Concept of pedagogical education. Educational programs of higher education and the form of their implementation The concept of creating an educational program of higher education

The relevance of research. System Modernization higher education The post-industrial society requires both effective practical embodiment and theoretical justification. The educational system of Russia ceased to be closed, the processes of globalization and internationalization, primarily the Bologna process, suggest substantial adjustment in the educational policy of the national education system. In order not to lose your advantages, this system should become more competitive, more technologized, more flexible. Centralized university management system in modern conditions It cannot be successfully competing with more flexible and adaptive systems used by the business community, involving the broad autonomy of their structural units, in which administrative methods are harmoniously combined with the methods of economic, psychological, and power relations are based on a highly developed corporate culture.

Today, only 20% of the occupied population has been working on a basic specialty received at the university, and 42% of young people in the first two years after the end of professional educational institutions change their professions. The current trend increases due to the high technological processes in the field of industry, without work, first of all, persons with low qualifications and a narrow specialization, low general education levels, are primarily provided. Many young people seek two or more diplomas about higher education.

There were many new, alternative educational institutions, with a different approach to educational activities and ways to manage it. The result is to enhance the competition of traditional and innovative educational institutions, such as open universities, network educational institutions, specialized non-communication institutions and corporate universities of transnational companies.

Increases interest in the problems of education efficiency and new models of management of various types of educational institutions. Research centers are being created involved in planning and financing, developing more rational in terms of new models for the education of organizational forms of the educational process, the modernization of its content. This actually existing and current practice requiring a conceptual scientific justification.

The degree of development of the problem. The total methodological position of the author was determined in accordance with the concept of theoretical knowledge (theory), which includes concepts, judgments, hypothesis, principles, laws, etc., associated with logical relations (G.I. Ruzavin). We will highlight scientific knowledge, paradigms, theories that have had a special impact on the development of our conceptual provisions of modeling the educational activities of the university with the target feature of training competitive specialists in international joint educational programs.

Methodologically based and guiding the search for systemic theoretical provisions of the content of modern education is the concept of profile differentiation of the content of "post-industrial education", developed by A.M. Novikov. The concept of integration and internationalization of national educational systems was developed by A.L.andreyev, J. Knight, E.A. Knyazev, J. Ritzer, P. Scott. So J. Knight proposed a classification of paths for which the internationalization of higher education is undergoing, P. Scott arguments in favor of a clear separation of the concepts of "internationalization" and "globalization". Conceptual issues of globalization of education are reflected in the works of V. Clark, N. Devis, G.ritzer, P. Rubinson, P. Walters. The concept of diversification as one of the innovative areas of modernization of education is proposed by F.D. Altbach, V.I. Bidenco, ji.

Vlasov, M.B. Hitman, T.Y. Lomakina, T.Y. Polyakova, A.G. Smirnov. So, by V. Baidenko, under the diversification of education means a globalized process, within which a departure from the traditional designs of educational systems should occur, from the principle of unitary and unified construction of them. L. Vozavena distinguishes vertical and horizontal diversification. A.G. Smirnov believes that the goal of the diversification process is to create a more flexible system of education that can respond to any acts in the field of labor market opportunities and considers it as a factor in smoothing access to prestigious university education and a way to improve the education system itself. The concept of T. Lomakina, considering diversification vocational education As the general general principle of the development of a system of continuous vocational education, which forms a new pedagogical system of vocational education and modern typology of professional educational institutions. It also formulates the following set of principles for diversifying vocational education: the principle of compliance, the principle of high-quality vocational education, the principle of personality, the principle of freedom of choice. However, the diversification of individual educational trajectories as the main means of increasing the competitiveness of trainees in science at the conceptual level has not yet been studied.

Conceptual ideas related to the transition to the new quality of education in the conditions of formation of a personal-oriented, "student-centered" paradigm of education are reflected in the scientific works of V.P.Bespalko, E.V. Bondarevskaya, I.Zimney, S.I. PLAKSIYA, V.A. Khutorsky and many others. In the concept of personal-oriented education, E.V. Bondarevskaya is approved by the humanistic Values \u200b\u200bof Education, the foundations of pedagogy personality are laid, as a new direction in pedagogical science. The simplicity of this concept is its orientation not to form a person's qualities, carried out with the help of external means of influence, but on the processes, the subject of which personality becomes in a sociocultural environment: socialization, cultural identification, individualization, livestock.

Various pedagogical systems for the development of personal properties in unity with professional skills and skills are designed by G.M. Andreva, S.I. Arkhangelsky, G.A. Bokareva, S.Ya. Batyshev, B.C. Ilyin, A.K. Markova, V.V. Serikov. These works were theoretical foundation when creating new concepts of professional training of specialists aimed at the development of the intellectual potential of the individual (A.P. Belyaeva, V.P. Bespalko, M.Yu. Bokarev, N.K. Sergeev). Conceptual character have the work of V.V. Kondratyev on the methodology of professional engineering activities.

Significant for our study are also the concepts of foreign scientists V. Cheepanach, J. Lefsted, G. Moskowitz, R.L. Oxford, R.C. Scarcella, E.W. Stevick, E. Tarone, G. Yule, G. Weiter, devoted to the competence approach to the preparation of modern specialists. So I. Sustvik developed the concept of a "competent employee", in which an attempt was made to allocate the palette of the individual psychological qualities of a specialist, which includes discipline, independence, communicativeness, desire for self-development. In this concept, the most important component of the skills of a specialist becomes the ability to quickly and conflict adapt to specific working conditions.

However, in the domestic university practice and classical pedagogy when characterizing a qualitative identity of the personality, the concept of "competitiveness" is almost never found. At the same time, recent studies have emerged dedicated to various aspects of training competitive specialists. The concept of competitiveness as an indicator of the quality of training of specialists is presented in the works of O.V. Dushkina, ppm Prince, H.h. Mashnikova, V.A. Oganesova, AD Pfeife, Yu.B. Rubina, V.P. Savina, M.V. Semenova, P.A. Fathutdinova, V.A. Fukina, D.V. Chernilevsky, S.N. Shrobokov. Basic and generalized concepts of the personality of a competitive specialist in different areas Professional activities were developed in the works of R.Ya. Akhmetshina, N.V., Borisova, S.A. Borisenko, O.I. Polkina, N.V. Foma.

Conceptual ideas for the influence of market processes on the educational sphere are contained in the works of B. Belash, A. Braserman, V.M. Kozhuhar, A.P. Pankrukhina, O.V. Saginovaya. These researchers note that the highest school turns into a full-fledged subject of market relations, as a result of which universities are forced to transform their structure and change their functions.

However, it should be noted that most of the existing concepts of modeling the competitiveness of a specialist most fully satisfy professional requirements, but not personal. Training of specialists in joint educational programs, as a means of increasing competitiveness, is also not considered in these models. While the Bologna Declaration allocates joint educational programs as an important means of achieving the harmonization of the pan-European educational space. Questions of design and modeling of joint educational programs in Russian universities rise in the works of M.B. Hitman, E.K. Hitmann, N.N. Matushkin, V.Yu. Pillars. The conceptual opinion of these researchers is that joint educational programs have one of the promising areas of modern modernization of vocational education, which expands the possibilities of successfully functioning and developing educational institutions in the market conditions. However, issues of the implementation of such joint international programs both in practice and in science, attention is not paid enough. There is no holistic practical-oriented concept of developing and practical implementation of such programs, as well as cooperation of various types of educational institutions in this direction.

In the considered pedagogical concepts there is also a student-centered paradigm of educational activities, since they do not consider the diversification of education from the point of view of personal achievements of students and as a major means of a significant increase in their competitiveness "as an ability to prove their competence" (V.I. Pozmenhansky, A.F. Zakirova). In addition, the forms of international cooperation of universities with various educational standards were not sufficiently studied with the aim of developing and testing joint, including international, educational programs, allowing to prepare world-class specialists for the global labor market.

Thus, from a wide range of concepts dedicated to vocational education, attention is quite much attention to modern global educational trends, but much less on the issues of communicative educational activities of Russian and foreign universities of different types and their associations. Modern educational reforms occur often without a serious theoretical conceptual basis, therefore the need arises in the practical-oriented concept of educational activities as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists.

Despite the described achievements in the consideration of the modernization of educational activities in Russian universities, a holistic practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university for the preparation of competitive specialists in international joint educational programs in the context of modernization of higher education in the "post-industrial society" (A.M. Novikov) has not yet become the subject of special scientific research.

Thus, the analysis of the process of modernization of higher professional education allowed us to identify and update the contradiction between the reform of entering the unified European educational space, the local practice of individual universities in this regard and not well developed scientific knowledge Comparative comparative analysis for the study of systemic relations between Russian and foreign education. This systemic contradiction is revealed in private contradictions:

Between the rapid proceedings of globalization and internationalization of education, on the one hand, and on the other, the development of educational trajectories of training specialists in various countries that generate a variety of approaches and scientific thesaurus, which impede mutual understanding and interaction of scientists and practitioners different countries peace; between the local practice of introducing innovative educational structures, programs, standards and approaches, on the one hand, and on the other, - insufficiently systemic domestic educational reforms, most often copying western experience without scientific conceptual understanding of general concepts;

Between the social need for specialists of a new type and new qualifications adequately relevant to the scientific and technical progress of the "post-industrial society", on the one hand, and on the other, expectation of the regulatory practice of their preparation in Russian universities;

Between the current practice of preparing narrow specialists on the one hand, and on the other, the needs of the domestic labor market in competitive, widely educated world-class specialists for work at numerous joint ventures, which leads to difficulties in employment and stimulates the outflow of labor resources abroad;

Between the locality of the practice of modernization and training with advanced innovative thinking, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the insufficient theoretical development of the conceptual and paradigm fundamentals of innovative educational activities in the "post-industrial education" system (A.M. Novikov).

The dedicated system of contradictions led to a choice of scientific research: to develop a practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university for the preparation of competitive world-class specialists in the modernization of higher professional education in Russia. The formulated problem made it possible to identify the topic of research: "The concept of educational activities of the university in the context of modernization of higher professional education."

Object of study: educational activities in higher educational institutions of different organizational forms and types.

Subject of research: The concept of educational activities in higher educational institutions of various organizational forms and types, promoting the preparation of competitive specialists in the context of modernization of higher professional education in Russia.

The purpose of the study: to develop, theoretically substantiate and experimentally test the concept of educational activities of higher educational institutions of various organizational forms and types, promoting the preparation of competitive specialists in international joint educational programs.

The main idea of \u200b\u200bthe study is to describe the practical-oriented scientific concept of educational activities of the university as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists.

