Presentation identifying signs of NATO tanks. Presentation on history on the topic "History in the faces: What kind of historical person is we talking about? Geodesic substantiation of NATO expansion east

"Education system in the United States" - the US education system includes: Princeton University. F - 10% of students - unsatisfactory results or complete ignorance educational material. Yale university. The school remains behind. The rating system is usually alphabetic, by the first five letters english alphabet. Modern system US education.

"USA Parties" - Franklin Delano Roosevelt (January 30, 1882 - April 12, 1945). William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton on August 19, 1946 (62 years). Richard Milhaus Nixon (January 9, 1913 - April 22, 1994) (81 years). Republican Party of the United States. James Earl Carter Jr. October 1, 1924 (84 years). Dwight David Eisenhower (October 14, 1890 - March 28, 1969).

"English in the USA" - sources. U.S. Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey. The English-Only Movement. French as the main. Level of English language below the average. Chinese as basic. US population (statistics for 2010). Languages \u200b\u200bon which houses are spoken (data for 2008). Languages \u200b\u200bspoken in the United States.

"Elections in the USA 2008" - when counting votes, a variety of voting systems and multistage schemes are used. The right to vote as such in the US Constitution is not spelled out. In the 11 states of the United States, not primaries are held, but party conferences or referendums are cookers. Republican Party (English voters (English. Voters). Law on Money Rights (English

"US Presidents" - Benjamin Harrison. Powers. Last years Monroe was overshadowed by financial concerns. Byyokenen attended College Dickinson in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. We must believe in what we learn our children. Arthur Chester Alan. In the year of the presidential election in the California Sacramento Valley, gold was found.

"The US country's population" is the distribution of US population income. The population of the United States of America. Conclusions and forecasts. Census - every ten years. Check yourself and add conclusions. The population and features of the dynamics. The population of the West grew faster. The vast majority of Americans. US population distribution on races and ethnic groups.

Total in the subject of 24 presentations

Description of the presentation on individual slides:

1 Slide

Slide description:

2 Slide

Slide description:

NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization (English) Otan - Organization Du Traité de L "Atlantique Nord (Fr.) NATO - Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty (RUS.) NATO Countries on the World Map Official languages NATO are English and French

3 Slide

Slide description:

NATO (Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty) is an alliance, designed to defend not only the authority of a country, but also values \u200b\u200bfor the service that this power is delivered. NATO protects non-state sovereignty or someone's geopolitical interests, but a certain type of human culture and civilization.

4 Slide

Slide description:

1949, April, after talks with the United States and Canada, the Washington Treaty on joint defense was signed on the creation of a single North Atlantic Union. It was joined by: Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Canada, Norway, Portugal and the United States. 1948 March Five Western European countries: Belgium, United Kingdom, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and France signed the Brussels Treaty and created the general NATO defense system does not have its own armed forces. All countries participating in the NATO military organization make their strength and equipment that together make up the integrated military structure of the Alliance. In the North Atlantic Treaty was signed on April 4, 1949 in the state of Washington. Iceland is the only member of NATO, who has no regular sun, it was one of the conditions for the country's entry into the organization. In Iceland there is only coast guard (Bochp). It was also decided to prepare Icelandic volunteers at bases in Norway to participate in NATO peacemaking missions. Since July 1966, France has come out of the NATO military organization, remaining the participant political structure North Atlantic Treaty. In 2009, returned to all abandoned structures.

5 Slide

Slide description:

Four more European states: Greece Turkey, Germany Spain 1952. and 1982 In Poland, Hungary Czech Republic on March 12, 1999, Latvia Lithuania Estonia, Slovakia, Slovenia Romania Bulgaria, has already arrived in NATO, there are already 26 countries and there are already applications of other countries to join this international organization. 2004 B.

