Life in the USSR during the war. How did people live after the Great Patriotic War? The state of internal affairs in the USSR

Briefly described events 1945 -1953 years give an idea of ​​the life of the country during this period. Start 1945 the year was the end of the Great Patriotic War, the battles went outside Soviet Union... In May 1945 year ended the war started by fascist Germany. With the end of hostilities, the Allies decided to mark out the occupation zones on the territory of the defeated country. Due to the fact that Germany, upon surrender, handed over its entire military and merchant fleet to the United States and Great Britain, the Soviet Union raised the question of transferring at least a third of the German fleet to it. The contradictions between the allies, pushed aside for the period of hostilities with a common enemy, are becoming more acute.

Transition to peaceful construction.

The end of the war put before the government the issues of solving economic, diplomatic, political, military-political problems. The enormous destruction caused by the war required great efforts to rebuild the country. Already May 26, 1945 the decree on restructuring of industry in a peaceful manner, having conditioned the beginning of the release of peaceful products, re-equipping military factories, while it was indicated that the capacity must be kept ready to resume the production of weapons if necessary. Already with June 1, 1945 years for the workers of the People's Commissariat of Defense were restored weekends and vacations... July began demobilization, new military districts began to be organized.

The beginning of the cold war.

But the battles have not stopped yet, fulfilling the allied agreement The Soviet Union declares war on Japan, which ends with its surrender in September 1945.
After the end of the war began reforming the army and special services... US use during the war with Japan atomic bomb encourages the Soviet Union to create nuclear weapons... Industrial centers and research institutions are being created to develop this direction.
Since the beginning of 1946 The United States is tightening its rhetoric of communication with the USSR, and Great Britain is joining it, since these states have always fought against a strong state on the continent. From this period begin Countdown cold war.
After the end of the war it began "Battle" for Antarctica: Americans sent a military squadron to Antarctica, the Soviet Union sent its fleet to this region. There is no exact information about how the events took place to date, but the US flotilla returned incomplete. Later, according to an international convention, it was established that Antarctica does not belong to any state.

Development of the country in the post-war period.

Post-war changes affected all spheres of life: the war tax was abolished, the nuclear industry was created, the construction of new lines began railroad, pressure structures on hydraulic structures, a number of pulp and paper enterprises on the Karelian Isthmus, aluminum plants.
Already in May 1946 year, a decree was issued on the creation of a rocket industry, design bureaus were created.
At the same time, there are changes in the management of the country and the army. A decree was adopted on the training and retraining of leading Party and Soviet workers. The government was structured according to the party-nomenclature scheme. The need for the safety of state property caused decrees on criminal liability for theft and strengthening the protection of personal property of citizens.
The construction of a peaceful life is proceeding with difficulty, there is not enough materials, the labor resource was greatly reduced during the war. However, in 1947 year aircraft construction marked by the test of the SU-12 aircraft. Military spending forced the state to issue a large number of money, at the same time, the output of consumer goods fell sharply. Financial problems had to be solved, and for this in December 1947, a financial reform was carried out. At the same time, the card system was canceled.
After war time not without struggle at all levels of life. The infamous session of the All-Union Agricultural Academy of Sciences of the USSR 1948 years, for years to come closed the development of genetic science, laboratories and research on hereditary diseases were closed.

The state of internal affairs in the USSR.

V 1949 year was started "Leningradskoe Delo", significantly thinning the leadership of the Leningrad region. Officially, nowhere and never was it reported what the crime of the leading workers of the Leningrad Regional Committee of the CPSU was, nevertheless this was reflected in the destruction of the Museum heroic defense Leningrad, the unique exposition of which was destroyed.
The arms race imposed by the West on the Soviet Union led to the creation of the atomic bomb, which was tested in August 1949 years in the region of Semipalatinsk.
The financial system was strengthened. Decree 1950 year settlement in international transactions between the CMEA countries was transferred to a gold basis, independent of the dollar. The development of science, culture, improvement of economic indicators show that the development of the country in the post-war period was stable. Completed in May 1952, the construction of the Volga-Don Canal, provided the possibility of irrigation of dry lands, obtaining electricity for agricultural and industrial areas.
The course of government taken by Stalin after the war is total bureaucratization. New organizations were created to monitor the implementation of decisions and instructions.
Restoring the country, the people were in poverty, starving, but Stalin believed that the construction of socialism is impossible without great sacrifices, hence little attention to the needs of the people. By the end 1952 of the year the company for the enlargement of collective farms was completed, MTSs were created, capable of serving these collective farms.
In March 1953, Stalin I.V. died... The period of development of the state has ended, which has absorbed both heroic times victory over fascist Germany, industrialization, the country's restoration after the terrible war years, and the dark pages of repression, neglect of the needs of the people.

Russian history. XX century Bokhanov Alexander Nikolaevich

§ 4. Life after the war: expectations and reality

“In the spring of 1945, people - not without reason - considered themselves giants,” E. Kazakevich shared his feelings. With this mood, the front-line soldiers entered a peaceful life, leaving - as it seemed to them then - beyond the threshold of the war the most terrible and difficult. However, the reality turned out to be more complicated, not at all what it was seen from the trench. “In the army, we often talked about what would happen after the war, - recalled journalist B. Galin, - how we will live the next day after the victory, - and the closer the end of the war was, the more we thought about it, and much to us painted in a rainbow light. We did not always imagine the size of the destruction, the scale of the work that would have to be done to heal the wounds inflicted by the Germans. " “Life after the war seemed like a holiday, for the beginning of which only one thing is needed - the last shot,” K. Simonov seemed to continue this thought. It was difficult to expect other ideas from people who had been under the psychological pressure of an emergency military situation for four years, which often consisted of non-standard situations. It is quite understandable that “a normal life, where one can“ just live ”without being exposed to every minute danger, in wartime was seen as a gift of fate. The war in the minds of people - front-line soldiers and those who were in the rear, introduced a reappraisal of the pre-war period, to a certain extent idealizing it. Having experienced the hardships of the war years, people - often subconsciously - also corrected the memory of the past peacetime, preserving the good and forgetting about the bad. The desire to return what was lost suggested the simplest answer to the question "how to live after the war?" - "as before the war."

