Pressing explains the phrase examples. Types of pressing offers

2.2. Complex sentence. Puttinglements that belong to one word in the main sentence

1. Questions: Candidate spectacle answers add-on questions, that is, on questions of indirect case.

2. The main word: Putting-free spectacle distribute the main word in the main thing that needs explanation and expressed verb, nouns, adjective, nashcha.

3. Means of communication: Candidatives can be attached to the main sentence with:

unions (what, as if, as if), Lie Union;
union words (who, what, which, what, whose, where, where, from where, when, why, why, why and etc.).

In the main sentence may be (but not necessarily) indexing wordsperforming the feature of the add-on.

4. Place in the sentence: Putting-free spectacle usually stand after the word to which they relate. However, their position is also possible before the main word.

It began with [why?], that ridge from mischief took a book (Gaidar).

[Ch. + Decree. Sl.], ( what - Union).

Slobodkina has arisen feeling [What?], as if he froze in the boundless space (Telpugov).

[SUB.], ( like - Union).

We are in bed asked Kucherov [about what?], they are humble horses (Marshak).

[Ch. ], ( lie - Union-particle).

- Julia Dmitrievna, Head ordel [what?], so you didn't go anywhere (Panova).

[Ch. ], ( to - Union).

Now no one does not know [What?], from in Kursk gardens "Nightingale School" (Sands).

[Ch. ], ( from - Union. word).

Note!

1) In the Issuctive Put, the most diverse means of communication (and unions, and allied words), and some of them ( what how) There may be both unions and allied words. Therefore, in this case, it is necessary to be especially attentive when distinguishing unions and allied words (see Section 2, Chapter 2, p. 2.1).

2) Union To always have the target value, and it can be used in the delivering goal.

I woke up Pasha [what for? for what purpose?], so that he does not fall down with yeast. (A.P. Chekhov)

This union can also be used in the deliverantly, this union can also be used, but the question from the main proposal to the apparent will be different (questions of indirect cases), and the apparent will have the meaning of desirability, possibilities, necessity.

Wed: Elizabeth Kiev Slavila [about what?], so that she herself allowed to take him to a big lazareret (A.N. Tolstoy).

3) Comparative unions as if they can be used in the apparent comparative.

There is something trembling, flickers [as? Like what?], as if an asterisk on the branches was confused (Marshak).

If they are used in the apparent exemplary, then the main word is asked by the question of an indirect case, and the addict itself contains a message with a tint of uncertainty, estimated.

Wed: Speak [what?], as if he took no alone adjutant duties (Turgenev).

4) Unions and allied words usually stand at the beginning of the apparent offer. It is for them that it is fairly easy to determine the border between the main and pressing proposals. But the Union-particle is always in the middle of the apparent emotional.

Therefore, such complex proposals are often confused with non-union complex suggestions. In addition, the position of the Union-particle whether it is necessary to take into account when aligning punctuation marks (the comma is not placed in front of it, but at the beginning of the pressing proposal).

Under the complex proposal is understood a large number of A variety of proposals that may differ from each other by the structure, the number of grammatical foundations, meaning, etc. Sometimes it is not even for a complex proposal. In this article, consider the types of apparent in NGN and learn to distinguish them from each other.

What is a complex proposal?

A complex proposal (SPP) is a form of a challenge, which consists of the main and dependent (additive) units connected by a subordination union or an allied word.

Need to grab an umbrella(main part) , because(subordinate union) Rain may begin(dependent part) .

Depending on the meaning, which carries the dependent part in relation to the main one, and on what word the dependent part in the main part includes, several types puttinglements :

definition
issuctive
circumstances
attachment.

Puttingular definition

depends on the noun, located in the main part of the NGN;
located in a proposal after or inside the main part, but always after the noun, on which it depends;
responsible to the definition questions "What?" What? "What?" What? ", Whose?" (Hence the name - "Determined Podder");
joins the main part of the allied words "that", "who", "where", "where", "when", "where", which can be replaced by the union word "which";
in the main part may be the indicative words "that", "such", "this", etc.

Viktor Petrovich(What?) who took the exam for the fifth hour to a row I felt the approaching migraine, filling the next test book.

For the birthday of Lida presented just such a bike(What?) what she dreamed about.

I find it difficult to recall the moment in life(What?) when my friends and I began to meet more and less.

Important! Puttingular definitions join only with union words. If an alliance is present in the sentence, then this is another variety of apparent.