6 Slide

Slide description:

Western Germany joined. Saar reunited with FRG in 1957, from October 3, 1990 - United Germany. NATO Member States of NATO Greece from 1974 to 1980 Greece did not participate in the NATO military organization due to tense relations with another member of the block - Turkey. Does not participate in the NATO military organization. Germany Spain

7 Slide

Slide description:

The NATO emblem white compass on a dark blue background was adopted on October 4, 1953 by the North Atlantic Council as the official symbol of the North Atlantic Alliance, after which the flag raising ceremony was held in Paris. Circle symbolizes unity and cooperation, and a compass rose - total way To peace

8 Slide

Slide description:

NATO headquarters - political and administrative center The North Atlantic Union, where the main political decision-making body in NATO is constantly posted - North Atlantic Council. NATO headquarters headquarters / Nato headquarters headquarters is located in Belgium, in the northeast of Brussels, on Leopold III Boulevard (Boulevard Léopold III, 1110 Brussels, Belgium). It contains delegations of member countries, bureaus and interaction or diplomatic representations of partner countries.

9 Slide

Slide description:

The Supreme Political Body of NATO, which consists of representatives of all Member States and conducts its meetings chaired by the NATO Secretary General. The North Atlantic Council can hold their meetings at the ministerial ministers and heads of states and governments. Council decisions are made unanimously. In the period between the sessions of the NATO Council function, the NATO Permanent Council is fulfilled, which includes representatives of all the participating countries in the rank of ambassadors. North Atlantic Council (NATO Council)

10 Slide

Slide description:

The Military Planning Committee of the Higher Military Political Authority of the Organization since December 1966 was the Military Planning Committee, which is going twice a year at its ministerial defense sessions, although formally consists of permanent representatives. In the period between sessions, the functions of the Military Planning Committee performs the Permanent Committee of Military Planning, which includes representatives of all the participating countries in the rank of ambassadors.

11 Slide

Slide description:

The Secretary General is the main official of the North Atlantic Treaty, which has the status of an international civil servant. The Secretary-General is responsible for managing the process of consulting and making decisions in the North Atlantic Union and ensures the implementation of decisions. The Secretary General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg the Secretary General becomes statesman NATO member countries. Appointed by member countries for a four-year term. Countries put forward candidates for this position and conduct unofficial diplomatic advice to select a suitable candidate decision is made finally when a consensus has been reached against one candidacy. At the end of the four-year term of staying as the Secretary-General may be invited to extend this period for another one year.

12 Slide

Slide description:

NATO Strategic Concept The new strategic concept approved by the members of the Alliance in 1999, so defines the primary tasks of NATO: to perform the basis of stability in the Euro-Atlantic region to serve as a forum for consulting on security issues to determine and protect against any threat of aggression against any of NATO member states to promote Effective conflict prevention and actively participate in crisis regulation to promote the development of comprehensive partnership, cooperation and dialogue with other countries of the Euro-Atlantic region

13 Slide

Slide description:

Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty History of Wars Official Site NATO Permanent Representation of Russia with NATO Russian Translation of the North Atlantic Treaty (1949) Military Informant Nato Source Information

Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty, NATO, North Atlantic Alliance The world's largest military-political bloc that unites most of Europe, USA and Canada. Based on April 4, 1949 in the United States. This "transatlantic forum" for consultation countries on any matters affecting the vital interests of its members, including events that can jeopardize their safety. One of the declared NATO goals is to ensure the containment of any form of aggression in relation to the territory of any NATO member state or protection against it.

Founding Countries, April 4, 1949 Belgium United Kingdom Denmark Italy Iceland Canada Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Portugal USA France First Expansion, February 18, 1952 Greece Turkey Second Expansion, May 9, 1955 Germany Third Expansion, May 30, 1982 Spain Fourth Expansion, March 12, 1999 Hungary Poland Czech Republic Fifth Extension, March 29, 2004 Bulgaria Latvia Lithuania Romania Slovakia Slovenia Estonia Nextonia in NATO - Croatia, Macedonia, Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine, Albania.