"Life is a holiday", "life is a fairy tale" - with the help of this image a special concept of post-war life was modeled in the mass consciousness - without contradictions, without tension, the stimulus for the development of which was actually only one factor - hope. And such a life existed, but only in films and books. An interesting fact: during the war and in the first post-war years, there was an increase in the demand for adventure literature and even fairy tales in libraries. On the one hand, this interest is explained by the change in the age composition of those working and using libraries; during the war, teenagers came to production (at some enterprises they accounted for 50 to 70% of the employed). After the war, the readership of the library of adventures was replenished by young front-line soldiers, whose intellectual growth was interrupted by the war and who, therefore, after the front, returned to the youthful reading circle. But there is another side to this issue: the growing interest in this kind of literature and cinema was a kind of reaction of rejection of the cruel reality that the war brought with it. We needed compensation for psychological overload. Therefore, even during the war, one could observe, for example, the front-line soldier M. Abdulin testifies, - “a terrible thirst for everything that is not connected with the war. I liked the simple film with dancing and fun, the arrival of the artists to the front, humor. " The thirst for peace, reinforced by the belief that life after the war would quickly change for the better, persisted for three to five post-victory years.

The film "Kuban Cossacks", the most popular of all the post-war films, enjoyed great success with the audience. Now he is being harshly and in many respects fair criticism for inconsistency with reality. But criticism sometimes forgets that the film "Kuban Cossacks" has its own truth, that this fairy tale film carries very serious information of a mental nature, conveying the spirit of that time. Journalist T. Arkhangelskaya recalls an interview with one of the participants in the filming of the film; she told how hungry these smart guys and girls were, who on the screen cheerfully looked at fake fruits, an abundance of papier-mâché, and then added: whatever you want. And we needed so much that everything was elegant and that the songs were sung. "

The hope for the best and the optimism fueled by it set a shock rhythm for the beginning of post-war life, creating a special - post-victory - social atmosphere. “All my generation, with the exception of some, experienced ... difficulties,” the famous builder V.P. Serikov. - But they did not lose heart. The main thing was that the war was behind us ... There was the joy of work, victory, the spirit of competition. " The emotional uplift of the people, the desire to bring a truly peaceful life closer with their work made it possible to quickly solve the main problems of recovery. However, this attitude, despite its enormous creative power, also carried a different kind of tendency: a psychological orientation towards a relatively painless transition to the world ("The hardest thing is over!"), The perception of this process as generally consistent, the further, the more came into conflict with reality, which was in no hurry to turn into a "life-fairy tale".

Conducted in 1945-1946. Inspection trips of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) recorded a number of "abnormalities" in the material and living conditions of people, primarily residents of industrial cities and workers' settlements. In December 1945, a group of the Propaganda and Agitation Directorate of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) carried out such an inspection of the coal industry enterprises in the Shchekino District of the Tula Region. The survey results were very disappointing. The living conditions of the workers were considered "very difficult", and the repatriated and mobilized workers lived in particular poorly. Many of them did not have underwear, and if it was, it was old and dirty. The workers did not receive soap for months, the dormitories were very crowded and crowded, the workers slept on wooden trestle beds or two-tier bunks (for these trestle beds, the administration deducted 48 rubles from the workers' monthly wages, which was a tenth of it). The workers received 1,200 g of bread per day, however, despite the sufficiency of the norm, the bread was of poor quality: there was not enough oil and therefore the bread molds were greased with oil products.

Numerous signals from the localities indicated that facts of this kind were not isolated. Groups of workers from Penza and Kuznetsk addressed letters to V.M. Molotov, M.I. Kalinin, A.I. Mikoyan, which contained complaints about the difficult material and living conditions, the lack of most of the necessary products and goods. These letters were used by a brigade of the People's Commissariat from Moscow, which, based on the results of the inspection, recognized the workers' complaints as justified. In Nizhniy Lomov, Penza Oblast, workers at factory # 255 opposed delays in bread cards, while workers at a plywood mill and a match factory complained of lengthy wage delays. After the end of the war, difficult working conditions remained at the reconstructed enterprises: they had to work in the open air, and, if it was in winter, knee-deep in snow. The premises were often not lit and heated. In winter, the situation was aggravated by the fact that people often had nothing to wear. For this reason, for example, the secretaries of a number of regional committees of Siberia turned to the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) with an unprecedented request: to allow them not to hold a demonstration of workers on November 7, 1946, justifying their request by the fact that "the population is not sufficiently provided with clothes."

A difficult situation arose after the war and in the countryside. If the city did not suffer so much from the lack of labor (there the main problem was to improve the work and life of the existing workers), then the collective farm village, in addition to material hardships, experienced an acute shortage of people. The entire population of collective farms (including those who returned after demobilization) by the end of 1945 decreased by 15% compared with 1940, and the number of able-bodied farms decreased by 32.5%. The number of able-bodied men decreased especially noticeably (from 16.9 million in 1940, by the beginning of 1946 there were 6.5 million). Compared to the pre-war period, the level of material security of collective farmers also decreased: if in 1940 about 20% of grain and more than 40% of the cash income of collective farms were allocated for distribution according to workdays in the country, then in 1945 these indicators fell to 14 and 29%. Payment in a number of farms looked purely symbolic, which means that collective farmers, like before the war, often worked "for sticks." The drought of 1946, which covered most of the European territory of Russia, Ukraine, and Moldova, became a real disaster for the village. The government used the drought to apply tough measures of food appropriation, forcing the collective and state farms to hand over 52% of the harvest to the state, that is, more than during the war years. Seed and food grains were seized, including those intended for issuance according to workdays. The bread collected in this way was sent to the cities, the villagers in the areas affected by crop failure were doomed to mass starvation. Accurate data on the number of victims of the famine of 1946-1947. no, since medical statistics carefully concealed the true cause of the increased mortality during this time (for example, instead of dystrophy, other diagnoses were made). Infant mortality was especially high. In the famine-stricken regions of the RSFSR, Ukraine, Moldova, whose population numbered about 20 million people, in 1947 compared with 1946 due to flight to other places and an increase in mortality, it decreased by 5-6 million people, from According to some estimates, the victims of hunger and related epidemics amounted to about 1 million people, mainly the rural population. The consequences were not slow to affect the mood of the collective farmers.