Research Hypothesis: The concept of educational activities in universities as a systemic methodological knowledge about the training of specialists will be focused on the success of their entry into the environment of socio-professional cooperation (both in Russia and abroad), if:

The purpose of educational activities of the university is the preparation of a competitive specialist in demand in the global labor market; Competitiveness "As a mental phenomenon integrates the relationship of the personal and professional properties of cognitive, motivational, subject-activity, emotional-volitional and value-semantic components; As the main means of forming a high competitiveness of specialists, joint international training programs are used, contributing to a significant expansion of individual educational trajectories and having a multiplicative effect;

Educational activities are a flexible combination of competition and cooperation with world network educational centers, wide participation of higher educational institution in associations, associations, innovative educational projects, including international, mainly on joint educational programs; The model of organizational and administrative educational activities of the university is based on corporate identity, entrepreneurial type of power, suggests openness and multi-stage organizational structure, decentralization with delegation of a number of powers by structural units and a significant increase in the participation of the collective in management, taking into account the principle of separation of advisory functions , decision-making and control functions;

Monitoring the effectiveness of educational activities includes the methods of "measurement" level of competitiveness of future specialists through correlation analysis and mathematical theory of verification of statistical hypotheses.

In accordance with the purpose of, subject and hypothesis, the main objectives of the study are defined:

1. To carry out a relatively comparable analysis of the main innovative concepts of educational activities of universities in the preparation of competitive specialists, on the basis of which to develop a new practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational training programs.

2. Develop an ideal model of a competitive specialist, considering competitiveness as the main key competence, an integrative immanent personality property and the main purpose of the educational process.

3. Synthesize the algorithm of a systematic "personal" diversification of individual educational trajectories of future specialists of the economic profile by joint training in universities of Russia and foreign countries According to international educational programs.

4. Struiting the content of individual educational programs in autonomous blocks and modules invariant with Russian and international (European) educational standards, taking into account global internationalization trends, democratization, informatization, fundamentalization of higher education in the "post-industrial" society.

5. Match various forms of university cooperation, scientific institutions and business community, contributing to the intensification of educational activities for the synthesis of its own model, an adequate task of training competitive specialists in international joint educational programs.

6. Test the concept of diversifying the educational activities of the university as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists.

7. Develop a copyright method for monitoring the effectiveness of educational activities for the preparation of competitive specialists in joint international educational programs using the toolkit of correlation analysis and the mathematical theory of verification of statistical hypotheses.

The methodological and theoretical base of the study was ideas: system-structural analysis of phenomena (P.K.Anohin, V.G. Afanasyev,

A.m.Miklin, V.N. Sadovsky, V.A.Svidersky et al.); Theories of a holistic personality and its development (K.A.Abulkhanova, V.I. Inderev, N.I.Anziferova, L.S.Vugotsky, P.Ya. Galperin, V.V. Dvalov, A.N. Lyontiev, with .L. Rubinstein et al.); differential integral system approach to the analysis of pedagogical phenomena (G.M.andreyev, G.A. Bokarev, M.Yu.Bokarev); The theories of a holistic pedagogical process (Yu.K. Babansky, G.A. Bokareva, B.S. Rhershunsky, O.S. Grebenyuk, V.S. Hylin,

B.V. Krayevsky); competent approach to the development of personality (V.I. Baitenko, V.I. Blinov, V.A. Kozyrov, N.V. Kuzmina, N. Rodionova, N.Kh.zov, A.I.Subetto, Yu. Tattur, V.D. Shadrikov); Personal-oriented pedagogy (E.V. Bondarevskaya); comparative comparable analysis (S.G. Verslovsky, E.E.ISMAILOV); polycultural approach (A.Yu.Belogurov); training of specialists in higher educational institutions (S.I. Arkhangelsky, Yu.K. Babansky, V.P.Bespalkko, G.A. Bokareva, A.V. Corguev, V.Ya. Laudis, P.I. Jested, in .A.Popkov, V.Slaslatin, N.F. Talisin, D.V. Chernilevsky, B.ji. Shatunovsky).

The study relies on the fundamental philosophical and methodological and cultural research (N.M. Borytko, V.S.Bibler, B.S.German, M.S. Kagan, A.S. Karmin, AM Novikov, G.I. Ruzaquin); Philosophical and pedagogical ideas of humanization and democratization of education (E.V. Bondarevskaya, A.A. Bodalev, G.V. Muhametzyanova); Psychological and pedagogical concepts of personality development (B.G. Ananyev,

A.G.Asmolov, O.S. Grebenyuk, TB Grebenyuk, V.S. Ilin, A.N. Lyontiev, D.I. Feldstein); Concepts of professionalism and professional readiness (G.A. Bokarev, V.Slaslatin, N.V. Kuzmin, A.N. Libovich); Concepts of management and pedagogical management (L.V.Biborodova,

B.Yu. Krichevsky, V.S. Lazarev, A.M.M. M. M. M.M. Potchnik, P.I.Treyakov, T.I.Shamova); Theories of social and pedagogical management (V.V. Kraevsky, V.Y. Krichevsky, M.M.Potashnik, V.P. Simonov); Problems of pedagogical technologies (V.P.Bespalko, G.I. Ibrahimov, M.V. Kerin, M.I.Makhmutov); Methodological concepts of modern psychological and pedagogical studies (N.M. Borytko, GD Bukharova, V.V. Kraevsky, G.I. Ruzavin, etc.).

In the formation of the concept of educational activity as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists, the concepts were also analyzed: professional culture methodologies (O.S. Anisimov); The unity of the meaningful and procedural (V.V. Kraevsky, V.S. Llyvev); intellectual technologies (M.Yu.Bokarev, G.A. Bocarev); methodology for creating prognostic models (A.A.Kirsanov); diversification of educational activities (F.D. Altbach, V.I. Baitenko, T.Y.Lomakina, T.Y. Polyakova); general professional training of bachelors (T. L. Kamos); the formation of the personal maturity of the future specialist in the innovative conditions of higher professional education (A.O. Kosheleva); formation of educational image humanitarian university (V.V. Volkova); bilingual language Education in high school (I.E. Buryxina); Forming multilingual competence of students (N.V. Evdokimova, etc.).

The study used a complex of methods: Theoretical methods: abstraction and idealization, generalization scientific facts, methodological and heuristic principles of constructing theories; system-structural and systemic analysis; differential integral analysis of domestic and foreign studies on pedagogy, psychology and management in high school, scientific forecasting; pedagogical modeling and design; generalizations of scientific facts, idealization, identification, retrospective analysis, comparative comparable analysis; empirical methods: study and synthesize innovations in the field of pedagogical management systems, observation, conversation, interviews, studying documents and results of teachers and educational institutions, methods of pedagogical measurements (questionnaires, testing, scaling, etc.), followed by the processing of the experimental data obtained by methods of mathematical statistics, Pedagogical experiment.

Protection issues:

1. Practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university in the context of modernization of higher vocational education as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists is a holistic pedagogical knowledge described in the relationship and relationships of its essential components: the main idea, goals, contents, Patterns, principles of educational activities, means and technology for the implementation of joint educational programs, which distinguishes it from other existing concepts of educational activities (V.I. Bayenko, T.Y. Lomakina).

2. The main object of the holistic concept of educational activities of the university in the context of modern modernization of higher professional education, its core is the formation of the competitiveness of the future specialist considered as the main key competence and integrative immanent properties of the personality of the future specialist, which determines the success of entering the environment of socio-professional interaction and degree In demand by the global labor market of his personal-professional qualities, which is reflected in the cognitive, motivational, objective, activity, emotional-volitional and value-sense components, including: possession of methods and methods for solving a wide class of professional tasks; The ability to successfully cope with various social and professional problems; high overall culture, determining the ability to self-development, self-dissection, self-expression and self-study; self-confidence, responsibility for the entrusted business; Orientation for success, flexibility, creativity and adaptation mobility.

3. The integrity of conceptual knowledge is achieved if the setpoint is considered as the main means of the "personal" diversification of educational studies by introducing joint international training programs to the educational practice of joint international training programs that contribute to a significant expansion of a set of individual educational trajectories and having a multiplicative effect.

4. The main pattern of holistic conceptual knowledge is the structuring of international joint training programs in autonomous blocks and modules, invariant with Russian and international educational standards, taking into account the global tendencies of internationalization, democratization, informatization, fundamentalization of higher education "post-industrial" society.

5. The factor in the integrity of the practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university is a flexible combination of competition and cooperation with global educational centers, the wide participation of higher educational institutions in associations, associations, innovative educational projects, including international, mainly in the form of joint educational programs.

6. In modern competitive educational space The organizational and administrative model of the educational activities of the university, based on corporate identity, the entrepreneurial type of power, which is supplied as its main system qualities openness and multistage of organizational structure, decentralization with delegation of a number of powers by structural divisions and a significant expansion of the participation of the team in management, taking into account the principle Separation of advisory functions, decision-making and control functions, which will allow to combine competence in decision-making and personal responsibility for their consequences.

7. Methods of monitoring of the model of basic activities for the preparation of competitive specialists in joint international educational programs will be effective if they include tools to measure not only the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the competitiveness of the student's competitiveness, but also record the success of the "entry" of a graduate on Wednesday of Social and Professional Interaction and the degree of demand for the global labor market, rely on the correlation analysis methods and mathematical theory Checks of statistical hypotheses.

The scientific novelty of the study is that:

Based on the analysis of modernization processes in the modern educational space, a new concept of educational activities of the university was developed as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists, which significantly distinguishes it from the concepts of educational activities developed earlier by Russian (FD Altbach, V. I. Baidenko, L. Vonzov, T.Ya. Lomakina, T.Y. Polyakova, A.G. Smirnov) and foreign (D. Butby, L.Kamfore, L. Res, S. Gorch, A. Orthtsvard, and .Hemblin, J. Chouni) scientists, is a significant contribution to the development pedagogical science, as it expands the essence of the general concepts of the modern process of modernizing the educational activities of the university for the preparation of competitive specialists, in particular:

Expanded the terminological apparatus by introducing the concept of "competitiveness" of a specialist considered in contrast to the previously found in scientific literature Interpretations R.Ya. Ahmetshina

N.V. Borisova, S.A. Borisenko, A.V.Grishin, O.I. Polkina, TA Slugina, N.V. Fomina as a system purpose of the learning process, key integral competence and a holistic property of the individual, structured by cognitive, motivational, subject-workshop, emotional-volitional and value-semantic components, which significantly expands the organizational and pedagogical goals of educational activities;

The paradigm field of professional pedagogy was expanded by building a holistic concept of educational activities of the university, adequate global and domestic educational trends based on the impact of global trends in the modernization of higher education on the structure and organization of educational activities of universities of various types and organizational forms and their associations, which significantly complements the set of well-known models. organizational and managerial structure of educational institutions and concepts of educational activities described by Russian and foreign scientists (I. Ansoff, U. Bergquist, J. Boldridge, E.A. Knyazev, T.L. Kamosa, A.O. Kosheleva, N. Maximov , Minzberg, B.A. Sazonov, K. Tavernie, E.Taffler);

Classified forms and ways of cooperation of educational institutions, scientific, industrial enterprises and business communities, which significantly complements the concept of formation of educational and industrial groups as a tool for upgrading educational system Russia (E.M. White, N.R. Kelchevskaya, I. B. Romanova, S.L. Skalovro); The typology of joint educational programs for training specialists in higher educational institutions, based on the classification of network interaction of educational institutions with each other, is developing on the classification of network interaction of educational institutions with each other, which develops an existing look at the process of modernizing education (E.K. Hitman, M. B.Gitman, E. Karavaeva, N. Maximov, B.A. Sazonov, V.Yu. Pillars);

Based on the type of typology, a block-modular technology was developed for designing joint educational programs in accordance with individual educational needs of students, which makes a significant contribution to the methodology of modern vocational training and develops the well-known concepts of "career guidance" (E.Yu. Sprynikova, N.S. Burst), "post-industrial" education (A.M. Novikov);

A system for monitoring the effectiveness of educational activities of the university on the preparation of competitive versatile specialists formed specialists to prepare a competitive versatile specialist, which supplements the qualimetric tools used in the pedagogy, is complemented by a qualimetric toolkit (O. Beresteneva, G.A. Bokareva, M. A. Valeev, J. Glas, N. Sh. Nikitina, O. Marahina, J. Stanley, P. E. Scheglov, etc.).