Suddenly, a crazy thought came to mind (What? What about?) as if everything was planned in advance and now nothing can be changed.

From the noun "thought" you can ask a question "What?" or "What", and it may seem that this is an appropriate determination. But it is the presence of the Union "as if" indicates that it putting-emptying.

Putting-emptying

refers to the verb, noun, adorge or adjective, located in the main part;
located in a sentence after or in the middle of the main part;
answers questions of indirect cases of "Who?", "What?", "Who?", "What?", "Who?", "What?", "OK?", "What?" etc.;
joins the main part of the unions, "as if", "so that" "Where", "where", whose "who", "what", "which", "what", "what" "," Where, "" why "," why ", etc.

Dog devoted to his owner always feels from afar(What? - V.P.) that the owner is approaching the house.

Small children are confident(What? - P.P.) that in the new year they are under the Christmas tree gifts bring Santa Claus.

I think I guess(What about? - pp) Where did this hearing come from.

As can be seen from the name, such appendage are similar to circumstances: they answer the same questions, denote the same as circumstances, and there are the same species as circumstances.

Putting time

denotes the time to which the action occurs in the main part;
answers questions "When?", "How long?", "Since when?", "How long?";
joined the main part of the unions "when", "while", "as soon as", "barely", "before", "until", "Before", "as", etc. .

By the time Sofia came from school, Mom has already prepared lunch(what time?) .

The sun looks(when?) when the rain is over.

I will try new scarlet recipes(How long?) until I find the best.

Pressile place

indicates the place of the event occurring at the end of the main part
can be located in any part of the sentence;
in the main part, as a rule, there are indicable words "there", "from there", "there", "everywhere", "everywhere", etc.;
answers the question "Where?", "Where?", "Where?";
it is connected to the main part of the allied words "where", "where", "where".

Scout returned from there(where?) where no one has ever returned.

Cat goes to bed there(Where?) where the warmer is all.

Where I.(where to?) , there and you.

Pressing reasons

contains an explanation in itself why certain actions occur in the main part;
can be located in any part of the sentence;
answers questions "Why?", "Because of what?", "Why?", "For what reason?";
associated with the main part of the unions, "for", "from what", "because", etc.

(whereby?) Due to the fact that Oksana was preparing for the exam in physics all night, She passed it on perfectly.

Children tomorrow you need to get up early, so today you need to lie down early(Why? For what reason?).

Appearance

contains the value of the total, the result, the result, which arise from the main part of the main part;
always located in the sentence after the main part;
answers the question "as a result of what?", And from the main part, you can ask questions "What follows from this?", "What happened because of this?";
joins the main part with the help of the Union "So."

By winter in the evenings, it is fatal(What follows from this?) so evening walks have to cancel (as a result of what?) .

Important! The proposal does not apply to PPP with the apparent effect if:

a) the main part contains the adverb "so", and the appropriate - the Union "What" (this is an appropriate action and degree);

Sun today baked so(as?) that already in ten minutes on the street it was possible to get a sunshine.

b) between parts is written or unsoyous communication, and the second part contains adverbs "because".

Today Misha got a twice in mathematics and therefore he did not rush home. - SP.

Our cat recently gave birth to kittens , so it rarely out of your shelter . - BSP.

Pressing conditions

contains a condition in which it is possible to accomplish actions about which we are talking in the main part;
can be located in any part of the sentence;
answers the question "With what condition?";
connected with the main part of the unions, "when" (in the value "if"), "provided if", "if", "if", "if ... then", "once ... so", "like ... so" and t ..

If light graduates academic year without trinkers Parents will buy her roller skates(with what condition?) .

Come visit - send and feed , if we are at home (with what condition?) .

Since the promise gave, So keep it in spite of everything.

Pressing goal

contains the purpose of what is discussed in the main sentence;
in the sentence can occupy any place;
answers questions "Why?", "Why?", "For what purpose?";
it is connected to the main part of the unions "so that", "if only", "so that", etc.

To live well, We need to work much(for what purpose?) .

In order to fly to rest with children in asia countries, Need to prepare a first aid kit and sunscreen(what for?) .

Tourists should be able to use the compass then(what for?) to find out of any chance to find a yield to civilization.

Putting concessions

contains conditions, actions, despite the commission of which events in the main part are still occurring;
answers questions, "Despite what?";
it is connected to the main part of the unions, "at least", "despite the fact that", "let" "let", "" for nothing, "as well as the allied words" how "," how much "," what () "," Where, "" Where "," Who ", etc. (Mandatory with a negative particle "nor").