“During 1945-1946. I came very close, studied the life of a number of collective farmers in the Bryansk and Smolensk regions. What I saw made me turn to you as the secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), - this is how I began my letter addressed to G.M. Malenkov, student of the Smolensk military-political school N.M. Menshikov. - As a communist it hurts me to hear such a question from the collective farmers: "Do you know if the collective farms will soon be dismissed?" As a rule, they motivate their question by saying that “there is no strength to live like this any longer”. Indeed, life on some collective farms is unbearably bad. For example, on the Novaya Zhizn collective farm (Bryansk, Region), almost half of the collective farmers have not had bread for 2-3 months, and some have no potatoes either. Not better position and in half of the other collective farms in the region. This is inherent not only for this region. "

“A study of the state of affairs on the ground shows,” there was a similar signal from Moldova, “that famine is spreading to an increasing number of the rural population ... An unusually high increase in mortality, even in comparison with 1945, when there was a typhus epidemic. Dystrophy is the main cause of high mortality. The peasants of most districts of Moldova eat various substandard substitutes, as well as the corpses of dead animals. Recently, there have been cases of cannibalism ... Emigrant sentiments are spreading among the population ”.

In 1946, several notable events took place, which in one way or another disturbed the public atmosphere. Contrary to the fairly widespread belief that public opinion was extremely tacit at that time, actual evidence suggests that this statement is not entirely true. In late 1945 - early 1946, there was a campaign for the elections to the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, which took place in February 1946. As one would expect, at official meetings people mostly spoke out “for” the elections, unconditionally supporting the policy of the party and its leaders ... As before, on the ballot papers on election day one could find toasts in honor of Stalin and other members of the government. But along with this, there were judgments of a completely opposite kind.

Contrary to the official propaganda emphasizing the democratic character of the elections, people spoke about something else: “The state is wasting money on elections, it will still conduct those it wants”; “It won't be our way anyway, they write what they vote for”; “We have too much money and energy spent on preparing for the elections to the Supreme Soviet, and the essence comes down to a simple formality - the registration of a pre-designated candidate”; "The upcoming elections will not give us anything, but if they were held, as in other countries, it would be a different matter"; "Only one candidate is included in the ballot, this is a violation of democracy, since if one wants to vote for another, the one indicated in the ballot will be elected anyway."

Rumors were spreading among the people about the elections, and very different at that. For example, there was talk in Voronezh: voter lists are being checked in order to identify those who are not working to be sent to collective farms. People closed their apartments and left home in order not to be included in these lists. At the same time, special sanctions were imposed for evading elections; some people express direct condemnation of this kind of “stick democracy”: “The elections are held incorrectly, there is one candidate for the electoral district, and the ballot is controlled in some special way. If you do not want to vote for a certain candidate, you cannot cross it out, it will be known to the NKVD and will be sent to where it should be ”; "In our country there is no freedom of speech, if today I say something about the shortcomings in the work of Soviet bodies, then tomorrow they will put me in jail."

The inability to express one's point of view openly, without fearing the sanctions of the authorities, gave rise to apathy, and with it subjective alienation from the authorities: “Whoever needs it, let him choose and study these laws (I mean the laws on elections. - E. Z.), and we are already tired of all this, they will choose without us "; “I am not going to choose and will not. I have not seen anything good from this power. The communists have appointed themselves, let them choose. "

During the discussion and conversations, people expressed doubts about the expediency and timeliness of holding elections, which cost a lot of money, while thousands of people were on the verge of starvation: “They don’t care about the unharvested bread in the fields, but they have already started to“ call ”about the re-election of the government ... Nobody benefits from this ”; "What to do with idleness, they would better feed the people, but you cannot feed them with elections"; “They choose well, but they don’t give grain on the collective farms.”

A strong catalyst for the growth of discontent was the destabilization of the general economic situation, primarily the situation on the consumer market, which has been going on since the war, but at the same time has post-war reasons. The consequences of the drought of 1946 limited the volume of marketable bread. However, the already difficult food situation was exacerbated by the September 1946 increase in ration prices, that is, the prices of goods distributed by cards. At the same time, the contingent of the population covered by the rationing system was decreasing: the number of the supplied population living in rural areas was reduced from 27 million to 4 million, in cities and workers' settlements 3.5 million non-working adult dependents were removed from the bread ration supply and 500 thousand cards were destroyed due to the streamlining of the card system and the elimination of abuse. The total consumption of bread for the ration supply was reduced by 30%.

As a result of such measures, not only the possibility of a guaranteed supply of people with basic foodstuffs (primarily bread) was reduced, but also the possibility of purchasing food products on the market, where prices rose quickly (especially for bread, potatoes and vegetables). The scale of speculation in bread has grown. In a number of places, it came to an open expression of protest. The most painful news of an increase in ration prices was greeted by low-paid workers with many children, women who had lost their husbands at the front: “Food is expensive, and a family of five. The family does not have enough money. We waited, it will be better, and now there are difficulties again, but when will we survive them? "; “How to survive difficulties when there is not enough money to buy bread?”; "You will either have to refuse the products, or buy them out for some other means, there is nothing to think about buying clothes"; "Before, it was hard for me, but I had hope for food cards with low prices, now the last hope is gone and I will have to go hungry."

Even more frank were the conversations in the queues for bread: “Now we need to steal more, otherwise you will not live”; “A new comedy - the salary was increased by 100 rubles, and the prices for food were increased three times. They did it so that it would be profitable not for the workers, but for the government ”; “Husbands and sons were killed, but instead of relief they raised prices for us”; "With the end of the war, they expected an improvement in the situation and waited for improvement, now life has become more difficult than during the war years."

Attention is drawn to the unpretentiousness of the desires of people who require only the establishment of a living wage and nothing more. Dreams of the war years that after the war "there will be a lot of everything" will come happy life, began to land rather quickly, devalue, and the set of benefits included in the "ultimate dream" became so scarce that the salary, which made it possible to feed the family, and a room in a communal apartment were already considered a gift of fate. But the myth of the “fairy tale life”, living in everyday consciousness and, by the way, supported by the major tone of all official propaganda, presenting any difficulties as “temporary”, often interfered with an adequate understanding of cause-and-effect relationships in the chain of events exciting people. Therefore, finding no apparent reason to explain the "temporary" difficulties that would fall under the category of objective, people looked for them in the usual extraordinary circumstances. The choice here was not too wide, all the difficulties of the post-war period were explained by the consequences of the war. It is not surprising that the aggravation of the situation inside the country was also associated in the mass consciousness with the factor of war - now a future one. At the meetings, questions were often asked: "Will there be a war?" Some were even more categorical: “The end of peaceful life has come, war is imminent, and prices have increased. They hide it from us, but we understand it. Before the war, prices are always raised. " As for rumors, here the folk fantasy knew no boundaries at all: “America broke the peace treaty with Russia, there will soon be a war. They say that echelons with the wounded have already been delivered to the city of Simferopol ”; “I have heard that the war is already going on in China and Greece, where America and England have intervened. Not today or tomorrow they will attack the Soviet Union as well. "

For a long time, war in the popular mind will be perceived as the main measure of the difficulties of life, and the verdict "if only there was no war" - to serve as a reliable justification for all the hardships of the post-war period, for which, apart from it, there were no rational explanations. After the world crossed the line of the Cold War, these sentiments only intensified; they could stay hidden, but at the slightest danger or a hint of danger they immediately made themselves felt. For example, already in 1950, during the Korean War, panic was intensified among the residents of the Primorsky Territory, who believed that since a war was going on nearby, it meant that it would not bypass the borders of the USSR. As a result, essential goods (matches, salt, soap, kerosene, etc.) began to disappear from the shops: the population created long-term "military" stocks.