The theoretical significance of the study is that a new concept of educational activities of the university, considered as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational programs for training competitive specialists, was developed and theoretically substantiated, by adequate transformation of the organizational and management structure of the university, the formation of organizational culture and corporate identity; Cooperatives with global educational centers and commercial enterprises, designing the content of international dual educational programs in autonomous blocks and modules that meet the global trends in the global market for intellectual labor, innovative needs and tasks of modernization of modern higher professional education in Russia.

The described concept of modernization of vocational education opens up a new scientific direction in the area of \u200b\u200bthe content of training and diversification of educational activities of a university oriented in the need for modern competitive qualified world-class specialists; makes a "contribution" to the development of the conceptual apparatus of the theory of vocational training in the modern high school; complements the organizational and pedagogical foundations of the educational activities of the university in order to effectively use them in modern pedagogical practice; It deepens and expands the problem of management quality management of modern specialists with higher education being developed in the pedagogical science, opens up new ways to solve this problem in the post-industrial society.

Practical significance of the study. Practical-oriented algorithms and the design and standardization mechanism of the content of international joint educational programs for the preparation of competitive specialists in the direction of "Economics" (profile world economy) and the specialty "World Economy" taking into account the needs of the global and all-Russian labor market. This mechanism is synthesized in the form of a model of joint training of specialists in Russian and foreign universities, which ensures improvement in the quality and competitiveness of the received vocational education. The approbation of the presented practical-oriented model determines its widespread use in the real educational practice of universities of any organizational forms.

The typology of individual educational and trajectories developed and tested during the Longitudinal experiment allows to diversify educational activities of the university and serve as the basis for the participation of the university in joint educational programs, including international, at different levels of higher education (undergraduate, graduate, specialty, graduate school), providing Individualization and continuity of training, as well as to participate in systemic integration with educational, scientific and industrial organizations.

Research base: Institute European Business School -Kaliningrad, Institute EBS München (Germany), Institute of EBS París (France), Institute of Mim New-York (USA), Kaliningrad State Technical University, Baltic State Academy of Fish Flot, Baltic federal University them. I.Kanta.

The study was conducted within the framework of the state budget research work of the Baltic State Academy of Fled Fleet "The problem of improving the systematic training of specialists with higher technical education" (Per. No. 0191.0000280, scientific. Hands. Bokareva G.A.).

First stage (2002-2004) (analytical) - analysis of methodological, pedagogical, psychological, social, economic, philosophical literature on the issue of research; study of trends in the modernization of educational systems of Russia and abroad; innovative models of educational institutions and empirical models of training specialists; Detection of contradictions between developing practices and scientific descriptions of processes and phenomena in the field of professional pedagogy of higher education, the concept of "post-industrial education" (A.M. Novikov). The rationale for the initial positions of the study, its problems, object, subject, goals and objectives. The wording of the system of hypotheses, refinement of the chosen methodology of the system differential integral approach when developing a study plan.

Second Stage (2004-2009) (Methodological) - Development of methods for comparative analysis of specialist training programs in Russia and abroad, identification and description of the university mission (for example, NNO "Institute European Business School-Kaliningrad"), its educational policy According to the formation of corporate identity and training of professionals for the global market for intellectual labor. Development of the concept of cooperation with global educational centers, taking into account the globalization of the global educational space and modernization of higher vocational education. Processing of the resulting theoretical and experimental results, comparing them with empirical practice. Preparation scientific articles and approbation of some research results at scientific Russian and international conferences.

The third stage (2009-2010) (experimental) - experimental work on the implementation of universities developed by the model of the international joint training program in the direction of "Economics" (profile - world economy) and the specialty "World Economy", detection of management factors Quality of this training.

Fourth Stage (2010-2012) (resulting) - a description of the concept of educational activities of the university for the preparation of competitive specialists in the global market for intellectual labor on the international joint educational program; Completion of a longitudinal experiment with the processing of the experimental data obtained using mathematical statistics methods; design of dissertation materials; Publication of monograph.

The accuracy and validity of the results of the study formulated in the work of scientific provisions, concepts and conclusions are ensured by the study methodology, including systemic and differential integral approaches, methods of pedagogical modeling and design, comparative comparable analysis, as well as experimental data expressed in quantitative factors, Interpreted with the help of methods of mathematical statistics, personal participation of the author as a teacher, researcher, organizer and head of innovative educational activities to improve the preparation of competitive specialists in international joint educational programs.

Compliance with the formula and passport of the specialty. The dissertation work discusses the issues of management and organization of the educational process, forecasting and determining the structure of training training, taking into account the needs of the personality and the labor market, society, and the state, which fully complies with the formula of the specialty 13.00.08 "Theory and Methodology of Vocational Education" and paragraphs 4 "Training of specialists In higher educational institutions "and 12" educational management and marketing "of the specialty passport.

Testing and implementation of research results. Innovative practical oriented concept of educational activities of the university, considered as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational training programs for competitive specialists presented in the monograph "Management of educational activities in new socio-economic conditions" (2011).

Scientific results, theoretical provisions and practical application of the study at its various stages were discussed at meetings of the Academic Council of the NNO "Institute of EbSh-Kaliningrad", meetings of the Department of Theory and Methods of Vocational Education Institute of Professional Pedagogy at the Baltic State Academy of Fish Fleet.

The most essential results are presented and approved at international seminars, symposia and conferences: "Formation of professional culture of specialists of the XXI century in a technical university" (St. Petersburg, 2004), "Education in the XXI century: new approaches, continuity of traditions, prospects" (Orenburg, 2004), "Innovations in Science and Education" (Kaliningrad, 2004, 2010), "Great Pin Converters: Zhores Alferov" (Minsk, 2004), "Education and Humanitarian Technologies for the Integration of Ethnic, Ethno-Regional and Civil Identity" (St. Petersburg, 2008), "Modern Scientific and Scientific and Pedagogical Studies" (Ufa, 2010), "Psychology and Pedagogy: Methods and Problems of Practical Application" (Novosibirsk, 2010), "Science and Education: Fundamental Fundamentals, Technologies, Innovations" (Orenburg, 2010), "Innovative Economics and Industrial Policy of the Region" (St. Petersburg, 2010), "Prospects for the development of international cooperation in the field of education and and Nnowledges "(Moscow, 2010)," Socio-technological culture of a specialist: problems of formation and development "(Kemerovo, 2010)," Actual problems development of modern society "(Saratov, 2010)," Psychology of relations and human resources in modern russian society: trends, problems and prospects "(Volgograd,

2010), the Second All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Tver,

2011), the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Actual Issues of Development of Modern Society" (Kursk, 2011), the International Scientific and Technical Conference "Economics and Efficiency of Production Organization" (Bryansk, 2011), All-Russian (with international participation) of the scientific and practical conference " Theoretical and practical aspects of the development of modern education "(Cheboksary, 2011); In collections of scientific papers of the Kaliningrad state technical University, Baltic State Academy of Fled Fleet, Institute of Ebshch-Kaliningrad (2008 - 2011), etc.

The volume and structure of the thesis. The thesis consists of introduction, three chapters, 9 paragraphs, conclusions, literature of references, 13 tables, 5 schemes.

Conclusions on the third chapter

1. The competitiveness of a specialist is a key competence and integrative property of the individual, which determines the success of entering the environment of socio-professional interaction and the degree of demand for the established labor market of the person-professional qualities of a specialist, which is reflected in the cognitive, motivational, subject-work, emotional, and value -Celphic components, including possession of ways and methods for solving a wide class of professional tasks; The ability to successfully cope with various social and professional problems; high overall culture that encourages self-development, self-examination, self-expression and self-study; self-confidence, responsibility for the entrusted business; Orientation for success, flexibility, creativity and adaptation mobility.

2. Under modernization russian education and the rapid development of the global market for educational services. The participation of higher educational institutions in international associations, associations became an indispensable mechanism for the successful functioning, the exchange of advanced pedagogical experience, increasing the competitiveness of the specialists issued.

3. An effective way to significantly increase the competitiveness of the future specialist is the "personal" diversification of the education obtained through the introduction into the educational activities of the university of international dual programs that contribute to a significant expansion of the spectrum of individual trajectories of vocational education, as well as reduced period and reduce the cost of training, due to the unification of education resources , science and business.

4. Dual educational programs are one of the strategic directions for the modernization of higher vocational education, which expands the chances of educational institutions for successful operation and harmonious development in the context of the globalization of the educational services market. Education on international dual programs contributes to a deeper and versatile professional development Students. The assignment of joint degrees contributes to overcoming the national closetness, makes the holder of a degree of a more wide profile and a horizon, increases its competitiveness on the Russian and world, global labor market.

5. Dual and joint educational programs in the system of higher professional education are an innovative model of the organization of the educational process in the university. To implement such educational programs, it is necessary to struggle with each of the educational programs included in the complex with the release of fundamental, basic and elective disciplines; Individualization of the learning process, giving the opportunity to each student to choose its version of the dual educational program; Material and technical, personnel (destination of tutors) and documentary support for the learning process.

6. The Joint Educational Program "Double Diploma" has a pronounced personality, student-centered orientation, but also vital university, because it is: the instrument of tactical and strategic positioning of the educational institution; the ability to strengthen and expand international academic mobility East-West; the way to further expand the image of the university and its wide participation in the European educational and scientific space; mechanism for increasing the competitiveness and authority of the university; as well as improving the competitiveness of specialists produced by the university.

7. The work of the university for joint dual educational programs requires the methodological support of the new type, the main one among which becomes "Syllabus", which is a deployed plan-prospectus of the individual educational trajectory of the student, agreed in time and place with other educational processes in the university.

Conclusion

The modern high school should undergo a serious systemic modernization, along with the necessary conservatism, which is the key to its sustainability and fundamentalness, ensure the record of the main features and global trends of modern society, to acquire greater flexibility and adaptability, to significantly diversify their educational activities and methods. effective management She, to satisfy the main educational needs of the basic subjects of the educational process: personality, society, business and state. Methodological studies in this area should be provided with a holistic practical-oriented concept of educational clerism, which is a holistic pedagogical knowledge described in the relationship and the relationships of its essential components: the main idea, goals, content, patterns, principles of educational activities, and its technology, implementation .

