish Latin rule in it. The city was to be plundered and all the booty amicably divided between Venice and the French. The territory of the country was divided between them and the newly elected Latin emperor. The decisive assault began on April 9. Constantinople was taken on April 12, 1204. This date can be considered the true end Byzantine Empire, although formally it was restored after sixty years, after which it existed for two more centuries.

The crusaders staged a three-day bloody orgy in Constantinople. They killed, robbed, raped. Eyewitnesses of the events, even from the Latins, described these three days with horror. The knights burned libraries, destroyed priceless works of art, took out relics from churches, did not spare either the elderly or children. And all this took place in a Christian city, within the framework of the Fourth Crusade, announced to fight the "infidels"! The Latin Empire was formed on the territory of Byzantium.

During the entire time of the Fourth Crusade, in fact, only small detachments of those leaders who at one time refused to join the crusaders in Venice arrived in the Holy Land from Europe. But these several hundred knights could do little to help their fellow believers. Their army carried out several minor punitive expeditions against the Muslim emir in the vicinity of Sidon, and the fleet sacked the Egyptian city of Fuvu in the Nile Delta. As a result of these actions, in September 1204, a peace treaty was signed for a period of six years: the Christians returned to Jaffa, taken from them in 1197, half of the territory of Sidon, part of the city of Nazareth. In general, the Fourth Campaign only weakened the Christian East. The emerging Latin Empire divided the forces: Constantinople absorbed part of the subsidies intended for the Holy Land, attracted soldiers who could go to Syria.

In our opinion, there is nothing surprising in the fact that the story of the children's crusade was attributed to the time of the aforementioned Pope Innocent III. His personality in the highest degree curious. The Pope was distinguished by indomitable energy, ambition, apparently, sincere conviction that he was doing a just cause, devotion to the Catholic Church. During his time on the papal throne, Innocent III organized many large-scale events. He interfered in the affairs of sovereigns throughout Europe, his hands reached out to England, the Baltic States, Galicia ... The pope considered his main goal to consolidate the dominion of the popes over Europe.

Innocent III (his name before the adoption of the tiara by Giovanni-Lothar Conti) succeeded Celestine III on the papal throne on January 8, 1198. It is curious that before that he was not even a bishop, he was only 38 years old, but the cardinals already considered him the best contender for the Holy See.

The Pope immediately began to solve problems with the enemies of the throne. To begin with, he dealt with the Roman aristocrats, while enjoying the full support of the simple urban population, among whom he was extremely popular. Then Innocent turned to Italian affairs, where the Germans traditionally fought for influence with him. German barons, planted in different cities of the Apennine Peninsula by Emperor Henry VI, were forced to leave the Papal States. The Florentine cities formed an independent alliance, but papal sympathies were strong there, too. Less than a year later, the Papal States, under the leadership of Innocent III, reached their greatest limits in all previous history. After Italy it was the turn of the rest of Europe. As the historian N. Osokin writes: "For Innokenty, in the whole West there was no person who was too poor, too insignificant and, on the contrary, a ruler too influential." That is why he boldly entered into confrontation with the most powerful sovereigns, making extensive use of the mood in the lower classes, exploiting their religiosity, and, sometimes, ignorance and belligerence.

In the implementation of his plans in relation to the rulers of contemporary Europe, Innokenty met with strong resistance. Influence in Germany, England, France, Leone (one of the Spanish kingdoms), Portugal, finally, the rebellious Languedoc (region in the south of France), the Pope strengthened after a hard struggle with politicians and the spirit of national identity.

In Germany there was complete confusion: there was a struggle for the imperial throne. The hopes of the parties were also associated with the actions of Innocent III, much depended on which of the three contenders he supported: Philip Hohenstaufen, Friedrich Hohenstaufen or Otto IV, Duke of Braunschweig, leader of the Welf party. Philip and Otto were elected to the throne by the German princes almost simultaneously, each with his own party. A war broke out between the rivals. At first they did not pay attention to the direct heir, the son of the last emperor - Frederick. Innocent, after long deliberation, spoke in favor of Otto, against whom almost all of central and southern Germany protested. His opponents sent a rather tough protest to the Pope. “Perhaps the holy curia,” wrote the authors of this document, “in her parental tenderness, considers us an addition to the Roman Empire. If so, then we cannot but declare the injustice of all this ... ”But the curia thought so, so Innokenty continued to defend his point of view. In favor of Philip, his namesake spoke up - the French king, who had just been humiliated by the pontiff, which will be discussed below. The situation was resolved in Otto's favor rather unexpectedly. June 23, 1208 Philip Hohenstaufen was killed by his personal enemy - one of the German feudal lords. Otto, however, did not live up to the hopes of the pope. In 1210, he tried to conquer the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, which included a large part of the Apennine Peninsula, and was excommunicated. This once again showed that the differences between the pontificate and the Holy Roman Empire are of a systemic nature. Whoever came to power in the empire, he invariably came into conflict with the pope over the right to interfere in the affairs of the church in his country and claims to some disputed territories.

Much more harshly, Innocent III put in place the rebellious English monarch, who was the notorious John the Landless, a king who did not want to share his power with anyone, even with the Catholic Church. In 1205, John attempted to revoke the papal approval of the new Archbishop of Canterbury as head of the Church of England. As a result, Innocent imposed an interdict on England. For a medieval person, the end of all rituals and celebrations, the closure of churches was a disaster. For some time, the English king fought: he ordered to seize, expel, hang and cut those clergy who obeyed the interdict. He confiscated their estates, encouraged robbery, but only achieved that he further turned the population of the country against him. In 1212, Innocent abdicated John from the throne and freed the English feudal lords from their vassal oath to their king. The monarch's anger was replaced by servility. He gave up England in favor of Rome and got it back from the pope with the obligation of a large annual tribute.

Pope did not limit himself to England and Germany. It was under Innokenty that the conquest campaigns of the Teutonic Order began on the territory of the settlement of the Prussians and the Order of the Swordsmen in the Livonian lands. In both Prussia and Livonia, the crusades were accompanied by the merciless devastation of the land. The pope also fought to strengthen his influence in Spain.

One of the strongest opponents of Innocent at one time was the outstanding French monarch Philip II Augustus. Then the time of power came royal power, there was a process of unification of the French lands. Philip II successfully fought with the British for the vast territories in France that had ceded to them under Eleanor of Aquitaine, took possession of the feudal lords who were leaving for the crusades to the east, and established relations with the cities that he removed from the rule of the barons. Much has been done in the field of the administrative and economic structure of the state. Such a king was naturally opposed to Rome having a great influence on French affairs. The reason for the clash between Philip and Innocent was the king's marriage problems. The latter did not like his wife Ingeborg, the sister of the Danish king Knut. When Pope Celestine III refused to ask Philip for a divorce, the king ordered Ingeborg to be locked up in a monastery, and he himself married the daughter of one of the Tyrolean princes. Having come to power, Innocent resolutely led the struggle for the fulfillment of the papal order. In January 1200, the French clergy gathered at a cathedral in Vienne. The legate of the pope announced that France was committed to excommunication for the sins of her king. Philip II Augustus was forced to concede. In 1202, the excommunication was lifted. They say the king said bitterly: "How happy Saladin is that he has no daddy." Ingeborga was returned to the court. But the French monarch harbored a hatred of Rome and was undoubtedly not a reliable subject of the curia.

Innocent III had certain hopes for establishing his influence in Byzantium. It was during the reign of this pontiff that the bloody Fourth Crusade was organized, during which the crusaders defeated Constantinople. However, the Pope was dissatisfied with the cruelty shown by them. Upon learning of the savage atrocities of the French and Venetians, he punished the perpetrators with an excommunicating bull. But Innokenty himself became the organizer of the no less bloody Albigensian campaign in the south of France, during which it was with his permission that the Inquisition began to operate. It is curious that King Philip did not personally take part in the wars against heretics. The battles with the Albigensians at the first stage were fought, in fact, by Rome and the crusader army recruited by it. It is unlikely that the French king was delighted with the fact that a foreign army ruled on the territory of his kingdom.

