This "preface" interested me most, because I already know that bourgeois ideologues can do everything to their own way. We read the "Preface" and reach the most interesting place:

"The judicial report, which you hold in your hands, was published in the USSR in 1938. Today it is a bibliographic rarity - most books were destroyed in Khrushchev. On the Internet you can find the text of this report, but it is very different from authentic. The setting texts of the speeches of the defendants and their last words printed in the report, I found a lot of inconsistencies with what can be found in the world cobweb. What is posted on the Internet is much more in volume. Falsification? Most likely. It is enough to analyze what is added to the court materials. In the book, published in 1938, the words of admiration to Stalin from the sentenced to the shooting. In texts from the world wide web of the Slavs and Diffiramba, the leader's address are in a huge amount. For example, a solid fragment has been added to the defendant Bukharina: "I can assume APRIORI as Trotsky, and my other allies for crimes, and the II International, especially because I spoke about this with Nikolaevsky, will try to defend We, in particular, and especially me. I reject this defense, because I stand the crankshaft in front of the country, in front of the party, in front of the whole people. The monstristence of my crimes is immense, especially at the new stage of the Wrestling of the USSR. Let this process be the last grade lesson, and let everyone be visible to the Great Power of the USSR, let everyone be seen that the counter-revolutionary thesis on the national limitations of the USSR is in the air as a pathetic rag. Everyone can see the wise leadership of the country, which is provided to Stalin. With this consciousness, I'm waiting for the sentence. The point is not in personal experiences a repentable enemy, but in the flourishing of the USSR, in its international meaning. " And this is not the only praise Stalin allegedly from the mouth of Bukharin. It would still be said: "For in reality, the whole country, the hope of peace, is worth the whole country, and" tried to kill Lenin, continued by Stalin with a gigantic success. " And so in many cases ... "

That is, old people claim that the falsification and the words of Bukharin were committed about his worship before Stalin - they were attributed to him. On the grounds that he, old people, discovered the texts where these words are not.

In fact, on the Internet, you can really find both variants of text - full and abbreviated. But for some reason, the old men immediately suspects in the fake. And it is clear why. Because he is trying to prove that Stalin only in words was the successor of Lenin's business, and in fact, he did everything on the contrary, he was allegedly never Marxist, a revolutionary Bolshevik, but was a Patriot of Russia ...

The bourgeoisie understood how it is profitable to use nostalgia Russian people in the USSR and their respect for Stalin, which she could not shake. And she tries to use it as it, the bourgeoisie beneficially - opposing Stalin Lenin, quite consciously raising her pillary Trotskyist fabrication on the fact that allegedly Stalin did not go Leninsky, did not serve the same thing as Lenin - the case of communism.

And then the whole meaning of Stalinist life and work immediately changes, see the reader at a different angle. Scientific revolutionary theory depreciates and discredit. Instead of Stalin - Marxist, a dialectical materialist, an outstanding revolutionary and communist, a faithful student and a consistent successor of the Great Affairs V.I. Lenin, how he remained to last Minute The bourgeoisie represents us by His Stalin, the one that she needs and is useful - Stalin-Greater-containing Patriot, Clericula, Chauvinist and Imperial.

At the field of this lie, the above-mentioned Mr. Starikov especially succeeded. He works the diligence of many other bourgeois holders to create an opinion of Stalin, to pervert its role, to snatch out of his life what is the main and defining - Stalin was an outstanding theorist of Marxism-Leninism, a communist and follower V.I. Lenin. In line with these familiar fores, he is also trying to distort the reality, to prove that the speech of Bukharin on the court was allegedly falsified. And the Larchik, as they say, opens simply - both works of 1938 are genuine, but one is the full text of the stenograph report, and the other is drawn up on the text of the newspaper "News of the Councils of Deputies of the Workers of the SSR Union" and "True". Mr. Starikov, of course, could not think that some meticulous comrades like me would need to view both options and compare the texts without believing him for the word.

So the bourgeois bastard discredits the communist theory, according to V.I Lenin, takes her a revolutionary soul, trying to adjust the name I.V. Stalin under his bourgeois.

Alexander Kurganov Editorial board "For Bolshevism!" Recommends on reading an article on the activities of I.V. Stalin:

In this article, Vranne Starikov is divided into 3 parts:

1. Lena Goldfields.
2. Purchase from the Swedes of locomotives, which old people called "Swedish business".
3. The concession, which old people entitled the "Deal with the Devil".

Now everything is in order.

Lena Goldfields.