As the main purpose of the concept of educational activities of the university developed by us, its kernel was chosen by the formation of the competitiveness of the future specialist, considered as the main key competence and integrative immanent property of the personality of the future specialist, which determines the success of entering the environment of socio-professional interaction and The degree of demand for the global labor market of his personal-professional qualities, which is reflected in the cognitive, motivational, subject-workshop, emotional-volitional and value-sense components, including: possession of methods and methods for solving a wide class of professional tasks; The ability to successfully cope with various social and professional problems; high overall culture, determining the ability to self-development, self-dissection, self-expression and self-study; self-confidence, responsibility for the entrusted business; Orientation for success, flexibility, creativity and adaptation mobility.

The main idea and the main means of forming high competitiveness in our concept is systemic training on joint international educational programs to promote a significant expansion of a set of individual educational trajectories and having a multiplicative effect. The goal is also considered as the main means of the "personal" diversification of education obtained by students.

The main pattern of the considered holistic conceptual knowledge is the structuring of international joint training programs in autonomous blocks and modules, invariant with Russian and international educational standards, taking into account the global trends in internationalization, democratization, informatization, the fundamentalization of higher education of the "post-industrial" society.

The integrity factor of a practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university is a flexible combination of competition and cooperation with world educational centers, the wide participation of higher educational institutions in associations, associations, innovative educational projects, including international, mainly in the form of joint educational programs.

Let us dwell on the principles of educational activities synthesized by us. The most important of them is innovative approach to managing educational activities of the university. A hard administrative command vertical in modern conditions cannot be successfully competing with more flexible and adaptive systems used by the business community. The creation of university management systems should be based on the transition from mechanical, quasisadial control models to organic, liberal; reform types of power relations - changing political relations to economic and further entrepreneurial and corporate; Decentralization and delegation of broad powers by structural divisions. The matrix organizational model will be effective as a synthesis of administrative vertical control and control based on democratic principles, and horizontal - for autonomous and semi-autonomous structures. The matrix structure combines the properties of the state budget educational institution and the commercial organization, since the structure of the matrix type is decentralized to specialized institutions and faculties as independent structural units with the transfer of the part of the authority of the university together with economic independence and responsibility for their activities. The system transformation of the structure is carried out successfully, if it is based on strategic planning, synergistic approach, SWOT-ANALISE and quality management systems. Thus, in the process of modernization of higher professional education, there will be a viable model of the university, which is structured by system qualities: openness, multistage of organizational structure, decentralization with delegation of a number of powers by structural divisions and a significant expansion of the team's participation in management.

In the context of the modernization of Russian education and the rapid development of the global market for educational services, the participation of higher educational institutions in international associations, associations are an indispensable mechanism for the successful functioning, exchange of advanced pedagogical experience, increasing the competitiveness of specialists. Important is the development of a mechanism and forms of interaction of universities and their associations, integration with enterprises and business structures, which allows you to predict the needs of enterprises and prepare specialists with these needs and business development patterns. Educational - industrial groups can perform an effective form of such cooperation, that is, such an association of educational institutions and enterprises partially united their financial, material and intangible assets in order to implement investment and other projects and programs aimed at improving the quality of educational services and meeting the needs of society in highly qualified, competitive, practiced specialists of the appropriate profile. No less effective form of interuniversity international cooperation is the training of specialists in joint international educational programs. Joint educational programs are the strategic direction of modernization of modern higher vocational education, expand the possibilities of educational institutions in successful operation and harmonious development in the context of globalization of the educational services market. Learning on international joint programs contributes to a deeper and versatile professional development of students. The assignment of joint international degrees contributes to overcoming national closetness, makes the owner of the degree specialist of a wider profile and outlook, increases its competitiveness at the international global labor market.

The university decisive in the educational activities is the formulation of systemic objectives formulated on the basis of a mission, basic values, activities and university policies recorded in the brand. The implementation of the goals set directly is associated with the level and type of organizational culture dominant in this university. The importance of organizational culture for the development of the university organization is determined by the fact that it gives employees corporate identity, determines the intragroup idea of \u200b\u200bthe university, being an important source of stability and continuity, which creates the sense of reliability of the university organization itself and its position in it. Corporate identity, in turn, contributes to the formation of a unique image of the university, which is necessary to strengthen its position in the global competitive market for educational services and active countering external destructive phenomena and impacts. Acute competition of state and non-governmental higher educational institutions of various types forces actively engaged in marketing and corporate communications, which is impossible without creating the relevant public relations department. For the university, this means building an open positive dialogue, the use of new communication forms and original creative ideas when interacting with target audiences and public organizations.

Joint educational programs in the higher vocational education system can be viewed as the main innovative model of the organization of educational activities in the university. The introduction of joint educational programs is responsible to modern challenges of society and represents one of the strategic directions for reforming vocational education, which expands the chances of educational institutions for successful operation and harmonious development in the global market for educational services. Dualization of education is the system integration of the content of training in the organization of dual education in different directions or specialties, or through learning on different levels With the appropriate degrees. The introduction of such joint programs contributes to a significant expansion of the spectrum of individual educational trajectories offered to trainees, reduce the period and reduce the cost of training, due to the unification of the resources of education, science, production and business, which generates a multiplicate synergistic effect.

The main condition for the implementation of such preparation programs is the individualization of the learning process, since the implementation of a wide range of personal educational trajectories on various combinations of educational programs in the framework of academic flows or sustainable training groups is difficult to implement. An individual approach to the organization of the learning process makes it possible to choose a unique training program and do not depend in its choice from other students, while the student has to constantly interact with the tutor throughout the term of study, whose function is to develop, clarify and correct an individual educational trajectory. For each student, taking into account his personal opportunities and needs within the framework of the conditions determined by the university. The work of the university on joint educational programs requires significant innovation and, above all, the methodological support of a new type. Main among methodological developments There is an expulsive plan-prospectus of the individual educational trajectory of the trainee, coordinated over time and place with other educational processes occurring in the university.

At each stage of our study, we in line with the described logic of funds used a complex of complemental diagnostic methods for the qualitative and quantitative measurement of the competitiveness of future specialists. The obtained quantitative results were treated using the apparatus of mathematical statistics (correlation analysis and the theory of verification of statistical hypotheses). In particular, a hypothesis about the direct connection of the level of "potential" competitiveness, considered as the main key competence, and the real behavior of graduates in the labor market in a competitive struggle for highly paid, prestigious work on the selected specialty, which indicates a positive solution to the tasks and proves Reliability of hypotheses advanced. Additional meaningful results obtained in the course of the study make it possible to set the tasks of further study of the impact of globalization processes on the world educational space.

To implement the described concept, special structuring in blocks and modules invariant with Russian and foreign educational standards are necessary. Special accent must be done on mathematical, computer, language and vocational training. Mathematical preparation is a base and a solid foundation for the successful development of special economic disciplines. Computer preparation - tool and main mechanism for obtaining new knowledge, scientific relevant information, "channel of international communication of specialists. Language preparation is considered as a tool for mutual enrichment and mutual understanding, aims to form a polylingval competence that ensures the synthesis of language, subject and multicultural elements, and which is the basis for the internationalization of higher education, proclaimed in the Bologna Declaration, and an indispensable mechanism of free open international communication, multicultural communication and successful interaction of experts different countries. Professional economic training is a crown of an international educational program and aims to form a competitive world-class specialist, comprehensively and fundamentally prepared, which owns international professional thesaurus, creative and communicable.

To implement the described concept, special methods for monitoring educational activities are needed. Methods for monitoring the model of educational activities on the preparation of competitive specialists in joint international educational programs will be effective if they include tools to measure not only the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the level of competitiveness of students, but also fix the success of the "entry" of a graduate on Wednesday of socio-professional interaction and degree Values \u200b\u200bin the global labor market, rely on the correlation analysis methods and the mathematical theory of verification of statistical hypotheses. The technique used allowed us to prove that with a probability of 99.9% of the success of the employment of graduates directly depending on the key system competence developed by us in the process of university educational activities, which we called "competitiveness". This confirms the validity of the research hypotheses formulated by us and testifies to the successful solution of all tasks set in research. Another evidence of the validity of our methodological position and the correctness of the university's educational activities described in the study of the concept of the educational activities of the university, which participated in the experiment is served.

Thus, the practical-oriented concept of educational activities of the university as a multiplicative system of individual educational trajectories of joint international educational training programs for competitive specialists allows effective training specialists who meet the basic needs of the innovation economy, modern society and personal aspirations of students.

1. Abdulina O.A. Democratization of education and training of specialists: problems and search // Higher education in Russia. -1996.-№ 1. - P.75-76.

2. Abdulina O., Markova N.I. Innovation and standards. \\\\ Higher education in Russia. M., 1999, №5. P.34-42.

3. Abovsky N.P. Creativity: Systemic approach The laws of development - decisions. - M.: Synthesis, 1998. - 92 p.

4. Abulkhanova K.A. Activity and psychology of personality. M.: Science, 1980.-335 p.

5. Adolf V., Stepanova I. Competitiveness Quality indicator VPO // Higher education in Russia. - 2007. - № 6. - S.77-79.

6. Aleshina I.V. Corporate image: strategic aspect // Marketing in Russia and abroad. 1998. - №1. - p.47-53.

7. Allak Jacques. Contribution to the future: the priority of education. M.: Pedagogy-Press, 1993. - 244 p.

8. Altunina V.V. Higher vocational education of Russia in the context of the Bologna process // Collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference: "Modern Scientific and Scientific and Pedagogical Studies". Ufa: Ritz Bashhru, 2010.- 14-19.

9. Altunina V.V. The main directions of development of the educational services market in the global economy // Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference "Innovations in Science and Education 2010". - Kaliningrad. Publishing House, 2010. - P. 270-272.

10. Altunina V.V. Management of educational activities in new socio-economic conditions. Kaliningrad: Publishing House of RGU, 2011.-184С.

11. Altunina V.V. Comparative analysis of higher professional education systems in various countries // KazanskayaNauka. Kazan: Publishing House Kazan Publishing House, 2010, №8. - P. 220-222.

12. Altunina V.V. Experience in the implementation of joint educational programs and programs of a double diploma in the Kaliningrad region // Higher education today. 2011. - № 2. - P. 18-21.

13. Altunina B.B. Public and Private Education: World Experience and Russian Realities // Higher Education Today. - 2011. - №4.-C. 8-10.

14. Altunina V.V. Educational activities of the Kaliningrad Business School as a consequence of world educational trends // Vestnik of the Higher School "Alma Mater". 2011. - № 3. - P. 28-30.

15. Altunina V.V. Diversification of education, personal approach // Education and society. 2011. - № 3 (68). - P. 32-35.

16. Altunina V.V. Preparation of competitive specialists // Vocational education. 2011. - № 7. - P. 34-35.

18. Altbach, F.D. Models of development of higher education on the eve of 2000 M.: Science, 1992. 286 p.

19. Analytical reviews in the main areas of development of higher education: reforms of higher education in Europe. M., 1997. - 60 s.