Peter went in the footsteps of his father and became the prosecutor of the city(Contrary to what?) , although during training at the institute he did not show interest in this profession.

Despite the fact that there is good weather on the street, Children refused to walk(Despite what?) .

As I murzed to the station, The train went out without me(Despite what?) .

Putting comparison

contains a comparison with the main part;
can occupy any place in the sentence;
answers questions "How?", "Like what?", "What?", "How?", "What?", "What?";
the main part may contain the indicative word "so";
joins the main part with the help of unions, "as if", "what", "exactly", "just like", "as if", "I don't care," etc.;

The dog at the sight of the bone began to jump so much(as?) As if she did not eat a week.

The daughter skillfully managed with the test As if many times knew him.

in a special group allocated pressure comparisonsthat contain a comparison of two parts, and characteristic feature Such proposals are the presence of the Union "than ..., the topics."

another separate group is a NGN, which in the main part there are:

a) adjective or adverb comparative degree,

b) pronouns "other", "Other",

c) prime conflicting "otherwise",

and the apparent joins the unions "than", "rather than".

Homework turned out to be more What I was hoping.

I would be better(adaptable in comprehensive degree) he went for two weeks to go around Karelia than to go to Turkey.

And you are very different than I thought about you.

Important! Pressure comparison may not contain a leakable if it coincides with the faithful in the main part. Do not configure such an apparent turnover. It is possible to distinguish them from each other at the following basis: the appendage of comparison has in its composition to be tamed or the words dependent on it, there is no comparative turnover of such words.

The girl danced gracefully and sophisticated like a real ballerina (dancing)(Where?) on the stage.
Here we see an apparent comparison with the omitted ledged "dancing". "On the stage" is a dependent circumstance ( dancing (Where?) on the stage).

The girl danced gracefully and sophisticated as a real ballerina.
If you remove the sentence-dependent member dependent, then the apparent comparison turns into a comparative turn.

speaks about the image, the method of action, as well as to the extent and the degrees that are discussed in the main sentence;
the offer is located after the main part;
answers questions "How?", "How?", "To what extent?", "To what extent?", "How?", "How much?", "How much?", "To what extent?";
it is connected to the main part of the unions "what", "so", as well as the allied words "how", "how much", "how much";
in the main part, there are certain words "such", "so much", "so", "so", "to such an extent", "before", which with alliances form a pair "so ... that", "so ... What "," before ... that ", etc.

He looked at her so(as?) how looked only lovers.

Seeing the mountain of the balls and a three-storey cake, the birthday girl was delighted before(How much?) what happened to joyfully jump and clap your hands.

Dad is so tired of work(How? How much?) that on the weekend I even turned off the phone.

as a rule, it applies to the entire main part, contains any extension or evaluation;
in the sentence stands after the main part;
the main part is complete in shape and does not contain any instructions on the fact that it follows the apparent
answers questions "What is the conclusion from this?", "What is the evaluation of this?", "What can be said about this?";
joins the allied words "what", "where", "where", "where", "when", "how", "why", "why", "why", "why", "as a result of what", etc. d.

Highness he spent on travels that could not not leave the imprint on his personality.

Bears are perfectly able to fish What is the middle of small mountain rivers come out and fish right on the fly.

My father rebuilt the house on the cottage with his own hands what required a lot of hardness and skills.

Table "Pressure Proposals"