Thus, the crusade of children, allegedly in 1212, may have the most direct relation to the history of the struggle of Innocent with the German and French rulers. We are again dealing with some kind of called by the church, organized and, probably, armed groups that gather in Germany and France and march along the roads of the possessions of disobedient monarchs. In this case, their goals can be divided into formal and factual. Just as the participants of the Fourth Crusade went to Egypt, and sailed to Dalmatia, the participants of the "children's" campaign went to the Holy Land, and reached Marseilles. And, possibly, both the French and the Germans. The French even had a letter with them addressed to Philip II Augustus. What was in this document, what did the legates who secretly directed the campaign wanted to achieve? Speeches of the King's Regular Forces in the Middle East? Their participation in the Albigensian War? Complete submission of the king to the pope? Or maybe the monarch was preparing another attempt to remove the church from solving the state problems of France, and the procession of many thousands served as a preventive measure that kept him from taking this step? After all, since the pontiff can put under his banners colossal masses of commoners (in addition to the main part of the "children's army", local formations marched along the roads of France), is it possible to fight Rome?

"A foolish mind leads to the shore ..." Children's Crusade 1212 To believe or not to believe in the biblical story about the sea parted before Moses is a private matter for everyone. But the thousands of children who, singing hymns, walked along the streets of Marseille straight to the sea, undoubtedly believed in her. They

From the book History of the Middle Ages the author Sergei Nefedov

Crusade of the swords Bare swords, the Franks scour the city, They spare no one, even those who pray for mercy ... Chronicle of Fulcherius of Chartres. The Pope instructed all monks and priests to preach a crusade to free the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. Bishops

the author Baganova Maria

Second Crusade "Torah to King Louis, because of which my heart was clothed in mourning," said the troubadour Marcabru through the lips of a young maiden mourning parting with her lover leaving for the Crusade. Saint Bernard echoed him, proudly writing to Pope Eugene:

From book The World History in gossip the author Baganova Maria

Third Crusade Saladin continued to conquer the Crusader states. Taking away the coastal cities, he destroyed Christian garrisons everywhere and replaced them with Muslim ones. The battle of Tiberias was a terrible defeat for the Christians; king of Jerusalem and prince

From the book History of the Military Monastic Orders of Europe the author Akunov Wolfgang Viktorovich

2. 1st Crusade of the Cross Clashes between popes and emperors continued for decades, so the crusading movement, organized at the initiative of the pope, initially did not find much response in the Germanic lands. The emperor and his nobles

From the book History of the Crusades the author Kharitonovich Dmitry Eduardovich

Campaign of knighthood, or actually the First Crusade Historians traditionally count the beginning of the First Crusade with the departure of a knightly army in the summer of 1096. However, this army also included a considerable number of common people, priests,

Karnatsevich Vladislav Leonidovich

CRUSH OF CHILDREN The legendary Crusade of children gives an excellent idea of ​​how the mentality of the people of the Middle Ages differed from the worldview of our contemporaries. Reality and fiction in the head of a person of the 13th century. were closely intertwined. The people believed in

From the book Generals Ancient Rus... Mstislav Tmutarakansky, Vladimir Monomakh, Mstislav Udatny, Daniil Galitsky author Kopylov N.A.

The failed crusade Daniel continued negotiations on a military alliance against the Golden Horde with Hungary and found understanding in this matter at the Holy See. Pope Innocent IV in 1246 promised to declare a crusade against the Mongols. He also promised Daniel

From the book The Era of the Battle of Kulikovo the author Alexander Bykov

CROSSMARK And at this time in the south, the Turkish state was gaining strength. Macedonia and Bulgaria were subordinated. In 1394, the Turkish sultan conceived an attack on the very capital of Byzantium. The first step towards this was the blockade of Constantinople. For seven years, the Turks have blocked

From the book Clan Gambino. A new generation of mafia the author Vinokur Boris

The Crusade Before Rudolph Giuliani arrived in New York, he worked for many years in Washington, DC, holding high positions in the US Department of Justice. The NYU Law School graduate has had a successful career, advancing his career

From the book Crusades author Nesterov Vadim

Crusade of children (1212) The failure of military expeditions to the East caused the spread of a naive belief among the people in the possibility of a miraculous liberation of the Holy Land. They expected a miracle ... from children. The land, unconquered by the force of arms, was to submit to sinless souls.

From the book Between Fear and Admiration: The Russian Complex in the Mind of the Germans, 1900-1945 author Kenen Gerd

Anti-Bolshevik Crusade? The attack on the USSR in June 1941 - in the complete absence of preliminary ideological preparation - again and instantly opened the floodgates of anti-Bolshevik propaganda. Goebbels cynically remarked in his diary that now

From the Book of 100 Forbidden Books: A Censored History of World Literature. Book 1 by Sowa Don B

Digging through the Internet, I found an interesting article. Rather, this is an essay by a 4th year student of the Smolensk Pedagogical University Kupchenko Konstantin. Reading about the crusades, I came across a mention of a children's crusade. But I didn’t even suspect that everything was so bad !!! Read to the end, do not be intimidated by the volume.

Children's crusade. How it all began

Gustave Dore The Children's Crusade

Introduction

« It happened just after Easter. We had not yet waited for the Trinity, when thousands of youths set out on the road, abandoning their work and their shelter. Some of them were barely born and were only six years old. For others, it was just right to choose a bride for themselves, but they chose exploit and glory in Christ. They have forgotten the worries entrusted to them. They left the plow with which they had recently blown up the earth; they let go of the wheelbarrow that weighed them down; they left the sheep, next to which they fought against the wolves, and thought about other adversaries, the Mohammedan heresy of the strong ... Parents, brothers and sisters, friends persistently persuaded them, but the firmness of the ascetics was unshakable. Having put on the cross and rallied under their banners, they moved to Jerusalem ... The whole world called them madmen, but they went forward».

This is approximately how medieval sources tell about an event that shook the entire Christian society in 1212. In the sultry dry summer of 1212, an event took place that is known as the children's crusade.

Chroniclers of the XIII century. described feudal quarrels and bloody wars in detail, but did not pay close attention to this tragic page of the Middle Ages.

More than 50 medieval authors mention children's campaigns (sometimes briefly, in one or two lines, sometimes giving them a half-page description); of these, only more than 20 are trustworthy, since they either saw the young crusaders with their own eyes. And the information of these authors is very fragmentary. For example, here is one of the references to the children's crusade in the medieval chronicle:

"The Crusade Called for Children, 1212"

« Children of both sexes, adolescents and adolescents, and not only small children, but also adults, married women and girls went on this expedition - they all walked in crowds with empty wallets, flooding not only all of Germany, but also the country of the Gauls and Burgundy. Neither friends nor relatives could in any way keep them at home: they indulged in any tricks to hit the road. It got to the point that everywhere, in the villages and right in the field, people left their weapons, throwing in place even those that were in their hands, and joined the procession. Many people, seeing in this a sign of true piety, filled with the Spirit of God, hastened to supply the pilgrims with everything they needed, giving them food and everything they needed. The laity fiercely rebuffed the clergy and some others, who possessed a more sound judgment and denounced this walk, reproaching them for unbelief and claiming that they resisted this act more out of envy and avarice than for the sake of truth and justice. Meanwhile, any business started without a proper test of reason and without relying on wise discussion never leads to anything good. And so, when these mad crowds entered the lands of Italy, they scattered in different directions and scattered throughout the cities and villages, and many of them fell into slavery to the local residents. Some, as they say, made it to the sea, and there, trusting the crafty sailors, they allowed themselves to be taken to other overseas countries. Those who continued the campaign, reaching Rome, found that it was impossible for them to go further, since they did not have support from any authorities, and they had to finally admit that their energy was wasted and in vain, although, however, no one could take off their vow to make a crusade - only children who had not reached a conscious age, and the elderly, bent under the weight of years, were free from it. So, disappointed and embarrassed, they set off on their way back. Once accustomed to marching from province to province in a crowd, each in his own company and without stopping chanting, they now returned in silence, alone, barefoot and hungry. They were subjected to all kinds of humiliation, and more than one girl was captured by rapists and deprived of innocence».

Religious authors of subsequent centuries, for obvious reasons, bypassed the terrible plot in silence. And enlightened secular writers, even the most evil-speaking and merciless, apparently considered the reminder of the senseless death of almost a hundred thousand children to be "a blow below the belt," an unworthy reception in polemics with churchmen. The venerable historians saw in the ridiculous enterprise of children only an obvious indisputable stupidity, on the study of which it was inexpedient to expend mental potential. And therefore, the children's crusade is given in respectable historical research dedicated to the crusaders, at best, a few pages between the descriptions of the fourth (1202-1204) and fifth (1217-1221) crusades.

So what happened in the summer of 1212?To begin with, let's turn to history, consider briefly the reasons for the crusades in general and the campaign of children in particular.

Causes of the Crusades.

