Calculation of integer values ​​of PPP rates. New technologies

tov in 2011 according to Appendix 3, Form 3 (Fig. 3). This significantly reduced the time for primary data processing and made it possible to identify the positive dynamics of the processes.

Budget set

plan full-time fact full-time

Rice. 1. Admission of applicants for the specialty of the Criminal Code (budgetary enrollment)

Commercial set

full-time plan

fact full-time

Rice. 2. Admission of applicants for the specialty of the Criminal Code (commercial recruitment).

Graduated in 2011

OSFO plan

fact of OSFO

plan ZSFO fact ZSFO

Fig. 3. Graduation of students in 2011

Increasing the functionality and visibility of application 5 form 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12 "Final data of control of students 'knowledge", "Generalized results of final certification of graduates and control of students' knowledge by cycles", etc. by constructing pie charts (see Fig. 4), it was possible to determine the quality attestation indicators in the specialty of the Criminal Code and to clearly demonstrate their compliance with the indicator of state accreditation - "The quality of training".

Engineering graphics 1 course

Rice. 4. "The final data of control of students' knowledge (cycle of general professional disciplines) in the discipline Engineering Graphics 1 course"

Conclusion: Thus, as a result of the work on the application of the Exel-2010 program in the calculation of accreditation indicators within the framework of self-examination of the specialty of the Criminal Code, certain results were achieved, which made it possible to significantly increase the efficiency and quality of the self-examination process, as well as its informative and evidentiary components. The modified standard application forms of the report can be used without restriction for other specialties of the university.

Literature 1. Order of the Federal Service for Supervision of Education and

Science of September 30, 2005 No. 1938 "on the approval of performance indicators and criteria for state accreditation of higher educational institutions."

2. Gorbachev A. Microsoft Excel... Work with spreadsheets 10 times faster - DMK Press, 2007. - 96 p.

Scientific adviser: Stavyshenko A.S., Art. lecturer of the SI department.

Simplified methodology for calculating the percentage of graduate teachers from the total number of teaching staff reduced to integer values ​​of rates

Botter Yu.V., Styvyshenko A.S., TyumGNGU, Tyumen

One of the most important goals of the educational and methodological work of the university in the framework of the quality management system in 2012 is to conduct self-examination of specialties and areas on the eve of the ministerial audit. The main purpose of self-examination is to determine the main (key) indicators of the university's work in each specialty or direction and correlate them with the accreditation indicators established by the Ministry of Education and the Federal State Educational Standards of Higher Education. vocational education in the areas of training higher professional education (FSES HPE).

In accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education in the direction of training 221400 "Quality Management", the university must provide a number of accreditation indicators, among which one of the most important is the criterion - "staffing educational process", I.e. indicators of the quality of the teaching staff involved in the preparation of bachelors. In this case, clause 7.16 of section VII. "Requirements for the conditions for the implementation of basic educational programs of bachelor's degree" regulates that at least 60 percent of teachers (in the given

to integer values ​​of rates ), providing educational software

cess on the professional cycle, must have academic degrees or academic titles. But not the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education itself, not the order of Rosobrnadzor, do not provide a methodology for calculating these indicators, but they propose to fill out only a certain form (Table 2c. Information about persons with academic degrees and academic titles involved in teaching ...), which gives general information by the composition of the teaching staff (PPP).

Calculation of the percentage of graduated teachers from the total number of teaching staff reduced to integer values ​​of rates, as well as a number of other accreditation indicators for employees of the UMU of the Tyumen State Oil and Gas University it is recommended to do it manually, while according to this methodology, it is proposed to first determine for each teacher individually his total teaching load for each of the disciplines readable according to the working curriculum (for example, ID i), dividing it by the load norm established for each category of teaching staff (admissible NN x) to obtain values rates for each teacher (for example, ZS i). The definition of integer values ​​of the rates of graduate teachers

where NN D is the load norm for doctors and professors; NNk is the load norm for Ph.D. and associate professors.

After that, it is necessary to determine the values ​​of the rates of all teachers of the AP ∑ according to the following formula:

This calculation method is, in principle, quite understandable, but it requires a significant amount of additional information from secondary sources and is highly labor-intensive even with the use of such modern computer technologies as spreadsheets of the Exel-2010 program.

In this work, the authors proposed an alternative method for calculating the percentage of graduate teachers of the total number of teaching staff reduced to integer values ​​of rates, which is less laborious and is based mainly on information data standard form Tables 2c.

The calculation of the rates of all teachers of the AP ∑ here is proposed to be performed using a simpler expression:

ЗС∑ = СН / (к1 * ННк + к2 * ННД + к3 * ННн),

where k1, k2, and k3 are weight coefficients equal to the proportion of candidates (associate professors), doctors (professors) and non-graduated teachers in the total number of teaching staff in the field of training; СН - total load in the direction of training.

Determination of the percentage of graduated teachers of the teaching staff of the total number of teaching staff reduced to integer values ​​of rates

Practical application of the proposed methodology with the use of the Exel-2010 program table as a mathematical tool during self-examination of the 221400 "Quality Management" direction has shown its high efficiency and rather high accuracy in calculating accreditation indicators. The calculation error using this simplified technique relative to the traditional technique is no more than 0.5%, which is considered to be practically optimal when solving problems of this kind.

Conclusion: Thus, as a result of the work on the development and application of a simplified methodology for calculating the percentage of graduate teachers from the total number of teaching staff reduced to integer values ​​of rates based on the Exel-2010 program when calculating accreditation indicators within the framework of self-examination of direction 221400 “Quality management, certain positive results were achieved ... The main one is a significant reduction in the labor intensity of the self-examination process. In addition, the use of this technique in combination with the Exel-2010 program allowed to reduce the number of possible arithmetic errors inherent in ordinary manual counting on calculators. The above method for calculating the percentage of graduate teachers from the total number of teaching staff reduced to integer values ​​of rates due to its comparative simplicity and efficiency can be used without restriction for other specialties of the university when conducting self-examination of specialties and areas.

Literature

1. Federal state educational standard higher professional education in the direction of training 221400 "Quality Management" approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation from 08.12.2009 No. 704.

2. Order of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science (Rosobrnadzor) of October 25, 2011 N 2267 "On approval of criteria for indicators necessary to determine the type and type of educational institution of higher professional and secondary vocational education"("Rossiyskaya Gazeta" - Federal issue No. 5678 January 13, 2012).