20. Ananyev B.G. Selected psychological works. T.1. M.: Science, 1980.-383 s.

21. Andreev A.A. Pedagogy of higher education. M., 2000. - 184 p.

22. Andreev A.Ji. Russia in the global educational space // Higher education in Russia. 2009. - №12. - P. 9-19.

23. Andreev V.I. Pedagogy creative self-development. Kazan, 1996. -188 p.

24. Anhin P. K. Selected Proceedings. Philosophical aspects of the theory of the functional system. M., 1978. - 400 p.

25. Arnautov V.V., Saranov A.M., Sergeev N.K. Designing the educational and pedagogical complex as an innovation education system. Methodological aspect: monograph. - Volgograd: Change, 2001. 174 p.

26. Artemieva N.G., Yastrebova A.P. The role of the teacher in the modern university // University in the system continuing education. St. Petersburg., 1992. - p.46-48.

27. Arkhangelsky S.I. The educational process in the highest school, its regular basis and methods. M.: Higher School, 1980. - 368 p.

28. Arshinov V.I., Danilov Yu.A., Tarasenko V.V. Network thinking methodology: self-organization phenomenon. M., in Sat. "Ontology and epistemology of synergetics", Institute of Philosophy RAS, 1997, p. 101-118.

29. Asmolov A.G. Psychology of Personality. M.: MSU, 1990. - 396 p.

30. Afanasyev V.G. Society: Systemity, knowledge, management. -M.: Policy, 1981.-432 p.

31. Babansky Yu.K. Optimization of the educational process. -M .: Enlightenment, 1982,192c.

32. Babishin S.D., Miturov B.N. Pedagogical thought in the period of the origin and development of feudalism // Anthology of pedagogical thought Ancient Russia and the Russian state of the XIV-XVII centuries. M .:, 1998.-364 p.

33. Babos E. M. Management Sociology. Minsk: Tetracysidems, 2002. 288 p.

34. Babochem Yu.K. Problems of the formation of specialists in high school. -M., 1997. 246 p.

35. Bagrov N.M. Trends in the development of higher education in Russia / N.M. Baghrov, G.A. Trofimov // Economics and Management.-2006. №2.-C. 140-143.

36. Badyana I.M. Strategic management of the quality of professional training of specialists in the university: author. dismount. Ped. science M., 2010.-40 s.

37. Bidenko V.I. Diversification of secondary vocational education: essence, conditions, implementation paths: author. Disr.Kand. Ped. science M., 1995. 26 p.

38. Bidenko V.I. Standards in Continuing Education: Conceptual, Theoretical and Methodological Problems / Monograph. M.: Research Center for the Quality Problems of Training of Specialists, 1999. - 296 p.

39. Bidenko V.I., Nice J. Wang. Modernization of vocational education: a modern stage. M.: Research Center for the Problem of Training of Specialists, 2003. 674 p.

40. Balitsky A. Humanization and humanitarianization of education // Higher education in Russia. 2007. - №2. - P. 108-112.

41. Poor A. International Activities University Competitiveness Tool // Higher Education in Russia. - 2008.- №4.-S.58-61.

42. Belas O.Yu. On marketing activities in the State Technical University // Marketing in Russia and abroad. 2006. No. 1. P. 97-107.

43. Bespalko V.P. Socialized pedagogical technologies. - M.: Pedagogy, 1989. - 192 p.

44. Bespalko V.P., Tatur Yu.G. System-methodical support for the educational process of training specialists M.: Higher School, 1989. - 216 p.

45. Besrabova I.S. The current state and trends in the development of polycultural education in the United States: author. dismount. Ped. science Volgograd, 2008. 40 s.

46. \u200b\u200bBody D., Paiton R. Fundamentals of management. - SPB: Peter, 1999. 816 p.

47. Bokarev M.Yu. Professional oriented learning process in the complex "Lyceum-University": theory and practice / monograph. M.: Publishing Center APO, 2002. - 232 p.

48. Bokarev M.Yu., Bokareva G.A. Quality management of specialists in high school as pedagogical problem // Sat. Problems of the educational process. Vol. 33. Kaliningrad: Bigf, 1999.-. 8-10.

49. Bokareva G. A. Dynamics of pedagogical skills on the development of personal qualities of students // Sat. Problems of the educational process. Vol. 23. Kaliningrad: Bigf, 1998. -s. 4-5.

50. Bokareva G.A. On the diagnosis of the level of readiness of students to professional activities // New studies in pedagogical sciences. 1987. -№2.- S.63-67.

51. Bokareva G.A., Ilyin B.C. On the ways to describe the levels of development of the cognitive need of a schoolboy // New studies in pedagogical sciences.-1971.- № 4. P. 15-17.

52. Bokareva G.A. Improving the system of vocational training of students on the example of learning mathematics in a technical university). Kaliningrad: KN. Publishing house, 1985. - 284С.

53. Bokareva G. A. Professional socialization of future engineers in the process of their fundamental training in the university // Sat. Problems of the educational process. Vol. 14. Kaliningrad: Bigf, 1996.-p.6-7.

54. Bokareva G.A., picky A.M. The use of mathematical models in the study of pedagogical processes // ALMA MATER. 2002.- №7. P.16-18.

55. Bologna Process: 2007-2009. Between London and Levny / Luvan-La Neva / under scientific. ed. IN AND. Baidenko. M.: Research Center for the quality of training of specialists, 2009. 302 p.

56. Bologna process 2020 (Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers). // Higher education in Russia. 2009. - № 7. - C.156-162.

57. Bordovsky V. A. Study of the development strategies of the overseas system of higher pedagogical education // Pedagogical Bulletin. 1998. - № 2. - P. 31-42.

58. Borytko N.M., Modulevenko A.B., Solovtsova I.A. Methodology and methods of psychological and pedagogical studies: Tutorial. - Moscow: Academy, 2008. 320 p.

59. Braverman A. Marketing in russian economy transition period. M.: Economics, 1997. 543 p.

60. Bryxina I.E. Concept of bilingual / bicultural language education in high school: author. dismount. Ped. science Tambov, 2009. 41 p.

61. Bublik P.A. About the case of Case in Russian economic universities / Modern problems Higher Education: Materials of the reports of the MSTU scientific and methodological conference. Murmansk: MGTU, 2001.-S. 74-77.

62. Budapest-Vienna Declaration "On the European Space of Higher Education". // Higher education in Russia. 2010. - № 5. - S.59-62.

63. Bungj N.O. On the modern direction of Russian universities and the needs of higher education // Higher education in Russia. 1994. - № 2. - C.129-135.

64. Bourdieu P. The education system and the system of thinking // Higher education in Russia. 1997. - №2. - P. 36-44.

65. Burkov V.N., Novikov D.A. Models and mechanisms of the theory of active systems in the management of the quality of training of specialists. M., 1998. -157 p.

66. Bukharova GD, Starikova LD General I. professional pedagogy: tutorial. Moscow: Academy, 2009. - 336 p.

67. Verbickle A.A. Formation of the individuality of a student in a holistic educational process: Disc.D-Ra Ped. science -M., 1991.-297 p.

68. Verbicksky A. A. Contextual training in a competence approach // Higher education in Russia.-2006. - No. 11. P. 39-46.

69. VOLOCHAN, L. Ensuring the quality of education: problems and ways to solve them. M.: Science, 1993. 269 p.

70. Volgin A.P., Matirko V.I., Modin A.A. Personnel management in a market economy: FRG experience. M.: Case, 1992. - 236 p.

71. Volkova V.V. Pedagogical concept of formation of an educational image of a humanitarian university: author. dismount. Ped. science M., 2010. 49 p.

72. Vroeinstine A. I. Evaluation of the quality of higher education. M.: Publishing house MNEPU, 2000. 180 p.

73. The World Declaration on Higher Education for the XXI century: approaches and practical measures // Alma Mater. 1999.-№3.-s. 5-8.

74. Wulfson B.A. Strategy for the development of education in the West on the threshold of 21th century .-M., 1999.- 34.

75. Voute Philip. Changes in university management // Alma Mater (Higher School Bulletin). 1997. - № 2. - p.32-37.

76. Vygotsky ji.c. Collected Works: In 6 T. / Ed. M.G. Yaroshevsky. M.: Pedagogy, 1984.

77. Gaskov V.M. Management of professional education system. - M.: IRPO, 2001. 282 p.

78. Gaffort.E. Planning in the quality management system of the university // Higher education in Russia. 2005. - № 5. - S.56-59.

79. Genina N. I., Kolkov N. I. Regulatory and methodical support of the educational process in high school. // Standards of the highest educational institution. Kemerovo, 1998. - p.36-48.

80. Genes F. Management Psychology. M., 1982. - 422 p.

81. GershUn B.S. Philosophy of education for the XXI century. M.: Perfection, 1998.- 608 p.

82. Hitman M.B., Pillars V.Yu., Gitman E.K. Dual educational program in high school: foreign experience and Russian prospects // Higher education in Russia. 2006. No. 10. - P. 1622.

83. Hitman M.B., Hitman EK Plan-Prospect of the course for students, or what is syllabus // Higher education in Russia. 2007. No. 10. - P. 43-48.

84. Hitman M.B., Hitman E.K., Matushkin H.H. Diversification of a vocational education system based on the use of dual programs // Higher education in Russia 2009. - № 3. -C. 39-46.

85. Glass J. Stanley J. Statistical Methods in Pedagogy and Psychology. M., 1976. - 495 p.

86. Blue S.B. Vocational education as a socio-pedagogical problem // Specialist. 1999. - № 10. P. 28-41.

87. Gorbunov A.B., Skardonov A.B. Training of frames of managers and specialists in the West countries: EDUCATION. Location. M., 1991.-246 p.

88. Gorin Yu., Svistunov B. to another paradigm // Higher education in Russia. 1999.- №3. - S.60-67.

89. Grachev M.V. Supercadres: personnel management in the international corporation. M.: Case, 1993. - 238 p.

90. Grebenyuk O.S., Grebenyuk TB Basics of Pedagogy Individuality. - Kaliningrad: Amber Skaz, 2000. 572 p.

91. Grigoriev S. I., Kinelev S.V. The status of the intelligentsia and the quality of education // Pedagogy. 2000. - №7. - P. 18-22.

92. A. Grishin A.B. Socio-pedagogical concept of the development of competitive specialists of secondary vocational school: author. dismount. Ped. science Chelyabinsk, 2010.-46 s.

93. Growodov A.K. Formation of readiness for self-education. M.: Enlightenment, 1983. - 144 p.

94. Groshev I.V., Stepanycheva E.V. Brand as an element of organizational culture (main characteristics) // Economy and management. 2006. - № 1. - P. 35-39.

95. Groshev I.V., Yuriev V.M. University as a branding object. // Higher education in Russia. - 2010. №1. - P. 23-30.

96. Gruzdeva M.ji. Methodical system of formation of information culture of students of the university economic profile: author. dismount. Ped. science Shuya, 2011. -46 p.

97. Guzeev V.V. Lectures on pedagogical technology. M.: Enlightenment, 1992. - 144 p.

98. Humanitarianization of higher education: experience, searching for the problem. M., 1992. - 212 p.

99. Gurin V.E. Formation of moral and volitional readiness of high school students to life. Krasnodar, 1974. - 164 p.

100. Gusinsky EN Construction of the formation theory based on an interdisciplinary system approach. M., 1994. - 312 p.

101. Guskova N., Makarkin N., Salimova T. Monitoring the quality of education. // Standards and quality. 2000. - №5. - P. 86-88.