	Location	Questions	Unions / Union words	Indexing words
Puttingular definition	after or inside the main part, but after the noun, on which it depends	"What?" "What?" , "what kind?" , "Whose?"	"What", "Who", "where", "where", "when where" ---- Can be replaced by "which"	"TOT", "such", "this" and etc.
Putting-emptying	after or inside the main part	"Who?" "What?" , "Who?" "What?" , "by whom?" "What?" "OK?" , "about what?" etc.	"As", "as if", "so", "that", "like", "where", "where", whose "," who "," what "," which "," why " "," Where, "" why "," why "
Appendency
Putting time	in any part	"when?" , "how long?" , "since when?" , "How long?"	"When", "While", "as soon as", "barely", "before", "until", "While", "Before", "as"
Pressile place	in any part	"Where?" , "where to?" , "Where?"	"Where", "where", "where"	"There," "from there," "there", "everywhere", "everywhere", etc.
Pressing reasons	in any part	"from what?" , "because of which?" "Why?" , "for what reason?"	"Since", "because" because "," because "," because "," due to the fact that "due to the fact that", "due to the fact that" etc.
Appearance	after the main part	"As a result?"	"so that"
Pressing conditions	in any part	"With what condition?"	"If", "when" (in the meaning "if"), "subject to", "if", "if", "if ... then", "once ... so", "like ... so", etc. .
Pressing goal	in any part	"what for?" , "for what?" , "for what purpose?"	"To", "in order", "if only", "so that", "then so that", etc.
Putting concessions	in any part	"Contrary to what?" , "Despite what?"	"Despite the fact that", "even", "Although", "despite the fact that", "let", "let", "let that", "how", "how much", "what ()", "Where," "Where", "Who", etc. (Mandatory with a negative particle "nor").
Putting comparison	in any part	"as?" "Like what?" , "like what?" , "like who?" "What?" "What?"	"(As) as if", "how", "like", "what", "exactly", "just like", "as if", "I don't care that", etc.	"So"
Pressing image and degree	after the main part	"as?" , "how?" "To what extent?" , "in what degree?" , "as?" , "how much?" , "How much?" "To what extent?"	"What", "so", "how", "how much", "how much"	"Such", "so much", "so", "so", "to such an extent", "before"
Appointed attachment	after the main part	"What is the conclusion from this?" , "What is the evaluation of this?" "What can I say about this?"	"What", "where", "where", "where", "when", "how", "why", "why", "why", "why", "as a result of what", etc.

Candidate spectacles respond to questions of indirect case. The main part needs a meaningful inventive, the main thing without apparent looks unfinished.

Examples: Still, it seems to me that you do not have the right to do. (it seems that?)

Candidate definitions

Application definitions answer what?; not from the main part, but from the noun. There is always the word "which" or the word that can always be replaced by the word "which" is always.

Examples: She sacing motifs that touched to tears. (What are the motives?)

Putitive circumstances

Applying circumstances are responsible to the questions of the adverb. Since there are a lot of questions, then the apparent circumstances are divided into subtypes:

Pressing goal answers the question "For what purpose?". In the apparent purpose there is always the word "to"

Examples: In order to come soon New Yearwe transferred the clock arrows forward.

Putting concessions. In the apparent concession there is always a union "although" or another union is synonym (despite the fact that that neither ...)

Examples: At Prince a stupid face, although many considered him a sad man.

Putting effect. In the apparent effect there is always a union "So." The comma is necessarily placed before that.

Examples: The boat was not hushed, so I had to row the board.

Pressure causes. In the apparent reason there is always a union "because" or it is synonymous (since, from what)

Pressing conditions. There is an union "if", but sometimes the role of the Union "If" can carry out the Union "when".

Examples: If I knew all the consequences, I would not get into the water.

Pressing image of action. Responsible to the question "How?" Indicates a method of action.

Examples: He went up as if she did not eat three days.

Measures and degrees.

Examples: It was so dark that I did not see anything.

Pressure comparison.

Examples: The air was trembling, as perturbed water trembling.

Pressing time. Is there always a question "When?"

Examples: When I woke up, already dawned.

Pressile place. Answers questions "Where? where to? Where? "

Remember: The main thing to determine the type of pressing proposals is a semantic question.

Unions and allied words can be made to a complex proposal additional shades of value.

Example: The village, where he missed Eugene, was an adorable corner. -This is a complex proposal with an appropriate definition that has an additional spatial shade of value.

In Russian, a group stands out complexed proposals, the apparent parts of which cannot be called neither definitive, nor thanctative or circumstances. These are complex proposals with pressing attachments.

Such apparent contain additional, associated, add a message to the main part of the complex proposal. In this sense, such appendages are often approaching the value to the plug-in structures.

The means of communication in them are the allied words that why, why, why, as a result, other, which, as if repeating in a generalized form, the main part content.

For example: His enemies, his friends, that, maybe the same thing, he was chilled and Syak. (A. Pushkin) Yamshchika decided to ride the river, which was supposed to cut the naga path with three worst. (A. Pushkin)

There is no question to the connecting additive, since in the main part of the complex proposal there is no word, phrases that would require the presence of the pressing part.

Algorithm for determining the appendage

1). Determine the main part complex proposal.

2). Determine supportword In the main part (if it is).