For quite some time now, Europe looked with dismay at what was happening in Palestine. The stories of the pilgrims returning from there to Europe about the persecution and insults they endured in the Holy Land worried European peoples... Little by little, a conviction was created to return to the Christian world its most precious and revered shrines. But in order for Europe to send numerous hordes of various nationalities to this enterprise over the course of two centuries, it was necessary to have special grounds and a special situation.

There were many reasons in Europe that helped to realize the idea of ​​the Crusades. Medieval society was generally characterized by a religious mood; the crusades were a peculiar form of pilgrimage; the rise of the papacy was also of great importance for the crusades. In addition, for all classes of medieval society, the crusades seemed very attractive from a worldly point of view. Barons and knights, in addition to religious motives, hoped for glorious exploits, for profit, for the satisfaction of their ambition; merchants expected to increase their profits by expanding trade with the East; the oppressed peasants were freed from serfdom for participating in the crusade and knew that during their absence the church and the state would take care of the families they had left in their homeland; the debtors and defendants knew that during their participation in the crusade they would not be prosecuted by the creditor or the court.

A quarter of a century before the events described below, the famous Sultan Salah ad-Din, or Saladin, defeated the crusaders and cleared Jerusalem of them. The best knights of the Western world tried to reclaim the lost shrine.

Many people of that time came to the conviction that if sin-laden adults cannot return Jerusalem, then innocent children must fulfill this task, since God will help them. And then, to the joy of the pope, a prophet-boy appeared in France, who began to preach a new crusade.

Chapter 1. Young preacher of the children's crusade - Stephen of Clois.

In 1200 (or perhaps the next), not far from Orleans, in the village of Cloix (or perhaps elsewhere), a peasant boy named Stephen was born. This is too similar to the beginning of a fairy tale, but this is only a reproduction of the negligence of the then chroniclers and the inconsistency in their stories about the children's crusade. However, the fabulous opening is quite appropriate for a story about a fabulous fate. This is what the chronicles tell us about.

Like all peasant children, Stefan helped his parents from an early age - he grazed cattle. He differed from his peers only by a slightly greater piety: Stephen was more often than others in church, he wept bitterly than others from the feelings that overwhelmed him during the liturgies and religious processions... He was shocked by the April "course of the black crosses" - a solemn procession on the day of St. Mark. On this day, prayers were offered for the soldiers who died in the holy land, for those who were tortured in Muslim slavery. And the boy burst into flames along with the crowd, furiously cursing the infidels.

On one warm May day in 1212, he met a pilgrim monk who was coming from Palestine and begging for alms.The monk began to talk about overseas miracles and exploits. Stefan listened, fascinated. Suddenly the monk interrupted his story, and then suddenly that he was Jesus Christ.

Everything further was like in a dream (or the boy's dream was this meeting). The monk-Christ ordered the boy to become the head of an unprecedented crusade - a children's one, for "from the lips of infants comes strength against the enemy." There is no need for swords or armor - for the conquest of Muslims, the sinlessness of children and the word of God in their mouths will be enough. Then the numb Stephen took a scroll from the hands of the monk - a letter to the king of France. Then the monk quickly walked away.

Stephen could no longer remain a shepherd. The Almighty called him to a feat. Out of breath, the boy rushed home and dozens of times recounted what had happened to him to his parents and neighbors, who looked in vain (because they were illiterate) at the words of the mysterious scroll. Stefan’s zeal didn’t quench Stefan’s zeal. The next day he packed up his knapsack, took his staff and headed for Saint-Denis - the abbey of Saint Dionysius, patron of France. The boy reasoned correctly that it was necessary to collect volunteers for the children's trip in the place of the greatest gathering of pilgrims.

And so early in the morning, a frail boy walked with a knapsack and a staff on a deserted road. The "snowball" rolled. The boy can still be stopped, restrained, tied up and thrown to "cool down" in the basement. But no one foresaw a tragic future.

One of the chroniclers testifies " by conscience and truth, " what Stefan was " an early matured villain and a nest of all vices"But these lines were written thirty years after the sad ending of a crazy undertaking, when they began to look for a scapegoat in hindsight. After all, had Stephen had a bad reputation in Cloix, the imaginary Christ would not have chosen him for the role of a saint. It is hardly worth calling Stephen and the holy fool, as Soviet researchers do. ”

On the way, Stephen stayed in towns and villages, where with his speeches he gathered tens and hundreds of people. From numerous repetitions, he ceased to be shy and confused in words. An experienced little speaker came to Saint-Denis. The abbey, located nine kilometers from Paris, attracted crowds of thousands of pilgrims. Stephen was well received there: the sanctity of the place disposed to the expectation of a miracle - and here it is: the child Chrysostom. The shepherd boy boldly recounted everything he had heard from the pilgrims, deftly knocked out a tear from the crowds, which had come to be moved and cry! "Save, Lord, those suffering in captivity!" Stephen pointed to the relics of Saint Dionysius, kept among gold and precious stones, revered by crowds of Christians. And then he asked: is this the fate of the Tomb of the Lord Himself, which is defiled by the unbelievers every day? And he snatched a scroll from his bosom, and the crowds buzzed when the boy with burning eyes shook before them the immutable command of Christ addressed to the king. Stephen recalled the many signs and wonders given to him by the Lord.

Stephen preached to the adults. But in the crowd there were hundreds of children, whom the elders often took with them on their way to the holy places.

A week later, the wonderful youth came into fashion, having withstood the fierce competition with adult eloquence and holy fools.His children listened with fervent faith. He appealed to their secret dreams: about feats of arms, about travel, about glory, about serving the Lord, about freedom from parental care. And how it flattered the ambition of the teenagers! After all, the Lord chose as his instrument not sinful and greedy adults, but their children!

Pilgrims dispersed to the cities and villages of France. The adults very soon forgot about Stefan. But the children excitedly talked everywhere about their peer - the miracle worker and the orator, amazing the imagination of the neighboring children and making each other terrible vows to help Stephen. And now the games of knights and squires were abandoned, the French children began a dangerous game of the army of Christ. The children of Brittany, Normandy and Aquitaine, Auvergne and Gascony, while the adults of all these regions quarreled and fought with each other, began to unite around an idea that was not higher and purer in the 13th century.

Chronicles are silent whether Stephen was a happy find for the pope, or one of the prelates, or perhaps the pontiff himself, had planned the appearance of the boy-saint in advance. Whether the cassock that flashed in Stephen's vision belonged to an unauthorized fanatic monk or the disguised envoy of Innocent III - it is now impossible to find out. And it doesn't matter where the idea of ​​the children's crusading movement arose - in the bowels of the papal curia or in the heads of children. Dad grabbed her with an iron grip.

Now everything boded well for the children's hike: the fertility of frogs, the clashes of dog packs, even the beginning drought. Here and there there appeared "prophets" twelve, ten and even eight years old. They all insisted that they were sent by Stephen, although many of them did not see him in the eyes. All these prophets healed the possessed and performed other "miracles" ...

The kids formed squads and marched around the neighborhood, recruiting new supporters everywhere. At the head of each procession, singing hymns and psalms, there was a prophet, followed by an oriflamma - a copy of the banner of St. Dionysius. The children held crosses and lighted candles in their hands, waved smoking censers.

And what a tempting sight it was for the children of the nobility, who watched the solemn procession of their peers from their castles and houses! But almost every one of them had a grandfather, a father or an older brother who fought in Palestine. Some of them died. And now - an opportunity to take revenge on the infidels, gain glory, continue the work of the older generation. And children from noble families enthusiastically joined the new game, flocked under the banners with images of Christ and the Ever-Virgin. Sometimes they became leaders, sometimes they were forced to obey an artistic peer-prophet.

Many girls joined the movement, who also dreamed of the Holy Land, exploits and freedom from parental authority. The leaders did not drive the "girls" - they wanted to collect a bigger army. Many girls disguised themselves as boys for safety and ease of movement.

As soon as Stefan (May has not yet expired!) Announced Wandom as a gathering place, hundreds and thousands of teenagers began to converge there. With them were a few adults: monks and priests, going, in the words of the Reverend Gray, "to plunder to their hearts or to pray to their fill," the urban and rural poor, who joined the children "not for Jesus, but for the sake of bread bite"; and most of all - thieves, cheaters, various criminal rabble, who hoped to profit from noble children, well equipped for the journey. Many adults sincerely believed in the success of the unarmed expedition and hoped that they would get rich prey. The elders who had fallen into their second childhood were also with their children. Hundreds of corrupt women hovered around the offspring of noble families. So the detachments turned out to be amazingly colorful. And in the previous crusades, children, old people, hordes of Magdalene and all kinds of scum took part. But beforethey were just a makeweight, and the core of Christ's army was made up of barons and knights skilled in military affairs. Now, instead of broad-shouldered men in armor and chain mail, the core of the army was made up of unarmed children.

