Criteria for evaluating the oge in biology. Criteria for evaluating the entire oge

The translation of the OGE scores in the Russian language into grades is carried out according to the scale of translation developed by the specialists of FGBNU "FIPI" primary points in marks on a five-point scale for holding the OGE, and is RECOMMENDED.

OGE grading scale from FIPI - download

OGE scores 2017 in Russian

Maximum amount points OGE (GIA grade 9) in the Russian language, which an examiner can receive for completing the entire examination work, – 39.

For the execution of the examination work, a mark is set on a five-point scale.

How many points do you need to score on the OGE in the Russian language to get a grade of 3, 4, or 5?

Mark "2" Exhibited if the student scored no more than 14 points (from 0 to 14) for completing all parts of the examination paper.

Mark "3" Exhibited if the student scored at least 15 and no more than 24 points (from 15 to 24) for completing all parts of the examination work.

Mark "4" Exhibited if the student scored at least 25 and not more than 33 points (from 25 to 33) for completing all parts of the examination work. In this case, the student must score at least 4 points for literacy (criteria GK1-GK4). If the student scored less than 4 points according to the criteria ГК1-ГК4, the mark "3" is set.

Mark "5" Exhibited if the student scored at least 34 and not more than 39 points (from 34 to 39) for completing all parts of the examination work. In this case, the student must score at least 6 points for literacy (criteria ГК1-ГК4). If the student scored less than 6 points according to the criteria ГК1-ГК4, the mark "4" is set.

The criteria for assessing the OGE in the Russian language and points for assignments can be found in the demo version of the KIM, or in more detail in the document from the official website of FIPI:

Methodological materials for the chairmen and members of regional subject commissions for checking the fulfillment of tasks with a detailed answer of the examinations of the OGE in 2017

Since we published the criteria for presentation and writing in the relevant sections, it remains to publish only the criteria for assessing literacy and notes from the demo version of the OGE 2016.

Literacy Assessment Criteria

№	Criteria for assessing literacy and actual accuracy of the examiner's speech	Points
GK1	Compliance spelling norms
	No spelling errors, or no more than one mistake has been made.	2
	Two or three mistakes were made.	1
	Four or more mistakes were made.	0
GK2	Compliance with punctuation norms
	There are no punctuation errors, or no more than two errors have been made.	2
	Three or four mistakes were made.	1
	Five or more mistakes were made.	0
GK3	Compliance with grammatical norms
	There are no grammatical mistakes or one mistake was made.	2
	Two mistakes were made.	1
	Three or more mistakes were made.	0
GK4	Compliance with speech norms
	Speech errors no, or no more than two mistakes were made.	2
	Three or four mistakes were made.	1
	Five or more mistakes made	0
FC1	Actual Accuracy written speech
	There are no factual errors in the presentation of the material, as well as in the understanding and use of terms.	2
	One mistake was made in the presentation of the material or in the use of terms.	1
	Two or more mistakes were made in the presentation of the material or in the use of terms.	0
	The maximum number of points for essay and presentation according to the criteria of FC1, GK1 – GK4	10

Notes (edit)

When assessing literacy (GK1 – GK4), the volume of presentation and essay should be taken into account.
The standards indicated in the table are used to check and evaluate the presentation and essay, the total volume of which is 140 or more words.
If the total volume of the essay and presentation is 70-139 words, then for each of the criteria GK1-GK4 no more than 1 point is given:
ГК1 - 1 point is given if there are no spelling errors or one blunder was made;
ГК2 - 1 point is given if there are no punctuation errors or one blunder is made;
ГК3 - 1 point is given if there are no grammatical errors;
ГК4 - 1 point is given if there are no speech errors.
If the presentation and the essay as a whole contains less than 70 words, then such work according to the criteria of GK1-GK4 is estimated at zero points. If the student has completed only one form creative work(or
presentation, or essay), then the assessment according to the criteria of GK1-GK4 is also carried out in accordance with the amount of work:
- if there are at least 140 words in the work, then literacy is assessed according to the above table;
- if there are 70–139 words in the work, then no more than 1 point is given for each of the criteria ГК1 – ГК4 (see above);
- if there are less than 70 words in the work, then such work according to the criteria of ГК1 – ГК4 is assessed with zero points.
Maximum points that an examinee can receive for completing all examination work, - 39 .