Some saw the reason for the rise in ration prices in the fall of 1946 in the approximation a new war, others considered such a decision unfair in relation to the results of the past war, in relation to the front-line soldiers and their families, who had gone through a difficult time and had right for something more than a half-starved existence. In many statements on this score, it is easy to notice both the feeling of the insulted dignity of the winners, and the bitter irony of disappointed hopes: “Life is becoming more beautiful, more fun. The salary was increased by one hundred rubles, and 600 was taken away. Finished, winners! ”; “Well, here we are. This is called taking care of the material needs of the working people in the fourth Stalinist five-year plan. Now we understand why meetings are not held on this issue. There will be riots, uprisings, and the workers will say: "What did you fight for?"

However, despite the presence of very decisive moods, at that time they did not prevail: the craving for a peaceful life turned out to be too strong, the fatigue from the struggle, in any form, was too great, the desire to get rid of extremism and associated her harsh actions. In addition, despite the skepticism of some people, the majority continued to trust the country's leadership, to believe that it was acting in the name of the people's good. Therefore, the difficulties, including those that brought with it the food crisis of 1946, most often, judging by the reviews, were perceived by contemporaries as inevitable and ever surmountable. Quite typical were statements like the following: “Although it will be difficult for low-paid workers to live, our government and the party have never done anything bad for the working class”; “We emerged victorious from the war that ended a year ago. The war has brought great destruction and life cannot immediately return to normal. Our task is to understand the ongoing activities of the Council of Ministers of the USSR and support it ”; “We believe that the party and the government have well thought out the measures being held in order to quickly eliminate temporary difficulties. We believed in the party when we fought for Soviet power under its leadership, we believe now that the event being held is temporary ... "

Attention is drawn to the motivation of negative and “approving” sentiments: the former are based on the real state of affairs, while the latter come exclusively from the belief in the justice of the leadership, which “has never done anything bad for the working class”. It can definitely be argued that the policy of the upper circles of the first post-war years was built solely on the credit of trust from the people, which after the war was quite high. On the one hand, the use of this loan allowed the leadership to stabilize over time the post-war situation and, in general, to ensure the country's transition from a state of war to a state of peace. But on the other hand, the people's confidence in the top leadership made it possible for the latter to delay the decision in a vital way. important reforms, and subsequently actually block the trend of democratic renewal of society.

From the book Pravda by Viktor Suvorov the author Suvorov Victor

Valery Danilov Stalin's strategy for the start of the war: plans and reality The political dispute over responsibility for the start of the German-Soviet war flared up from its very first hours. Both opposing sides gave their own interpretations of what happened in the government

From the book The Psychology of War in the Twentieth Century. Historical experience Russia [ Full version with attachments and illustrations] the author Senyavskaya Elena Spartakovna

Heroic symbols of the Great Patriotic War: the reality and mythology of war An important point in maintaining the spirit of the troops is the appeal to heroic examples, purposefully presented as a model for mass imitation. It is common, widely

From the book History of the Cossacks from the reign of Ivan the Terrible to the reign of Peter I the author Gordeev Andrey Andreevich

INDEPENDENT COSSACKS WARS AFTER THE END OF THE LEBON WARS After the end Livonian War The Cossacks returned to the Don, and their main question arose before them - the war against the Crimea and the seizure of Azov, their property, from which the Cossacks were expelled by the Turks. Instead of

From the book The Main Secret of the GRU the author Maksimov Anatoly Borisovich

Afterword. Life after death. Not obvious, but possibly probable, the life of Oleg Penkovsky after his official execution (author's reconstruction) ... In an interview with the Vek newspaper in 2000, the author replied that “the Penkovsky case” would be solved in fifty years.

From the book The Split of the Empire: from Terrible-Nero to Mikhail Romanov-Domitian. [The famous "ancient" works of Suetonius, Tacitus and Flavius, it turns out, describe Great the author Nosovsky Gleb Vladimirovich

10. Wars of Germanicus with the local population after the arrival of the fleet in "Germany" - these are the wars of Cortes-Ermac with the Aztecs in Mexico 10.1. General scheme of correspondence So, having arrived in "Germany", Germanicus begins to fight with the "Germans". A difficult war is described, the success in which

From the book The only superpower the author Utkin Anatoly Ivanovich

4. Reality after euphoria A miracle of the post-Cold War era is that Russia was able to endure the collapse that made it strategically irrelevant, without revolution and revanchism C. Krauthammer, 2002 American politics became overly persistent, self-focused,

From the book "Flying Tank". 100 sorties to IL-2 the author Lazarev Oleg Vasilievich

Service and life after the war Wyszkow, Unterwaltersdorf (July 1945 - May 1946) The war was over, but it seemed to me that it was continuing. As if another respite had come - an operational pause, as it was sometimes called, after which there were more battles. This feeling was not only for

From the book Alexander I. The most mysterious emperor of Russia the author Sergei Nechaev

15. LIFE AFTER DEATH? There is no death - everyone knows that. It has become boring to repeat it ... AA. AKHMATOVA RUMORS, UNCLAIMERS, GUESSES ... Naturally, the sudden death of the emperor gave rise to a lot of rumors among the people. In particular, one of them reported that the emperor, finally

From the book Sennaya Ploschad. Yesterday Today Tomorrow the author Yurkova Zoya Vladimirovna

Life after death For Haymarket, a period of unsuccessful searches for her new architectural design and misadventures began - for a long time in her corner, behind a fence, a pile of bricks from a broken church rose. The constructed ground lobby of the metro station covered part of it

