We are talking about people a limited person. We sometimes talk about other people limited person

I am engaged in "Five with plus" in Gulnur Gataullovna's group of biology and chemistry. I am delighted, the teacher knows how to interest the subject, find an approach to the student. Adequately explains the essence of his requirements and gives a realistic volume of homework (and not like most teachers in the year of the exam, ten paragraphs per home, but one in the classroom). ... We are studying strictly for the Unified State Exam and it is very valuable! Gulnur Gataullovna is sincerely interested in the subjects she teaches, she always gives the necessary, timely and relevant information. Highly recommend!

Camilla

I am preparing in "Five with a plus" for mathematics (with Daniil Leonidovich) and the Russian language (with Zarema Kurbanovna). I am very happy! The quality of classes is at a high level, at school there are now only A's and A's in this subject. I wrote the mock exams at 5, I am sure that I will pass the OGE perfectly. Thank you!

Ayrat

Preparing for the exam in history and social studies with Vitaly Sergeevich. He is an extremely responsible teacher in relation to his work. Punctual, polite, pleasant to talk to. It can be seen that a person lives by his work. He is well versed in adolescent psychology, has a clear training methodology. Thank you "Five Plus" for the work!

Leysan

I passed the exam in Russian for 92 points, mathematics for 83, social studies at 85, I think this is an excellent result, I entered the university on a budget! Thank you Five Plus! Your teachers are real professionals, with them a high result is guaranteed, I am very glad that I turned to you!

Dmitriy

David Borisovich is a wonderful teacher! Preparing in his group for the exam in mathematics profile level, passed on 85 points! although knowledge at the beginning of the year was not very good. David Borisovich knows his subject, knows USE requirements, he himself is a member of the verification commission examination papers... I am very glad that I was able to get into his group. Thank you "Five Plus" for this opportunity!

Violetta

Five Plus is a great exam preparation center. Professionals, cozy atmosphere, friendly staff work here. I studied English and social studies with Valentina Viktorovna, I passed both subjects with a good score, I'm happy with the result, thank you!

Olesya

In the center "Five with a plus" I studied two subjects at once: mathematics with Artem Maratovich and literature with Elvira Ravilievna. I liked the lessons very much, the clear methodology, the accessible form, the comfortable environment. I am very pleased with the result: mathematics - 88 points, literature - 83! Thank you! I will recommend everyone your Education Centre!

Artem

When I was choosing tutors, I was attracted by the Five Plus Center good teachers, a convenient schedule of classes, the availability of trial free exams, my parents - affordable prices for high quality. As a result, the whole family was very pleased. I studied three subjects at once: mathematics, social studies, English. Now I am a student of KFU on a budgetary basis, and all thanks to good preparation - I passed the exam for high scores... Thanks!

Dima

I very carefully selected a social studies tutor, I wanted to pass the exam for maximum score... "Five plus" helped me in this matter, I was in Vitaly Sergeevich's group, the classes were super, everything is clear, everything is clear, at the same time fun and easy. Vitaly Sergeevich presented the material in such a way that it was remembered by itself. I am very pleased with the preparation!

Composition: What kind of person can be considered limited?

What kind of person can be considered limited? The question is very difficult, and it is impossible to give an unambiguous answer to it. If a person loves to read and learn new things about our amazing and multifaceted world, he cannot be limited, so to speak, “by default”.

But one cannot speak about the limitations of a person only on the basis of the small number of books he has read or the theoretical knowledge he has learned. After all, there are people who comprehend the foundations of everything that exists in our life, including work, hobbies, laws of morality, communication with other people, in a practical way, without resorting to quoting the wise classics.

For example, one of the most valuable traditions of the peoples of the Caucasus is respect for the elders in the family and unquestioning submission to their will. How, it would seem, the elder of the clan can know everything, but he says really wise things, teaches young people, resolves disputes between fellow tribesmen. In fact, we understand that this knowledge, this ability to see the smallest, but such important details of life came to him not from books, but through oral transmission of information from generation to generation, and, of course, from our own observations.

But there are also people who live in their own, artificially isolated world, not wishing to comprehend any other reality. They do not want to know the history of their country, they are not interested in how people live in other places, they have no hobbies; work, home, family are the only values in life. Yes, the worldview of such a person is narrower and, according to an outside observer, can be considered rather limited.