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs the main general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 25, 2013 No. 1394, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia No. 31206 on February 03, 2014) “48. The examination papers are checked by two experts. Based on the results of the check, the experts independently set points for each answer to the tasks of the examination work ... In the event of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. Significant discrepancy in points
defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject... The third expert is appointed by the chairman of the subject committee from among experts who have not previously checked the examination paper. The third expert is provided with information about the points given by the experts who previously checked the student's examination work. The scores given by the third expert are final. "
The discrepancy of 10 or more points given by two experts for completing tasks 1 and 15 is considered significant (points are summed up for all positions (criteria) for assessing the task
by each expert: IK1 – IK3, S1K1 – S1K4, S2K1 – S2K4, S3K1 – S3K4, GK1– GK4, FC1). In this case, the third expert rechecks items 1 and 15 for all assessment positions. For the execution of the examination work, a mark is set on a five-point scale.
Mark "2" is given if the student scored no more than 14 points (from 0 to 14) for completing all parts of the examination work.
The mark "3" is given if the student scored at least 15 and not more than 24 points (from 15 to 24) for completing all parts of the examination work.
The mark "4" is given if the student scored at least 25 and not more than 33 points (from 25 to 33) for completing all parts of the examination work. In this case, the student must score at least 4 points for literacy (criteria GK1-GK4). If the student scored less than 4 points according to the criteria ГК1-ГК4, the mark "3" is set.
The mark "5" is given if the student scored at least 34 and not more than 39 points (from 34 to 39) for completing all parts of the examination work. In this case, the student must score at least 6 points for literacy (criteria ГК1-ГК4). If the student scored less than 6 points according to the criteria ГК1-ГК4, the mark "4" is set.

The exam work of the OGE in the Russian language consists of three parts.

The third part of the work contains a creative task (Task 15), which checks communicative competence schoolchildren, in particular the ability to build their own utterance in accordance with a given type of speech.

Detailed evaluation criteria OGE compositions are presented in detail in the document published on the FIPI website:

You can briefly familiarize yourself with the criteria for evaluating the OGE composition in the demo version in the Russian language.

Task 15.1. Evaluation criteria for an essay - reasoning on a linguistic topic

Table 1

№	Evaluation criteria for essay-reasoning on linguistic theme (15.1)	Points
S 1 K1	Existence of a reasonable the answer
	The examinee brought the reasoning at a theoretical level. There are no factual errors associated with understanding the thesis	2
	The examinee brought the reasoning at a theoretical level. There was one factual error related to with understanding of the thesis	1
	The examinee brought the reasoning at a theoretical level. Two or more factual errors were made related to the understanding of the thesis, or the thesis is not proven, or reasoning is given outside the context of the assignment, or the thesis is proven at the household level	0
S 1 K2	The presence of example arguments
	from the text correctly indicating their role in the text	3
	The examinee gave two example arguments from the text, but did not indicate their role in the text, or gave two example-arguments from the text, indicating the role in the text of one of them, or gave one example-argument from the text indicating its role in the text	2
	The examinee gave one example argument from the text, without specifying its role in the text	1
	The examinee did not give a single example-argument illustrating the thesis, or the examinee gave examples-arguments not from the read text	0
S 1 K3
		2
	butand / or	1
	but and / or	0
S 1 K4	Compositional harmony of work
		2
	The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, but	1
		0
Maximum points for an essay by criteria S 1 K1–S 1 K4		9

An essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic, the examinee can write based on both general cultural experience and philological knowledge.

Evaluation criteria for an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis

table 2

№	Evaluation criteria for an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.2)	Points
C 2 K1	Understanding the meaning of a piece of text
	The examinee gave a correct explanation of the content of the passage. There are no mistakes in interpretation	2
	The examinee gave a generally correct explanation of the content of the passage, but made one mistake in his interpretation	1
	The examinee gave an incorrect explanation of the content of the text fragment, or the examinee made two or more mistakes when interpreting the content of the text fragment, or there is no explanation of the content of the fragment in the test taker's work	0
C 2 K2	The presence of example arguments
	The examinee brought from the text two example arguments that match the explanation of the content of this snippet	3
	The examinee brought from the text one example is an argument that matches the explanation of the content of this snippet	2
	The examinee gave example (s) argument (s) not from the read text	1
	The examinee did not give a single example-argument explaining the content of this passage, or the examinee gave as an example argument the quote or part of it given in the assignment	0
C 2 K3	Semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of the composition
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and the sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of the paragraph division of the text in the work	2
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error was made, and / or in the work there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text	1
	In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and / or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text	0
C 2 K4	Compositional harmony
	The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, there are no errors in the construction of the text	2
	The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, but one mistake was made in the construction of the text	1
	In the work, two or more mistakes were made in the construction of the text.	0
The maximum number of points for an essay according to the criteria C 2 K1–C 2 K4		9