Electronic support systems educational process as a factor in improving the quality of education

Donkova I.A., Shchiptsov A.V., Ergin A.V., Tyum State University, Tyumen

Improving the quality of education is one of the priority areas of educational subjects of the Russian Federation. For a knowledge-based society, information and motivation to renew knowledge are critical factors in development and competitiveness. Due to development information technologies the storage of service information in electronic form is becoming more and more important.

Graduate of the Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science of Tyumen state university Shchiptsov A.V. performed scientifically - research"Development of a support system for the educational process and statistical analysis of the final certification on the basis of the interschool methodological center of the Education Department of the city of Urai."

The main functions of the center are: organization of conferences, seminars, round tables; methodological support for teachers; professional development of teachers; introduction of innovative programs of general and additional education... Information software is required for these functions.

In the course of the work, the following technical and organizational tasks were solved:

studied production activities at the information level;

database designed;

applied methods of data processing are considered;

a program has been developed to automate tasks for entering, processing

processing and obtaining information.

Development environment for software application and database: C ++

Builder, Microsoft Access.

The work provides for electronic document management. For example, the document “ Electronic journal course ”(Figure 1) contains a list of students' names, the number of absenteeism, grade and final grade.

Figure 2 shows the results of the study of statistical data. As a result of one-dimensional regression - correlation analysis, the following are calculated: root-mean-square error of approximation, regression coefficients, determinations and correlations. For determining numerical values sample regression coefficients implemented method least squares... Checking the statistical significance of the correlation and regression coefficients by t-statistics

Student's t, coefficients of determination and the model as a whole using F-statistics with the Fisher distribution.

In multi-step regression analysis the method of inclusion of variables was used, based on the construction of the regression equation for one significant factor and the sequential addition of all other statistically significant variables and the method of eliminating factors according to the t - criterion.

Rice. 1. Electronic journal of the course.

On the basis of multivariate regression - correlation analysis, the relationship between the resulting trait Y and the factor traits j was investigated.

To restore the dependence, a linear multifactorial model of the form was used: Y = a 0 + a 1 x 1 + a 2 x 2 + a 3 x 3 + a 4 x 4 + a 5 x 5.

Where Y is the final examination mark in points, x 1 is work experience; x 2 is a category; x 3 is a category; x 4 is education; x 5 is the number of visits to classes.

The regression coefficients a 1, ..., a 5 show how many units the effective indicator will change with a change in the corresponding factor.

torny characteristic per unit, provided that the remaining characteristics remain at the same level.

It is possible to make a forecast depending on the criterion, indicating the value of the conditioning factor.

Rice. 2. Results of data analysis.

Usage information systems support of the educational process allows you to optimize work and bring educational activities to a higher professional level.

Literature

1. A.I. Novikov. Econometrics. Tutorial... Pub: INFRA-M,

2007 .-- 143 p.

2. Dronov S.V. Multidimensional statistical analysis... Publishing house: Alt. State

University, 2003 .-- 213 p.

3. Orlov A.I. Applied statistics / A.I. Orlov .- M .: Publisher-

state "Exam", 2006. - 671 p.

4. Statistics: Textbook / Kharchenko L.P. and etc.; Edited by V.G. Ionina. - 2nd ed., Rev. and add. - M .:

INFRA-M, 2006 .-- 384 p.

5. Portal natural sciences http://www.e-science.ru

Scientific adviser: Donkova I.A., Ph.D., associate professor

Implementation of the Lean Manufacturing methodology in manufacturing enterprises

Kostromin K.S., TyumGNGU, Tyumen

V last years in Russia, interest in production management, namely, to the tools that enterprises are trying to implement on their own or with the help of consultants. Having set themselves the goal of increasing the competitiveness of their products, top managers of various companies face the problem of choosing a methodology and its implementation.

There is a large abundance of different concepts, models, systems and management methods on the market: Business Process Reengineering (BPR), Total Quality Management (TQM), Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Statistical Process Management (SPC), Coaching, International Standards Models ( ISO), Six Sigma, etc.

One of the most common tools that businesses choose is lean production. The main direction of work on this methodology is to identify and reduce losses in the production process.

The following types of losses are distinguished:

1. Overproduction;

2. Defects and alterations;

3. Excessive movement;

4. Excess stocks;

5. Transportation;

6. Downtime and waiting;

7. Excessive processing;

8. Loss of staff creativity.

By reducing or eliminating these types of losses, enterprises can obtain the following results:

1. Increase in labor productivity by 20% or more;

2. Reduction of equipment changeover time by 100%;

3. The production cycle time is reduced by 50% or more;

4. Customer satisfaction increases;

5. The volumes of work in progress and inventories are annually reduced by 10-15%;

6. turnover Money increases annually by 10

But when implementing Lean manufacturing tools, enterprises face various obstacles:

1. Do not get the quick promised effect;

2. Cannot cope with staff resistance;

3. We were unable to continue mastering the approach on our own after the implementation of several projects by consultants at different production sites;

4. The existing management system has become an insurmountable obstacle to innovation;

5. The management lacked the will to continue the implementation

Analyzing the listed problems, it can be assumed that the reasons for their occurrence are hidden in ignorance or misunderstanding of the basic ideas of Lean production. Some enterprises, such as KAMAZ, Russian Railways, etc., create corporate institutions to implement this methodology, but not everyone has this opportunity.

The way out of this situation is the total and systematic training of personnel, both at the enterprise itself and in educational institutions.

The implementation of this event will provide an opportunity to get the maximum effect from the implementation of Lean Manufacturing at manufacturing enterprises in Russia.

Literature

1. Wumek James P., Jones Daniel T. Lean Manufacturing: How to Get Rid of Waste and Make Your company.-M .: Alpina Business Books 2006.-472 p.

2. Kane M.M., Ivanov B.V., Koreshkov V.N., Skhirtladze A.G. Management systems, methods and tools quality.-M .: Peter, 2008.-560 p.

Scientific adviser: Kostromin K.S., assistant.

Possibilities of using ultrasound in construction

K.V. Malakhov, TyumGNGU, Tyumen

Currently, scientists around the world have carried out a lot of research on the use of ultrasound, which is widely used in the fields of physics, chemistry and medicine. However, the results of the analysis of works on the study of the influence of elastic sound vibrations of high frequency on the quality of preparation of construction, in particular, concrete mixes, indicate the insufficient development of this issue. In the construction industry, ultrasound is actively used to determine the strength of concrete, but the process of mixing it remains free from the use of sound vibrations. At the beginning of the XX century. American scientists have proved that two immiscible liquids, after ultrasonic irradiation, form a fine suspension, an emulsion. Similar

Order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation of 15.07.2013 N 560 "On approval of the COMPETITION FOR DISTRIBUTION check digit reception of citizens on trades, professions and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education within the budget FEDERAL BUDGET"

II. Calculation of the normalized value of the indicator of the effectiveness of the educational organization

10. Calculation of the normalized value of the performance indicator educational organization is carried out according to the following formula:

PEV = ((I_o + I_ n + I_m + I_ph + I_u) / 5), where

PEV is the normalized value of the performance indicator of an educational organization participating in a competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level.