Another example of an essay:

In our time, it is difficult to say for sure who is considered a limited person. Whether to take the level of education, reading, outlook? But this level of education with erudition today is so low among the majority that, perhaps, it is not entirely correct to judge by these criteria.
I think that limited person is a person who cannot understand the new and the old. A limited will be a teenager who rejects all the experience of past generations from above, without trying to understand. Who does not listen to advice, not because they seem stupid to him, but because they are given by those who "do not understand anything." An adult will be limited, unable to understand the aspirations of youth, not understanding progress, recognizing only the past.

Limited, I would call those who repulse everything that does not fit into their understanding - without trying to figure it out. Those who see everything in one light and will never change their mind - due to the fact that he is too lazy to think. He is limited by the already established opinion. This, the last, is the most terrible and destructive limitation. From her all the misunderstanding in the relationship. From her, myriads of scientists and geniuses "perished" - not recognized and punished for not recognizing the usual truths. There are still many different troubles from her.

A person for that and a person endowed with reason - to be able to understand and accept new things. And there is no need to illustrate Mephistopheles' "... he would have lived like this, if you had not illuminated him with the spark of God from within - he calls this spark with reason, and with it cattle live with cattle."

Composition: What kind of person can be considered limited? (According to V. Soloukhin).

(1) We sometimes say about other people: "Limited person."
(2) But what can this definition mean?
(3) Each person is limited in his knowledge or in his idea of the world.
(4) Humanity as a whole is also limited.
(5) Imagine a miner who, in a coal seam, has developed a certain space around himself, surrounded by layers of impenetrable black stone.
(6) This is its limitation.
(7) Each person in the invisible, but nevertheless impenetrable layer of the world and life has developed around himself a certain space of knowledge.
(8) He is, as it were, in a capsule surrounded by a boundless, mysterious world.
(9) "Capsules" vary in size because one knows more and the other less.
(10) A person who has read a hundred books presumptuously speaks of someone who has read twenty books: "The Limited Man."
(11) But what will he say to someone who has read a thousand?
(12) And no, I think, a person who would read all the books.
(13) Several centuries ago, when the information side of human knowledge was not so extensive, there were scientists whose "capsule" approached the "capsule" of all mankind and, perhaps, even coincided with it: Aristotle, Archimedes, Leo-Nardo da Vinci.
(14) Now it is impossible to find such a sage who would know as much as mankind as such knows.
(15) Therefore, we can say about everyone that he is a limited person.
(16) But it is very important to separate knowledge and ideas.
(17) To clarify my point, I return to our miner in the coalbed.
(18) Let us assume conditionally and theoretically that some of the miners were born there, underground, and never got out.
(19) They have not read books, have no information, no idea about the external, transcendental (outside of their slaughter) world.
(20) So he worked out a rather vast space around him and lives in it, thinking that the world is limited by his slaughter.
(21) Another, less experienced miner, whose mined area is smaller, also works underground.
(22) That is, he is more limited by his slaughter, but he has an idea of the external, terrestrial world: he swam in the Black Sea, flew on an airplane, picked flowers.
(23) The question is, which of the two is more limited?
(24) That is, I want to say that you can meet a scientist with great specific knowledge and soon become convinced that he is, in essence, a very limited person.
(25) And you can meet a person who is not armed with a whole arsenal of accurate knowledge, but with the breadth and clarity of ideas about outside world.
(According to V. Soloukhin).

Main problems:

1. The problem of human limitation. What kind of person can be considered limited?

1. Limitedness is a relative concept. A person can have great specific knowledge and remain limited if he does not have a clear idea of the external world. At the same time, the space not cognized by man is so large that each person and humanity as a whole can be considered limited.

What kind of person we can call limited is the problem raised by V. Soloukhin in the text.

The author, arguing about which of us is limited in our knowledge or in our idea of the world, draws an interesting parallel. He believes that today it is impossible to find a sage who would know everything, as it was in the times of Aristotle, Archimedes, Leonardo da Vinci, because the volume of human knowledge has grown immeasurably. So everyone today can be called a "limited" person? Yes. But one, according to V. Soloukhin, is limited by knowledge of a topic that interests only him, but the other, “not armed with a whole arsenal of accurate knowledge,” will have a broad and clear idea of the external world.
V. Soloukhin believes that a “limited person” is one who has withdrawn into the study of only one kind of science, not noticing anything other than it.