Assessment criteria for the assignment 15.3

Table 3

№	Evaluation criteria for an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.3)	Points
C 3 K1	Interpretation of the meaning of the word
	The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) gave a definition and commented on it	2
	The examinee (in one form or another in any of the parts of the essay) gave a definition, but did not comment on it	1
	The examinee has given an incorrect definition, or there is no interpretation of the word in the examiner's work	0
C 3 K2	The presence of example arguments
	The examinee gave two example-arguments: one example-argument was given from the text read, and the second from life experience, or the examinee gave two example arguments from the text read	3
	The examinee gave one example-argument from the text read	2
	The examinee gave example (s) argument (s) from life experience	1
	The examinee did not give a single example argument	0
C 3 K3	Semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of the composition
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of the paragraph division of the text in the work	2
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error was made, and / or in the work there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text	1
	In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and / or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text	0
C 3 K4	Compositional harmony
	The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, there are no errors in the construction of the text	2
	The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, but one mistake was made in the construction of the text	1
	In the work, two or more mistakes were made in the construction of the text.	0
The maximum number of points for an essay according to criteria С 3 К1–C 3 K4		9

It is important that the student is offered 3 essay options. In each option, a different setting (research, analytical, value) can be implemented, which corresponds to both different types 6 perception of the text, and different forms of the student's personality orientation.

Availability different options essay contributes to the development of the competence of the student's responsible choice, allows the teacher, when preparing for the exam, to implement all the variety of teaching aids aimed at developing speech. At the same time, it is no coincidence that special attention is paid to the ability to argue the provisions of one's work using the text read: fostering a culture of evidence-based reasoned reasoning is the most important task modern school... It is also important to note that argumentation is an integrated indicator of the depth and accuracy of understanding the source text and the ability to functionally use the extracted information to solve certain communication goals.

It is indicative that the ability to argue their own statements is not sufficiently developed among 11th grade graduates. The new form of examination work for basic school graduates contributes to more active work of the teacher in this direction already in elementary school.

Description of the presentation for individual slides:

1 slide

Slide Description:

STATE FINAL CERTIFICATION (GIA) OGE - 2017 CLASS 9 R US S K I Y Z S K Specification Codifiers of the elements of the content of the examination work Evaluation criteria

2 slide

Slide Description:

The OGE in the Russian language 2017 is a mandatory form of certification for graduates of grade 9. It is necessary for further obtaining school education, as well as enrollment in secondary specialized institutions. Students who passed this exam in high score, get the opportunity to study in classes with a humanitarian specialization.

3 slide

Slide Description:

OGE is carried out in accordance with the FEDERAL LAW dated December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "ON EDUCATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION" FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE STATE FINAL CERTIFICATION OF GRADUATES ON THE BASIS OF PRE-CENTRAL EXPERTISE. THE EXAM RESULTS CAN BE USED FOR ADMISSION OF STUDENTS IN THE PROFILE CLASSES OF SECONDARY SCHOOL. The examination work in RUSSIAN LANGUAGE consists of three parts, including 15 tasks. 3 hours 55 minutes (235 minutes) are allotted for the execution of the examination work in the Russian language.

4 slide

Slide Description:

During the tests, when performing all parts of the work, the examinees have the right to use a spelling dictionary. The OGE in Russian in 2017 is considered passed if the graduate scored 15 points out of 39 possible.

5 slide

Slide Description:

PART 1. ASSIGNMENT 1. BRIEF SUMMARY This is a small paperwork according to the listened text. Performed on a separate sheet. The original text is heard 2 times. PURPOSE - to convey the main content of both each micro-theme (there are 3 of them), and the entire text as a whole. The volume of the presentation is at least 70 words. Summaries of the main points of the text (draft recordings) are allowed already at the 1st listening! To enjoy spelling dictionaries also allowed from the very beginning of the exam.