But where did the authorities and, most importantly, the parents look? Everyone expected the children to get mad and calm down.

King Philip II Augustus, a tireless collector of French lands, an insidious and far-sighted politician, initially approved the initiative of the children. Philip wanted to have the Pope on his side in the war with the English king and was not averse to please Innocent III and organize a crusade, but only his power was not enough for that. Suddenly - this idea of ​​children, noise, enthusiasm. Of course, all this should kindle the hearts of the barons and knights with righteous anger against the infidels!

However, the adults did not lose their heads. And children's fuss began to threaten the tranquility of the state. The guys are abandoning their houses, fleeing to Vendome, and in fact they are going to move to the sea! But on the other hand, the pope is silent, the legates are agitating for the campaign ... Cautious Philip II was afraid to anger the pontiff, but nevertheless turned to the scientists of the recently created University of Paris. They answered firmly: the children must be stopped immediately! If necessary - by force, for their campaign is inspired by Satan! Responsibility for stopping the march was removed from him, and the king issued an edict commanding the children to immediately get rid of stupidity from their heads and go home.

However, the royal edict did not impress the children. Childish hearts had a lord more powerful than a king. The matter has gone too far - you can't stop it with a shout. Only the faint-hearted returned home. Peers and barons did not dare to use violence: ordinary people sympathized with this idea of ​​children and would rise to their defense. There would have been riots. After all, the people had just been taught that God's will will allow children without weapons and bloodshed to convert Muslims to Christians and thus free the "Holy Sepulcher" from the hands of the infidels.

In addition, the pope declared loudly: "These children are a reproach to us, adults: while we sleep, they are happy to stand up for the holy land." Pope Innocent III still hoped with the help of children to awaken the enthusiasm of adults. From distant Rome, he could not see the frenzied childish faces and, probably, did not realize that he had already lost control of the situation and could not stop the children's trip. The massive psychosis that gripped the children, skillfully fueled by the churchmen, was now impossible to contain.

Therefore, Philip II washed his hands and did not insist on fulfilling his edict.

There was a groan of unhappy parents in the country. Amusing solemn children's parades around the district, so touching the adults, turned into a general flight of teenagers from families. Few families, in their fanaticism, themselves blessed their children for a disastrous campaign. Most of the fathers whipped their offspring, locked them in closets, but the children gnawed at the ropes, undermined the walls, broke the locks and ran away. And those who could not break free fought in hysterics, refused food, languished, fell ill. Willy-nilly, the parents gave up.

Children put on a kind of uniform: gray simple shirts over short pants and a large beret. But many children could not afford this either: they wore what they were wearing (often barefoot and bareheaded, although the sun almost never set behind the clouds that summer). On the chests of the participants of the campaign, a cloth cross of red, green or black was sewn (of course, these units competed with each other). Each detachment had its own commander, flag and other symbols, which the children were very proud of. When the detachments with singing, banners, crosses cheerfully and solemnly passed through cities and villages, heading to Vendome, only locks and strong oak doors could keep a son or daughter at home. Like a plague swept across the country, taking away tens of thousands of children.

Enthusiastic crowds of onlookers enthusiastically greeted the detachments of children, which further fueled her enthusiasm and ambition.

Finally, some priests realized the danger of this venture. They began to stop the detachments, where they could persuade the children to disperse to their homes, assured that the thought of a children's campaign was the machinations of the devil. But the guys were adamant, especially since in all major cities they were met and blessed by papal emissaries. Reasonable priests were immediately declared apostates. The superstition of the crowd, the enthusiasm of the children and the machinations of the papal curia won over common sense. And many of these apostate priests deliberately set out with children doomed to inevitable death, like seven centuries later, teacher Janusz Korczak went with his pupils to the gas chamber of the fascist Treblinka concentration camp.

Chapter 2. Way of the Cross of German children.

The news of the boy-prophet Stephen spread throughout the country at the speed of the pilgrims on foot. Those who went to worship at Saint-Denis brought the news to Burgundy and Champagne, from there it reached the banks of the Rhine. In Germany, his "holy youth" was not slow to appear. And there the papal legates zealously set about processing public opinion in favor of organizing a children's crusade.

The boy's name was Nicholas (we only know the Latin version of his name). He was born in a village near Cologne. He was twelve or even ten years old. At first, he was just a pawn in the hands of adults. Nicholas's father energetically "shoved" his child prodigy into the prophets. It is not known whether the boy's father was rich, but he was undoubtedly driven by low motives. The monk-chronicler, witness of the process of "making" a minor prophet, calls Father Nicholas " mischievous fool". How much he earned on his son, we do not know, but after a few months he paid for his son's affairs with his life.

Koln- the religious center of the Germanic lands, where thousands of pilgrims often flocked with their children, - was the best place for the deployment of campaigning. In one of the churches of the city, the jealously revered relics of the "Three Kings of the East" - the Magi, who brought gifts to the Christ-child, were kept. Let us note a detail, the fatal role of which will become clear later: the relics were capturedFrederick I Barbarossa during his robbery of Milan. And it was here, in Cologne, at the instigation of his father, Nicholas proclaimed himself God's chosen one.

Then the events developed according to the already tested scenario: Nicholas had a vision of a cross in the clouds, and the voice of the Almighty ordered him to collect the children on a campaign; the crowds greeted the newly appeared boy-prophet; Immediately followed by the healing of the possessed and other miracles, rumors of which spread with incredible speed. Nicholas spoke on the porches of churches, on stones and barrels in the middle of the squares.

Then everything went according to the well-known scheme: adult pilgrims spread the news about the young prophet, children whispered and gathered in teams, marched around the outskirts of different cities and villages finally left - to Cologne. But there were also some peculiarities in the development of events in Germany. Frederick II, himself a young man who had just won the throne from his uncle Otto IV, was at that time the pope's favorite, and therefore could afford to contradict the pontiff. He decisively forbade the idea of ​​children: the country was already shaken by turmoil. Therefore, the children gathered only from the Rhine regions closest to Cologne. The movement snatched from families not one or two children, as in France, but almost everyone, including even six-year-olds and seven-year-olds. It is this little one that, on the second day of the hike, will ask the elders to snag, and in the third or fourth week it will start to get sick, die, at best, stay in roadside villages (unknowingly the way back - forever).

The second feature of the German version: among the motives of the children's campaign, the first place was occupied not by the desire to liberate the "holy land", but by the thirst for revenge. The valiant Germans perished in the crusades quite a lot - families of any rank and state remembered the bitter losses. That is why the detachments consisted almost entirely of boys (although some of them turned out to begirls in disguise), and the sermons of Nicholas and other leaders of the local troops more than half consisted of calls for revenge.

Detachments of children hurriedly gathered in Cologne. The campaign had to start as soon as possible: the emperor was against, the barons were against, the parents were breaking sticks on the backs of their sons! Just look, the tempting idea will fail!

The inhabitants of Cologne showed miracles of patience and hospitality (nowhere to go) and gave shelter and food to thousands of children. Most of the boys spent the night in the fields around the city, groaning with the influx of criminal rabble, who hoped to profit by joining the children's campaign.

And then came the day of the solemn performance from Cologne. End of June. Under the banner of Nicholas - at least twenty thousand children (according to some chronicles, twice as many). These are mainly boys of twelve years of age and older. No matter how opposed the German barons, but the offspring of noble families in the troops of Nicholas turned out to be more than Stephen's. After all, there were much more barons in fragmented Germany than in France. In the heart of every noble teenager, brought up on the ideals of knightly valor, there was a burning thirst for revenge for the grandfather, father or brother killed by the Saracens.

The people of Cologne poured out onto the city walls. Thousands of identically dressed children are lined up in columns in the field. Wooden crosses, banners, pennants sway over the gray sea. Hundreds of adults - some in cassocks, some in rags - seem to be captives of the children's army. Nicholas, the commanders of the detachments, some of the children from noble families will go in carts, surrounded by squires. But many young aristocrats with knapsacks and staffs stand side by side with the last of their slaves.

Mothers of children from distant cities and villages cried and said goodbye. The time has come to say goodbye and sob to the Cologne mothers - their children make up almost half of the participants in the campaign.