The highest political authority of NATO is the North Atlantic Council (Council of NATO), which consists of representatives of all Member States and conducts its meetings chaired by the NATO Secretary General. The North Atlantic Council can hold their meetings at the ministerial ministers and heads of states and governments. Council decisions are made unanimously. In the period between the sessions of the NATO Council function, the NATO Permanent Council is fulfilled, which includes representatives of all the participating countries in the rank of ambassadors.

The highest military political body of the Organization since December 1966 was the Military Planning Committee, which is collected twice a year at its defense ministers, although formally consists of permanent representatives. In the period between sessions, the functions of the Military Planning Committee fulfills the Permanent Committee of Military Planning, which includes representatives of all participating in the rank of ambassadors.

The Supreme Military Body of NATO is the Military Committee, consisting of the headquarters of the General Headquarters of the countries of the NATO members and the Civil Representative of Iceland, which has no regular armed forces, and going to their meetings at least twice a year. The Military Committee has in its submission of the command of two zones: Europe and the Atlantic. The Supreme Command in Europe is headed by the Supreme Commander (always American General). Its submission is the main commands on the three European theaters of hostilities: North European, Central European and South European. In the period between meetings, the Military Committee functions performs the Permanent Military Committee.

NATO's main bodies include a nuclear planning group, which holds its meetings usually twice a year at the level of defense ministers, usually before meetings of the NATO Council. Iceland is presented in a group of nuclear planning by a civil observer. The official languages \u200b\u200bof NATO English and French, NATO headquarters are located in Brussels (Belgium).

Slide 1.

Clade 2.

Slide 3.

Slide 4.

Slide 5.

Slide 6.

Slide 7.

Slide 8.

Slide 9.

Clade 10.

Clade 11.

Slide 12.

Slide 13.

Since 1993, the expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance east forms one of the leading plot lines in relations between Russia and the West, in the formation of Russian foreign policy as a whole, in the struggle of ideas and political flows on the military-strategic orientation of Russia and ultimately its civilizational accessories. At the same time, the history of discussions on the expansion of NATO indicates profound differences in the perception of the problem by Russian and Western observers. In Russia, officials and most of the experts involved in the "real policy" viewed expansion as a consolidated Western strategy (or at least American elites) and tried to either affect the situation with nothing with threats, or to limit damage to NATO agreements on private issues. - Thereby demonstrating both supporters and opponents of expansion in the West their actual recognition of its inevitability. However, in the report of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy (Swap alleged that the expansion is not predetermined and suggested to influence the elites of the United States and NATO countries in order to block the expansion.

Meanwhile, the author of the most fundamental American study on this issue (and written from the standpoint supporters of expansion) believes that the expansion of NATO to the east "was not inevitable ... By the beginning of his discussion, the prospect of NATO's dissolution was at least as probable how much and His expansion ... and in the administration, and in Congress, only a small handful of people has relate to this idea. "

According to the conviction of recognized authorities of the realistic school, after the disappearance of the Soviet threat of NATO, it was doomed to disintegrate as an alliance, lost its defensive function, and its preservation and especially expansion gives the basis of Russian "realists" to consider that the authentic interests of his participants, and above all the United States, Are in their essence convicted.

In the Russian community of politicians and experts, there were various, largely diametrically opposite points of view at the expense of NATO expansion to the East. Some believe that the expansion of the Alliance creates a direct military threat to Russia from the West, the goal of the economic challenge and dismemberment of the country, while many are convinced that the expansion of NATO is a natural answer to "imperial ambitions" or "imperial nostalgia" of Moscow And perhaps his only negative effect lies in the indirect propaganda feeding of the "National Communist Revenge".

Such a polarity in estimates (largely continuing to this day, at least in expert and political circles) reflects the depth of public split in the assessment domestic history and civilizational identity and in itself is a factor national Securityrequiring accounting when conducting any foreign policy.