102. Davydov V.V. Theory of educational training. M., 1996. - 412 p.

103. Dagaeva E. Image of university and corporate identity. // Higher education in Russia. - 2008. №11.- P. 89-93.

104. Daft P.ji. Management. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2000. - 832 p.

105. From. Dakhin A.N. Actual problems of optimal management of the educational process // Pedagogue. 1999. - № 7. - P. 47-52.

106. Demidova Ji.A. Development of higher professional education of students in non-state universities of the Russian Federation: author. dismount. Ped. science M., 2008. 45 s.

107. Dzhurinsky A.N. Development of education B. modern world. -M.: Vlados, 1990.-200c.

108. Doyle P. Marketing Management and Strategies. St. Petersburg: ed. House "Peter", 2002.

109. UNESCO report on the state of affairs in world education for 1991. Paris, 1991. - 36 p.

110. Dracker P.F. Management aimed at results. M.: Technological School of Business, 1994 - 191c.

111. Dyachenko M.I., Kandybovich Ji.A. Psychology of higher education. Features of the activities of students and teachers of the university. -Minsk: BSU, 1978. -320 s.

112. Durkheim E. Sociology of Education. M., 1996. - 446С.

113. Evdokimova H.B. Concept of formation of multilingual competence of students of non-language specialties: author. dis. . Ped. science Stavropol, 2009. - 44 s.

114. Yezhov Yu.A., Maleeva E.A. Educational management in high school: opportunity and necessity. / Materials of the scientific and methodological conference "Modern problems of higher education." Murmansk: MGTU, 2001. P. 39-43.

115. Yershikov S., Lobova T., Filippov S., Shidlovskaya T. Experience using the rating system. // Higher education in Russia. 1998. - №1. - P. 97-99.

116. Efremova I.A., Loginova OB Methods of statistical processing of the results of pedagogical changes. M.: Miysimo APN of the USSR, 1995. 138 p.

117. Zagognaminsky V.I. On the ways of developing the theory of active learning in higher school // Methodology and methods for researching problems of higher education pedagogy: Scientific works Tyumen University. - 1980.-№73.- S. 99-151.

118. Zagognaminsky V.I. Methodology and methodology of socio-pedagogical research. - M.: Pedagogy, 1995. 98 p.

119. Zadorozhnyuk I. Philosophy of education today. // Higher education in Russia. - 1997. №2. - P. 56-61.

120. Law Russian Federation "On education" // Higher education in Russia. No. 4. - 1992- P. 26-41.

121. Winter I.A. Pedagogical psychology. M.: Logos, 1999. -475 p.

122. Winter I.A. Key competencies New paradigm of the result of education // Higher education today. - 2003. - № 5-C.42-53.

123. Zinoviev S.Z. The educational process in the highest school. - M.: Higher School, 1975.- 316 p.

124. Zorina L.Ya. The reflection of the ideas of self-organization in the content of education // Pedagogy. 1996. -№ 4. - P. 105-109.

125. Ivanchikova T.V. Formation of speech competence of students economic specialties University: Situation approach: Author. dismount. Ped. science M, 2010. -41 p.

126. Ignatiev E.Yu. Improving the educational process in a modern university: author. dismount. Ped. science Veliky Novgorod, 2009. 46 s.

127. Ilyenkov E.V. How to prepare a creative specialist // Higher School Bulletin.-1979.- №3. P. 12-15.

128. Ilyenkova S.D., Yagudin S.Yu. and others. Innovative management / ed. Ilyenkova S.D.- M., 1997.- 254 p.

129. Ilyin B.C. On the concept of a holistic educational process // Methodological basis Improving the educational process. - Volgograd, 1981.-C.21-25.

130. Ilyin B.C. Formation of a schoolboy personality (holistic process). M.: Pedagogy, 1984.- 144 p.

131. Ilyinsky I.M. Educational revolution. M., 2002. - P. 168-169.

132. Irodov M.I., Stepanova T. A. Monitoring as an instrumental means of improving the efficiency of managing the system of vocational education // Pedagogical Bulletin. 1998. - № 1. - P. 47-54.

133. Isaev I.F. Theory and practice of the formation of professional-pedagogical culture of a teacher of higher education, M.: Moscow Pedagogical state University. - 1993. -214 p.

134. Kalinkin E.V. Higher school in the system of continuous education. Scientific and theoretical manual. M.: Higher School. - 1990.-108 p.

135. Kamorjanova N., Yankovsky K. Business final games // Higher education in Russia. 2001. - № 2. - P. 119-125.

136. Kapitsa S.P., Kurdyumov S.P., Malinetsky G.G. Synergetics and forecasts of the future. M., Science, 1997. 285 p.

137. Karpov V. V., Katkhanov M. N. Invariant model of intensive learning technology for multi-stage preparation in the university. - St. Petersburg, 1992.-246 p.

138. Kachalov V. A. Problems of quality management in universities. // Standards and quality, 2000, №5. P. 82-85.

139. Kibanov A.Ya. Personnel Management Fundamentals: Tutorial. - M.: Infra-M, 2002. 342 p.

140. Kinelev V.G. Education and civilization // Higher education in Russia. 1996. - №3. - P. 7-18.

141. Koshno D.I. Individuality and creative thinking. M., 1992. - 171 p.

142. Kitov A.I. Psychological peculiarities Economic decisions. M.: Knowledge, 1983. - 63 p.

143. Clarin M.V. Innovative learning models in foreign pedagogical searches. M., 1994. 238 p.

144. Klaus. Introduction to the Differential Psychology of Teachings: Per. with it. M.: Pedagogy, 1987. - 176 p.

145. Klingberg Ji. Problems of the theory of learning / trans. with it. M.: Pedagogy, 1984. - 256 p.

146. Knyazev E. A. Definition of positions and objectives (about the mission and politicians of the Kazan University) // Development of a strategic approach to the navigation in Russian universities. Kazan: Unipress, 2001. C.166-190.

147. Knyazev E. A., Morgan A. Management and organizational adaptation of Russian universities in a resource deficit // University management: Practice and analysis. 2003. - № 1 (24). - P. 17-29.

148. Knyazev E. A., Tavernik. On the trends in the state and institutional policy in the highest education of the XXI century. M, 2009. - 244 p.

149. Koblyatsky I.I. Basics of pedagogy of higher education. Kiev: Vice school, 1978.-287 p.

150. Kogan V.I., Schechenkov I.A. Basics of optimizing the learning process in high school. M.: Higher School, 1987. -141 p.

151. Kozhuhar V.M. To determine the content of the educational service // Marketing in Russia and abroad. 2005. - № 3. - P. 108-111.

152. Kozyrev V.A., Shubina H.ji. Higher education in Russia in the mirror of the Bologna process. - SPb.: Publishing house RSUPI. A.I, Herzen, 2005. 94 p.

153. Kolesnichenko L.F. Efficiency of education. - M., 1991. 184 p.

154. Komarov M.S. Education as a social institution // Pedagogical Bulletin. 1997. # 3. - P. 41-53.

155. The concept of the Federal Task Force Development Program for 2006-2010 // Bulletin of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. Higher and secondary vocational education. M.: Moscow Lyceum, №1 - 2006. - s. 6-10.

156. Korguev A.B., Popkov V.A. Training process in high school: condition, problems, solutions. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 2000. - 432 p.

157. Korguev A.B., Popkov V.A. Essays of the applied methodology of the process of university learning. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 2001. - 352 p.

158. Korotkov E.M. Quality of education: formation, factors and evaluation, management. - M., 2002. - P. 6.

159. Kosovakovsky A. Psychological foundations of the formation of a person in the pedagogical process. M.: Pedagogy, 1981. - 246 p.

160. Coter F. Marketing Basics. M.: William, 2008. - 656 p.

161. Kosheleva A.O. The concept of becoming the personal maturity of the future specialist in innovative conditions of higher professional education: author. dismount. Ped. science Elets, 2009. 43 s.

162. Kraevsky V.V. Methodology of pedagogical science. M.: Center "School Book", 2001. - 236 p.

163. Kraevsky V.V. Problems of Scientific Justification of Training: Methodological Analysis. M.: Thought, 1997. - 247 p.

164. Krasnova T.I. Innovation in the school assessment system of students // Education for sustainable development. -Minsk, 2005. P. 438-440.

165. Krylov A.N. Corporate identity for managers and marketers: M.: ICAR Publishing House, 2004. 226 p.

166. Krylov A. Programs of Double and Joint International Diplomas / A. Krylov // Higher Education in Russia. 2007. -№5.- p.42-45.

167. Kryukov M.M., Kryukova L.I. Principles of reflection of economic reality in business games. M.: Science, 1988. - 204 p.

168. Kudryavtsev T.V. Psychological and pedagogical problems of higher education // Questions of psychology.-1981.-№ 3. C.20-30.

169. Kuznetsova N.E. Pedagogical technologies in problem learning. St. Petersburg: Education, 1995. - 80 s.

170. Kuzmina H. V. The concept of "Pedagogical system" and the criteria for its assessment. Methods of systemic pedagogical research. JL, 1980 - 172c.

171. Lavrentiev G.V., Lavrentieva N.B. Methods for assessing the pedagogical activities of the Higher School teacher in the process of introducing new technologies of training, Barnaul: Publishing House Agu, 2000.- 36 p.

172. Lazarev V. S. Education Management on the threshold of the new era // Pedagogy. №5. - 1995. - P. 12-23.

173. Lapidus V. A. Universal quality (TQM) in Russian companies. -M.: Publishing house news, 2002. 432c.

174. Leddess B.c. Education content: essence, structure, perspectives. M.: Higher School, 1991. - 86 p.

175. Lemland. Checking statistical hypotheses. M.: Science, 1979. -408 p.

176. Leontiev A.N. Selected psychological works: in 2 t. M.: Pedagogy, 1983.

177. Lerner I. Ya. Didactic bases of learning methods. M., 1981. -200 p.

178. Lerner I.Ya. (Ed.) The prognostic concept of the objectives and content of education. M., 1994. - 130 p.

179. Lomakina T.Yu., Sergeeva M.G. Pedagogical technologies in professional educational institutions. M.: Academy, 2009. 216 p.

180. Loskutov A. A., Mikhailov A.M. Introduction to Synergetics, M.: Science, 1990. 126 p.

181. Lukashenko M. Competition on the market of educational services // Higher education in Russia. 2006. - №9. - P. 47-56.

182. Skiz H.A. Lyza A.E. Model ideas about personality development. // Psychology and pedagogy. Taganrog, 2008. p.32-42.

184. Markov M. The Theory of Social Administration. M., 1978. - 431 p.

185. Markova A.K. Psychology of Professionalism M., 1996. - 308 p.

186. Marukhina O., Beresteneva O. Systems approach To assess the quality of education // Standards and quality. 2002. - № 4. - P. 35-44.

187. Oil A. Long reserves of the human psyche. M.: Science, 1999.- 320 p.

188. Matveeva TA Formation of professional competence of students of technical university in the conditions of informatization of education: author. dismount. Ped. science Nizhny Novgorod, 2008.-46 p.