But then the trumpet sounded. The children started singing a hymn to the glory of Christ of their own composition, alas, not preserved for us by history. The line moved, trembled - and moved forward to the enthusiastic cries of the crowd, the lamentations of mothers and the murmur of sane people.

An hour passes - and the army of children hides behind the hills. Only a thousand-voiced singing is still heard from afar. Cologne disperse - proud: they have equipped their children on the way, and the Franks are still digging! ..

Not far from Cologne, Nicholas's army broke into two huge columns. One was headed by Nicholas, the other by a boy whose name the chronicles did not preserve. Column of Nicholas moved south by a short route: along Lorraine along the Rhine, in the west of Swabia and through French Burgundy. The second column reached the Mediterranean Sea along a long route: through Franconia and Swabia. Both the Alps blocked their way to Italy. It would have been wiser to go plain to Marseille, but the French children intended to go there, and Italy seemed closer to Palestine than Marseille.

The detachments stretched out for many kilometers. Both routes ran through semi-wild lands. The local people, not numerous even at that time, huddled up to the few fortresses. Wild animals came out of the woods onto the roads. The thickets were teeming with robbers. Dozens of children drowned while crossing rivers. In such conditions, whole groups ran back home. But the ranks of the children's army were immediately replenished with children from roadside villages.

Glory was ahead of the participants in the campaign. But not in all cities they were fed and left to spend the night at least even on the streets. Sometimes they drove away, rightly protecting their children from "infection". The guys happened to be left without alms for a day or two. The edibles from the knapsacks of the weak quickly migrated into the stomachs of those who were stronger and older. Theft in the detachments flourished. Broken women lured money from the offspring of noble and wealthy families, the sharper took away the last penny from the children, enticing them to play dice on the halts. Discipline in the detachments was falling day by day.

We set off early in the morning. In the very heat, they made a halt in the shade of trees. While they walked, they sang simple hymns. At the halts, they told and listened to full extraordinary adventures and the wonders of the story of battles and campaigns, about knights and pilgrims. Surely there were jokes and mischievous children among the guys, who ran after each other and danced when others fell off their feet after a many-kilometer hike. Surely the children fell in love, quarreled, made peace, fought for leadership ...

On a bivouac in the foothills of the Alps, near Lake Leman, Nicholas was at the head of the "army" almost half the size of the original. The majestic mountains only for a moment, with their white caps of snow, enchanted children who had never seen anything similar in beauty. Then horror struck the hearts: after all, they had to climb to these white hats!

The inhabitants of the foothills greeted the children warily and sternly. It never crossed their minds to feed the guys. At least they didn't kill the good. The grubs in their knapsacks melted away. But that's not all: in the mountain valleys, German children - many for the first and last time - met ... the very Saracens whom they intended to baptize in the Holy Land! The vicissitudes of the era threw detachments of Arab robbers here: they settled in these places, not wanting or not being able to return to their homeland. The guys crept along the valley in silence, without songs, dropping their crosses. There would be to turn them back. Alas, clever conclusions were made only by the rabble who adhered to the children. These scum have already robbed the children and fled, for further promises only death or slavery among the Muslims. The Saracens hacked to death a dozen or two of the guys lagging behind the detachment. But children are already accustomed to such losses: every day they buried or abandoned dozens of their comrades without burial. Malnutrition, fatigue, stress and illness did their part.

Crossing the Alps- without food and warm clothes - became a real nightmare for the participants of the hike. These mountains terrified even adults. To wade along icy slopes, on eternal snows, on stone cornices - not everyone has the strength and courage for this. Merchants with goods, military detachments, and clerics were transshipped across the Alps to Rome and back as needed.

The presence of guides did not save unwary children from death. The stones were cutting bare, freezing feet. Among the snow there were not even berries and fruits to satisfy hunger. The knapsacks were already completely empty. The passage through the Alps due to poor discipline, fatigue and weakness of children took twice as long as usual! Frostbite feet slipped and did not obey, children fell into the abyss. A new ridge rose up behind the ridge. We slept on stones. If they found branches for a fire, they warmed up. Probably they fought because of the heat. At night they huddled in heaps to warm each other. Not everyone got up in the morning. The dead were thrown on the frozen ground - there was no strength even to roll them over with stones or branches. At the highest point of the pass was a monastery of missionary monks. There the children were slightly warmed and welcomed. But where could they get food and heat for such a crowd!

The descent was an incredible joy. Greens! Silver rivers! Crowded villages, vineyards, citrus fruits, the height of a luxurious summer! After the Alps, only every third participant in the campaign survived. But those who remained, perked up, thought that all the sorrows were already behind. In this abundant land, they, of course, will be fondled and fattened.

But it was not there. Italy met them with undisguised hatred.

After all, there appeared those whose fathers raided these abundant lands, desecrated shrines and plundered cities. Therefore, in the Italian cities "Germanic serpents" were not allowed. Alms were given only by the most compassionate, and even then secretly from the neighbors. Barely three or four thousand children reached Genoa, stealing food along the way and robbing fruit trees.

On Saturday, August 25, 1212 (the only date in the chronicle of the campaign, with which all the chronicles agree), emaciated teenagers stood on the shore genoese harbor... Two monstrous months and a thousand kilometers behind, so many friends are buried, and now - the sea, and the holy land is just a stone's throw away.

How were they going to cross the Mediterranean? Where were you going to get money for the ships? The answer is simple. They don't need ships or money. The sea - with God's help - must make way for them. From the first day of campaigning for the campaign, there was no talk of any ships and money.

Before the children there was a fabulous city - rich Genoa. Recovering in spirit, they again raised high the remaining banners and crosses. Nicholas, who had lost his carriage in the Alps and was now walking with everyone else on foot, stepped forward and made a fiery speech. The guys greeted their leader with the same enthusiasm. Even though they were barefoot and in rags, in wounds and scabs, they reached the sea - the most stubborn, the strongest in spirit. The goal of the campaign - the holy land - is very close.

The fathers of the free city received a delegation of children led by several priests (at other moments of the campaign, the role of adult mentors is hushed up by the chroniclers, probably due to their unwillingness to compromise the churchmen who supported this ridiculous venture). The children did not ask for ships, they only asked for permission to spend the night in the streets and squares of Genoa. The fathers of the city, glad that they were not asked for money or ships, allowed the children to stay in the city for a week, and then advised them to return to Germany, pick up, hello.

The participants of the hike entered the city in picturesque columns, for the first time in many weeks again reveling in everyone's attention and interest. The townspeople greeted them with undisguised curiosity, but at the same time wary and hostile.

However, the Doge of Genoa and the senators changed their minds: no week, let them go home tomorrow! The mob was strongly against the presence of little Germans in Genoa. True, the Pope blessed the campaign, but suddenly these children carry out the insidious plan of the German emperor. On the other hand, the Genoese did not want to let go of such an amount of gratuitous labor, and the children were asked to stay in Genoa forever and become good citizens of the free city.

But the participants in the campaign dismissed the proposal that seemed ridiculous to them. After all, tomorrow - on a journey across the sea!

In the morning, Nicholas's column in all its glory lined up at the edge of the surf. The townspeople crowded on the embankment. After the solemn liturgy, chanting psalms, the detachments moved towards the waves. The first rows entered the water up to their knees ... up to the waist ... And froze in shock: the sea did not want to part. The Lord did not keep his promise. New prayers and hymns did not help. As time went. The sun was rising and hot ... The Genoese, laughing, went home. And the children all did not take their eyes off the sea and sang, sang - until they were hoarse ...

The permit to stay in the city was about to expire. I had to leave. Several hundred teenagers, who had lost hope of the success of the campaign, seized on the offer of the city authorities to settle in Genoa. Young men from noble families were accepted into the best houses as sons, others were dismantled into service.

But the most stubborn gathered in a field not far from the city. And they began to confer. Who knows where the Lord laid down to open the bottom of the sea for them - maybe not in Genoa. We must go further, look for that place. And it is better to die in sunny Italy than to return home beaten by dogs! And worse than shame - the Alps ...

The heavily thinned detachments of the unlucky young crusaders moved further to the South-East. There was no longer a question of discipline, they went in groups, more precisely, in gangs, getting food by force and cunning. Nicholas is no longer mentioned by the chroniclers - he may have stayed in Genoa.