First lie about Trotsky. Quote:

recall that this fiery Russian revolutionary jewish origin about 12 years at the beginning of the twentieth century spent in the West and even managed to get a US passport

Pay attention to the pure Goebbels reception manipulation by facts. From this phrase, it is possible to conclude that Trotsky received an American passport because he spent 12 years in the West, he modestly silent about that of these 12 years, he spent 7 years in Austria, in Vienna, and in the US he stayed only 3 months. By the way, only therefore, he could not have an American passport, so as to receive American citizenship (a passport can only have a US citizen), according to the laws of the United States, it is necessary to live in the United States at least 5 years.

In fact, the only source of information about the American passport of Trotsky is the book of Anthony Satton "Wall Street and the Bolshevik revolution." However, no one has seen this passport and there are no documents confirming that this passport ever existed. For example, Dr. Richard Spence - Professor of History of the University of Idaho, who in an interview with Radio Liberty declared the following:

Anthony Sutton in his book "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution" writes that Trotsky left New York with an American passport in his pocket. I studied this question very carefully and did not find it absolutely no evidence - no documentary, no evidence from reliable sources. No one resolutely saw him with an American passport. Yes, there was no need for it. Trotsky in the hands were all necessary for the return of paper - both from the Russian consulate, and, more importantly, from the British Consulate in New York. He just did not need an American passport.

And now the Bolsheviks themselves handed over to the British consortium, who owned Lena Goldfields, the right to mining gold on the Lena River (and not only there) for 30 years! The area of \u200b\u200bthe concession covered the huge territory from Yakutia to the Urals ...

Etc. In fact, the fact that the Bolsheviks did from Lena Goldfields was the most real raider capture. At first they divided the British as a suckers, promising the Golden Mountains, and then, when they got the equipment and set up production, the Bolsheviks actually selected their business. Here's how this policy described the former Secretary of Stalin Boris
Bazhanov in chapter 8 of his book "Memories of the former secretary of Stalin":

The politburo has long known and for itself firmly found that these concessions were nothing but rude sculpical traps. Western capitalists were offered concessions on very tempting looking and outwardly very favorable terms. The terms of the contract were well observed until the concessionaire was imported and installed in Russia cars, equipment and allowed the company to move. Following the help of any trick (what the tricks at the authorities have had any way), the concessionaire was raised under the conditions under which he could not fulfill the contract, the contract was terminated, the unreamed equipment and the established enterprise went to the ownership of the Soviet state ( i will tell you in detail about one of these focus with Lena Goldfields Because this story had unexpected and fun consequences) Actually, for this trick with concessions and was created.

Swedish business

I will immediately say that the deal that old people describe is, that is, the purchase of locomotives from the Swedes, really had a place to be. Lie Starikova is that he as always accused of this transaction Trotsky, although he really was not only the initiator of this transaction, but the opposite tried to prevent. This is what old men writes:

How did the Bolsheviks returned the money to foreign bankers? Just send to the west and write in the column "Appointment of payment": "Return of funds for the Russian revolution and win in Civil War"Obviously it would be impossible. I needed a beautiful pretext. For example, to buy something in the West, at least the same locomotives. Organizes the purchase of Trotsky, but Lenin seems to be aware of the transaction and does not prevent her. Otherwise, the dubious contract would cost Trotsky Career.

Nonsense about the return of money through the purchase of locomotives, I have already commented, and about everything else I want to say that neither in the book, nor in this article, old people do not give references to any source, which is understandable, since documents confirming the involvement of Trotsky to This transaction does not exist.

Unlike the amateur and nonsense Starikov, a real historian, namely - a specialist in economic History Russia, doctor historical sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member Raen Alexander Alekseevich Igolekin conducted a study on this topic and wrote an article called "Lenin People's Commissar" in which the circumstances of this transaction describes in detail. And as sources, it gives links to 126 documents.

So Igolekin writes that the initiator of this transaction was someone Yuri Vladimirovich Lomonosov, who since November 1920 he held the position of the authorized Council of People's Commissars for Railway orders abroad. It was he who had unlimited powers for purchasing railway equipment abroad.

However, the question arises - how the Lomonosov received such huge powers, although it was formally subordinate to the Trotsky? Igolekin gives the following answer:

In 1920, Lenin would like to see Lomonosov at the most important economic and political post office of the Communications. Lomonosov's candidacy for the post of Commissar Commissars on May 24 - 25, 1920 Lenin discussed with G.M. Krzhizhanovsky, Ya.S. Ganetsky, V.I. Sverdlov, V.P. Milyutin, Ya.E. Rudzutak and others (Lenin's total listened to 19 people). But for some reason they were not approved.