I_i (i = O, N, M, F, I) is the normalized value for each indicator of the educational organization's activity.

О - the value of the indicator of the educational organization according to the average score of a single state examination(hereinafter - Unified State Exam) of students, calculated by the formula:

O = O_BS1 + O_BS2 , where
K_1 + K_2

О_BS1 - the sum of the average USE scores of students accepted for training in full-time training at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget for educational programs bachelor's and specialty studies in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held, multiplied by the number of all students enrolled in full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations for bachelor's and specialty educational programs in the corresponding year;

О_BS2 - the sum of the average USE scores of students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for educational programs of undergraduate and specialty

in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held, multiplied by the number of all students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for undergraduate and specialty educational programs in the corresponding year;

К_1 is the total number of students admitted to full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations for bachelor's and specialist's educational programs in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held;

K_2 - the total number of students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for undergraduate and specialty educational programs in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held;

H is the value of the indicator characterizing scientific activity educational organization, calculated by the formula:

H = H_1 + H_2 , where
2

Н_1 - the number of publications in the abstract and bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science per 100 scientific and pedagogical workers (hereinafter - the NDP)<1>reduced to integer values ​​of rates, calculated as the ratio of the number of published articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals the world, which are taken into account when calculating the citation index in the abstract-bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science, to the number of teaching staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates, multiplied by 100;

<1>Hereinafter, the number of teaching staff and research workers (as of October 1 of the year preceding the year in which the competition is held) is understood as the number of scientific and pedagogical workers (SPD), including those working on the terms of full-time part-time work (external part-time workers), without working under contracts of a civil nature.

Н_2 - income of an educational organization from research and development work per one teaching staff, calculated as the ratio of the total volume of research and development performed to the number of teaching staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

M is the proportion of the contingent foreign students enrolled in educational programs higher education in the general contingent of students, reduced to full-time education, calculated as the ratio of the contingent of foreign students enrolled in educational programs of higher education, reduced to full-time education, to the total contingent of students enrolled in educational programs of higher education, reduced to full-time education;

Ф is the value of the indicator characterizing the financial activity of the educational organization, calculated according to the formula:

Ф = F_1 + F_2 , where
2

Ф_1 - income of an educational organization from all sources per one teaching staff, calculated as the ratio of budgetary and extra-budgetary funds received by an educational organization to the number of teaching staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

F_2 is the ratio of the average earnings of the teaching staff in the educational organization to the average wages in the economy of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation, calculated as the ratio of the accrued wages fund of the teaching staff, divided by the average number of teaching staff and the number of months in a year, to the average salary in the region's economy, expressed in percent. The average number of academic staff is determined by summing the average number of academic staff for all months of the reporting period and dividing the amount received by the number of months in the reporting period. The average number of academic staff per month is calculated by summing up the number of academic staff on the payroll<2>for each calendar day of the month and dividing the amount received by the number of calendar days of the month;

<2>The number of staff members on the payroll includes staff members who worked under an employment contract and performed work for one day or more, both actually worked and absent from work for any reason (who were on annual, additional, educational leaves, on business trips; who did not appear to work due to illness).

Part-time workers work time in accordance with labor contract or transferred with the written consent of the employee to work with part-time work, when determining the average headcount, they are taken into account in proportion to the hours worked.

Employees who receive two, one and a half rates in one organization or are registered in one organization as internal part-time workers are counted in the payroll number of employees as one person.

The following are not included in the payroll and average number of employees: those on maternity leave and parental leave; hired part-time from other organizations.

The average number of external part-time workers is calculated in proportion to the hours actually worked.

And - the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings (premises) that are owned and (or) in operational management, per student (given contingent), calculated as the ratio of the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings that are owned and ( or) in operational management, to the number of the reduced contingent of students enrolled in educational programs of higher education.

APPLICATION

Fulfillment of indicators of compliance of the staffing of educational programs with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education (VPO)

CODE, NUMBER UGS, DIRECTION ___________________________________________________________

DIRECTION (profile): ______________________________________________________________

Table 1. Compliance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education, clauses 7.2.1 and 7.2.4 ***

Disciplines *

Discipline

Position

education

(University, year of completion of training, specialty, diploma qualification)

education

Retraining**

(University, year of completion of training, program)

Enhancement

qualifications

year of passing the PC,

number of hours, program)

* Discipline code and name are indicated in accordance with the approved curriculum

**Professional retraining indicated if available

*** The table shows all disciplines indicated in the curriculum. This table may indicate the compatibility.

Table 2 . Compliance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education, clauses 7.2.1 and 7.2.4

* Disciplines must correspond to the approved curriculum

Management of master's programs (compliance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education, clause 7.2.5.)

Code, UGS code, direction of training _____________________________________________________

Focus (Master's program) ___________________________________________________

Full name of the head of the magistracy _____________________________________________________________

Academic degree, academic rank ________________________________________________________________

Table 3. Compliance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education, clause 7.2.5.

* Annual publications in leading domestic and (or) foreign peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications; annual approbation of the results of research activities

Fulfillment of the requirements of clause 7.1.5 of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education

These requirements are presented (http: // base.garant.ru/55170898 /)

7.2. Requirements for the personnel conditions for the implementation of the undergraduate program.

7.2.1. The implementation of the bachelor's program is provided by the leading and scientific-pedagogical workers of the organization, as well as by persons involved in the implementation of the bachelor's program on the terms of a civil law contract.

7.2.2. The share of scientific and pedagogical workers (in reduced to integer values ​​of rates) with an education corresponding to the profile of the taught discipline (module), in the total number of scientific and pedagogical workers implementing the bachelor's program ( specialist, magistracy) must be at least 70 percent.

7.2.3. The share of scientific and pedagogical workers (in terms of rates reduced to integer values) with academic degree(including an academic degree awarded abroad and recognized in the Russian Federation) and (or) an academic title (including an academic title obtained abroad and recognized in the Russian Federation), in the total number of scientific and pedagogical workers implementing the bachelor's program , must be at least 50 percent ( specialty - not less than 60%, magistracy - not less than 80%).