The horde of adolescents has reached at last Pisa... Being expelled from Genoa was an excellent recommendation for them in Pisa, a city that rivaled Genoa. The sea did not part even here, but the inhabitants of Pisa, in defiance of the Genoese, equipped two ships and sent some of the children to Palestine on them. In the chronicles there is a dull mention of the fact that they safely reached the coast of the holy land. But if this happened, they probably soon died of want and hunger - the Christians there themselves barely made ends meet. The chronicles do not mention any meetings between children-crusaders and Muslims.

In the fall, several hundred German teenagers reached Rome, the poverty and abandonment of which, after the luxury of Genoa, Pisa and Florence, amazed them. Pope Innocent III received the representatives of the little crusaders, praised and then chided them and ordered them to return home, forgetting that their home is a thousand kilometers beyond the accursed Alps. Then, by order of the head of the Catholic Church, the children kissed the cross, that, "having arrived at a perfect age," they would certainly end the interrupted crusade. Now, at the very least, the Pope had several hundred crusaders for the future.

Few of the participants in the campaign decided to return to Germany, most of them settled in Italy. Only a few reached their homeland - after many months, or even years. Due to their ignorance, they did not even know how to tell plainly where they had been. The children's crusade resulted in a kind of migration of children - scattering them in other areas of Germany, Burgundy and Italy.

The second German column, no less numerous than Nicholas's column, suffered the same tragic fate. The same thousands of deaths on the roads - from hunger, fast currents, predatory animals; the hardest crossing over the Alps - though through another, but no less destructive pass. Everything was repeated. Only the uncleared corpses were left behind even more: there was almost no general leadership in this column, the campaign in a week turned into a wandering of uncontrollable hordes of teenagers hungry to brutality. Monks and priests with great difficulty gathered the children into groups and somehow curbed them, but this was before the first fight for alms.

In Italy, children managed to poke their Milan, who for fifty years barely recovered from the raid of Barbarossa. From there they barely carried their feet: the Milanese hunted them with dogs like hares.

The sea did not make way for the juvenile crusaders not in Ravenna nor elsewhere. Only a few thousand children made it to the very south of Italy. They had already heard about the Pope's decision to stop the campaign and decided to deceive the pontiff and sail to Palestine from the port of Brindisi. And many things simply plodded forward by inertia, not hoping for anything. In the extreme south of Italy that year there was a monstrous drought - the harvest died, the famine was such that, according to the chroniclers, "mothers devoured their children." It is even difficult to imagine what the German children could eat in this region, swollen with hunger, hostile to them.

Those who miraculously survived and made it to Brindisi, new misadventures awaited. The townspeople identified the girls who took part in the campaign to the sailors' dens. Twenty years later, chroniclers will wonder: why are there so many blond blue-eyed prostitutes in Italy? Boys were seized and turned into half-slaves; The surviving offspring of noble families were, of course, more fortunate - they were adopted.

Archbishop Brindisi tried to stop this Sabbath. He gathered the remains of the little martyrs and ... wished them a pleasant return to Germany. The most fanatical "merciful" bishop seated on several boats and blessed for the unarmed conquest of Palestine. The vessels equipped by the bishop sank almost in sight of Brindisi.

Chapter 3. Way of the Cross of French Children

More than thirty thousand French children came out when German children were already freezing in the mountains. There was no less solemnity and tears at the farewell than in Cologne.

In the first days of the campaign, the intensity of religious fanaticism among the teenagers was such that they did not notice any difficulties on the way. Saint Stephen rode in the best carriage, covered and covered with expensive carpets. Young high-born adjutants of the leader pranced beside the cart. They happily rushed along the marching columns, transmitting instructions and orders of their idol.

Stefan subtly captured the mood of the masses of the participants in the campaign and, if necessary, addressed them at the halts with an incendiary speech. And then there was such a crowd around his carriage that in this crowd of one or two babies were certainly maimed or trampled to death. In such cases, they hastily erected a stretcher or dug a grave, quickly prayed and hurried on, remembering the victims until the first crossroads. But they discussed for a long time and lively who was lucky to get hold of a piece of St. Stephen's clothes or a splinter from his cart. This exaltation captured even those children who fled from home and joined the crusader "army" not at all for religious reasons. Stephen's head was spinning from the consciousness of his power over his peers, from incessant praise and boundless adoration.

It is difficult to say whether he was a good organizer - most likely the movement of the detachments was led by the priests accompanying the children, although the chronicles are silent about this. It is impossible to believe that loud-voiced adolescents could, without the help of adults, cope with a thirty-thousand-strong "army", set up camps in convenient places, organize overnight stays, give the detachments a direction of movement in the morning.

While the young crusaders marched through the territory home country, the population everywhere received them hospitably. If children died on the hike, it was almost exclusively from sunstroke. And yet, gradually, fatigue accumulated, discipline weakened. To maintain the enthusiasm of the participants in the campaign, every day they had to lie that by evening the troops would arrive at their destination. Seeing some fortress in the distance, the children excitedly asked each other: "Jerusalem?" Poor fellows forgot, and many simply did not know, that it is possible to reach the "holy land" only by crossing the sea.

Passed the Tour, Lyon and came to Marseilles almost at full strength. The guys covered five hundred kilometers in a month. The ease of the route allowed them to get ahead of the German children and were the first to reach the Mediterranean coast, which, alas, did not part for them.

Disappointed and even offended by God, the children scattered around the city. We spent the night. The next morning they prayed again on the seashore. By the evening, several hundred children were missing in the detachments - they moved home.

The days passed. The Marseilles somehow tolerated the crowd of children that had fallen on their heads. Fewer and fewer "crusaders" went out to pray to the sea. The leaders of the campaign looked longingly at the ships in the harbor - if they had money, they would not disdain now the usual way of crossing the sea.

The Marseilles began to murmur. The atmosphere was heating up. Suddenly, according to the old expression, the Lord looked back at them. One day the sea parted. Of course, not in the literal sense of the word.

The woeful situation of the young crusaders touched two of the city's most eminent merchants - Hugo Ferreus and William Porkus (Hugo the Iron and William the Pig). However, these two devilish figures with their gloomy nicknames are not at all invented by the chronicler. Other sources also mention their names. And they, out of pure philanthropy, provided the children with the required amount of ships and provisions.

The miracle that was promised to you, - said Saint Stephen from the platform in the city square, - has happened! We just misunderstood the signs of God. It was not the sea that was supposed to part, but the human heart! The will of the Lord is revealed to us in the act of two honorable Marseilles, etc.

And again the guys crowded around their idol, again strove to snatch a piece of his shirt, again they crushed someone to death ...

But there were quite a few children among the children who tried to quickly get out of the crowd in order to sneak out of the blessed Marseilles on the quiet. Medieval boys had heard enough about the unreliability of the ships of that time, about sea storms, about reefs and robbers.

By the next morning, the number of participants in the campaign had significantly diminished. But it was for the best, the rest were tolerably accommodated on the ships, clearing their ranks of the faint-hearted. There were seven ships. According to the chronicles, a large ship of that time could hold up to seven hundred knights. Thus, we can reasonably assume that there were no less children on each ship. This means that the ships took about five thousand children. With them were no less than four hundred priests and monks.

Almost the entire population of Marseille poured out to see the children ashore. After the solemn prayer service, ships under sails, colored with flags, accompanied by chants and enthusiastic shouts of the townspeople, majestically sailed out of the harbor, and now they disappeared beyond the horizon. Forever.

For eighteen years nothing was known about the fate of these ships and the children who sailed on them.

Chapter 4. Tragic ending. What is left in the memory of Europeans about the children's crusade.

Eighteen years have passed since the departure of the young crusaders from Marseilles; all the deadlines for the return of the participants in the children's campaign have passed.

After the death of Pope Innocent III, two more crusades fizzled out, they managed to capture Jerusalem from the Muslims, having entered into an alliance with the Egyptian sultan ... In a word, life went on. They forgot to think about the missing children. To throw a cry, to raise Europe in search, to find five thousand children who, perhaps, are still alive - this never occurred to anyone. Such a wasteful humanism was not in the customs of that time.

Their mothers have already wept. Children were born visibly and invisibly. And many died. Although, of course, it is difficult to imagine that the hearts of mothers who took their children on a hike did not sore from the bitterness of senseless loss.

In 1230, a monk suddenly appeared in Europe, who had once sailed from Marseilles with his children. To him, for some merits released from Cairo, mothers of children who disappeared during the campaign flocked from all over Europe. But how much joy did they have from the fact that the monk saw their son in Cairo, that the son or daughter was still alive? The monk said that in Cairo, about seven hundred participants in the campaign were languishing in captivity. Of course, not a single person in Europe touched a finger to ransom the former idols of the ignorant crowds from slavery.