Nevertheless, Lomonosov receives huge real powerful powers. On June 17, 1920, Lenin signed the "Okaz of the Russian Railway Mission abroad", and the head of the mission - Lomonosov - all the rights of the People's Commissar, including the final resolution of issues on the spot. In all the affairs of Lomonosov, it becomes accountable only to the Council, that is, Lenin . Formally - the task of Lomonosov to buy and repair (for gold) steam locomotives, acquire wagons, tanks, spare parts, etc.

And what about Trotsky? Naturally, he really did not like it. This is what Iglenkin writes:

Lomonosov is so enters the power that Lenin complains about him (no one else!) All-stop Trotsky. Otherwise, do not explain the words of Lenin in a letter dated December 8, 1920: "... With Lomonosov, take written (underlined by Lenin. - Avt.) The obligation not to change anything in the system or in the solutions of Trotsky (then - the NCR Committee. - Avt.) And not to dismiss the Glavkom, i.e. Borisov "(I.N. Borisov - Head of the Main Directorate of the NKPS Communications Communication. - Aut.). Like this!

But it did not help, because - quote:

Lomonosov - it is the Leninsky People's Commissar. Answer for his activity did not want neither Krasin nor Trotsky nor Dzerzhinsky .

In 1923 Trotsky gave explanations to Dzerzhinsky about the provision of Lomonosov of the Powers of the Commissar: "I, I remember, suggested himself to send it to the Rights of the People's Commissar, since it did not consider it possible to carry responsibility for Lomonosov" .

As you can see Trotsky not only did not participate in the conclusion of this contract, but did not even have any influence. You can read this in more detail.

Deal with the devil

I can not come up with the definition of what is written in this section. Ignorance, incompetence, all this is too soft. I do not want to be rude, but the most accurate definition of this nonsense is IDIOCY. Judge for yourself. Quote:

The exact number of contracts and concessions issued by the Soviet government to the American firms at the dawn of the construction of a new state is difficult to name. But this is $ 25 million. Commissions to American industrialists for the period from July 1919 to January 1920, and the concession for the extraction of asbestos issued by Armand Hammer in 1921, and the lease agreement concluded for 60-year term with Frank Vanderlip and his A consortium, which envisaged the operation of coal and oil deposits, as well as fishing in the North Siberian region with an area of \u200b\u200b600 thousand square meters. km.

From Soviet times, there was a myth as if Hummer financed the Bolsheviks, although in fact most likely it was the opposite.

First, a few words about the Hammer family. Father Armanda, Julius Hummer, was specialty a gynecologist. In addition, he created the sale of drugs under the name "Allied Drug". In short, he was theoretically a capitalist, which did not prevent him from entering into the US socialist party. Moreover, in 1907, in the seventh of the Second International in Stuttgard, he personally met Lenin. Above, I wrote that the capitalist Zhulius Hummer was theoretically, because his company was going out of the rank badly. So bad that Zhulius had to make a living illegally making abortions at home.

Then the sons of Zhulius, Victor and Hamer on the basis of the Father's company created another company, which was made over-profile selling tinctures on alcohol during the Dry Law in the United States, but it will be much later and not to the revolution in Russia, no relation to the concessions, but Before that, in 1920, Zhulius Hammer was planted.

True, it was noted for the fact that he was a socialist, but for the fact that he made an unsuccessful abortion, as a result of which a woman died. But that's not all.

Police suspected that Armand, who at that time was a student medical university, I helped my father. There is even a version that the abortion did it precisely Armand, and his father just took the blame to save the Son. That is why Zhulius, using the acquaintance with Lenin, sent Armand to Soviet Union, as they say - from sin away.

Here is the person of old people in full considers a sponsor of the revolution. True, in the Soviet Union, Hammer really rose well, but not because he or his father sponsored the revolution (I hope it is clear that the person who is forced to earn his life underground abortions, can not sponsor any revolutions), but because Soviet authorities Urgently needed the exemplary businessman who managed to earn millions, cooperating from the USSR.

By that time, the Bolsheviks understood that the policy of military communism failed and they planned to introduce NEP and attract foreign investment. However, foreign businessmen were afraid to deal with the Bolsheviks and to win their confidence required such an exemplary businessman. And the Armond Hummer was in opening time, in the right place. That is why Lenin gave him a concession for long-abandoned asbestos fields (which Hammer brought one losses) and much more.