3). Ask a question from the main part to the appropriate sentence:

from the main part of the main part;
from the faithful in the main part;
from noun or pronoun in the main part;
it is impossible to ask a question to the apparent (with connecting and comparable).

4). Specify the means of communication in the apparent part (alliances or allied words).

Puttinglements in Russian are dependent parts from the main in the complex proposal. That is, they play the role of minor members of the sentence. Therefore, the types of presidential proposals are divided into account of the role performed in the proposal. To the entire secondary proposal, one question can be asked just how this is done in relation to the members of the sentence.

Main types of departing offers

Consider four of their types: determinant, circumstantial, thanks and attachment. Examples can be given that will present all types of departing offers:

Flowerbed, which was broken in the courtyard on the left side of the porch, resembled a reduced copy of the town - a sort of flower town from a fairy tale of Nosov about Lekhanka. (Determined).
And I introduced me that there really lives restless and funny shorteys. (Issuctive).
And we do not see them because they are hiding from us under the earth. (Constentive).
But only we are leaving somewhere, as the shorteys are chosen from their shelters and begin to raise life violently. (Connecting).

Definition apparent

These attachments in Russian define the sign of one name of the noun or sometimes phrase consisting of a noun and index word. They serve as answers to questions what? whose? which the? These minor proposals join the main part of the allied words whose who, who, what, from where, where, when. Usually in the main part of the complex offer are such indicative words as such, everyone, anyone, any or tOT In various forms of childbirth. As examples, you can take the following proposals:

Live creatures ( what kind?) who dwell on the planet next to people feel good human attitude to them.
Stretch your hand with food, palm cutting, Zamre, and some kind of ptah, ( what?) whose voice in the morning hears in the bushes of your garden, with trust will be in your hand.
Every person ( what?) who considers themselves the top of the creation of the Most Highmust comply with this rank.
Lie, Forest or Normal Dvor, (What?) where everything is familiar and familiarcan open the door to the door in amazing world Nature.

Appendix attachments

Interesting types of departing proposals that are not related to single word or phrase, and to the whole main part. They are called connecting. Often, these parts of the complex proposal enclose the importance of the investigation, complementing or explaining the content of the main part. The secondary sentences of this type are joined by allied words. where, how, when, why, where, that. Examples:

And only next to mom, any kid feels protected, what is envisaged by nature itself.
Caring for cubs, tenderness to their offspring, self-sacrifice is laid in a creature at the level of instinct, how to break the need to breathe, sleep, eat and drink.

Issuctive appendages

If the author of the text wants to clarify, specify some one word of the main part, which matters thoughts, perception, feelings or speech. Often these additives relate to verbs, such as say, answer, think, feel, be proud, hear. But they can specify and adjectives, for example, satisfied or glad. It is often observed when these kinds of departing proposals act as explanations of the shortcoming ( clearly, you need, it is necessary, it is known, sorry) or nouns ( message, Thought, Statement, Rumor, Thought, Feeling). Advanced supplanted with help are joined:

Unions (so that when, as if, like others);

Any union words;

Particles (Union) Lee.

Examples can serve as the following complex suggestions:

And whether you were watching, ( what?) as amazingly playing sunlight, reflecting in dew droplets, insect wings, snowflakes?
Once a sort of beauty, a person will certainly be incomprehensible, ( what?) that discovered the unique world of the beautiful.
And immediately becomes clear, ( what?) that everything around is created not just so that everything is interconnected.
Consciousness fill the indescribable feelings of joy, (what kind?) as if you were and yourself are a part of this amazing and unique world.

Pressing image and degree

Consulative appendages are divided into several subspecies. A group of dependent parts of complex proposals, which relate to a trait or action, called in its main part, and denote its degree or measure, as well as the image relating to the apparent image and extent. They usually respond to the following questions: how? How much? as? in what degree? The design of the plot connection with the main part looks about this way: full adjective + noun + such; Full adjective + such; verb + TA. The joining of these pressing proposals is ensured by alliances. so that or allied words how much, how much And some others. Examples:

The girl laughed so causingly, so directly What and everything else was difficult to stay from a smile.
Ringing overflows of her laughter broke the stressed silence of the room, like unexpectedly crumbled multicolored peas from the package.
And the lichki itself was transformed so much as far as it was possible in this case: the girl exhausted by the disease is easily easily called the charming and absolutely healthy child.