7.2.4. * The share of employees (in reduced to integer values ​​of rates) among the heads and employees of organizations whose activities are related to the focus (profile) of the undergraduate program being implemented (with at least 3 years of work experience in this professional field) in the total number of employees implementing an undergraduate program must be at least 5 percent ( Master's degree - at least 7 percent).

* the requirements of this paragraph must be verified with your standard

Extract from the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education (magistracy)

7.2.5. General leadership scientific content Master's programs of a certain orientation (profile) should be carried out by a full-time scientific and pedagogical worker of the organization who has an academic degree (including an academic degree awarded abroad and recognized in the Russian Federation), carrying out independent research (creative) projects (participating in the implementation of such projects) in the direction of training, having annual publications based on the results of the specified research (creative) activities in leading domestic and (or) foreign peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications, as well as carrying out annual approbation of the results of the specified research (creative) activities on national and international conferences

7.1.5. The qualifications of the leading and scientific and pedagogical workers of the organization must comply with the qualification characteristics established in the Unified Qualification Handbook of the Positions of Managers, Specialists and Employees, the section "Qualification characteristics of the positions of managers and specialists of higher professional and additional professional education", approved by order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation dated January 11, 2011 N 1n (registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on March 23, 2011, registration N 20237), and professional standards (if any).

(http: // base.garant.ru/55170898 /)

N - the number of disciplines provided by the curriculum (we consider all disciplines of the UP OBOP)

С - the number of disciplines implemented by teachers who have basic education corresponding to the profile readable discipline

The share of teaching staff with a basic education corresponding to the profile of the discipline being read = N / C * 100 (!!! Normally, this share should be at least 70%)

The methodology for identifying the compliance / non-compliance of the accreditation indicator is presented in the methodological recommendations of the experts. These recommendations are sent on request.

Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of July 15, 2013 No. 560 "On Approval of the Procedure for Holding a Competition at the Expense of Budgetary Appropriations of the Federal Budget"

In accordance with clause 8 of the Rules for establishing, organizations carrying out educational activities, check digits admitting citizens in professions, specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget approved by the Government of the Russian Federation of April 17, 2013 No. 350 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2013, No. 16, article 1977), I order:

1. To approve the attached Procedure for holding a competition for the distribution of target figures for admission of citizens by profession, specialty and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget.

2. To recognize as invalid the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of December 7, 2012 No. 1024 "On approval of the procedure for holding a competition for establishing the target figures for admission of citizens in the areas of training (specialties) for state-accredited educational institutions of secondary vocational and higher education training at the expense of the federal budget for educational programs of secondary vocational and higher vocational education in accordance with the license granted to the educational institution "(registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on February 11, 2013, registration No. 26961).

3. Control over the execution of this order shall be entrusted to Deputy Minister A.A. Klimov.

The minister D.V. Lebanon

The procedure for holding a competition for the distribution of control figures for the admission of citizens by professions, specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget
(approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of July 15, 2013 No. 560)

1. This Procedure determines the rules and timing of the competition for the distribution to organizations carrying out educational activities, the quotas for the admission of citizens by professions, specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget (hereinafter respectively - competition, educational organizations, admission control figures).

2. The competition is held by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation through the distribution and establishment of admission control figures for each profession, specialty and field of training with the allocation of full-time, part-time and extramural forms training to organizations carrying out educational activities on state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education:

a) in the professions of secondary vocational education (for training in educational programs for the training of qualified workers, employees) and specialties of secondary vocational education (for training in educational programs for training mid-level specialists and educational programs of secondary vocational education, integrated with the main educational programs of basic general and secondary general education) at the federal level;

b) in the areas of preparation of higher education (for training in educational programs of bachelor's, master's, training of scientific and pedagogical personnel in graduate school (adjunct), residency and assistant-internship) and specialties of higher education (for training in educational programs of a specialist) at the level of subjects of the Russian Federation Federation and / or at the federal level.

The volume of admission control figures for specialties and areas of higher education training, distributed within the framework of a competition at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and at the federal level, is determined taking into account the regional and sectoral needs of the economy for qualified personnel.

When holding a competition at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and at the federal level, the volumes of admission control figures distributed during the competition for each constituent entity of the Russian Federation and the volumes of admission control figures distributed during the federal competition are established.

3. The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, at least 30 days before the day of opening the envelopes with applications, publishes on its official website on the Internet an announcement of the competition, which indicates:

a) the subject of the competition;

b) requirements for the participants of the competition;

c) the volumes of admission control figures for the relevant professions and specialties of secondary vocational and (or) areas of training and specialties of higher education, established during the competition;

d) the minimum number of check digits for admission, which can be established based on the results of the competition of the educational organization in the relevant professions, specialties and areas of training;

e) the date and place of the beginning of the filing of applications;

f) requirements for the content and design of the application;

g) date and time of the end of acceptance of applications and opening of envelopes with applications;

h) the procedure for considering applications;

i) the procedure for evaluating applications;

j) the date of the announcement of the results of the competition.

4. The competitive selection is carried out by the competitive commission created by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the basis of applications submitted by educational organizations *.

5. The application of the educational organization must contain:

a) the name of the educational organization, information on the organizational and legal form, location and postal address;

b) proposals of the educational organization on the establishment of admission control figures. When submitting an application for participation in the competition for the distribution of admission control figures in areas of training and specialties of higher education, held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and at the federal level, the application shall indicate proposals for establishing the control figures for admission separately for the respective constituent entities of the Russian Federation and at the federal level ;

c) information on the educational organization's license to carry out educational activities in the relevant professions, specialties and areas of training;

d) information on whether the educational organization has state accreditation for educational programs in the relevant professions, specialties and areas of training;

e) the values ​​of the performance indicators of educational organizations, assessed in the process of the competitive selection.

6. Control figures for admission based on the results of the competition are established by educational organizations only in professions, specialties and areas of training specified in the appendix to the license to carry out educational activities and in the appendix to the certificate of state accreditation of the educational organization.

If the competition commission identifies in the application of an educational organization proposals for establishing control numbers for admission in professions, specialties and areas of training that are not specified in the appendix to the license for the implementation of educational activities and (or) in the appendix to the certificate of state accreditation of the educational organization, such an application is not allowed to participate in the competition for the relevant professions, specialties and areas of training, and admission control figures for them are not established.