The Frank Vanderlip case, which was once and an assistant to the Minister of Finance of Liman Geyja and the Vice President, and then the President of one of the largest US banks - National City Bank of New York (now Citibank). He had money and tie and really could have a lot, but only there is one problem - Frank Vanderlip has never concluded any contracts with the Soviet government, and Nikolay Starikov once again proved that he is no analyst or historian, but an illiterate amateur.

In fact, at that time, someone named Warterylip was arrived in the Soviet Union, that is, a banker named. Using this, he betrayed himself for the famous banker. The most amazing thing that, despite the fact that his name was Washington, and not Frank, he was believed. And they believed to such an extent that Lenin personally accepted him and it was with him that the Soviet leaders signed all contracts, while a real banker, Frank Vanderlip, is neither a dream about it.

This is how this story describes a well-known historian, doctor of historical sciences, professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, as well as an associate professor of Parisian (France), Cambridge (United Kingdom) and Priestonian (USA) universities, Vladlen Georgievich Sirotkin in his book called "Foreign Gold of Russia ". In § 2 called "Where are these Klondike and why are they needed?" , he's writing:

And how many times in 1990-1993 Repeated in Democratic Russia "Casus Vanderlipa"! Of this American mining engineer and the gold detector, even at the beginning of the XX century. Having been on about. Sakhalin and the Kamchatka Peninsula in search of gold, in 1920 even Lenin accepted for the American millionaire F.A. Vanderlip, although the "liar millionaire" is nothing in common, except last name, with the present did not have (65).

Mountain engineer from California, behind which there were no major capital, rejoiled Lenin as a boys. With a "millionaire" in 1920, rushed as with a written tube. And if in the Japanese court there was a certain Japanese pilot talented the role of the "Russian general" of the palty drug, then why would aventurist-Americans not play the role of "Uncle Sam" - here it is not necessary to reincarnate. Engineer modestly hinted that he was behind the "whole republican party" (in 1920, the next elections were held in the United States, and indeed Democrat Wilson lost them, and the Garding republic won), although he had no relation to that, no other party ( except as an ordinary voter).

Passatorsci received Lenin personally, other "leaders", deputy chairman of the Sovnarkom A.I. Rykov signed a concession agreement with a false millionaire (rental - with a planned profit of $ 3 billion, - all the Kamchatka, which in 1920 was also part of the Russian Federation; peninsula for the sake of friendship with the "millionaire" on December 15, 1920 urgently "Sell" from DVR and "attached" to the RSFSR) (66).

At the same time, the "millionaire" promised Ilyich seven barrels of the arrestants, and, the main thing, quick diplomatic recognition Soviet Russia. According to some reports, Lenin even supplied Vanderlip No. 2 by writing to Washington "Who follows that the Bolsheviks are ready to give the United States ... Petropavlovsk-on-Kamchatka bay for the construction of a naval base (according to Guantanama in Cuba) for a term of 99 years old.

The whole scam turned out to be a complete shift, especially when the new US President Harding said that he knew quite another Vanderlip and did not hear anything from the Genuine millionaire anything about Kamchatka concessions.

Ilich will get out, and calling the "liar millionaire" in December 1920 in Russian "American Kulak", nevertheless, it will be said that he, as always, was right - the case, de, not in personalities, and the fact that "We take to restore international economy - our plan" (67)

This whole story was published to publicly thanks to the Writer Herbert Wells, who at that time was also in Moscow and to which Lenin told everything. This is how it describes the historian and journalist Sergey Nehamkin in the article with himself by the talking name "Lipa Vanderlipa". Describing Lenin's conversation with Herbert Wels, in which Lenin told Herbert Ultraste about a deal with Vanderlip, Nehambin writes:

The conversation translated an employee of Nicknamedel Rothstein. He crumbled, wrinkled, finally, really reminded Lenin about the need to be restrained. But Ilyich carried. "Will it help to strengthen the world? Will the new world fight be the beginning? Does the English imperialists like this project? "

But why nervous comrade Rotstein? Just because of the fact that the fascinated Ilyach was trying diplomatic secrets? Not only.

The fact is that Vanderlip came to Moscow was not mean Vanderlip. Billionaire and called the name Frank A. Vanderlip.. And this - Washington B. Vanderlip.. Indeed, the owner of the firm "Syndicate Vanderlipa". But what kind of company, what is related to the empire togo Vanderlipa is a question.