From the book Book II. New geography antiquity and the "exodus of the Jews" from Egypt to Europe the author Saversky Alexander Vladimirovich

Life after death The similarity of Fufluns-Bacchus-Dionysus with Jesus Christ is quite obvious. Firstly, among the Greeks, the Romans, and the Etruscans, it is this character that is portrayed as a divine infant. It is he who is the god of death and rebirth. We recall that it is

From the book Between Fear and Admiration: The Russian Complex in the Mind of the Germans, 1900-1945 author Kenen Gerd

Expectations and visions of the world war In 1914, when the war began, all this internal and external tension was discharged, giving rise to a feeling of relief and liberation, which later seemed inexplicable and paradoxical even to those who expressed it in the very

From the book Routes of Travel: Russian Schoolchildren on Migration, Evacuations and Deportations of the 20th Century the author Irina Shcherbakova

"If only there was no war" Life of the northern outback after the war Olga Onuchina School No. 2, Nyandoma, Arkhangelsk region, scientific director G.N. Soshneva Military childhood The heroes of my research were born and raised in the northern outback, and their childhood fell on the Great

From the book The Case of Bluebeard, or Stories of People Who Became Famous Characters the author Makeev Sergey Lvovich

Life after Masha They are not elected as saints, they are not appointed as martyrs. The life of Maria Dobrolyubova is already extraordinary, and other people's exploits or, on the contrary, crimes are of no use to her. Those who knew her intimately changed, many - strongly and forever.

Despite the fact that the USSR suffered very heavy losses during the war years, it entered the international arena not only not weakened, but became even stronger than before. In 1946-1948. in states of Eastern Europe and in Asia, communist governments came to power, embarking on a course of building socialism on the Soviet model.

However, the leading Western powers pursued a policy of force in relation to the USSR and the socialist states. One of the main means of restraining them was atomic weapon, the monopoly of which was used by the United States. Therefore, the creation of the atomic bomb became one of the main goals of the USSR. These works were headed by a physicist I. V. Kurchatov. The Institute of Atomic Energy and the Institute of Nuclear Problems of the USSR Academy of Sciences were created. In 1948 the first atomic reactor was launched, and in 1949 the first atomic bomb was tested at the test site near Semipalatinsk. In the work on it, the USSR secretly helped some Western scientists. Thus, a second nuclear power appeared in the world, the US monopoly on nuclear weapon ended. Since that time, the confrontation between the USA and the USSR has largely determined the international situation.

Economic recovery.

Material losses in the war were very high. The USSR lost a third of its national wealth in the war. Agriculture was in deep crisis. The majority of the population was in distress and was supplied with the help of the rationing system.

In 1946, the Law on a five-year plan for the restoration and development of the national economy was adopted. It was necessary to accelerate technical progress, to strengthen the country's defensive power. Postwar five-year plan marked by large construction projects (hydroelectric power station, state district power station) and the development of road transport construction. The technical re-equipment of the industry of the Soviet Union was facilitated by the export of equipment from German and Japanese enterprises. The highest rates of development were achieved in such industries as ferrous metallurgy, oil and coal mining, construction of machines and machine tools.

After the war, the village found itself in a more difficult situation than the city. On the collective farms, tough measures were taken to procure grain. If earlier collective farmers gave only part of the grain “to the common barn”, now they were often forced to give all the grain. Discontent in the countryside grew. The sown area has been greatly reduced. Due to the deterioration of equipment and a lack of workers, field work was carried out with a delay, which negatively affected the harvest.

The main features of post-war life.

A significant part of the housing stock was destroyed. The problem of labor resources was acute: right after the war, many demobilized people returned to the city, but the enterprises still lacked workers. I had to recruit workers in the countryside, among the students of vocational schools.


Even before the war, decrees were adopted, and after it, the decrees continued to operate, according to which workers were prohibited from leaving their enterprises without permission on pain of criminal punishment.

To stabilize the financial system in 1947, the Soviet government carried out a monetary reform. Old money changed for new money in a ratio of 10: 1. After the exchange, the amount of money in the population sharply decreased. At the same time, the government has cut prices for consumer products many times. The rationing system was abolished, food and industrial goods appeared in the open sale at retail prices. In most cases, these prices were higher than ration prices, but significantly lower than commercial ones. The abolition of the cards has improved the situation of the urban population.

One of the main features of post-war life was the legalization of the activities of the Russian Orthodox Church. In July 1948, the church celebrated the 500th anniversary of self-government, and in honor of this a meeting of representatives of local Orthodox churches was held in Moscow.

Power after the war.

With the transition to peaceful construction, structural changes took place in the government. In September 1945, the GKO was abolished. On March 15, 1946, the Council of People's Commissars and the People's Commissariats were renamed the Council of Ministers and Ministries.

In March 1946, the Bureau of the Council of Ministers was created, the chairman of which was L. P. Beria . He was also entrusted with supervising the work of the internal affairs and state security bodies. He held a fairly strong position in the leadership A.A. Zhdanov, combined the duties of a member of the Politburo, Orgburo and party secretary, but in 1948 he died. At the same time, the positions of G.M. Malenkov, who previously held a very modest position in the governing bodies.

Changes in party structures were reflected in the program of the 19th Party Congress. At this congress, the party received a new and not - instead of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) it began to be called Communist Party Council and the 1st Union (CPSU).

USSR in the 50s-early 60s. XX century.

Changes after Stalin's death and XX Congress of the CPSU.

Stalin died on March 5, 1953. The leader's closest associates proclaimed a course towards the establishment of collective leadership, but in fact a struggle for leadership unfolded between them. Interior Minister Marshal L.P. Beria initiated an amnesty for prisoners whose term was no more than five years. He put his supporters at the head of several republics. Beria also proposed to soften the policy towards collective farms and spoke in favor of easing international tension and improving relations with Western countries.

However, in the summer of 1953, other members of the top party leadership, with the support of the military, organized a conspiracy and overthrew Beria. He was shot. The struggle did not end there. Gradually Malenkov, Kaganovich and Molotov were removed from power, G.K. Zhukov was removed from the post of Minister of Defense. Almost all of this was done on the initiative NS. Khrushchev, which since 1958 began to combine party and government posts.