6 slide

Slide Description:

7 slide

Slide Description:

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF TASKS 1 No. Criteria for evaluating the condensed presentation Points IK1 Content of the presentation 2 - 1 - 0 IK2 Compression of the original text 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 IK3 Semantic integrity, verbal coherence and sequence of presentation 2 - 1 - 0 succinct summary according to criteria IK1 – IK3 7

8 slide

Slide Description:

PART 2. ASSIGNMENTS BASED ON THE READ TEXT Part 2 consists of 13 assignments (2-14). Part 2 assignments are performed on the basis of the text read. Answers to tasks 2-14 are written in the form of a word (phrase), number, sequence of numbers in the answer bank number 1 without spaces or other symbols.

9 slide

Slide Description:

10 slide

Slide Description:

SPECIFIC: TASKS 2 - 14 ... № 2 - Adequate understanding of written speech in various spheres and situations of communication (which fragment of the text contains the information necessary to substantiate the answer to the question ...) - a number. № 3 - Expressiveness of Russian speech (indicate a sentence in which the means of expressiveness of speech is ...) - number. № 4 - From the sentences ... write out a word in which the spelling of the prefix is determined by its meaning - "approximation".

11 slide

Slide Description:

No. 5 - From the sentences ... write out a word in which the spelling of the suffix is an exception to the rule ... No. 6 - Replace the colloquial word "whispered" in sentence 12 with a stylistically neutral synonym. Write this synonym. № 7 - Replace the phrase "wooden box", built on the basis of agreement, synonymous with the connection management. Write the resulting phrase. # 8 - Write out the grammatical basis of the sentence ...

12 slide

Slide Description:

No. 9 - Among the offers ... find an offer with separate homogeneous definitions... Write the number of this sentence. № 10 - In the sentences below from the text read, all commas are numbered. Write down the numbers denoting the commas when introductory remarks... No. 11 - Indicate the quantity grammatical foundations in a sentence ... Write down the answer in numbers. № 12 - In the sentences below from the text read, all the commas are numbered. Write down the numbers denoting commas between the parts of a complex sentence connected by a subordinate link. No. 13 - Among the proposals ... find complex sentence with homogeneous subordination subordinate clauses. Write the number of this sentence. No. 14 - Among the proposals ... find difficult sentence with non-allied and allied creative communication between the parts. Write the number of this sentence.

13 slide

Slide Description:

EVALUATION OF PART 2: Automatic processing, which means - extremely accurate filling of the answer form! The maximum number of points is 13. (one point for each correct answer). Zero points are given for an incorrect answer or lack of it.

14 slide

Slide Description:

PART 3 COMPOSITION-DISCUSSION The task of part 3 is carried out on the basis of the same text that the graduates read while working on the tasks of part 2. Using the text read from part 2, it is necessary to complete ONLY ONE of the tasks on a separate sheet: 15.1, 15.2 or 15.3. This is a written reasoned answer! Before writing an essay, you must write down the number of the selected task: 15.1, 15.2 or 15.3. The length of the essay must be at least 70 words. The essay must be written in a neat, legible handwriting.

15 slide

Slide Description:

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF TASKS 15 (COMPOSITION-READING) No. Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic (15.1) Points С1К1 Availability of a reasonable answer to the question posed 2 - 1 - 0 С1К2 Availability of examples-arguments 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 С1К3 Meaningfulness, verbal coherence and sequence of the composition 2 - 1 - 0 С1К4 Compositional harmony of the work 2 - 1 - 0 The maximum number of points for an essay according to the criteria С1К1 – С1К4 9

16 slide

Slide Description:

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF TASKS 15 (COMPOSING-REASONING) No. Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.2) Points С2К1 Understanding the meaning of a text fragment 2 - 1 - 0 С2К2 Availability of example arguments 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 С2К3 Meaningful integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of the composition 2 - 1 - 0 С2К4 Compositional harmony of the work 2 - 1 - 0 The maximum number of points for an essay according to the criteria С2К1 – С2К4 9

17 slide

Slide Description:

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF TASKS 15 (COMPOSING-REASONING) No. Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.3) Points С3К1 Interpretation of the meaning of a word 2 - 1 - 0 С3К2 Availability of example arguments 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 С3К3 Meaningfulness , verbal coherence and consistency of the composition 2 - 1 - 0 С3К4 Compositional harmony of the work 2 - 1 - 0 The maximum number of points for an essay according to the criteria С2К1 – С2К4 9