When it was realized - the situation became ambiguous. Some kind of coolness arrives in Russia, the impostor, bought and, using the fact that he has the same surname with financial tycoon, tries to shaking Kamchatka. And serious people are negotiating with him. Moscow Vanderlip stated that he was a relative of the billionaire and his messenger. But evidence did not introduce.

From Moscow, he nevertheless left for the project of a contract for which the United States was promised to rent Kamchatka for a period of 60 years, - if the gararding confirms the powers of the guest.

Finally:

The Garding said to power said that the "Moscow" Vanderlip knows does not know, and the United States does not claim to Kamchatka. The question was taken out by himself.

Now this story knows the whole world except for one great Russian analytics and a historian who still believes that Frank Vanderlip really concluded this contract.

He lies want to figure out ,? See links below: How old men are bred: he utters the word Liberast and you applod to him - and then - he beautifully hangs you noodles as well as who such a traitor Stalin - Agent of Masonic backstage, who collided Russia by his forehead with Germany and moved millions in the war Russians. Stalin was afraid of Russians. Maximum scene is otherwise fed in Masonic wars. It's time to propagate the truth! We are Russians with us Jesus Christ, so who are at us! Video need to be cutting! Russians do not surrender! If you understand that before that point, the old mans diluted you as a loach, then feel free to distribute these useful patriotic video setups, if you wish to distribute to friends, fans and all lovers of the "creativity" of the skillful dreams of the times and peoples of the publication of Nikolai Starikov, see the links and you will understand More: Link1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v\u003dPTREC8TLWXG Slip 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v\u003djdywgkhgwc Link 3: https://www.youtube.com/ Watch? v \u003d 9wuea_mk_pm You can talk about world backstage, about the bank controlled by external management. All this is right. Be sure to come on those who would have reported to this. N.V. Old people interferes with the truth and lies. And this is the danger of such figures for Russia. They will tell about how to love their homeland, and meanwhile to regain their ideas. In Russia, it is unacceptable !!! Invalid substitution of truth lie. Therefore, such "figures" must be denounced. Russian people are naive in nature. And hack Starikovsko-Fedor's portion of lies at times. Schemers, so-called patriots, Nikolay Starikov and a group of nuckers illy wants to rewrite history. It is unacceptable. After all, this is Russia! Vs. Masons, against liberas, against debauchery, against nasty, against fraud, against fascism, we are Russian! Screws, so-called patriots, Nikolay Starikov and a group of nuckers, others want to rewrite with them. It is unacceptable. After all, this is Russia! Caution, the gang of conspiraologists of Starikov, Andrei and Fursov, Evgeny and Fedorov, Vladimir Ya Matveyev and them are similar. They won't tell you the truth, perhaps because one of them is a massone. If I went, listen to honest person Valentina Yurevich Katasonova. Cognitive TV also invites everyone in a row without disaster. It is necessary to filter and cognitive TV, because It is not greatly informative.

In this article, I want to refute another lies of Starikov from his book "The crisis: how it is done," namely, as it describes the purchase of WELLS Fargo Bank Wachovia Bank. More precisely, these are not banks, but banking holdings, but for simplicity we will call them banks.

Let's start with the quotation from page 188:

So, the essence of what happened. Wachovia Bank stunned, experiencing difficulties. According to the scenario of the organizers of the crisis to buy it must Citigroup. However, it tried to do another, not "their" bank ... "Wells Fargo ... expressed his readiness to purchase a bank at the price of closing stock trading on Friday ($ 10 per share), but asked a postponement for several days to finalize the situation.

If you believe the old man, then Wells Fargo is not the "their" bank, that is, not a member of the Fed. In the article "Who owns the Federal Reserve System (Fed) of the United States?" I already told how to determine how to determine - is a bank member of the Fed or not. So, if you use the method described in the article, you will make sure Wells Fargo is also a member of the Fed and has exactly the same status as Citigroup, that is, Wells Fargo is also "their" bank. Moreover, Wachovia was also a member of the Fed and had exactly the same status as well as Fargo and Citigroup, so the theory of Starikov does not work, but I decided to show how old people distort the facts to prove my theory. Further, Starikov, all events are described in the sequence of the reverse what happened. Quote from pages 188-189:

And then it happened incredible: the federal reserve WELLS Fargo refused, referring to the allegedly avral situation Wachovia - the bank as if Monday would not survive!

Having received the refusal of the federal reserve in the postponement, Wells Fargo eliminated the negotiations, and immediately the Citigroup came up on the stage ... You know how much Citigroup suggested for Wachovia? Do not believe: $ 1 per share!