7. Conducting a competitive selection to establish control numbers for admission in specialties and areas of training of higher education is carried out in accordance with the following indicators of the activities of educational organizations for the year preceding the year in which the competition is held (except for the indicators provided for in subparagraphs "a", "b" , "g", "d" and "k" of this paragraph):

a) average score the unified state examination (hereinafter - the USE) of students admitted to full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations for bachelor's and specialty educational programs in the year preceding the year for which the admission targets are set, and in the year preceding the year, in where a competition is held, multiplied by the number of all students admitted to full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations for each specialty and direction of training in the corresponding year;

b) the average USE score of students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for undergraduate and specialty educational programs in the year preceding the year for which the admission targets are set, and in the year , the previous year in which the competition is held, multiplied by the number of all students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities in each specialty and area of ​​training in the corresponding year;

c) the number of publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals of the world, indexed in the abstract-bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science, per 100 scientific and pedagogical workers (hereinafter referred to as CPD), reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

d) the number of citations of articles published in 5 years preceding the year in which the competition is held, in the abstract-bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science in the relevant field of science, per 100 academic staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

e) the number of citations of articles published in 5 years preceding the year in which the competition is held, in the bibliographic database of scientific publications of Russian scientists Russian Science Citation Index in the relevant field of science per 100 academic staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

f) expenses of an educational organization for scientific and research developments in the relevant field of science, calculated per one academic staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

g) income of an educational organization from the performance of research and development work per one academic staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

h) the proportion of the contingent of foreign students enrolled in educational programs of higher education;

i) income of an educational organization from all sources per one teaching staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

j) the ratio of the number of dissertations defended to the number of graduates of postgraduate studies (adjunct studies) in the two years preceding the year in which the competition is held;

k) the ratio of the number of admitted to postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies), residency and assistant-internship to the admission control figures established in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held;

l) the ratio of the average salary of the teaching staff in the educational organization to the average salary in the economy of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation;

m) the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings (premises) owned and (or) in operational management, per student (given contingent);

n) the possibility of an educational organization to provide training of personnel with higher education for the security of the country and for enterprises of the military-industrial complex, on the territory of closed administrative-territorial entities, as well as in the immediate geographical proximity to production centers in specialties and areas of training;

o) the proportion of the number of graduates of an educational organization who studied full-time, who did not apply to employment services to assist in employment during the first year after graduation from an educational organization, in the total number of graduates, for the year preceding the year in which the competition is held ...

8. Conducting a competitive selection to establish control numbers for admission by professions and specialties of secondary vocational education is carried out in accordance with the following indicators of the activities of educational organizations for the year preceding the year in which the competition is held. (with the exception of the indicators provided for in subparagraphs "a", "d" and "g" of this paragraph):

a) the duration of the implementation in the educational organization of educational programs in the relevant professions and specialties (number of years);

b) the number of full-time teaching staff with an academic degree and / or academic title, as well as the first and highest qualification categories;

c) the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings (premises) and sports facilities per student (given contingent);

d) the number of students who became winners and prize-winners All-Russian Olympiads professional skills, All-Russian and international sports competitions (for professions and specialties of physical culture and sports orientation) for two years preceding the year in which the competition is held;

e) the number of units of educational and educational-methodical literature in all disciplines, interdisciplinary courses and professional modules of the main professional educational program per 100 students (given contingent);

f) the proportion of educational equipment for laboratory work and practical training not older than 10 years in the total volume of such equipment;

g) the share of funds allocated for the development of the material and technical base of the educational organization, which ensures the conduct of all types of laboratory work and practical exercises, in the total amount of funds received from all sources during the five years preceding the year in which the competition is held;

h) the ratio of the average salary of teaching staff in an educational organization to the average salary in the economy of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation.

9. The Competition Commission makes a decision on the establishment of admission control figures for educational organizations:

a) by specialties and areas of training of higher education, depending on the values ​​of indicators of the potential of educational organizations for each specialty and area of ​​training, calculated in accordance with the Methodology for the competitive selection and decision criteria for establishing target numbers for the admission of citizens by specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget (Appendix No. 1 to this Procedure);

b) by professions and specialties of secondary vocational education, depending on the values ​​of the indicators of the potential of educational organizations for each profession and specialty, calculated in accordance with the Methodology for the competitive selection and the criteria for deciding on the establishment of target numbers for the admission of citizens by professions and specialties for training with state accreditation of educational programs of secondary vocational education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget (Appendix No. 2 to this Procedure).

10. The tender committee keeps the following minutes:

a) a protocol of opening envelopes, which must contain information about the place, date, time of opening of envelopes with applications and a list of educational organizations that submitted applications for the competition, on assigning serial numbers to applications in the list of educational organizations;

b) the application review protocol, which must contain information about the educational organizations whose applications were considered, the decision on admitting educational organizations to participate in the competition or on the refusal to admit educational organizations to participate in the competition with the justification for such a decision;

c) a protocol for evaluating and comparing applications, which must contain information about educational organizations whose applications were admitted to participate in the competition, a list of educational organizations for each profession, specialty and field of study, ranked based on the results of the assessment and comparison of applications, on the establishment of reception check digits.

11. The competition committee makes a decision by a simple majority of votes. In case of an equal number of votes, the vote of the chairperson at the meeting of the competition committee is decisive. The competition commission is competent to make a decision if at least half of its members are present at the meeting.

The protocol is signed by all members of the competition committee present.

12. In case of refusal of the educational organization from the admission check figures established by it, the competition committee, within three days from the date of receipt of such a refusal, draws up a protocol on the waiver of the established admission check figures. The protocol on refusal from the established check digits for admission is signed by the competition commission.

Released in the event of such a refusal, the admission control figures are subject to redistribution among other participants in the competition until February 1 of the year for which the admission control figures are set. The competition commission redistributes the released admission control figures between educational organizations that have applied for participation in the competition in the relevant profession, specialty, field of study, in proportion to the values ​​of the indicators of the potential of educational organizations until their applications are fully satisfied.

In the case when the applications of educational organizations for participation in the competition for the establishment of control figures for admission in specialties and areas of preparation of higher education, conducted at the level of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation, contain proposals for establishing control figures for admission in an amount less than the volume of control figures distributed at such a competition admission control figures not distributed at the level of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation are redistributed at the federal level.

13. The admission control figures established as a result of the competition are approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation until December 31 of the year preceding the corresponding academic year **.

* Clause 9 of the Rules for establishing to organizations engaged in educational activities, target figures for the admission of citizens by professions, specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget, approved by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 17 2013 No. 350 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2013, No. 16, Art. 1977).

** Clause 10 of the Rules for establishing to organizations engaged in educational activities, target figures for the admission of citizens by professions, specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget approved by the Government of the Russian Federation of 17 April 2013 No. 350 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2013, No. 16, Art. 1977).