There is enough grounds for evaluating the expansion of the alliance as a real threat to the military-strategic, and with political, and from cultural and civilization points of view. Non-understanding for a number of experts and military threat politicians from NATO is related to its dynamic character, under which in this case it is meant in mind the increase in the aggressiveness of the alliance as it changes its composition and regrouping elites as a result of the victory of supporters of a more rigid offensive strategy over "pigeons". Anxious signal sounded a statement by the Hungarian Prime Minister V. Orban in the fall of 1999. On the possibility of placing nuclear missiles in the Hungarian Earth.

Although the top management of NATO or its individual members at the moment does not consider the conduct of any hostilities against Russia, be it nuclear or conventional forces, as a realistic scenario, a demonstration of warlike intentions at a lower level, especially the states of the Eastern and South Flange, represents Independent threat to Russia, since it affects psychologically vulnerable elite groups, lost immunity to various forms of blackmail and power pressure both within the country and intern.

It runs here a sufficiently unshenticated border between military and unbelievable threats, and the latter are much more relevant for today's Russia, although many in the West are presented abstract, and therefore secondary. NATO's offensive on the life interests of Russia revives such fruitlessness, how destructive for a holistic national self-consciousness of disputes between "Wessengers" and their various opponents, as well as discussions about whether Russia is a European or Eurasian power or, maybe quite special , isolated by a geopolitical unit. NATO's perception as a military-political equivalent of Western civilization or Europe as a whole puts Russian Westerners in a situation of false choice - either to seek the utopian integration goal with NATO at the cost of great humiliation, or recognize Russia in fact non-European, non-Western country, and themselves - Something like a fifth column or at least a civilizational minority, which should, like today, provide access to the institutions of power by quasi-democratic methods or accept the existence in cultural and political enclaves.

One of the paths of neutralization of this cultural and psychological, and therefore the political threat is the refusal to perceive the West as a monolithic, integrated, from giving historically transient institutional formations of the status of expressiveness of certain absolute ideas of the West. Meanwhile, the radical refusal to the analytical tools of the Soviet era, in combination with the decoupling of information and scientific study western World, gave rise to many Russian observers an exaggerated idea of \u200b\u200bthe consolidation of the West (which is in a sense back side own, quite real disunity of Russian society). Confrontation within the Western, in particular the American Society on the issue of NATO's fate, the presence of a serious opposition to expansion, including in power structures, remained unnoticed in Russia, either thickened due to the disadvantage of this information, both for Russian isolationists and for fanatical adherents of total integration With the West. In today's circumstances, an understanding of the deep internal conflict of the Western world, the refusal to absolutize the temporary ratio of forces within it, as well as between the West and other "poles" of the world community, is primarily necessary for the Russian Westerns, if they want to restore the legitimacy of their direction as an integral part of Russian sociocultural and political spectrum.

What resources of the influence on the process of expanding NATO has Russia at this stage? Opportunities for this in the framework of the ATP are substantially minimal, since NATO is institutionally interested in further expansion. Therefore, if the passivity of Russian diplomacy in the preceding structures (CFSAS and PRM) led to negative consequences, then at this stage, on the contrary, the reduction of bilateral contacts to necessary minimum It seems the most rational solution. In these circumstances, rapprochement with India, China, the countries of the near and middle east, conducted by independent policies, as well as those european countrieswhich still retain neutrality is a condition for preventing geopolitical isolation, but it can only have an indirect effect on the dynamics of NATO expansion.

To date, the key problem of Russian security and foreign policy is the steady image of Russia as an unprincipled force, which is considered exclusively with the material factors - the image, rooted not only in the West, but also in the East, not only among elites, but also in the wide layers of public opinion. Internal political circumstances foreign Policy Russia, they say that in the foreseeable future, this unattractive image will in any case fade, and the behavior of Russia as a subject of world politics will continue to be based on the assessment of the momentum ratio of material resources, outside of any system of universal values \u200b\u200band long-term principles, which would be attractive to a wide range of participants in the world community.