189. Matros D. Sh., Polev D. M., Melnikova N. N. Management of education quality based on new information technologies and educational monitoring. - M.: Russian Pedagogical Society, 1999. 96 p.

190. Matushkin H.H., Hitman M.B., Pillars V.Yu., Hitman E.K. Training of highly qualified personnel: some integration mechanisms // Higher education in Russia. 2007. - №1. - P. 119-127.

191. Melnichuk O., Yakovleva A. Specialist model // Higher education in Russia. - 2000. - No. 5. S. 19-23.

192. Quality management in high school / ed. Yu. P. Khularkova, A. I. Chuchalin. Tomsk: ed. TPU, 2003. 251 p.

193. Meson M.Kh., Albert M., Hedoury F. Fundamentals of Management. M.: Case, 1998. - 704 p.

194. Mitina L.M. Problems of professional socialization of the individual. Kemerovo, 1996. - 160 p.

195. Mitina L.M. Psychology of the development of a competitive personality. - M., 2003. 398 p.

196. Mikheev V.I. Methods for obtaining and processing experimental data in psychological and pedagogical studies. M., 1986 - 198s.

197. Mozhava L.G. Scientific and technical progress and modern concepts of education in developed capitalist countries. -M., 1987.-184 p.

198. Modernization of Russian education: documents and materials. -M.: GU WESS, 2002.-116 p.

199. Modeling a specialist's activities based on a comprehensive study / Ed. Smirnova E.E. -L., 1984. 134 p.

200. Mosquinov G.I. Management in organizational systems: tasks, strategies, decision methods. Tutorial. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State. University. 1992. 148 p.

201. Moochalova N. Management of the quality of education on a diagnostic basis. // Folk Education, 2000. №7. - P. 62-69.

202. Muratov R., Dyakonov G., Abdullin I., Tuzikov A. Corporate University as a tool for the development of scientific and production activity infrastructure // Higher education in Russia. -2008. №2. - P. 56-64.

203. Science in the context of globalization M.: Logos, 2002. - 288 p.

204. National Doctrine of Education in the Russian Federation // Sitarov V.A. Didactics. -M.: Academy, 2002. P. 359-363.

205. Novikov A.M. Russian education in a new epoch: heritage paradoxes; Vector development. M.: Egvez., 2000. - 272 p.

206. Novikov A.M. Methodology of education. M.: EGVES., 2006. - 488 p.

207. Novikov A.M. Pedagogy bases. M.: EGVES., 2010.- 208 p.

208. Novikov A.M. Post-industrial education. M.: EGVES., 2008.- 136 p.

209. Novikov P.M., Zuev V.M. Advanced vocational education: scientific and practical manual. M.: Rgatiz, 2000. -266 p.

210. North D. Institutes, Institutional Changes and Economy Function. Per. from English M.: Fund of the Economic Book, 1977. 364 p.

211. Educational environment And the business community is the path to dialogue // Higher education in Russia. - 2006. - №2. - P. 14-34.

212. Course V. Introduction to general didactics. M.: Higher School., 1990.-382 p.

213. Oleikov O. N. The role of assessing the quality of vocational education and training in Europe / secondary vocational education. 2001. - №6. - P. 50-53.

214. Fundamentals of university pedagogy / ed. N.V.Kuzminina. JL, 1972.- 208 p.

215. Basics of pedagogy and high school psychology: / Tutorial for students of courses and faculties to improve the qualifications of university teachers / Avanesov B.C., Verbicky

216. A.A., ITELSON L.B. et al., ed. A.B. Petrovsky. M.: Publisher of Moscow State University, 1986. - 302 p.225.0 "Schonsessi D. Principles of the Organization of Management of the Firm. -M., 1979, 420 p.

217. Pavlov N., Artemov A., Sidorova T. Control of students' knowledge. \\\\ Higher education in Russia. 2000. - №1. - P. 119-121.

218. Pankruchin A.P. Marketing educational services in higher and additional education. M.: Interpraks, 1995. 347 p.

219. Pakchikova L.P. Development of the socio-pedagogical function of the university in a changing economic environment: author. dismount. Ped. science M., 2008.-40 s.

220. Pedagogical skill and pedagogical technologies / ed. Ji.k. Grebenkina, Ji.A. Baikova.-M.: Ped. Society of Russia, 2000. -256 p.

221. Permyakov O.E. Development of specialist training quality assessment systems: author. dismount. Ped. science S. Pb., 2009. -49 p.

222. Petrov V.M. Universities and scientific and technical progress. M.: Higher School, 1973.-124 p.

223. Fidasy PI, Hydarov Zh.S. Technology game in training and development. M.: Russian Pedagogical Agency, 1996. - 268 p.

224. Peter T., Watermen R. in search of effective management / trans. from English M.: Economics, 1987. - 423 p.

225. Plaks S.I. Quality of higher education. M., 2003. - 367 p.

226. Plaks S.I. Assessment of the quality of the educational institution. M., 2005. - P. 138-146.

227. Platonova R.I. Formation of a competitive specialist in the system of regional senior pedagogical education: author. dismount. Ped. science M., 2011. -45 p.

228. Hello A.M. Basics of educational activities in new socio-economic conditions. Kaliningrad, BGA RF, 2002. -160 p.

229. B. Polener about incentives for the formation of a person and the change of its values \u200b\u200b// Higher education in Russia. 1996. - №3. - P. 116124.

230. Polyakova TA. Diversification of continuous training foreign language In engineering education: Author. dismount. Ped. science Kaliningrad, 2011. -39 p.

231. Pospelov D.A. Logic-linguistic models in control systems. M.: EnergyISdat. 1981. - 164С.

232. Potashnik MM Optimization of school management. M. Knowledge, 1991, -61c.

233. Problems of planning and management: experience of systemic studies // Ed. E.P. Galkova and A.M. Jandarov. - M.: Economics, 1987. 208 p.

234. Psychological mechanisms of target formation \\ ed. O. K. Tikhomirova. M., 1977. - 259С.

235. Pusikov V.V. Investment potential of education // Higher education in Russia. 2001. - №2. - P. 10-18.

236. Rabinovich V.L. Scientist man in medieval culture // Science and culture. M., 1984. 280 p.

237. Development of a strategic approach to management in Russian universities / Ed. E. A. Knyazeva. Kazan: Unipress, 2001. - 182 p.

238. Raikova D.D. International scientific relations of institutes of the RAS in the context of the crisis. M., 1994. -80 s.

239. Rean A.A. Psychology studying personality. St. Petersburg, Publishing House Mikhailova V.A., 1999. - 288 p.

240. Rezheabek E.A. Scientific search and its stages. Rostov on Don: Publishing Rostov University, 1972. - 174 p.

241. Rifkin B. On new trends in the US Higher Education. // Higher education in Russia. 2009. - № 5. - P. 127-134.

242. Rodionov V.E. Theoretical basis pedagogical design: Author. diss. Dr Raped. n. St. Petersburg, 1996. - 31 p.

243. Rosin V.M. Education philosophy: subject, study direction concept // AIMA MATER. 1991. - №1. - P. 76-83.

244. Rosin V.M. Education crisis and new teaching experience. // Higher education in Russia. 2010. - № 3. - P. 109-117.

245. Rosov N. Valit humanitarian education // Higher education in Russia. 1996. - No. 1. - P. 85-89.

246. Romanenko JL on the threshold of the XXI century // Higher education in Russia. -1997. -№1.-s. 126-134.

247. Rubin Yu. Theory of competition and the tasks of improving the competitiveness of Russian education // Higher education in Russia. 2007. - №1. - P. 26-43.

248. Rubinstein C.ji. Basics general psychology. T.1., T.2 - M.: Enlightenment, 1989 - 485 p.

249. Ruzavin G.I. Methodology of scientific research M.: Uniti, 2009.-286 p.

250. Rusalov V. M. Natural Prerequisites and Individually Psychophysiological Features of the Personality // Psychology of Personality in Socialist Society. Personality and her life Path. - M.: Science, 1990. - P. 18-33.

251. Rusinov F.M. , Nikulin L.F. Fatain L.F. Management and self-management in the system of market relations. M.: Infra-M, 1996.-351c.

252. Rusinov F.M., Zhuravlev A., Kulapov M. Evolution of educational systems in a civilization aspect // Higher education in Russia. 1997. - №1. - P. 121-129.

253. Rindak V. Management of the Quality of Education // Folk Education. - m., 1999. -№1. P.15-19.

254. Market economy: 200 terms. / Under total. G. I Cyperman. M.: Polizdat, 1991. 372 p.

255. Saveliev A.Ya. Training technologies and their role in higher education reform // Higher education in Russia. 1994. - №2. - P. 3-12.

256. Saginova O. Nature and characteristics of educational services // Marketing. 2005. - № 3. - P. 53-63.

257. Sadovniki V. Tradition and modernity. (Russian Congress of Rectors) // Higher Education in Russia. №1. - 2003. - P. 11-18.

258. Sazonov B., Maksimov N., Karavaeva E. Classification of educational programs: state and prospects for updating // Higher education in Russia. 2006. - №1. - P. 51-63.

259. Salnikov N., Burukhin S. Reforming of higher education: the concept of a new educational model // Higher education in Russia. - 2008. No. 2. - p. 3-11.

260. Saran A.M. Innovative processes As a factor in self-development of the modern school: Methodology, Theory, Practice: Monograph. Volgograd: Change, 2000. 259 p.

261. Sarkisov P. New approaches to the organization of higher education // Higher education in Russia. 1997. - №3. - P. 31-39.

262. Sartan G.N., Smirnov A.Yu., Gudimov V.V., Picklepin N.V., Aleshunas M.R. New staff management technologies. - St. Petersburg, 2003. 234 p.

263. Selezneva H.A. Higher education quality as an object system Research. M.: Research Center for the Quality Problems of Training of Specialists, 2008. 95 p.

264. Selezneva H.A., Tatur Yu.G. Designing qualifying requirements for specialists with higher education: studies. Location. M., 1991.- 129 p.

265. Serikov V.V. Personal approach in education, concept and technology. Volgograd, 1994. - 152 p.

266. Serikov G.N. Training as a condition for self-preparation for professional activities. Irkutsk: Publishing House of Irkutsk University, 1985. - 136 p.

267. Sivertseva N.V. Education Factor of socialization // Higher education in Russia. - 1997. - №3. - P. 53-61.

268. Sigov I.I. On the content of models of specialists with higher education and methods of their development // Problems of the formation of the personality of a wide profile specialist. Vol. 113. L., 1976. -184 p.

269. Quality systems in education / under total. ed. Yu. P. Adler. M., 2000. 98 p.

270. Sloshenin V. A., according to LS smoke Pedagogy: innovative activity. M.: Magister, 1997. - 224 p.

271. Slastinin V.A., Isaev I.F., Shihanov E.H. Total pedagogy. Part 1 / Ed. V.A. Salahiven.- M.: Vlados, 2002. 286 p.

272. Slivina TA Formation of the competitive personality of the future specialist in the educational process of the university: author. dis. . Cand. Ped. science Krasnoyarsk, 2008. 24 s.