Appendix No. 1
to the Competition Procedure
for distribution of reception check digits
citizens by professions, specialties
and areas of training for learning
by state accredited
educational programs of secondary
vocational and higher education
through budgetary allocations
federal budget approved
by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
dated July 15, 2013 No. 560

Methodology for the competitive selection and criteria for making a decision on the establishment of target figures for the admission of citizens in specialties and areas of training for training in state-accredited educational programs of higher education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget

I. General Provisions

1. Control figures for the admission of citizens in specialties and areas of training for training at the expense of budgetary allocations of the federal budget for educational programs of higher education (hereinafter referred to as the control figures for admission) within each specialty and direction of preparation of higher education are established by educational institutions of higher education (hereinafter referred to as educational organizations ) in the amount not exceeding the proposals for establishing the admission control figures specified in the application of the educational organization.

2. When establishing the control figures for admission within the framework of a competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the performance indicators of an educational organization located on the territory of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation (excluding branches located on the territory of other constituent entities of the Russian Federation) or branches of educational organizations are taken into account, located on the territory of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation.

When establishing the control figures for admission within the framework of a competition held at the federal level, the performance indicators of an educational organization are taken into account without taking into account its location.

3. The criterion for making a decision on the establishment of admission control figures for educational programs of bachelor's, specialist's, master's, programs for the training of scientific and pedagogical personnel in graduate school (adjunct) is the indicator of the potential of an educational organization.

4. Decision-making on the establishment of admission control figures for educational programs for the training of scientific and pedagogical personnel in residency and assistant-internship is carried out on the basis of expert assessments in accordance with section IV of this Methodology.

5. The value of the indicator of the potential of an educational organization is calculated according to the following formula:

PPV is an indicator of the potential of an educational organization;

PEV is the normalized value of the performance indicator of an educational organization participating in a competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level;

T is the proportion of the number of graduates of an educational organization who studied full-time, who did not apply to employment services to assist in employment during the first year after graduation from an educational organization, in the total number of graduates, for the year preceding the year in which the competition is held ...

This indicator is used when calculating the indicator of the potential of an educational organization participating in the competition for establishing admission control figures for educational programs of bachelor's, specialist's and master's degrees, and is calculated by the formula:

* - the total number of graduates;

* - the number of graduates who applied to the employment service within a year after graduation.

PEP is an indicator of the effectiveness of educational programs for bachelor's and specialist's *, master's * and programs for the preparation of scientific and pedagogical personnel in postgraduate (postgraduate) studies *;

R is an indicator characterizing the ability of an educational organization to provide training of personnel with higher education for the security of the country and for enterprises of the military-industrial complex, on the territory of closed administrative-territorial entities, as well as in the immediate geographical proximity to production centers in specialties and areas of training, which It is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the scores of all members of the competition committee, awarded by an expert by this educational organization for this indicator. The maximum value of this indicator in points is indicated in the announcement of the competition.

If the criteria of this indicator are applied, the points awarded to the application of the educational organization for the indicated indicator are calculated according to the formula:

* - the amount of points awarded to the application of the educational organization for the specified indicator;

This indicator is used to establish admission control figures for educational programs of bachelor's, specialist's and master's degrees when holding a competition at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

When establishing the control figures for admission under the programs of training scientific and pedagogical personnel in postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies), this indicator is used in the course of the competition at the federal level.

The maximum value of this indicator in points is indicated in the announcement of the competition.

6. The performance indicator of an educational organization (PEV) is calculated in accordance with section II of this Methodology.

7. The indicator of the effectiveness of the educational program implemented by the educational organization (PEP) is calculated in accordance with section III of this Methodology.

8. All performance indicators of an educational organization, indicators characterizing educational programs implemented by educational organizations are normalized in the following order:

The normalization of values ​​for each indicator of the activity of an educational organization I is carried out through the rating of educational organizations.

The rating for each performance indicator is constructed from the unique values ​​of the corresponding indicator from the complete set of data for the specified indicator for all educational organizations participating in the calculation of the indicator of the potential of the educational organization.

For each indicator, its integral value is determined as the sum of the values ​​of indicators of all educational organizations according to the following formula:

Educational organizations, depending on the rating of each indicator, are divided into three groups:

the first group are educational institutions, for which the values ​​of l are less than or equal to 150. For these educational organizations, 70% of the total integral value of the indicator is distributed in proportion to the place of the educational organization in the rating l for this indicator:

the second group consists of educational organizations for which l is less than or equal to 850 and more than 150. For these educational organizations, 20% of the total integral value of the indicator is distributed in proportion to the place of the educational organization in the rating l for this indicator:

the third group consists of educational organizations for which l is more than 850. For these educational organizations, 10% of the total integral value of the indicator is distributed in proportion to the place of the educational organization in the rating l for this indicator:

Linear transformation coefficients are selected from the condition of continuity of the obtained distribution line.

9. The volume of admission control figures in a specialty or area of ​​training for an educational organization participating in a competition held at the level of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation or at the federal level is calculated by the formula:

KTsP - the volume of admission control figures in a specialty or direction of training for an educational organization participating in a competition held at the level of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation or at the federal level;

Z - the volume of proposals for the establishment of admission control figures for the relevant specialty or field of study in the application of the educational organization;

PPV is the potential of an educational organization in the relevant specialty or field of study;

b - coefficient, which is determined from the condition * for KPI> 0, the calculated KPI value is rounded to the nearest integer. The summation of the CVC is carried out at the request of all educational organizations that have applied for participation in the competition for a given specialty or area of ​​training;

Q is the volume of admission control figures for the relevant specialty or field of study, distributed during the competition.

II. Calculation of the normalized value of the indicator of the effectiveness of the educational organization

10. The calculation of the normalized value of the indicator of the effectiveness of the educational organization is carried out according to the following formula:

PEV is the normalized value of the performance indicator of an educational organization participating in a competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level.

* (i = O, N, M, F, I) - the normalized value for each indicator of the activity of the educational organization.