I agree with the opinion of the author. Indeed, by ignoring everything except the topic that interests you, a person limits himself in many ways.
Take, for example, the well-known literary heroes 19th century, characters from the novels of I.A. Goncharov and I.S. Turgenev. Which of them could be called a limited person: Ilya Oblomov or Evgeny Bazarov? Of course, most will name Oblomov. But I think that Bazarov was truly “limited”. He was interested only in his science, medicine, but he preached nihilism. Neither painting nor poetry interested Turgenev's hero! But Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, a sloth known to everyone, actually knew a lot and could support any topic in a conversation. So judge now which of them is more limited!

Thus, I can conclude that each person, deeply studying the topic chosen by him in life, should not be limited only to it, but be interested in other issues of the external world.

(1) We sometimes say about people: "Limited person." (2) But what can this definition mean? (3) Each person is limited in his knowledge or in his idea of the world. (4) Humanity as a whole is also limited.

(5) Imagine a miner who, in a coal seam, has developed a certain space around himself, surrounded by layers of impenetrable black stone. (6) This is its limitation. (7) Each person in the invisible, but nevertheless impenetrable layer of the world and life has developed around himself a certain space of knowledge. (8) He is, as it were, in a capsule surrounded by a boundless, mysterious world. (9) "Capsules" vary in size because one knows more and the other less. (10) A person who has read a hundred books presumptuously speaks of someone who has read twenty books: "The Limited Man." (11) But what will he say to someone who has read a thousand? (12) And there is no, I think, a person who would read all the books.

(13) Several centuries ago, when the information side of human knowledge was not so extensive, there were scientists whose "capsule" approached the "capsule" of all mankind and, perhaps, even coincided with it: Aristotle, Archimedes, Leonardo da Vinci ... (14) Now it is impossible to find such a sage who would know as much as humanity as such knows. (15) Therefore, we can say about everyone that he is a limited person. (16) But it is very important to separate knowledge and ideas. (17) To clarify my point, I return to our miner in the coalbed.

(18) Let us assume conditionally and theoretically that some of the miners were born there, underground, and never got out. (19) They have not read books, have no information, no idea about the external, transcendental (outside of their slaughter) world. (20) So he worked out a rather vast space around him and lives in it, thinking that the world is limited by his slaughter. (21) Another, less experienced miner, whose mined area is smaller, also works underground. (22) That is, he is more limited by his slaughter, but he has an idea of the external, terrestrial world: he swam in the Black Sea, flew in an airplane, picked flowers ... (23) The question is, which of the two is more limited?

(24) That is, I want to say that you can meet a scientist with great specific knowledge and soon become convinced that he is, in essence, a very limited person. (25) And you can meet a person who is not armed with a whole arsenal of accurate knowledge, but with a breadth and clarity of ideas about the external world.

(According to V. Soloukhin *)

Show full text

Who can be named in modern world limited person? The reader involuntarily thinks about this when he gets acquainted with an excerpt from the work of V. Soloukhin.

Arguing his position, the writer argues that such great scientists as Aristotle, Archimedes, whose knowledge was all-encompassing. However, now, according to V. Soloukhin, such a person cannot be found, so we can say about everyone that he is limited.

In the novel "Fathers and Sons" I.S. Turgenev tells the story of Evgeny Bazarov, an outstanding scientist. He possessed deep scientific knowledge, but at the same time he could not understand people and did not know how to interact with them... This

Criteria

1 of 1 Q1 Formulation of source code problems
2 of 3 K2

Text №44 According to V. Soloukhin. We sometimes talk about other people: "Limited person"

(According to V. Soloukhin)

1)		comparative turnover
2)	parceling
3)	ranks homogeneous members
4)	irony
5)	metaphor
6)	individual author's words
7)	interrogative sentences
8)	dialecticism
9)	Epithet Answers 7359 ???? 1 PROBLEM

Main problems:

1. The problem of human limitation. What kind of person can be considered limited?

What kind of person we can call limited is the problem raised by V. Soloukhin in the text.

Sasha Cherny."Books"
There is a bottomless box of the world

From Homer to us.

To know at least Shakespeare,

It takes a year for smart eyes.

Quotes

1. We can as much as we know (Heraclitus, ancient Greek philosopher).

2. Not every change is development (ancient philosophers).

3. We were civilized enough to build a machine, but too primitive to use it (K. Kraus, German scientist).

4. We left the caves, but the cave has not yet emerged from us (A. Regulsky).

5. Jack London. Martin Eden

Limited minds only notice limitation in others.