273. Smirnov A.G. The system of higher education of the Western countries. M.: UDN, 1991. -264 p.

274. Smirnov S.D. Pedagogy and psychology of higher education: from activity to personality. M.: Pedagogy, 1995. - 286 p.

275. Smirnov E. A. Basics of the Organization Theory: Tutorial for universities. M.: Uniti, 2000. 375 p.

276. Smirnova V.P., Smirnov I.P. Professional Education Standards: Types, Structure, Quality Assessment ( comparative analysis Foreign and Russian practice). M., 2001. - 145 p.

277. Smirnova E.E. Ways of the formation of a model of a specialist with higher technical education. L.: LSU, 1987. - 234 p.

278. Sokolov V.M. Standards in the management of education quality. N. Novgorod, 1993. - 94 p.

279. Sokolov V.M. Theoretical Basics of Designing Educational Standards (Public Activity): DISS. . Dr. Ped. science N.Novgorod, 1997. - 410 p.

280. Solovyenko K.N., Pugacheva E. G. Openness and self-organization in high school reform // AIMA MATER: Vestn. Higher. Schools. 1998. - № 5. - P. 3-7.

281. Solomandin T. O. Company Culture // Personnel Management. M., 2003. 456 p.

282. Solonina A., Solonin V. Personalized training in the context of socialization // Higher education in Russia. 1996. -№3. - P. 141-148.

283. Spirin L. F. The essence of pedagogical systems: to the theory and methodology of the issue // Pedagogical Bulletin. 1998. - № 2. -C. 15-21.

284. Starikova OG Modern educational strategies of higher education: polyparadigmal approach: author. dismount. Ped. science Krasnodar, 2011. 48 p.

285. Subeto A. I. Quality of education: problems of assessment and monitoring // Standards and quality. 2000. - №2. - P. 62-67.

286. Subeto A.I. Quality of education (base and synthesis). M.: Research Center for the Quality Problems of Training of Specialists, 2000. 220 p.

287. Sukhanov A. The concept of the fundamentalization of higher education and its reflection in states // Higher education in Russia. 1996. -№3. - P. 27-35.

288. Talisina N. F. Management of the process of learning knowledge. -M., 1984, 344 p.

289. Toffler E. Metamorphosis of power. M.: LLC "Publishing Act", 2003.-669 p.

290. F.Sh. Togulov Methodological problems of education and theoretical issues of pedagogical science. // School technologies, 1999. №3. - P. 28-36.

291. Turbovich ji.t. Measuring knowledge when conducting mass examinations. M., 1984. - 154 p.

292. Turchenko V.N. Paradigm education strategy // Pedagogue. 1997. - №4.-s. 78-90.

293. Universities and society. Collaboration of universities in the XXI century: Sat. Theses of the Second International Conference of Universities (MSU. M. V. Lomonosov, 27-28 Nov. 2003). M., 2003. 522 p.

294. Personnel Management / Ed. A. Ya. Kibanov. 2nd ed., Add. and recreated. M.: Infra-m., 2002. 638 p.

295. Governance modern education: Social and economic aspects. / Ed. A.N. Tikhonov. M.: Vita-Press, 1998.-256 p.

296. Economic Management: Basic Concepts and Categories. Ed. P.A. Belousov. M.: Economy, 1986. 302c.

297. Ushinsky k.d. Man as a subject of education, - M., 1974. 504 p.

298. File A. Management is science and art. - M.: Republic, 1992-351 p.

299. Fathullin M.F. Education of a specialist. Kazan: ed. Kazan. Un. - Tha.- 1990.-252 p.

300. Fathutdinov R. A. The competitiveness of the organization in a crisis (economy, marketing, management). M., 2002. 886 p.

301. Filippov A.V. Questions of the psychology of management. // Psychol. Zhurn. - 1980. T.1. - №2. - P. 36-44.

302. Filippov V. Some trends in the development of classical universities // Higher education in Russia. 1996. - №3. - P. 16-26.

303. Fishman L.I. Models of educational management: review analysis // School technologies, 1999, №1-2. - P. 41-53.

304. Fokin Yu.G. CHEGODOKTE OF HIGH SCHOOL: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND DYDATIC BASES OF TEACHING. M.: Pedagogy, 2000. - 194 p.

305. Fokin Yu.G. Teaching and upbringing in high school. M.: Academy, 2002. - 224 p.

306. Formation of society based on knowledge. New tasks of higher education. Report of the World Bank. M., 2003. 120 s.

307. Hunt J. W. Managing people in companies: Manager for the manager: Per. from English -M.: Olympus Business, 1999. 258 p.

308. Hodgson J. Socio-economic consequences of the progress of knowledge and increase in complexity // Questions of the economy. 2003. - №8.- P. 32-45.

309. Chebyshev H., Kagan V. The basis of the development of modern high school // Higher education in Russia. 1998. - №2. - P. 35-42.

310. Chebyshev N. Kagan V. Higher School of the XXI century: Quality problem // Higher education in Russia. -2000. №1. - p. 54-62.

311. Chrylyaeva N.P. Ensuring the quality of training engineers in market conditions based on a competence approach: author. dis. . Ped. science Krasnoyarsk, 2007. 44 s.

312. Shadrikov V.D. Problems of system genesis of professional activity. -M.: Nauka, 1982. P. 185.

313. Shalov A.N., Tikhomirova N.K. Test control in the rating system // Higher education in Russia, 1995, №3. P. 64-71.

314. Shapovalov in the competitiveness of a specialist // Higher education in Russia. 2005. - №10. - P. 96-101.

315. Sharkov F.I. Modern marketing communications: Dictionary-directory. M.: Alpha Press, 2006. 266 p.

316. Shane E. X. Organizational Culture and Leadership / Per. from English; Ed. V. A. Spivak. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2002. 336 p.

317. Sterle M. Forms of knowledge and education // Selected works. -M., 1994.-346 p.

318. Shipina L. Management in the field of education // Higher education in Russia. 1997. - №2. - P. 26-33.

319. Schulte P. Business University: Institutional Development Strategy // Higher Education in Europe. -2004.-№2.-C. 45-56.

320. Shchedrovitsky G.P. Pedagogical studies system // Pedagogy and logic. 1993. - №1. - P. 126-148.

321. Yudin E.G. System approach and principle of activity. M.: Science, 1978.-391c.

322. UNESCO. International Conference on Education. 41-TRADE. Policies and strategy in the field of strategic education IUI its diversification in the light of employment situation. Paris, 1989.-42 p.

323. Yakimanskaya I.S. Development of personal-oriented learning technology // Questions of psychology. 1995. - № 2. -C. 31-41.

324. Yakovlev I.P. Integration processes in high school. JL: LSU Publishing House, 1980. - 115 p.

325. Yakunin V. A. Learning as a management process: Psychological aspects. L.: LSU, 1988. - 160 s.

326. Yakunin V. A. Psychology of the management of the educational and educational activities of students. L.: LHA, 1986. - 362 p.

327. ANSOFF I.N. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT. London: McMillan, 1979. 238 p.

328. Arnold M. Schools and Universities on the Continent. . Ann Arbor, 1964.-414p.

329. Baldridge J.V. (ED) Managing Change in Educational Organisations. Sociological Perspectives, Strategies and Case Studies. BERCLEY (CAL.), 1975.-244P.

330. BANKS D. The Sociology of Education. L., 1978. 368p.

331. BERGQUIST W.H. The Four Cultures of the ACADEMY: Insights and Strategies for Improving Leadership in Collegiate Organisations. San Francisco, 1992. -148 p.

332. BOOTH, C. "" Afterward "to Internationalizing British Policy Perspectives by David Elliott", In, Scott, P., ED. THE GLOBALIZATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION. Buckingham: Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1998. 274p.

333. Cheepanach V. INTEGRITY AND COMPETENCE / V. Cheepanach, G. Weiter, J.I. Lefsted New York, 1987. - 154 p.

334. Clark B. R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizeal Pathways of Transformation. Issues in Higher Education. Paris: Iau Press; Pergamon; Elsevier Science, 1998. 126 p.

335. CUSICK P. THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM: ITS NATURE AND LOGIC. N. Y., 1992. -214 p.

336. Devis N. The Globalisation of Education Through Teacher Education with New Technologies: A view Informed by Research // Educational Technology Review 1999. N12. P.8-12.

337. GOODMAN P.S. Change in Organisations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.1982.-194 p.

338. JAPANESE EDUCATION. International Society for Educational Information. Inc., Tokyo, 1995.-136 p.

339. Jones G., Schneider J. Intelligence, Human Capital and Economic Growth. June 2005. www.slue.edu/-garjone/.

341. McClelland CH. E. State, Society and University in germany 1700 -1914. Cambridge, 1980. 248 p.

342. Mercieca CH. MISMANAGMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A Case Of Study. -N.Y., 1983.-340 p.

343. MERILL J.M. ON-SITE STAFF / J. M. MERILL. SAN-FRANSISCO, 1977. - 234 p.

344. MINZBERG H. STRUCTURE IN FIVES. Designing Effective Organizations. New Jersey: Engewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 1992. 41 Op.

345. Mintzberg H. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. PRENTICE HALL EUROPE, 1994.-312 p.

346. MONROE P. RELATION OF COMMUNITY, STATE, GOVERNMENT, CHURCH, AND SCHOOL IN THE UNITED STATES // CHURCH, COMMUNITY, AND STATE IN RELATION TO EDUCATION. London, 1938. 274 p.

347. ODIORNE G.S. Strategic Management Of Human Resources: A Portfolio Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 1984. 342 p.

348. OKAMOTO K. EDUCATION OF THE RISING IN JAPAN. Tokyo, 1992,48 p.

349. OPREAN C., KIFOR C. PROCESS ALIGNMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION // PROC. 5thuicee Annual Conference On Engineering Education. Chennai, India, 2002.-p. 85-89.

350. Peters, Otto. "The University of The Future: Pedagogical Perspectives", CD Rom of the Ninetenth World Conference of Distance Education, Vienna, 1999. 246 p.

351. Ringer F. Education and Society in Modern Europe. Bloomingston and London, 1979. p. 269-270.

352. RITZER G. THE MCDONALDIZATION OF SOCIETY. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Pine Forge Press, 2000. p. 12-15.

353. Schults T. Investment in Human Capital // American Economic Review, No. 5, 1961.-p. 83-94.

354. Scott P., The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1998. -246 p.

355. Symon H. Does Scientific Discovery Have A Logic? // Philosophy of Science 2003. - V. 40. - No. 4. - P. 479.

356. UK Government WHITE Paper "The Future of Higher Education". 2003.

357. Walters P.B., Rubinson P. Eding EXPANSION AND ECONOMIC OUTPUT IN THE U.S.A. PRODUCTION ANALYSIS // American Social Review. 1983. -v. 48.-№4.-P. 480-493.

358. Willams G., Fry H. Longer Term Prospects for Higher Education: A Report to the CVCP // Institute of Education (L.). Science Quarterly. 21 (1) .- p. 1-19.

359. Zhou Ji. Higher Education in China. Thomson Learning Asia, 2005. -266 p.

360. An Introduction to Education