In February 1956, the XX Congress of the CPSU was held, the agenda of which included an analysis of the international and domestic situation, summing up the results of the fifth five-year plan. At the congress, the question of exposing the personality cult of Stalin was raised. N.S. Khrushchev. He spoke about Stalin's numerous violations of Lenin's policies, about "illegal methods of investigation" and purges that killed many innocent people. Stalin's mistakes were spoken of as statesman(for example, a miscalculation in determining the date of the beginning of the Great Patriotic War). Khrushchev's report after the congress was read throughout the country at party and Komsomol meetings. Its content shocked the Soviet people, many began to doubt the correctness of the path that the country had followed since the October revolution .

The process of de-Stalinization of society took place gradually. On the initiative of Khrushchev, cultural figures were given the opportunity to create their works without total control of censorship and harsh party dictatorship. This policy received the name "thaw" after the name of the then popular novel by the writer I. Ehrenburg.

During the period of the "thaw", significant changes took place in culture. Works of literature and art have become deeper and more sincere.

Economic reforms. Development of the national economy.

Reforms carried out in the 50s - early 60s. XX century, were controversial. At one time, Stalin outlined the economic frontiers that the country was supposed to reach in the near future. Under Khrushchev, the USSR reached these frontiers, but in the changed conditions, their achievement did not give such a significant effect.

The strengthening of the national economy of the USSR began with changes in the sector as well. It was decided to establish acceptable prices for agricultural products, change the tax policy so that collective farmers were materially interested in marketing their products. In the future, it was planned to increase the cash income of collective farms, pension provision, and a softening of the passport regime.

In 1954, on the initiative of Khrushchev, development of virgin lands. Later they began to reorganize the economic structure of the collective farmers. Khrushchev proposed to build urban-type buildings for rural residents and take other measures to improve their life. The relaxation of the passport regime opened the gateways for the migration of the rural population to the city. Various programs were adopted to improve the efficiency of agriculture, and Khrushchev often saw a panacea in the cultivation of any one crop. The most famous was his attempt to turn corn into the "queen of the fields". The desire to grow it, regardless of the climate, caused damage to agriculture, while among the people Khrushchev received the nickname "maize".

50s XX century. characterized by great success in the industry. The production of heavy industry has grown especially. Much attention was paid to those industries that ensured the development of technology. The program of continuous electrification of the country was of paramount importance. New hydroelectric and state district power plants were put into operation.

The impressive successes of the economy made the leadership headed by Khrushchev confident in the possibility of further accelerating the pace of development of the country. The thesis was put forward about the complete and final construction of socialism in the USSR, and in the early 60s. XX century. set course for construction communism , that is, a society where everyone can satisfy all their needs. According to the new party program adopted in 1962 by the 22nd Congress of the CPSU, the party's new program was supposed to complete the construction of communism by 1980. However, the serious difficulties in the economy that began at the same time clearly demonstrated to the citizens of the USSR that Khrushchev's ideas were utopian and adventurous.

Difficulties in the development of industry were largely associated with ill-conceived reorganizations recent years board of Khrushchev. Thus, most of the central industrial ministries were liquidated, and the leadership of the economy passed into the hands of economic councils, created in certain regions of the country. This innovation led to the severing of ties between the regions, slowing down the introduction of new technologies.

Social sphere.

The government has taken a number of measures to improve the well-being of the people. The law on state pensions was introduced. In secondary and higher educational institutions, tuition fees have been canceled. Heavy industry workers were transferred to a shorter working day, without any reduction in wages. The population received various cash benefits. The material incomes of the working people have grown. Simultaneously with the increase in wages, a decrease in prices for consumer goods was carried out: certain types of fabrics, clothes, goods for children, watches, medicines, etc.

Many public funds who paid various preferential benefits. Due to these funds, many were able to study at school or university. The working day was reduced to 6-7 hours, and on the pre-holiday and holidays the working day lasted even less. The working week has become shorter by 2 hours. On October 1, 1962, all taxes on the wages of workers and employees were abolished. Since the end of the 50s. XX century. the sale of durable goods on credit began.

Undoubted successes in social sphere in the early 60s. XX century. were accompanied by negative phenomena, especially painful for the population: products of the first necessity, including bread, disappeared from store shelves. There were several demonstrations of workers, the most famous of which was the demonstration in Novocherkassk, during the suppression of which the troops used weapons, which led to many casualties.

Foreign policy of the USSR in 1953-1964.

Foreign policy was characterized by a struggle to strengthen the position of the USSR and international security.

The settlement of the Austrian question was of great international importance. In 1955, on the initiative of the USSR, the State Treaty with Austria was signed in Vienna. Diplomatic relations with the FRG and Japan were also established.

Soviet diplomacy actively sought to establish the most diverse ties with all states. A severe test was the Hungarian uprising of 1956, which was suppressed Soviet troops... Almost simultaneously with the Hungarian events in 1956, a Suez Crisis .

On August 5, 1963 in Moscow, an Agreement was signed between the USSR, the USA and Great Britain on the nuclear tests on land, air and water.

Relations with most of the socialist countries have long been streamlined - they clearly obeyed Moscow's instructions. In May 1953, the USSR restored relations with Yugoslavia. The Soviet-Yugoslav declaration was signed, which proclaimed the principle of the indivisibility of the world, non-interference in internal affairs, etc.

The main foreign policy theses of the CPSU were criticized by the Chinese communists. They also challenged the political assessment of Stalin's activities. In 1963-1965. The PRC made claims to a number of border territories of the USSR, and an open struggle unfolded between the two powers.

The USSR actively cooperated with the countries of Asia and Africa, which won their independence. Moscow helped developing countries create national economies. In February 1955, a Soviet-Indian agreement was signed on the construction of a metallurgical plant in India with the help of the USSR. The USSR provided assistance to the United Arab Republic, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Cambodia, Syria and other countries of Asia and Africa.

USSR in the second half of the 60s - early 80s. XX century.

The overthrow of Nikita Khrushchev and the search for a political course.

Development of science, technology and education.

In the USSR, the number of scientific institutions and scientists. Each Union republic had its own Academy of Sciences, which was subordinate to a whole system of scientific institutions. Significant successes have been achieved in the development of science. On October 4, 1957, the world's first artificial Earth satellite was launched, then the spacecraft reached the Moon. On April 12, 1961, the first ever manned space flight took place. The first ascent of the UCM of space became Yu.L. Gagarin.

New ones were built more and more powerful power plants... Aircraft building, nuclear physics, astrophysics and other sciences developed successfully. Many cities created scientific centers... For example, in 1957 Akademgorodok was built near Novosibirsk.

After the war, the number of schools dropped dramatically; one of the government's tasks was to create new secondary schools. educational institutions... The increase in the number of secondary school graduates has led to an increase in the number of university students.