From the stories of the fugitive monk, which quickly flew around the entire continent, the parents finally learned about tragic fate their missing children. Here's what happened:

The children, crowded in the holds of the ships sailing from Marseille, suffered terribly from stuffiness, seasickness and fear. They feared sirens, leviathans and, of course, storms. It was the storm that fell upon the unfortunate as they passed Corsica and went around Sardinia... The ships were carried to St. Peter's Island off the southwestern tip of Sardinia. At dusk, children screamed in horror as the ship was thrown from wave to wave. Dozens of those on deck were washed overboard. The current carried five ships past the reefs. And two flew straight to the coastal cliffs. Two ships with children were blown to pieces.

Fishermen immediately after the shipwreck buried hundreds of children's corpses on an uninhabited island. But such was the disunity of Europe at that time that news of this did not reach either French or German mothers. Twenty years later, the children were reburied in one place and the Church of the New Immaculate Babies was erected on their mass grave. The church became a place of pilgrimage. This went on for three centuries. Then the church decayed, even its ruins were lost over time ...

Five other ships somehow made it to the African coast. True, nailed them in algerian harbor... But it turned out that it was here that they had to sail! They were clearly expected here. Muslim ships met them and escorted them to the port. Exemplary Christians, compassionate Marseilles Ferreus and Porcus donated seven ships because they intended to sell five thousand children into slavery to the infidels. As the merchants correctly calculated, the monstrous disunity between the Christian and Muslim worlds contributed to the success of their criminal design and ensured their personal safety.

What is slavery among the infidels, the children knew from creepy stories, which were carried across Europe by the pilgrims. Therefore, it is impossible to describe their horror when they realized what had happened.

Some of the children were sold out at the Algerian bazaar, and they became slaves, concubines or concubines of wealthy Muslims. The rest of the guys were loaded onto ships and taken to Alexandria markets... Four hundred monks and priests who were brought to Egypt with their children were fabulously lucky: they were bought by the elderly Sultan Malek Kamel, better known as Safadin. This enlightened ruler had already divided his possessions between his sons and had leisure for scholarly pursuits. He settled the Christians in the Cairo palace and put him in charge of translating from Latin into Arabic. The most educated of the learned slaves shared their European wisdom with the Sultan and gave lessons to his courtiers. They lived satisfyingly and at ease, only they could not go outside Cairo. While they were settling in the palace, blessing God, the children worked in the fields and died like flies.

Several hundred little slaves were sent to Baghdad... And it was only possible to get to Baghdad through Palestine ... Yes, the children stepped on Holy land... But in chains or with ropes around the neck. They saw the majestic walls of Jerusalem. They passed through Nazareth, their bare feet burned the sands of Galilee ... In Baghdad, young slaves were sold out. One of the chronicles tells that the Baghdad Caliph decided to convert them to Islam. And although this event was described according to the stencil of that time: they were tortured, beaten, tormented, but not one betrayed their native faith, the story could be true. Boys who have gone through so much suffering for a lofty goal could well have shown unbending will and die martyrs for their faith. There were, according to the chronicles, eighteen of them. The Caliph abandoned his venture and sent the surviving Christian fanatics to slowly dry up in the fields.

In Muslim lands, juvenile crusaders died of disease, beatings, or mastered, learned the language, gradually forgetting their homeland and relatives. They all died in slavery - not one returned from captivity.

What happened to the leaders of the young crusaders? About Stephen was heard only before the arrival of his column in Marseille. Nicholas disappeared from sight in Genoa. The third, unnamed, leader of the crusader children disappeared into obscurity.

As for the contemporaries of the children's crusade, then, as we have already said, the chroniclers limited themselves to only a very cursory description of it, and the common people, forgetting their enthusiasm and delight at the idea of ​​the little madmen, fully agreed with the two-line Latin epigram - literature honored one hundred thousand ruined children with only six words:

To the stupid shore
The mind is childish.

Thus ended one of the most terrible tragedies in the history of Europe.

The material is taken from here http://www.erudition.ru/referat/printref/id.16217_1.html slightly reduced, removed the situation in Europe at the beginning of the XIII century. and an excursion into the history of the Crusades. The book "The Crusader in Jeans" about the events described above can be found on Librusek. Posted by Thea Beckman.

For the first time at the very beginning of the XI century. Pope Urban II called on Western Europe to crusades. This happened in the late autumn of 1095, shortly after the gathering (congress) of churchmen ended in the city of Clermont (in France). Pope addressed the crowds of knights, peasants, townspeople. monks who gathered on the plain near the city, with an appeal to start a holy war against Muslims. Tens of thousands of knights and village poor from France responded to the pope's call, all of them in 1096 went to Palestine to fight against the Seljuk Turks, who had recently captured the city of Jerusalem, which was considered sacred by Christians.

The liberation of this shrine served as a pretext for the crusades. The crusaders attached crosses of fabric to their clothes as a sign that they were going to war with a religious goal - to expel the Gentiles (Muslims) from Jerusalem and other holy places for Christians in Palistina. In reality, the goals of the Crusaders were not only religious. By the XI century. land in Western Europe was divided between secular and church feudal lords. According to custom, only his eldest son could inherit the land of the lord. As a result, a large layer of feudal lords was formed who did not have land.

They longed to get it in any way. Catholic Church not without reason she feared that these knights would not encroach on her vast domains. In addition, the clergy, led by the Pope, sought to extend their influence to new territories and profit from them. Rumors about the riches of the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean, which were spread by pilgrim travelers who visited Palestine, aroused the greed of the knights. The popes took advantage of this by throwing a cry "To the East!"

L. Gumilyov also believes that at this time in Western Europe there was a passionary impetus and this overheated society had to be cooled with the help of expansion.

In the XII century. the knights had to equip themselves for war under the sign of the cross many times in order to keep the occupied territories. However, these crusades all failed. At the beginning of the XIII century, in the cities and villages of France, and then in other countries, the idea began to spread that if adults for “their sins” were not given the opportunity to free Jerusalem from “infidels”, then “innocent” children could do it ...

Pope Innocent III, the instigator of many bloody wars under the religious banner, did nothing to stop this insane campaign. On the contrary, he declared: "These children are a reproach to us adults: while we sleep, they are happy to speak up for the Holy Land." The crusade was also supported by the Franciscan Order.

The Children's Crusade began with the fact that in June 1212, in a village near Vendôme, a shepherd boy named Stephen (Etienne) appeared, who announced that he was a messenger of God and was called to become the leader and again to conquer the Promised Land for Christians: the sea was to dry before the army of spiritual Israel.

On a warm May day in 1212, Stephen met a pilgrim monk who was coming from Palestine and begging for alms.

The monk accepted the served piece of bread and began to talk about overseas miracles and exploits. Stefan listened, fascinated. Suddenly the monk interrupted his story, and then suddenly dropped that he was Jesus Christ.

Everything further was like in a dream (or the boy's dream was this meeting). The monk-Christ ordered the boy to become the head of an unprecedented crusade - a children's one, for "from the lips of babies comes strength against the enemy." And then the monk disappeared, melted away

Stephen walked all over the country and everywhere caused stormy enthusiasm with his speeches, as well as the miracles that he performed in front of thousands of eyewitnesses. Soon, in many localities, boys appeared as preachers of the cross, gathered around them whole crowds of like-minded people and led them, with banners and crosses and with solemn songs, to the wonderful boy Stephen. If anyone asked the young madmen where they were going, he received in response that they were going across the sea to God.

Stephen, this holy fool, was revered as a miracle worker. In July, singing psalms and gonfalons, they set off for Marseille to sail to the Holy Land, but no one thought about ships in advance. The army was often joined by criminals; playing the role of participants, they lived off the alms of pious Catholics.

The extravagance that gripped the French children also spread in Germany, especially in the lower Rhine regions. Here came the boy Nikolai, who was not yet 10 years old, led by his father, also a vile trader of slaves, who used the poor child for his own purposes, for which later “together with other deceivers and criminals ended, as they say, with a gallows. appeared with a machine on which there was a cross in the form of the Latin "T", and it was announced that he would cross the sea with dry feet and establish the eternal kingdom of peace in Jerusalem. Wherever he appeared, he irresistibly attracted children. 20 thousand boys, girls, as well as a disorderly rabble and moved south through the Alps.On the way, most of her died of hunger and robbers or returned home, frightened by the difficulties of the campaign: nevertheless, several thousand still reached Genoa on August 25. Here they were unfriendly driven away and forced them to a quick further campaign, because the Genoese were afraid of any danger to their city from a strange army of pilgrims.