D. London "Martin Eden"

The protagonist of the novel of the same name by American writer Jack London Martin Eden - a working guy, a sailor, a native of the lower classes, about 21 years old, meets Ruth Morse, a girl from a wealthy bourgeois family. Ruth begins to teach the semi-literate Martin correct pronunciation English words and awakens in him an interest in literature. Martin finds out that magazines pay decent royalties to the authors who are published in them, and firmly decides to make a career as a writer, earn money and become worthy of his new acquaintance, with whom he managed to fall in love. Martin composes a self-improvement program, works on his language and pronunciation, reads a lot of books. Iron health and unbending will moves him towards the goal. In the end, after going a long and thorny path, after numerous refusals and disappointments, he becomes a famous writer. (Then he becomes disillusioned with literature, his beloved, people in general and life, loses interest in everything and commits suicide. This is so, just in case. An argument in favor of the fact that fulfilling a dream does not always bring happiness)

6. Jack London.

I am just shy when I see my human limitations preventing me from covering all sides of the problem, especially when it comes to the fundamental problems of life.

It was an eternal tragedy - when limitation seeks to guide a true mind, broad and alien to prejudice, on the path.

7. Miguel de Cervantes. There are people for whom knowledge of Latin does not prevent them from being donkeys.

8. Evgeny Zamyatin. The novel "We". I am not afraid of this word - "limitation": the work of the highest thing in a person - reason - is reduced precisely to the continuous limitation of infinity, to the fragmentation of infinity into convenient, easily digestible portions - differentials. This is precisely the divine beauty of my element - mathematics.

9. MV Lomonosov. Evening meditation on the majesty of God ...

…

A black shadow ascended the mountains;

The beams bent away from us;

Opened abyss stars full;

To the stars the numbers No, abyss bottom.

The early Middle Ages are commonly referred to as the "dark ages". The raids of the barbarians, the destruction of the ancient civilization led to a deep decline in culture. It was difficult to find a literate person not only among the commoners, but also among the people of the upper class. For example, the founder Frankish state Charlemagne did not know how to write. However, the thirst for knowledge is originally inherent in man. The same Charlemagne, during his campaigns, always carried with him wax tablets for writing, on which, under the guidance of teachers, the prospector wrote letters.

The desire to learn new things lives in each of us, and sometimes this feeling takes over a person so much that it makes him change life path... Today, few people know that Joule, who discovered the law of conservation of energy, was a cook. The ingenious Faraday began his career as a peddler in a shop. And Coulomb worked as an engineer for fortifications and physics, giving only his free time from work. For these people, the search for something new has become the meaning of life.

Limited - SYNONYMS

silly; close; restrictive, finite, finite, one-sided, narrow, insufficient, tied, constrained, reduced; scanty, narrow-minded, narrow-minded; stupid, narrowly professional, narrowly specific, narrowly industry-specific, silly, stripped-down, narrow-minded, modest, compressed, local, sequestered, does not vomit stars from the sky, highly specialized, sequestered, stupid, localized, limited, narrow-minded, short-sighted, not conditioned mind, small, narrowed, stupid, chicken brains, there are not enough stars from the sky, contingent, stupid, localized, limited, incomplete, procrustes, restrained, reduced, not unlimited, servitude, oppressed, empty-headed, foolish, sequestered, rustic, conditional, collapsed, insignificant. Ant. wide, versatile, multifaceted

Problems

The problem of the relationship between the knowledge of an individual and human knowledge of the whole world.
The problem of the importance of the process of cognition in human life.

This problem has worried many generations. Back in the days of Herodotus and Homer, people thought about the universe, they realized the need for study for the development of the human personality.

Both during the golden age of Russian literature, and today, many writers reveal in their works the problem of the need for scientific knowledge in human life.