1954, the coeducation of boys and girls was restored in schools. Tuition fees for senior pupils and students were also abolished. Students began to receive stipends. In 1958, a compulsory eight-year education was introduced, and a ten-year school was transferred to an 11-year education. Work in the workplace was soon included in the school curriculum.

Spiritual life and culture of "developed socialism".

The ideologists of the CPSU tried to quickly forget the idea of ​​Khrushchev to build communism by 1980. This idea was replaced by the slogan of "developed socialism". It was believed that under "developed socialism" nations and nationalities are drawing closer together, a single community has developed - Soviet people. They talked about the rapid development of the country's productive forces, about blurring the lines between town and country, about the distribution of wealth on the principles "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his work." Finally, they proclaimed the transformation of the state of the dictatorship of the proletariat into a state of the whole people of workers, peasants and the people's intelligentsia, between which the lines are also constantly blurring.

In the 60s and 70s. XX century. culture has ceased to be synonymous with ideology, its uniformity has lost. The ideological component of culture receded into the background, giving way to simplicity and sincerity. The works created in the provinces - in Irkutsk, Kursk, Voronezh, Omsk, etc., gained popularity. A special status was recognized for the culture.

Nevertheless, the ideological tendencies in culture were still very strong. Militant atheism played a negative role. The persecution of the Russian has intensified Orthodox Church... Churches were closed in the country, priests were removed and defrocked. Militant atheists created special organizations to preach atheism.

Reading about historical disputes on various Internet sites, I discovered that people do not know the history of the USSR, even in its basic features. This is especially true of the pre-war years. So I have collected, as it seems to me, the most common myths and presented it in the manner of "stories for dummies" ...

1. The Bolsheviks overthrew the tsar and unleashed a civil war?
The tsar was overthrown by the liberals during February revolution 1917, not the Bolsheviks. Civil war in Russia unleashed western countries led by Great Britain, giving a direct order to the Czechoslovak corps to revolt and start hostilities. All the anti-Bolshevik forces that participated in the civil war in Russia, with the possible exception of some anarchist groups, obeyed orders from Berlin and London.

2. At Soviet power the population lived worse than under the autocracy?
The first years of Soviet power, after the long years of the First World War and the Civil War, were indeed difficult for the population. However, already in the second half of the 30s of the last century, the bulk of the population ate better, dressed better, and had more comfortable living conditions than under capitalism. The leisure of citizens has especially improved. There appeared public sanatoriums, rest houses, pioneer camps for children ... And most importantly, citizens had time for study, recreation, and sports. The builder of communism lasted only 7 hours a day. Whereas under the autocracy the workers worked for 9-11 hours, that is, on average, as much as Soviet people during the Great Patriotic War. Collective farmers in the 30s were required to work only 60-80 workdays a year. The rest of the time was disposed of at their own discretion. Under the tsar priest, the labor of agricultural laborers was not rationed at all.

3. Was there (was not) a dictatorship under Stalin?
Both the one and the other answer are correct, depending on what period of time we are talking about. Until 1936, the USSR was the dictatorship of the proletariat, after - the people's democracy. Sly Ilya Ehrenburg, even before the civil war in Spain, comparing the order in this country and in the USSR, wrote that here and there a dictatorship, but in fact what a difference!

4. By the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, had the country been living under socialism for more than 20 years (did not live)?
In fact, before the Great Patriotic War, the Soviet Union managed to live under socialism for only a little over four years, since the construction of socialism in the USSR was announced only in 1936.

5. Was the USSR a militarized state?
Universal military service in the USSR was introduced only in 1939. Prior to that, in order to save money, the army was built mainly on a territorial basis, when young people underwent only short-term military training, appearing at the collection points with their straw for mattresses. On Far East there were even "collective farm divisions". An army of a militia type is conditionally suitable for defensive operations and practically unsuitable for offensive operations.

6. Was the USSR a superpower on the eve of World War II?
The USSR became a superpower following the results of the Great Patriotic War. Before the outbreak of World War II, the largest, most populous, militarily most powerful state was not the USSR, not the United States, and, of course, not Japan and Germany, but Great Britain.

7. Was the standard of living of the population in the pre-war USSR lower than in Europe?
The standard of living of the population in the pre-war USSR was significantly higher than in most capitalist states of the world of that period, including European ones. This primarily concerns the states of Southern Europe: Italy, Greece, Yugoslavia. As well as Eastern Europe: Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, etc. The standard of living in the USSR was higher than in some states of Western and Northern Europe: Ireland, Finland, Spain, Portugal. The state with the most high level life in Europe was Great Britain. After Germany conquered continental Europe, Great Britain moved to second place, letting the Third Reich go ahead.

8. During the years of collectivization, were the individual peasants completely destroyed?
In 1940, there were 3 million 600 thousand individual peasant farms in the USSR. This is 16 times more than in modern capitalist Russia.

9. Soviet soldiers and officers in 1944, liberating Europe, were shocked by the high standard of living of the Europeans?
This statement could be true only in relation to Germany (see paragraph 7) - the state with the highest standard of living in Europe in the period from 1939 to 1944. In the rest of the capitalist states Soviet soldiers saw the screaming poverty.

The Great Patriotic War, which became a difficult test and shock for the Soviet people, for a long time changed the entire way of life and the course of life of the majority of the country's population. Huge difficulties and material hardships were perceived as temporarily inevitable problems as a consequence of the war.

The post-war years began with the pathos of restoration and hopes for change. The main thing is that the war was behind us, people were happy that they survived, everything else, including living conditions, was not so important.

All the difficulties of everyday life fell mainly on the shoulders of women. Among the ruins of destroyed cities, they planted vegetable gardens, removed rubble and cleared places for new construction, at the same time raised children and provided for their families. People lived in the hope that very soon a new, freer and more secure life would come, that is why the Soviet society of those years was called the “society of hopes”.

"Second bread"

The main reality of everyday life of that time, trailing like a train from the war era, was the constant lack of food, a half-starved existence. The most important thing was missing - bread. Potatoes became the "second bread", its consumption doubled, it saved, first of all, the villagers from hunger.