О - the value of the indicator of the educational organization according to the average score of the unified state exam (hereinafter - the USE) of students, calculated by the formula:

* - the sum of the average USE scores of students admitted to full-time study at the expense of federal budget allocations for bachelor's and specialist's educational programs in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held, multiplied by the number of all students admitted to full-time studies training at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget for educational programs of bachelor's and specialist's degree in the corresponding year;

* - the sum of the average USE scores of students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for undergraduate and specialty educational programs in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held, multiplied by the number of all students admitted to full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for undergraduate and specialty educational programs in the corresponding year;

* - the total number of students admitted to full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations for bachelor's and specialist's educational programs in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held;

* - the total number of students enrolled in full-time education under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities for undergraduate and specialist educational programs in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held;

H is the value of the indicator characterizing the scientific activity of the educational organization, calculated by the formula:

* - the number of publications in the abstract-bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science per 100 scientific and pedagogical workers (hereinafter - NPP) *, reduced to integer values ​​of rates, calculated as the ratio of the number of published articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals of the world, which are taken into account when calculation of the citation index in the abstract-bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science, to the number of HPPs, reduced to integer values ​​of rates, multiplied by 100;

* - income of an educational organization from the implementation of research and development work per one NPP, calculated as the ratio of the total volume of research and development performed to the number of teaching staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

M is the proportion of the contingent of foreign students enrolled in educational programs of higher education in the total contingent of students, reduced to full-time education, calculated as the ratio of the contingent of foreign students studying in educational programs of higher education, reduced to full-time education, to the total, reduced to full-time form teaching the contingent of students enrolled in educational programs of higher education;

Ф is the value of the indicator characterizing the financial activity of the educational organization, calculated according to the formula:

* - income of an educational organization from all sources per one teaching staff, calculated as the ratio of budgetary and extrabudgetary funds received by an educational organization to the number of teaching staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates;

* - the ratio of the average earnings of the teaching staff in an educational organization to the average salary in the economy of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation, calculated as the ratio of the accrued wages fund of the teaching staff divided by the average number of teaching staff and the number of months in a year, to the average salary in the economy of the region, expressed in percent. The average number of academic staff is determined by summing the average number of academic staff for all months of the reporting period and dividing the amount received by the number of months in the reporting period. The average number of academic staff per month is calculated by summing the number of academic staff on the payroll ** for each calendar day of the month and dividing the amount received by the number of calendar days of the month;

And - the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings (premises) that are owned and (or) in operational management, per student (given contingent), calculated as the ratio of the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings that are owned and ( or) in operational management, to the number of the reduced contingent of students enrolled in educational programs of higher education.

III. Calculation of the efficiency indicator of the educational program implemented by the educational organization

11. As an indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the educational program for undergraduate and specialty programs implemented by an educational organization, the normalized value of the average USE score in the relevant specialty or the direction of training of an educational organization is used, reduced to a single type of distribution for a sample of educational organizations participating in the competition at the level of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation or at the federal level.

Normalization of the average USE score in the relevant specialty or field of study is carried out according to the formula:

* - the average value for the sample of average USE scores in the relevant specialty or area of ​​training for educational organizations participating in the competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level, in the relevant specialty or area of ​​training;

x is the average USE score for a specialty or area of ​​training of an educational organization;

* - the standard deviation of the sample of average USE scores in the relevant specialty or area of ​​training for educational organizations participating in the competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level in the relevant specialty or area of ​​training;

* - standard deviation for a sample of normalized values ​​of performance indicators of educational organizations participating in a competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level, in the relevant specialty or field of study.

* - the average value for a sample of normalized values ​​of performance indicators for educational organizations participating in a competition held at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation or at the federal level, in the relevant specialty or area of ​​training;

The average USE score for a specialty or area of ​​training of an educational organization is calculated using the following formula:

* - the average USE score of the k-th student, calculated as the ratio of the sum of the USE results of the k-th student, recognized as the results entrance examinations on general education subjects corresponding to the specialty or the direction of training for which admission is carried out, to the number of such subjects in the year preceding the year for which the admission control figures are set.

Average USE scores calculated on the basis of data on the USE of persons enrolled in full-time education at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget and under education contracts at the expense of individuals and (or) legal entities in the relevant specialty or direction of training, implemented by an educational organization. Average USE scores are calculated for specialties and areas of training, for which at least 10 people were enrolled. If less than 10 people enrolled for training in a specialty or area of ​​training, the average USE scores are calculated for that enlarged group of professions, specialties and areas of training, which includes the corresponding specialty or area of ​​training. If the appointment for the appropriate enlarged group occupations, specialties and areas of training was less than 10 people, the average USE scores are calculated for the educational organization as a whole.

The data on the USE results of persons enrolled in the general competition and persons entitled to admission without entrance examinations are taken into account.

When calculating the average USE scores, data on the USE results of persons enrolled in the first year in an educational organization in general education subjects corresponding to the specialty or direction of training for which admission was carried out are taken into account.

When enrolling in an educational organization of persons entitled to admission without entrance examinations, the results of such students are recognized as the highest USE results (100 points) in the specified general education subjects.

When enrolling in an educational organization of persons who have the right to be equated with those who have scored the maximum number of points on the Unified State Exam in a general subject corresponding to the profile of the Olympiad for schoolchildren, the results of such students are recognized as the highest results of the Unified State Exam (100 points) in a general education subject that corresponds to the profile of the Olympiad for schoolchildren. In other general education subjects corresponding to the specialty and the direction of training, the USE scores of such students are taken into account in accordance with their certificates of the USE results.

Results of winners and runners-up final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren, members of the national teams of the Russian Federation, who participated in international Olympiads in general subjects and formed in accordance with the procedure established by the federal executive body in charge of developing public policy and legal regulation in the field of education, in specialties and (or) areas of training corresponding to the profile of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren or the international Olympiad, are recognized by educational organizations as the highest USE results (100 points) in these general education subjects when admitted to specialties and areas of training, not corresponding to the profile of the Olympiad for schoolchildren.

K - the number of students admitted to USE results for training in the relevant specialty and direction of training.

12. The indicators of publication activity of scientific and pedagogical workers of the educational organization and the costs of the educational organization for scientific and research developments in the relevant field of science are used as an indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the educational program of the master's program implemented by the educational organization.

The indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the educational program of the Master's degree implemented by the educational organization is calculated according to the following formula:

j - area of ​​science;

* - the number of citations of articles published in 5 years preceding the year in which the competition is held, in peer-reviewed scientific journals of the world, indexed in the Web of Science abstract and bibliographic database and the Russian Science Citation Index (hereinafter - RSCI) for the corresponding field of science in calculated per 100 academic staff, reduced to integer values ​​of rates, calculated as the ratio of the number of citations of publications in publications indexed in the abstract-bibliographic base of scientific citation Web of Science and RSCI, published in 5 years preceding the year in which the competition is held, in the relevant field science, to the number of R&D, multiplied by 100, according to the following formula:

NPR is the number of research and development projects;

* - expenditures of an educational organization on scientific and research developments in the relevant field of science per one research work, calculated as the ratio of the volume of expenditures of an educational organization on scientific and research developments in the relevant field of science to the number of NPPs, reduced to integer values ​​of rates.