An example of the inseparability of knowledge from a person is the work of a Russian writer I.A. Goncharova "Oblomov" ... One of the heroes of the work, Andrei Stolts, has been persistently improving his knowledge from early childhood. He developed his knowledge every minute. Knowledge of the world was his main goal. Thanks to his desire to reveal the secrets of the world, he became a man capable of solving any issue.
A very clear example - Evgeny Bazarov from the novel "Fathers and Sons" by I.S. Turgenev ... The hero was formed as a person thanks to his craving for knowledge, he became a man of a firm and deep mind.
Undoubtedly, a person should show a true desire and desire for knowledge, and not pretend to be a person who knows the world, as it is presented in the work. D.I.Fonvizina "Minor" ... In front of society the main character Mitrofanushka appears to be a man thirsty for knowledge, but in fact he was simply an ignoramus.

who has read a hundred books, arrogantly speaks about who has read twenty books: "A limited person." (11) But what will he say to someone who has read a thousand? (12) And no, I think, a person who would read all the books.

(13) Several centuries ago, when the information side of human knowledge was not so extensive, there were scientists whose "capsule" approached the "capsule" of all mankind and, perhaps, even coincided with it: Aristotle, Archimedes, Leonardo da Vinci ... (14) Now it is impossible to find such a sage who would know as much as mankind as such knows. (15) Therefore, we can say about everyone that he is a limited person. (16) But very important

share knowledge and perceptions. (17) To clarify my point, I return to our miner in the coal seam.

(18) Suppose, conditionally and theoretically, that some of the miners were born there, underground, and never got out. (19) They have not read books, have no information, no idea about the external, transcendental (outside of their slaughter) world. (20) So he worked out a rather vast space around him and lives in it, thinking that the world is limited by his slaughter. (21) Another, less experienced miner, whose mined area is smaller, also works underground. (22) That is, he is more limited by his slaughter, but he has an idea of the external, terrestrial world: he swam in the Black Sea, flew in an airplane, picked flowers ... (23) The question is, which of the two is

more limited?

(According to V. Soloukhin *)

Composition

"Limited person". What can this definition mean? " - this is how V. A. Soloukhin begins his reflections. In my opinion, these words contain the main problem of the text.

To bring us to the way the author sees the solution to the problem, he several times turns to the image of a miner working in "some space surrounded by thick layers of impenetrable black stone." This is his limitation. But another, less experienced miner is working nearby, and his limitations are greater. Likewise, the relative scarcity of people who have read a certain number of books. There is no person who has read all the books, there is no "sage who would know as much as mankind knows." Even such scholars as Aristotle, Archimedes, Leonardo da Vinci did not possess such knowledge, the "capsule" of which approached the "capsule" of all mankind and, perhaps, even coincided with it. "

Consequently, the author concludes, "about everyone we can say that he is a limited person." Limitedness is a relative concept. You can have great specific knowledge and be a limited person. And you can meet a person who is not armed with a whole arsenal of accurate knowledge, but with a breadth and clarity of ideas about the outside world.

V. Soloukhin's point of view is quite clear to me, I cannot but agree with her. I think the ability to see the world not only within the framework of one's own idea of it, but somehow wider, taking into account the vision of other people, is a special gift. I would like to add that it is good when a person is able to notice his "boundaries". This is the first step towards expanding them. And only the person himself can take this step. Any "help" from the outside is usually not accepted. It still seems to me that everyone can follow this path, if, of course, he has such a need.

In Russian classical literature, you can find images of people who can be called limited, but there are heroes who are aware of their limitations and strive to broaden their horizons. An example of images of people of the first type can, I think, serve as Chichikov from N. V. Gogol's poem "Dead Souls". His little world is limited by the need to become richer. He follows the behest of his father: "And most of all, take care of a penny, you will break everything with a penny." But aren't the limited people Khlestakov, Skvoznik-Dmukhanovsky, Bobchinsky and Dobchinsky and other characters in Gogol's "Inspector General" ?!

Let us recall another hero of Russian classical literature. Evgeny Bazarov in the novel

I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons" seeks to expand his knowledge, he is busy with science. But at the same time, we can call this hero a limited person: he does not recognize the beauty of nature, says reading fiction useless occupation, claims that "Raphael is not worth a penny" ... We know that this side of Bazarov's worldview is wrong.

In the novel by Lyudmila Ulitskaya "Kukotsky's Case" there are reflections similar to what V. Soloukhin wrote about: "A profession is a point of view. A professional very well sees one piece of life and may not see other things that do not concern his profession. " But Ulitskaya herself emphasizes that one cannot limit oneself only to professional knowledge, the main thing is to always remain human.

Yes, a person cannot know everything, in some ways he is really limited, but you need to strive to expand your horizons, not to consider yourself better and smarter than others. Then hardly anyone would think of calling you a limited person.