In fact, everything was exactly the opposite - first Citigroup offered 1 dollar per share, and then Wells Fargo offered several times more. Naturally, the shareholders of Wachovia grabbed the proposal of Wells Fargo. This is what New York Times wrote about this:

Early in the morning on Friday, WELLS Fargo stated that he was going to absorb Wachovia - including problem operations of Charlotte Bank - in the amount of $ 15.1 billion dollars.

The announcement came only four days after Citigroup reached an agreement in principle to buy Wachovia at a price of about $ 1 per share, by order of government and with a guarantee to cover most of the losses from the massive Wachovia loan portfolio.

Agree that it is radically changing the case. In addition, I want to pay attention to another lie, namely - supposedly " Federal Reserve WELLS Fargo refused".

Firstly - failed not " Federal reserve", and an organization called" Federal Deposit Insurance Corp - FDIC "(Federal Corporation of Deposit Insurance), and this is not the same, as despite the fact that FDIC is a regulator, this is exactly the same independent organization as a Fed. Her It can even be found in the list of independent state organizations on the official website of the US government. Since FDIC is an independent organization, it is independent including from the Fed.

Secondly - FDIC is not very refused. I do not know where old men took the following. Quote page 189:

if Wachovia does not accept Citigroup's conditions, on Monday, all bank assets will be arrested by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation under the pretext of the creation of "Vakovy" "System Risk" for the National Economy!

Please note that the federal reserve smoothly turned into a federal deposit insurance corporation. Another example of such a fantastic transformation can be found on page 191. Quote:

Who should support Federal Reserve SystemIf she really cares about the stability of the financial market and the interests of the state? Citigroup, which buys part of the bank for a penny and hanging possible losses in the United States, or Wells Fargo, acquiring the entire bank seven times more expensive and taking all the losses on yourself? The decision of the Fed and the American authorities will seem absurd if you do not understand the secret attack of what is happening: "Although the official agreement between Citigroup and Wachovia was signed and did not have, the authorities seem to prefer precisely this transaction. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) "Supports the initial agreement," said the chairman of FDIC Sheila Bair

As you can see, again the Fed at the beginning of the quotes turned into FDIC at the end. This may be two explanations - either old people sees the difference between these two organizations, in this case he needs not a book on the American economy to write, but wash the cars or deliver pizza, or the old people deliberately lies, as according to his theory, it is "private shop according to his theory "The Fed is the organizer of the crisis, and FDIC seems to be not with cases. Therefore, it is necessary to mask your lies in this way. However, what was really?

"Since the application process has been closed, WELLS apparently overestimated his position and came out with a new proposal that does not require the FDIC assistance. It should be emphasized that both Citigroup offers, as well as the new WELLS proposal will support all creditors, including investors. , insured and uninsured. For any sentence, all bank clients must be fully insured against service failures.

"FDIC supports the previously announced agreement with Citigroup. FDIC will consider all offers and work with the main regularity of all three institutions to implement a resolution that serves public interest."

Where is it says that " all bank assets will be arrested"? In fact, it simply says that the bargain is not yet completed. This is how this situation commented on Wall Street Journal:

In a sharp statement, Chairman of FDIC Sheila Bair, it was said that her agency "supports the agreement announced earlier with Citigroup." It is not clear whether the FDIC will ban the deal with Wells Fargo or simply says that the Citigroup offer is not completely rejected.

After that, an explanation came from FDIC. Quote New York Times:

On Friday night, Wachovia leaders learned that Sheila Bair K., head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which insisted on a deal with Citigroup, will not stand in the way of a new agreement with Wells Fargo, as it does not involve any risk for taxpayers.

That's the whole problem. In fact, two conclusions can be made from this press release - old people, as I noted above, I confused the reason with the consequence. Not wells Fargo " empty from negotiations"Because he was" denied ", although, as you could see, it was not really denied, and FDIC was laughed, because Wells Fargo first puts forward a sentence, then they take again, then they push again. Agree that as a result of Wells Fargo Looks like a very reliable partner. This is how this situation commented on Times in New York:

Wells Fargo expressed interest in buying Wachovia on Sunday, but suddenly came out of the negotiations on the purchase of a company, referring to concern about something from the bank's loan portfolio. After that, Citigroup received the blessing of FDIC to buy Wachovia, - but the government agency allowed the banking giant to absorb only the first $ 42 billion risky mortgage Wachovia, in exchange for preferred shares and guarantees $ 12 billion.