18 slide

Slide Description:

ASSESSMENT OF LITERACY AND ACTUAL ACCURACY OF SPEECH OF THE EXAMINED No. Criteria for assessing literacy and actual accuracy of speech GK1 points Compliance with spelling norms 2 - 1 - 0 ГК2 Compliance with punctuation norms 2 - 1 - 0 ГК3 Compliance with grammatical norms 2 - 1 - 0 ГК4 Compliance - 0 FC1 Actual accuracy of written speech 2 - 1 - 0 The maximum number of points for essay and presentation according to the criteria FC1, GK1 - GK4 10

19 slide

Slide Description:

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of basic general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated 25.12.2013 No. 1394 registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia 03.02.2014 No. 31206): “48. The examination papers are checked by two experts. Based on the results of the check, the experts independently set points for checking tasks 1 and 15 of the examination paper ... In the event of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant difference in scores was determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. THE THIRD EXPERT is appointed by the chairman of the subject committee from among experts who have not previously checked the examination paper. The third expert is provided with information about the points given by the experts who previously checked the student's examination work. The scores given by the third judge are FINAL ”.

Points transfer rules

Main State exam(OGE) - This is the final exam for 9th grade graduates in a secondary school in Russia.

By passing the final exams, the student confirms that he has mastered the program of basic general education.

Certification is required for the transition to grade 10 or admission to colleges and technical schools.

Graduates of 9 classes are taught in 14 subjects.

The primary scores for the execution of the examination work of the State Inspection Agency are converted into an assessment on a 5-point scale according to the methodology developed by the FIPI.

Points received at the GIA and converted into five-point system, affect the marks in the certificate in the relevant subject. In the certificate, the average indicator is put between the mark received at the GIA and the annual in the subject. Rounding is done according to the rules of mathematics, that is, 3.5 is rounded to 4 and 4.5 to 5.

Graduates can find out the marks for the exam at their school after the work has been checked and the results are approved.

Scale of conversion of points for the Russian language
(table of translation of OGE points in 2019)

The maximum number of points in the Russian language that an examinee can receive for completing all examination work, - 39 points

* Criteria and explanation for the assessment of the GIA in the Russian language

Criterion	Grading explanation	Points
GK1. Compliance with spelling norms	There are no spelling errors, or no more than 1 error was made.
	2-3 mistakes made
	4 or more mistakes were made
GK2. Compliance with punctuation norms	No punctuation errors, or no more than 2 errors
	3-4 mistakes made
	5 errors or more made
GK3. Compliance with grammatical norms	No grammatical mistakes, or 1 mistake
	2 mistakes were made
	3 or more mistakes were made
GK4. Compliance with speech norms	There are no speech errors, or no more than 2 mistakes were made
	3-4 mistakes made
	5 errors or more made

The scale for the transfer of OGE points in mathematics in 2019

Maximum primary score in mathematics in 2019: 32 points, of them - for the module "Algebra" - 20 points, for the module "Geometry" - 12 points.

The recommended minimum result of the examination work is 8 points, scored in total for completing the tasks of both modules, provided that at least 2 points of them were obtained in the "Geometry" module.

Scale for recalculating the total score for the examination work as a whole into a grade in mathematics

The results of the exam can be used when admitting students to specialized classes for training in educational programs of secondary general education. Indicators, the lower boundaries of which correspond to the following primary scores, can serve as a guideline for selection to profile classes:

for the natural science profile: 18 points, of which at least 6 in geometry;

for an economic profile: 18 points, of which at least 5 in geometry;

for the physical and mathematical profile: 19 points, of which at least 7 in geometry.

Biology score conversion scale 2019

Maximum primary score: 46 points

(there are no changes in 2019 compared to 2016 - 2018 - Letter of Rosobrnadzor dated February 27, 2019 No. 10-151)

The exam results can be used when enrolling students in specialized classes high school... A guideline for selection to specialized classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 33 points.

GIA points conversion table by geography in 2019

Maximum primary score: 32 points

The exam results can be used when admitting students to specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection to specialized classes can be an indicator, the lower limit of which corresponds to 24 points.