Circumstantial pressing places

These dependent proposals indicate the place of origin of the action called in the main part complex proposal. Referring to the entire general proposal, they respond to the following questions: where? where to? Where? and join the allied words Where, from where, where. Often in the main sentence are the words there, everywhere, there, everywhere, from everywhere and some others. You can bring the following examples of such proposals:

Determine the parties of light in the forest more often can be quite easy there, Where in the trees there is moss.
Ants dragged on back construction material For their anthills and food reserves from everywhere, where these hardworking creatures could get.
I am pulling me there, in the magic edges, where we went with him last summer.

Circumstantial pressing time

Indicating the time of action, these apparent are treated both to the entire main proposal, and specifically to one to the lean. To this species can be asked such questions: how long? How long? when? since when? Often, in the main part of the sentence there are indicable words, for example: sometimes, one day, always, now, then. For example: animals will then be friendly among themselves, (when?) when they grow near the childhood.

Consulative Putting Conditions, Causes, Objectives, Corollary

If the dependent parts of the complex proposals are responsible for questions in what is the case? Or with what condition? and belong to either to the lean main part, or to it to all, joining the conditional unions time, kid, if, if whenand as (in the meaning "if"), then they can be attributed to the apparent conditions. Example: Even the most dying chalopai turns into a serious and well-skitting gentleman, ( in which case?) When he acquires the status of a parent, whether it is a man, marty or penguin.
On questions because of which? why? for what reason? from what? Answer pressing reasons. Accession them occurs with the help of unions because because because, since. Example: For the baby in early childhood, the prestige of the parent is adamant, ( why?) because its well-being depends on this being.
Dependent proposals denoting the purpose of the action called in the main part and answering questions for what? What purpose? what for?are called apparent targets. Accessing them to the main part is provided by the target unions in order to, then, so that (so that). Example: but then you should accompany your credentials ( what purpose?) then so that the kid has grown thinking personality, and not a non-rest robot performer.
The dependent parts of the sentence, which indicate the conclusion or result, indicate a consequence arising from the foregoing in the main part of the proposal, are called the trendy consequences and refer to the entire main proposal. They usually join the alliances of the investigation so or so that, for example: Education - Complex and regular process ( what follows from this?) therefore, parents should always be in shape and not relax for a minute..

Circumstantial pressing comparisons

These types of dependent proposals in complexized structures are either a leaky, or to the whole main part and answer the question like what? By joining comparative unions as if, than (topics), as if, exactly. The comparative revolutions are distinguished by the fact that they have a grammatical basis. For example: White bear worker so funny poured on his side and looked up the paws up especially this is a sharp boy fun playing in a sandbox with his friends..

Circumstantial appropriate concessions

Dependent proposals in a complex design, denoting circumstances, contrary to which, or may be carried out, which is indicated in the main part, are called concessions. These include questions: contrary to what? Despite what? and attach to the main one with the help of giving unions although (though), let (let him go), that, for nothing that, despite And some others. Unclean combinations are often used: how much nor, when nor whoever And the like. Example: Despite the fact that the cubs panda fun playedTheir dark spots around the eyes created the impression of sad thoughtfulness.

A competent person should always remember: with a letter of supply, which are part of the complex, are separated by commas.

The apparent offer in Russian is of particular difficulty in determining its type on a single state exam In the second part. In fact, the definition of this very species does not cause big problems if you correctly ask questions from the main part.

Pressure proposal is a subordination part dependent part. As known, podep part It can stand not only at the beginning of the sentence, but also in its middle or late. An important rule: Any apparent part is separated from the main comma or other signs. Podep parts can explain both the main part and each other. If several appendants explain each other, it is called if the apparent explains the main one - in parallel (in this case, as a rule, the apparent parts have a common union).

Putitive offers B. german language Have a clear sequence of words, which you can not say about Russian. There every word has its own place: to be subject to, then lean and only then minor members. And the apparent offers in english language Can perform the roles of a facid to be or add-on.

So, the apparent offer in Russian has several species.

1) Determined (the main questions of common definitions - what? What?; It is connected only with the help of alliances: which, which, whose). Example: a house that stood on Mount, was the property of my grandmother.

2) Issuctive (Questions Example: I know that everything will be done soon.

3) circumstances (have their own structure):

Thus, the apparent offer in Russian explains and complements the main part of the complex proposal. To determine the type of this proposal, it is enough just to correctly put the question to the part, the value of which is disclosed with apparent.