13. As an indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the educational program of postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies) implemented by an educational organization, indicators of the publication activity of scientific and pedagogical workers of an educational organization, expenses of an educational organization on scientific and research developments in the relevant field of science, as well as an indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the functioning of postgraduate studies are used. (adjunct).

The indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the educational program of postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies) implemented by an educational organization is calculated using the following formula:

indicators * and * are calculated in accordance with the calculation of the indicator characterizing the effectiveness of the educational program of the master's degree implemented by the educational organization;

* - the effectiveness of the functioning of postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies) by areas of training, calculated according to the following formula:

* - the average number of defenses of dissertations in a period of two years preceding the year in which the competition is held, calculated as the ratio of the number of defenses in a period of two years preceding the year in which the competition is held to the number of graduate students (adjuncts) graduated in two years, previous year in which the competition is held, multiplied by 100;

* - the fulfillment of the target figures for admission of citizens for postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies), established in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held, calculated as the ratio of the number of those admitted to postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies) to those established in the year preceding the year in which the competition is held, reception check digits multiplied by 100.

IV. Methodology for evaluating competitive applications for making a decision on the establishment of admission control figures for educational programs for the training of scientific and pedagogical personnel in residency and assistant-internship

14. The criterion for making a decision on the establishment of admission control figures for educational programs for the training of scientific and pedagogical personnel in residency and assistant-internship is an expert assessment of the potential of an educational organization on a 100-point scale.

The potential of an educational organization is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the scores of all members of the competition committee, awarded by an expert by the i-th educational organization.

The points awarded to the application of the i-th educational organization are calculated according to the formula:

* - the amount of points awarded to the application of the i-th educational organization;

* - the value in points (the arithmetic mean of the marks in points of all members of the competition committee), awarded by the competition committee to the application of the i-th educational organization for participation in the competition according to the g-th criterion, where g is the number of established criteria.

______________________________

* Hereinafter, the number of teaching staff and research workers (as of October 1 of the year preceding the year in which the competition is held) is understood as the number of scientific and pedagogical workers (SPD), including those working on the terms of full-time part-time work (external part-time workers), without working under civil contracts.

** The number of staff members on the payroll includes staff members who worked under an employment contract and performed work for one day or more, both actually working and absent from work for any reason (who were on annual, additional, educational leaves, on business trips; who did not show up for work due to illness).

Persons who worked part-time in accordance with the employment contract or transferred with the written consent of the employee to work with part-time work, when determining the average headcount, are taken into account in proportion to the hours worked.

Employees who receive two, one and a half rates in one organization or are registered in one organization as internal part-time workers are counted in the payroll number of employees as one person.

The following are not included in the payroll and average number of employees: those on maternity leave and parental leave; hired part-time from other organizations.

The average number of external part-time workers is calculated in proportion to the hours actually worked.

Appendix No. 2
to the Competition Procedure
for distribution of reception check digits
citizens by professions, specialties
and areas of training for learning
by state accredited
educational programs of secondary
vocational and higher education
through budgetary allocations from the federal
budget approved by order
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
dated July 15, 2013 No. 560

Methodology for the competitive selection and criteria for making a decision on the establishment of target figures for the admission of citizens by profession and specialty for training in educational programs of secondary vocational education with state accreditation at the expense of budgetary allocations from the federal budget

1. Control figures for the admission of citizens by professions and specialties for training at the expense of federal budget allocations for educational programs of secondary vocational education (hereinafter referred to as the control figures for admission) within each profession and specialty of secondary vocational education are established separately by professional educational organizations and educational institutions of higher education (hereinafter referred to as educational organizations) in the amount not exceeding the proposals for establishing the admission control figures specified in the application of the educational organization.

2. The criterion for making a decision on the establishment of admission control figures is an indicator of the potential of an educational organization.

3. The calculation of indicators of the potential of educational organizations in the relevant profession and specialty is calculated according to the following formula:

* - normalized value of the indicator * *;

* - the duration of the implementation in the educational organization of educational programs in the relevant professions and specialties (number of years);

* - the number of full-time teaching staff with an academic degree and / or academic title, as well as the first and highest qualification categories;

* - the total area of ​​educational and laboratory buildings (premises) and sports facilities per student (given contingent);

* - the number of students who became winners and prize-winners of the All-Russian Olympiads of professional skill, All-Russian and international sports competitions (for professions and specialties of physical culture and sports) during the two years preceding the year in which the competition is held;

* - the number of units of educational and educational-methodical literature in all disciplines, interdisciplinary courses and professional modules of the main professional educational program per 100 students (given contingent);

* - the share of educational equipment for laboratory work and practical training not older than 10 years in the total volume of such equipment;

* - the share of funds allocated for the development of the material and technical base of the educational organization, which ensures the conduct of all types of laboratory work and practical exercises, in the total amount of funds received from all sources during the five years preceding the year in which the competition is held;

* - the ratio of the average salary of teaching staff in an educational organization to the average salary in the economy of the corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation.

The normalization of values ​​for each indicator of the activity of an educational organization * * is carried out through the rating of educational organizations.

The rating for each indicator of the activity of an educational organization is constructed from the unique values ​​of the corresponding indicator from the complete set of data for the indicated indicator for all educational organizations participating in the calculation of the indicator of the potential of an educational organization.

In this case, the value of the indicator for the educational organization (-s), occupying (s) the first position in the rating, is taken equal to 100; the value of the indicator for the educational organization (s) occupying the last position in the rating is equated to zero.

Document overview

Installed new order holding a competition among organizations of secondary and higher vocational education for the distribution of target figures for admission of citizens to study at the expense of budgetary funds.

Let us recall that it is possible to study at the expense of the funds of the respective budgets not only in state and municipal educational institutions, but also in non-state educational institutions with state accreditation.

According to the new rules, the competition is held by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. It establishes target numbers for admission by professions and specialties of secondary vocational education at the federal level, as well as by areas of training and specialties of higher education at the regional and federal levels.

Competitive selection is carried out by a specially created commission in the Ministry on the basis of applications submitted by educational organizations.

The list of performance indicators of universities assessed in the selection process has changed. In particular, among other things, the ratio of the number of dissertations defended to the number of graduate students is taken into account, as well as the number of those admitted to graduate school (postgraduate studies), residency and postgraduate training.

New methods of competitive selection and criteria for making decisions on determining the admission control figures have been established. As before, the criterion is the potential of the educational organization. In connection with the change in the list of assessed indicators, new formulas for its calculation are presented.

Share with your friends or save for yourself:

Loading...