This is the true reason that Wells Fargo first came out of the negotiations, and the FDIC first preferred Citigroup. Everything becomes in its place and everything is logical, is not it?

And finally, the question arises - and what is the Fed? On October 3, the Board of Governors of the Fed on its website published the following press release:

A new offer for the purchase of Wachovia came from Wells Fargo. The Citigroup offer was closely studied by the Federal Reserve and the control of the monetary circulation controller. We have not yet reviewed new sentence Wells Fargo and questions that it raises. Regulators will work with the parties to achieve the result that will protect alllendersWachovia, including depositors, insured and not insured, and will also contribute to the stability of the market.

As you can see a prohibition of a transaction from the Fed, this is nothing more than the fruit of the patient's imagination of Starikov. Then the question arises - and what did the Fed, when he considered all the circumstances of the transaction. Answer - Fed approved this transaction. You can familiarize yourself with the document that is called - "Order of approval of the acquisition of the banking holding company."

In conclusion, I would like to comment on the legal proceedings associated with this transaction in more detail. First quote from page 192:

On Saturday, Citigroup lawyers pulled out from the bed of the district New York judge Charles Ramos, who imposed a temporary ban on the transaction between the "Vakovy" and Wells Fargo to the final clarification of the circumstances related to an exclusivity point in the agreement on the intention signed by Citigroup. Sunday was followed by a response Punch: The court of superior instance canceled Ramos's decision, and in North Carolina and New York, two counterclaims against Citigroup federal judges were registered at once.

It seems to be all right, but I would like to quote the comment, which made old people:

And also talk about "Basmann Justice" in Russia! Judging by this story, here we are not far behind the whole "civilized humanity".

That he has found in general here with "Basmanny Justice" I personally incomprehensibly. Most likely, this quote indicates the inadequacy of Starikov, since this situation is not only not similar to the "Basmann Justice", but completely the opposite. Indeed, you can imagine that the Court of Appeal canceled the decision of the judge Danilkin? I think the answer is obvious.

There must be 2.5 million. If you think that the extracts are fake or he did not know about the real amount, he knew! Since 09/14/2017 in a video block №113 at 22:25 and 21:37 he said that it was collected more than talked.

"I took with me 1.328 million, a few days there should be receipts of party funds, and I said that some payments can be made from this money, and after 2 days to close. And on the next trip all the money will take the Donbass "

"At that time, it is not entirely clear how it will be distributed. This means that it is originally a very large amount of problems that can start right on the border, even 1.328 million, which I took the first time, which means that I need to be with me at least 2 people so that we Could legitly cross the border "

In the first fragment of old people, he said that he took out of donations and paid salary before the first trip, and the debt was going to pay at the second trip. But the old people announced that it was collected 1.3 million, and was brought to the Donbass 1.3 million, therefore, when old people reported that it was collected 1.3 million, then he selected, because If he had told the truth, he would not have made salaries from. Starikov himself confirms that it was collected more than he was taking, and he took exactly as much as he called. Consequently, old people lied about the number of money collected.

In the second fragment of old people directly says that he had a "very large amount", which he did not have to have no problems on the border, so he took only 1.328 million. Consequently, he knew that the money was collected more than 1.328, and So he lied on a blog when published screenshots.

Why does the old people at all recognize? Because in the case of a criminal case, it is elementary checked, and its lies will be used against him, so it cannot lie in key moments, but it can throw a lot of lies in secondary details that cannot be verified. His task to "creek" the audience, dilute on emotions to win the time, while the cold analysis shows that there are non-stalks in its version.

For example, if it was collected more, and it is part of the money for 2 days "redesigned" for salaries, then why didn't the old people voiced the real amount? I would say - "We collected 2.5 million, but the first stage in the Donbass we will take 1.3 million, the residue later." Why was it to hide, what is the rest? But this is only half of the already proven Lie Starikov ...

Why was the screenshots?

What the screenshots are fake can be proved! It is proven not only the words of Starikov, which was collected more than voiced, and not only, but also appearance Edited screenshots that are still falsified on the site.

Take the screen from 24.08.17, we will increase in Photoshop, and see that the numbers are located on different levelAs if they were moving, but did not leveled on the line. See how two numbers "6" are located, one above another, which should not be in principle.

https://nstarikov.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/sberbank-1.jpg - link to screen from Starikov site. If you increase it in photoshop, and impose a grid, you will see "dusting numbers":

On the upper screen, one of the six pixels is above another, and on the bottom one of the Trok is significantly higher than the other.