When a crowd of French children reached Marcel, singing hymns, they entered the suburb and walked through the streets of the city straight to the sea. The inhabitants of the city were shocked by the sight of this army, looked at them with awe and blessed them for the great feat.

The children stopped at the seaside, which most of them saw for the first time. Many ships were in the roadstead, and the sea went into an endless distance. Waves ran ashore, then receded, and nothing changed. And the children were waiting for a miracle. They were sure that the sea should make way for them and they will move on. But the sea did not part and continued to splash at their feet.

The children began to pray fervently ... time passed, but still there was no miracle.

Then two traders in slaves, volunteered to transport these "supporters of Christ" to Syria for "the reward of God." They sailed on seven ships, two of them suffered a wreck at the island of San Pietro near Sardinia, and on the other five merchants arrived in Egypt and sold pilgrims - crusaders as slaves. Thousands of them ended up in the Khalifa’s house and were worthily distinguished there by the endurance with which they worked in the Christian faith.
Both slave workers later fell into the hands of the Emperor Fridrich II and were sentenced to death by hanging. In addition, this empire was said to have succeeded, as they say, at the conclusion of peace in 1229 with Sultan Alkamil, to return again the freedom of a significant part of these unfortunate children-pilgrims.

Children from Germany, under the leadership of Nicholas, expelled from Genoa, reached Brindisi, but here, thanks to the energy of the local bishop, they were prevented from taking a sea voyage to the East. Then they had no choice but to return home. Some of the boys went to Rome to ask the Pope for permission from the crusader vow. But the Pope did not comply with their requests, although, as they say, he had already ordered them to abandon their insane enterprise; now he only gave them a reprieve of the crusade until they came of age. Return trip destroyed almost the entire remnant of this children's army. Hundreds of them fell from exhaustion on the journey and died miserably on the highways. The worst fate fell, of course, on the lot of the girls, who, in addition to all other disasters, were also subjected to all kinds of deception and violence. Several managed to find shelter in kind families and earn their own food in Genoa with their own hands; some patrician families even trace their origins back to the German children left there; but the majority perished in a miserable way, and only a small remnant of the entire army, sick and exhausted, ridiculed and mocked, saw the homeland again. The boy Nicholas seemed to live and later, in 1219, fought at Damietta in Egypt.

V 1212 year The so-called Children's Crusade took place, an expedition led by a young seer named Stephen, who breathed into French and German children the belief that with his help, as poor and devoted servants of the Lord, they would be able to return Jerusalem to Christianity. The children went to the south of Europe, but many of them did not even reach the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, but died on the way. Some historians believe that the Children's Crusade was a provocation organized by slave traders to sell the participants in the campaign into slavery.

In May 1212, when the German people's army passed through Koln, in its ranks, there were about twenty-five thousand children and adolescents heading to Italy to reach from there by sea Palestine... In the chronicles XIII century more than fifty times this campaign is mentioned, which is called the "children's crusade".

The crusaders boarded ships in Marseilles and partly died from the storm, partly, as they say, the children were sold into slavery to Egypt. A similar movement swept Germany, where the boy Nikolai gathered a crowd of twenty thousand children. Most of them died or scattered along the road (especially many of them died in the Alps), but some reached Brindisi, from where they were supposed to return; most of them also died. Meanwhile, King John of England, Andrew of Hungary and, finally, Frederick II of Hohenstaufen, who accepted the cross in July 1215, responded to the new call of Innocent III. The beginning of the Crusade was scheduled for June 1, 1217.

Fifth Crusade (1217-1221)

A business Innocent III(d. in July 1216 years) continued Honorius III... Though Frederick II postponed the campaign, and John English died, after all in 1217 year significant detachments of crusaders went to the Holy Land, with Andrey Hungarian, the duke Leopold VI of Austria and Otton Meransky at the head; it was the 5th crusade. The military operations went sluggishly, and in 1218 year King Andrew returned home. Soon, new detachments of crusaders arrived in the Holy Land, led by Georg Vidsky and Wilhelm of Holland(on the way, some of them helped Christians in the fight against Moors v Portugal). The crusaders decided to attack Egypt, which was at that time the main center of Muslim power in Asia Minor. A son al-Adil,al-Kamil(al-Adil died in 1218), offered an extremely beneficial peace: he even agreed to the return of Jerusalem to Christians. This proposal was rejected by the crusaders. In November 1219 year, after more than a year's siege, the crusaders took Damietta... Removal from the camp of the crusaders Leopold and the king John of Brienne was partly reimbursed by the arrival in Egypt Louis of Bavaria with the Germans. Part of the crusaders, convinced by the papal legate Pelagius, moved to Mansoor, but the campaign ended in complete failure, and the crusaders concluded 1221 year peace with al-Kamil, according to which they received a free retreat, but pledged to cleanse Damietta and Egypt in general. Meanwhile on Isabella, daughters Mary Iolanta and John of Brienne, married Frederick II Hohenstaufen. He pledged to the Pope to begin a crusade.

Sixth Crusade (1228-1229)

Frederick in August 1227 actually sent a fleet to Syria with Duke Henry of Limburg at its head; in September he sailed himself, but was soon to return to the shore due to a serious illness. Landgrave Ludwig of Thuringia, who took part in this crusade, died almost immediately after landing in Otranto... Dad Gregory IX did not respect Frederick's explanations and pronounced excommunication over him for not fulfilling his vow at the appointed time. A struggle began, extremely harmful to the interests of the Holy Land, between the emperor and the pope. In June 1228, Frederick finally sailed to Syria (6th Crusade), but this did not reconcile the pope with him: Gregory said that Frederick (still excommunicated) was going to the Holy Land not as a crusader, but as a pirate. In the Holy Land, Frederick restored the fortifications of Joppa and in February 1229 concluded an agreement with Alkamil: the Sultan ceded Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Nazareth and some other places to him, for which the emperor undertook to help Alkamil against his enemies. In March 1229, Frederick entered Jerusalem, and in May he sailed from the Holy Land. After the removal of Frederick, his enemies began to seek to weaken the power of the Hohenstaufens both in Cyprus, which had been a fief of the empire since the time of Emperor Henry VI, and in Syria. These disagreements were very unfavorable reflected in the course of the struggle between Christians and Muslims. Relief for the crusaders was brought only by the strife of the heirs of Alkamila, who died in 1238.

In the fall of 1239, Thibault of Navarre, Duke of Hugo of Burgundy, Count Peter of Brittany, Amalrich of Montfort and others arrived in Acre. And now the crusaders acted discordantly and recklessly and were defeated; Amalrich was taken prisoner. Jerusalem again fell for some time into the hands of a certain Eyyubid ruler. The alliance of the crusaders with the emir Ishmael of Damascus led them to war with the Egyptians, who defeated them at Ascalon. After that, many of the crusaders left the Holy Land. Earl Richard of Cornwall (brother of the English king Henry III), who arrived in the Holy Land in 1240, managed to conclude a profitable peace with Eyyub (Melik-Salik-Eyyub) of Egypt. Meanwhile, strife among Christians continued; the barons hostile to the Hohenstaufens transferred power over the kingdom of Jerusalem to Alice of Cyprus, while the legitimate king was the son of Frederick II, Konrad. After Alice's death, power passed to her son, Henry of Cyprus. The new alliance of Christians with the Muslim enemies of Eyyub led to the fact that Eyyub called for the help of the Khorezm Turks, who took Jerusalem shortly before that returned to Christians in September 1244 and devastated it terribly. Since then, the holy city was forever lost to the crusaders. After a new defeat for the Christians and their allies, Eyyub took Damascus and Ascalon. The Antiochians and Armenians had to at the same time pledge to pay tribute to the Mongols. In the West, the crusading zeal cooled, as a result of the unsuccessful outcome of the last Campaigns and as a result of the actions of the popes, who spent money collected for the emperor you can free yourself from the earlier vow to go to the Holy Land. However, the preaching of the Crusade to Palestine continued as before and led to the 7th Crusade. Before others the cross accepted Louis IX French: during a dangerous illness, he made a vow to go to the Holy Land. With him went his brothers Robert, Alphonse and Karl, Duke of Hugo of Burgundy, c. Wilhelm of Flanders, c. Peter of Brittany, Champagne Seneschal John Joinville (famous historian of this campaign) and many others.

Share with friends or save for yourself:

Loading...