Cakes were baked from grated raw potatoes, boneless in flour or breadcrumbs. They even used frozen potatoes, which were left in the field for the winter. It was taken out of the ground, the peel was removed and a little flour, grass, salt (if there was one) was added to this starchy mass and cakes were fried. Here is what the collective farmer Nikiforova from the village of Chernushki wrote in December 1948:

“The food is potato, sometimes with milk. In the village of Kopytova, bread is baked like this: they will wipe off a bucket of potatoes, put a handful of flour for gluing. This bread is almost without protein, which is necessary for the body. It is imperative to establish a minimum amount of bread that must be left intact, at least 300 grams of flour per person per day. Potatoes are a deceptive food, more flavorful than nourishing. "

People of the post-war generation still remember how they waited for spring, when the first grass would appear: you can cook empty sorrel and nettle cabbage soup. They also ate "pestysh" - shoots of young field horsetail, "columns" - sorrel peduncles. Even vegetable peelings were pounded in a mortar, then boiled and used for food.

Here is an excerpt from an anonymous letter to JV Stalin dated February 24, 1947: “Collective farmers mainly eat potatoes, and many do not even have potatoes, they eat food waste and hope for spring, when the green grass grows, then they will eat grass. But there are still some who will have dried potato peels and pumpkin rinds, who will bold and cook tortillas that pigs would not eat on a good farm. Children preschool age do not know the color and taste of sugar, sweets, biscuits and other confectionery products, but eat on a par with grown-up potatoes and grass. "

A real boon for the villagers was the ripening of berries and mushrooms in the summer, which were collected mainly by teenagers for their families.

One workday (the unit of labor accounting on a collective farm) earned by a collective farmer brought him less food than the average citizen received on a food card. The collective farmer had to work and save all the money whole year so that he can buy the cheapest suit.

Empty cabbage soup and porridge

Things were no better in the cities. The country lived in an acute deficit, and in 1946-1947. the country was gripped by a real food crisis. In ordinary stores, food was often absent, they looked wretched, often cardboard dummies of food were displayed in the windows.

Prices on collective farm markets were high: for example, 1 kg of bread cost 150 rubles, which was more than a week's wages. They stood in queues for flour for several days, the queue number was written on the hand with a chemical pencil, in the morning and in the evening they made a roll call.

At the same time, commercial stores began to open, where even delicacies and sweets were sold, but they were "beyond the means" of ordinary workers. This is how the American J. Steinbeck, who visited Moscow in 1947, described such a commercial store: “Grocery stores in Moscow are very large, like restaurants, they are divided into two types: those in which products can be purchased by cards, and commercial stores , also run by the state, where you can buy almost basic food, but at very high prices. Canned food is piled up in mountains, champagne and Georgian wines are in pyramids. We've seen products that might be American. There were jars of crabs with Japanese brands on them. There were German products. And here were the luxurious products of the Soviet Union: large cans of caviar, mountains of sausages from Ukraine, cheeses, fish and even game. And various smoked meats. But they were all delicacies. For a simple Russian, the main thing was how much bread cost and how much it was given, as well as the prices of cabbage and potatoes. "

Regular supplies and commercial trade services could not relieve people of food difficulties. Most of the townspeople lived from hand to mouth.

Bread and once a month two bottles (0.5 liters) of vodka were given on ration cards. People took her to suburban villages and exchanged for potatoes. The dream of a man of that time was sauerkraut with potatoes and bread and porridge (mainly pearl barley, millet and oats). Soviet people at that time practically did not see sugar and real tea, not to mention confectionery. Instead of sugar, they used slices of boiled beets, which were dried in the oven. They also drank carrot tea (made from dried carrots).

Post-war workers' letters testify to the same thing: city dwellers were content empty cabbage soup and porridge with an acute shortage of bread. Here is what they wrote in 1945-1946: “If it were not for bread, I would have ended its existence. I live on the same water. In the dining room, except for rotten cabbage and the same fish, you see nothing, portions are given such that you eat and you won't notice whether you had dinner or not ”(worker of the metallurgical plant IG Savenkov);

“The food has become worse than during the war - a bowl of gourd and two tablespoons of oatmeal porridge, and that for a day for an adult” (worker of the automobile plant M. Pugin).

Monetary reform and card abolition

The post-war period was marked by two major events in a country that could not help but affect the daily life of people: currency reform and the abolition of cards in 1947

There were two points of view on the abolition of cards. Some believed that this would lead to a flourishing of speculative trade and an aggravation of the food crisis. Others believed that abolishing rationing and allowing commercial trade in bread and cereals would stabilize the food problem.

The card system has been canceled. The queues in stores continued to stand, despite the significant increase in prices. The price for 1 kg of black bread increased from 1 rub. up to 3 rubles. 40 kopecks, 1 kg of sugar - from 5 rubles. up to 15 rubles. 50 kopecks. To survive in these conditions, people began to sell things acquired before the war.

The markets were in the hands of speculators who sold essential commodities: bread, sugar, butter, matches and soap. They were supplied by "dishonest" workers of warehouses, bases, shops, canteens, who were in charge of food and supplies. To suppress speculation, the Council of Ministers of the USSR in December 1947 issued a decree "On the norms for the sale of industrial and food products in one hand."

They released into one hand: bread - 2 kg, cereals and pasta - 1 kg, meat and meat products - 1 kg, sausages and smoked meats - 0.5 kg, sour cream - 0.5 kg, milk - 1 liter, sugar - 0.5 kg, cotton fabrics - 6 m, threads on spools - 1 piece, stockings or socks - 2 pairs, leather, textile or rubber shoes - 1 pair, household soap - 1 piece, matches - 2 boxes, kerosene - 2 liters.

The meaning of the monetary reform was explained in his memoirs by the then Minister of Finance A.G. Zverev: “Since December 16, 1947, new money has been put into circulation and money has been exchanged for it, with the exception of a bargaining chip, within a week (in remote areas - within two weeks) at a ratio of 1 to 10. Deposits and current accounts in savings banks were revalued at a ratio of 1 for 1 to 3 thousand rubles, 2 for 3 from 3 thousand to 10 thousand rubles, 1 for 2 over 10 thousand rubles, 4 for 5 for cooperatives and collective farms. All ordinary old bonds, except for the loans of 1947, were exchanged for bonds of the new loan at 1 for 3 of the previous ones, and the 3% winning bonds - at the rate of 1 for 5. "

The monetary reform was carried out at the expense of the people. The money "in the box" suddenly depreciated, the tiny savings of the population were seized. If we consider that 15% of savings were kept in savings banks, and 85% in hands, it is clear who suffered from the reform. In addition, the reform did not affect the wages of workers and employees, which were kept at the same level.

Share with your friends or save for yourself:

Loading...