The fact that fake screenshots are proven. The fact that old people deliberately published the underline amount - proven, because He himself told in the video. Consequently, the fact that old people faked screenshots - proven. He could not help but know that the screenshots are fake, if he himself said that it was collected more than confirmed by the screenshots.

Total we have - the publication of an old obviously understated amount on the blog through knowingly fake screenshots throughout the collection time. Next, the old people of the 8th pays salaries from donations, and claims that this is "redistribution" for 2 days, and not an attempt. But evidence of money receipt in 2 days does not provide , exports to the word on credit and faith.

A simple question: why did the old people fake screenshots and published an underestimated amount?

Why he immediately did not take everything, he kind of gave an explanation - as if everything could not be done, although it was possible to take more people. But why lie about the number of money collected?

How you are breeding

The calculation of Starikov's protection is based on the accusation of the air defense apparatus in the fact that they are turnover, blackmail, the invaders of the authorities, anti-Putinists and anti-Partisians. And while they do not disprove all this, the adepts of the sect will not ask a simple question of Starikov - what's the point was to fake screenshots?

The old people can boil at least for the air defense device, even if they are the worst in the world. But whoever they would, let's say, terrible dischargers, but there is a fact - old people knowingly published fake screenshots and undressed the amount of collection. Is it a jamb? Why not ask him a question - why did he do it? The month has already passed! Adepts, what are you waiting for? He himself admitted to this, why not fold the authority of the Chair until the Independent Commission (and not appointed by it) will not figure it out.

Starikov decided to blame her opponents, and raise the hysteria, to dig all on the emotions, so that he was not asked questions to him, and opponents did not listen, and were driven out of the party to Poganta. If you begin to ask questions and dig it, you will find a lot of non-stalks, but so that you do not do old people and speakers a lot of lies on the air defense device. But what's the difference, who are they, if old men lie? He was already forced to admit to one lie - that he undertakes the amount of donations. And only under the coordination he said, since he had no choice. You will continue to believe him for the word in everything?

Or do you agree that you need an independent investigation? You do not just believe the person who lied to you, he is still in power, and drove out of his opponents from the party so that they cannot prove something at the congress. How can you believe a person who once lied to you? He specifically wants to convince you that he was supposedly an attack "State Department" began, allegedly a definition campaign began against him. While you believe it, you do not ask him questions, do not require answers. If he had not inspired you about terrible blackmail and the invaders of the authorities, then you would ask him a simple question - Nikolai Viktorovich, why did you lie about the collected amounts and faked documents? And since he can not answer anything to it, then you would like a normal independent investigation in this case. Now the Investigation Commission appoints old men with its accomplices.

Similarly, now happens in Ukraine. Poroshenko is beneficial to stay in power as well as old mans favorably so that you think that you attacked the terrible discrepancies and blackmail. Therefore, any questions to Poroshenko are postponed, because war is war, and not the time during the war commander-in-chief change. Also, as in the case of Starikov, he inspires you allegedly for him and the air defense was attacked by the State Department of 6 people from the air defense unit, and therefore not the time of the Issues of Starikov to ask, not the time to put the powers of the CC Presidium and conduct an independent and objective investigation.

If you want to save air defense, then distribute these materials. Do not allow the batch in the sect while it remains even at least something. Send this link to your familiar adepts sects in a personal, only true you can save them. And if you yourself are still ADEPT, then you still give a link to friends, and discuss with them, you have nothing to be afraid or you finally recognize yourself with a believer sectarian, which, as a vampire from the holy water, runs from alternative information?

Epilogue

What I described above is the proven fact of Lie Starikov, it is absolutely obvious, as it is confirmed by the old man. But there are simply logical holes in his version, I advise you to read for a start. All that says in these two articles under each statement has a link, everything is proven, everything is easy to check. We have already found out that old people of the liar and its version cannot withstand normal criticism.

Next, it is already possible to dive into the details in this article, it is already more difficult, as it contains many facts, links, dates, broadcasts. It follows from it that the independent investigation is needed, which means it is necessary to add the powers of the Presidium of the Central Committee to the end of the investigation.

In general, everything is in detail here, here is a list of all materials, arguments, facts, as well as the analysis of manipulations and petty lies of the Presidium of the Central Committee, because of which adepts do not want an independent investigation, and believe in nonsense about blackmail and try to capture power.

Remember that Staritikov strategy is built on the discharge of the air defense apparatus in such a way that you do not even want to understand the facts! They cranked you a lot, naked a lot and manipulated, so that all this disassemble on the shelves it is necessary to learn all this.